Apostol's Calculus volume 1, 2.13 exercise 16
$begingroup$
This is a problem from Apostol's calculus, I have figured out how to find the volume, but not sure about the sketch, what am I supposed to sketch exactly? The problem has not given me what the solid is?
"The cross sections of a solid are squares perpendicular to the x-axis with their centers on the axis. If the square cut off at x has edge $2x^{2}$, find the volume of the solid between $x = 0$ and $x = a$. Make a sketch."
calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a problem from Apostol's calculus, I have figured out how to find the volume, but not sure about the sketch, what am I supposed to sketch exactly? The problem has not given me what the solid is?
"The cross sections of a solid are squares perpendicular to the x-axis with their centers on the axis. If the square cut off at x has edge $2x^{2}$, find the volume of the solid between $x = 0$ and $x = a$. Make a sketch."
calculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
and by similar triangles I'd get $s= dfrac{L}{h}cdot x= dfrac{2x^{2}}{x} cdot x = 2x^{2}$ ? I don't get how did we know from this problem that the length of the base would be $2x^{2}$?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 7 at 16:20
$begingroup$
I retract my original interpretation. The figure must have curved sides since the cross-section $x$ units to the right of the origin has vertices $(x, x^2, x^2)$, $(x, x^2, -x^2)$, $(x, -x^2, -x^2)$, and $(x, -x^2, x^2)$.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 10:29
$begingroup$
I am sorry, but I am kinda confused. If we were to draw it 2D would it be a parabola? then we'd imagine it has a square cross section?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 8 at 20:27
$begingroup$
If you were to take a cross section along the $x$-axis, the figure would lie between two parabolas that bend away from the axis.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 20:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a problem from Apostol's calculus, I have figured out how to find the volume, but not sure about the sketch, what am I supposed to sketch exactly? The problem has not given me what the solid is?
"The cross sections of a solid are squares perpendicular to the x-axis with their centers on the axis. If the square cut off at x has edge $2x^{2}$, find the volume of the solid between $x = 0$ and $x = a$. Make a sketch."
calculus
$endgroup$
This is a problem from Apostol's calculus, I have figured out how to find the volume, but not sure about the sketch, what am I supposed to sketch exactly? The problem has not given me what the solid is?
"The cross sections of a solid are squares perpendicular to the x-axis with their centers on the axis. If the square cut off at x has edge $2x^{2}$, find the volume of the solid between $x = 0$ and $x = a$. Make a sketch."
calculus
calculus
asked Jan 5 at 17:36
D. QaD. Qa
1656
1656
$begingroup$
and by similar triangles I'd get $s= dfrac{L}{h}cdot x= dfrac{2x^{2}}{x} cdot x = 2x^{2}$ ? I don't get how did we know from this problem that the length of the base would be $2x^{2}$?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 7 at 16:20
$begingroup$
I retract my original interpretation. The figure must have curved sides since the cross-section $x$ units to the right of the origin has vertices $(x, x^2, x^2)$, $(x, x^2, -x^2)$, $(x, -x^2, -x^2)$, and $(x, -x^2, x^2)$.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 10:29
$begingroup$
I am sorry, but I am kinda confused. If we were to draw it 2D would it be a parabola? then we'd imagine it has a square cross section?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 8 at 20:27
$begingroup$
If you were to take a cross section along the $x$-axis, the figure would lie between two parabolas that bend away from the axis.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 20:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
and by similar triangles I'd get $s= dfrac{L}{h}cdot x= dfrac{2x^{2}}{x} cdot x = 2x^{2}$ ? I don't get how did we know from this problem that the length of the base would be $2x^{2}$?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 7 at 16:20
$begingroup$
I retract my original interpretation. The figure must have curved sides since the cross-section $x$ units to the right of the origin has vertices $(x, x^2, x^2)$, $(x, x^2, -x^2)$, $(x, -x^2, -x^2)$, and $(x, -x^2, x^2)$.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 10:29
$begingroup$
I am sorry, but I am kinda confused. If we were to draw it 2D would it be a parabola? then we'd imagine it has a square cross section?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 8 at 20:27
$begingroup$
If you were to take a cross section along the $x$-axis, the figure would lie between two parabolas that bend away from the axis.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 20:56
$begingroup$
and by similar triangles I'd get $s= dfrac{L}{h}cdot x= dfrac{2x^{2}}{x} cdot x = 2x^{2}$ ? I don't get how did we know from this problem that the length of the base would be $2x^{2}$?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 7 at 16:20
$begingroup$
and by similar triangles I'd get $s= dfrac{L}{h}cdot x= dfrac{2x^{2}}{x} cdot x = 2x^{2}$ ? I don't get how did we know from this problem that the length of the base would be $2x^{2}$?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 7 at 16:20
$begingroup$
I retract my original interpretation. The figure must have curved sides since the cross-section $x$ units to the right of the origin has vertices $(x, x^2, x^2)$, $(x, x^2, -x^2)$, $(x, -x^2, -x^2)$, and $(x, -x^2, x^2)$.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 10:29
$begingroup$
I retract my original interpretation. The figure must have curved sides since the cross-section $x$ units to the right of the origin has vertices $(x, x^2, x^2)$, $(x, x^2, -x^2)$, $(x, -x^2, -x^2)$, and $(x, -x^2, x^2)$.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 10:29
$begingroup$
I am sorry, but I am kinda confused. If we were to draw it 2D would it be a parabola? then we'd imagine it has a square cross section?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 8 at 20:27
$begingroup$
I am sorry, but I am kinda confused. If we were to draw it 2D would it be a parabola? then we'd imagine it has a square cross section?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 8 at 20:27
$begingroup$
If you were to take a cross section along the $x$-axis, the figure would lie between two parabolas that bend away from the axis.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 20:56
$begingroup$
If you were to take a cross section along the $x$-axis, the figure would lie between two parabolas that bend away from the axis.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 20:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The volume is bounded by the following curves:
$z = x^2, z = -x^2, y = x^2, y = -x^2$ and x from 0 to a.
There are two parabolas one on positive z axis and one on the negative z axis. Similarly one on the positive y axis and one on the negative y axis. Hence when you view along the x axis towards the origin, you find a tunnel with square cross sections at each x value.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry for the late reply, I only now noticed your answer. I tried sketching this using GeoGebra but when viewing along the x-axis towards the origin I didn't see a tunnel with square cross sections.. I am very confused
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 12:01
1
$begingroup$
In fact the "Tunnel" is closed at the origin. When you the tunnel at a certain value of x, say 5, the first equation will give you z = 25 which is a straight line segment. Similarly, the second equation will give you z = -25 which is another straight line segment but this time in the lower quadrant. The third equation will give you y = 25 which is another line segment vertically. The fourth equation will give you another line segment y = -25. This 4 line segments will give you a square of line 50 or 2x^2. This is true for any value of x when x > 0.
$endgroup$
– KY Tang
Jan 27 at 18:40
$begingroup$
Although I am still having trouble to graph it, but I think I somehow understood what you meant.
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 18:54
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062960%2fapostols-calculus-volume-1-2-13-exercise-16%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The volume is bounded by the following curves:
$z = x^2, z = -x^2, y = x^2, y = -x^2$ and x from 0 to a.
There are two parabolas one on positive z axis and one on the negative z axis. Similarly one on the positive y axis and one on the negative y axis. Hence when you view along the x axis towards the origin, you find a tunnel with square cross sections at each x value.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry for the late reply, I only now noticed your answer. I tried sketching this using GeoGebra but when viewing along the x-axis towards the origin I didn't see a tunnel with square cross sections.. I am very confused
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 12:01
1
$begingroup$
In fact the "Tunnel" is closed at the origin. When you the tunnel at a certain value of x, say 5, the first equation will give you z = 25 which is a straight line segment. Similarly, the second equation will give you z = -25 which is another straight line segment but this time in the lower quadrant. The third equation will give you y = 25 which is another line segment vertically. The fourth equation will give you another line segment y = -25. This 4 line segments will give you a square of line 50 or 2x^2. This is true for any value of x when x > 0.
$endgroup$
– KY Tang
Jan 27 at 18:40
$begingroup$
Although I am still having trouble to graph it, but I think I somehow understood what you meant.
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 18:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The volume is bounded by the following curves:
$z = x^2, z = -x^2, y = x^2, y = -x^2$ and x from 0 to a.
There are two parabolas one on positive z axis and one on the negative z axis. Similarly one on the positive y axis and one on the negative y axis. Hence when you view along the x axis towards the origin, you find a tunnel with square cross sections at each x value.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry for the late reply, I only now noticed your answer. I tried sketching this using GeoGebra but when viewing along the x-axis towards the origin I didn't see a tunnel with square cross sections.. I am very confused
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 12:01
1
$begingroup$
In fact the "Tunnel" is closed at the origin. When you the tunnel at a certain value of x, say 5, the first equation will give you z = 25 which is a straight line segment. Similarly, the second equation will give you z = -25 which is another straight line segment but this time in the lower quadrant. The third equation will give you y = 25 which is another line segment vertically. The fourth equation will give you another line segment y = -25. This 4 line segments will give you a square of line 50 or 2x^2. This is true for any value of x when x > 0.
$endgroup$
– KY Tang
Jan 27 at 18:40
$begingroup$
Although I am still having trouble to graph it, but I think I somehow understood what you meant.
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 18:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The volume is bounded by the following curves:
$z = x^2, z = -x^2, y = x^2, y = -x^2$ and x from 0 to a.
There are two parabolas one on positive z axis and one on the negative z axis. Similarly one on the positive y axis and one on the negative y axis. Hence when you view along the x axis towards the origin, you find a tunnel with square cross sections at each x value.
$endgroup$
The volume is bounded by the following curves:
$z = x^2, z = -x^2, y = x^2, y = -x^2$ and x from 0 to a.
There are two parabolas one on positive z axis and one on the negative z axis. Similarly one on the positive y axis and one on the negative y axis. Hence when you view along the x axis towards the origin, you find a tunnel with square cross sections at each x value.
edited Jan 23 at 3:10
answered Jan 23 at 1:32
KY TangKY Tang
50436
50436
$begingroup$
Sorry for the late reply, I only now noticed your answer. I tried sketching this using GeoGebra but when viewing along the x-axis towards the origin I didn't see a tunnel with square cross sections.. I am very confused
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 12:01
1
$begingroup$
In fact the "Tunnel" is closed at the origin. When you the tunnel at a certain value of x, say 5, the first equation will give you z = 25 which is a straight line segment. Similarly, the second equation will give you z = -25 which is another straight line segment but this time in the lower quadrant. The third equation will give you y = 25 which is another line segment vertically. The fourth equation will give you another line segment y = -25. This 4 line segments will give you a square of line 50 or 2x^2. This is true for any value of x when x > 0.
$endgroup$
– KY Tang
Jan 27 at 18:40
$begingroup$
Although I am still having trouble to graph it, but I think I somehow understood what you meant.
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 18:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sorry for the late reply, I only now noticed your answer. I tried sketching this using GeoGebra but when viewing along the x-axis towards the origin I didn't see a tunnel with square cross sections.. I am very confused
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 12:01
1
$begingroup$
In fact the "Tunnel" is closed at the origin. When you the tunnel at a certain value of x, say 5, the first equation will give you z = 25 which is a straight line segment. Similarly, the second equation will give you z = -25 which is another straight line segment but this time in the lower quadrant. The third equation will give you y = 25 which is another line segment vertically. The fourth equation will give you another line segment y = -25. This 4 line segments will give you a square of line 50 or 2x^2. This is true for any value of x when x > 0.
$endgroup$
– KY Tang
Jan 27 at 18:40
$begingroup$
Although I am still having trouble to graph it, but I think I somehow understood what you meant.
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 18:54
$begingroup$
Sorry for the late reply, I only now noticed your answer. I tried sketching this using GeoGebra but when viewing along the x-axis towards the origin I didn't see a tunnel with square cross sections.. I am very confused
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 12:01
$begingroup$
Sorry for the late reply, I only now noticed your answer. I tried sketching this using GeoGebra but when viewing along the x-axis towards the origin I didn't see a tunnel with square cross sections.. I am very confused
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 12:01
1
1
$begingroup$
In fact the "Tunnel" is closed at the origin. When you the tunnel at a certain value of x, say 5, the first equation will give you z = 25 which is a straight line segment. Similarly, the second equation will give you z = -25 which is another straight line segment but this time in the lower quadrant. The third equation will give you y = 25 which is another line segment vertically. The fourth equation will give you another line segment y = -25. This 4 line segments will give you a square of line 50 or 2x^2. This is true for any value of x when x > 0.
$endgroup$
– KY Tang
Jan 27 at 18:40
$begingroup$
In fact the "Tunnel" is closed at the origin. When you the tunnel at a certain value of x, say 5, the first equation will give you z = 25 which is a straight line segment. Similarly, the second equation will give you z = -25 which is another straight line segment but this time in the lower quadrant. The third equation will give you y = 25 which is another line segment vertically. The fourth equation will give you another line segment y = -25. This 4 line segments will give you a square of line 50 or 2x^2. This is true for any value of x when x > 0.
$endgroup$
– KY Tang
Jan 27 at 18:40
$begingroup$
Although I am still having trouble to graph it, but I think I somehow understood what you meant.
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 18:54
$begingroup$
Although I am still having trouble to graph it, but I think I somehow understood what you meant.
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 27 at 18:54
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062960%2fapostols-calculus-volume-1-2-13-exercise-16%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
and by similar triangles I'd get $s= dfrac{L}{h}cdot x= dfrac{2x^{2}}{x} cdot x = 2x^{2}$ ? I don't get how did we know from this problem that the length of the base would be $2x^{2}$?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 7 at 16:20
$begingroup$
I retract my original interpretation. The figure must have curved sides since the cross-section $x$ units to the right of the origin has vertices $(x, x^2, x^2)$, $(x, x^2, -x^2)$, $(x, -x^2, -x^2)$, and $(x, -x^2, x^2)$.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 10:29
$begingroup$
I am sorry, but I am kinda confused. If we were to draw it 2D would it be a parabola? then we'd imagine it has a square cross section?
$endgroup$
– D. Qa
Jan 8 at 20:27
$begingroup$
If you were to take a cross section along the $x$-axis, the figure would lie between two parabolas that bend away from the axis.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Jan 8 at 20:56