Computing an Inverse Fourier Transform [closed]












0












$begingroup$


I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.




The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, Namaste, Paul Frost Jan 5 at 23:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, Namaste, Paul Frost

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    I could not find the table
    $endgroup$
    – Arnold Pettersson
    Jan 5 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Jan 5 at 17:00










  • $begingroup$
    could you explain how you did it? with steps
    $endgroup$
    – Arnold Pettersson
    Jan 5 at 17:13
















0












$begingroup$


I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.




The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, Namaste, Paul Frost Jan 5 at 23:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, Namaste, Paul Frost

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    I could not find the table
    $endgroup$
    – Arnold Pettersson
    Jan 5 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Jan 5 at 17:00










  • $begingroup$
    could you explain how you did it? with steps
    $endgroup$
    – Arnold Pettersson
    Jan 5 at 17:13














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.




The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.




The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$








fourier-transform






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 5 at 16:36









mrtaurho

6,12771641




6,12771641










asked Jan 5 at 16:34









Arnold PetterssonArnold Pettersson

1




1




closed as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, Namaste, Paul Frost Jan 5 at 23:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, Namaste, Paul Frost

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, Namaste, Paul Frost Jan 5 at 23:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, Namaste, Paul Frost

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    I could not find the table
    $endgroup$
    – Arnold Pettersson
    Jan 5 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Jan 5 at 17:00










  • $begingroup$
    could you explain how you did it? with steps
    $endgroup$
    – Arnold Pettersson
    Jan 5 at 17:13














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 16:42










  • $begingroup$
    I could not find the table
    $endgroup$
    – Arnold Pettersson
    Jan 5 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Noble Mushtak
    Jan 5 at 17:00










  • $begingroup$
    could you explain how you did it? with steps
    $endgroup$
    – Arnold Pettersson
    Jan 5 at 17:13








1




1




$begingroup$
Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 5 at 16:42




$begingroup$
Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 5 at 16:42












$begingroup$
I could not find the table
$endgroup$
– Arnold Pettersson
Jan 5 at 16:50




$begingroup$
I could not find the table
$endgroup$
– Arnold Pettersson
Jan 5 at 16:50












$begingroup$
According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Jan 5 at 17:00




$begingroup$
According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
$endgroup$
– Noble Mushtak
Jan 5 at 17:00












$begingroup$
could you explain how you did it? with steps
$endgroup$
– Arnold Pettersson
Jan 5 at 17:13




$begingroup$
could you explain how you did it? with steps
$endgroup$
– Arnold Pettersson
Jan 5 at 17:13










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:



$$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$



However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:



$$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$



Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:



$$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$



At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:



$$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$



Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:



    $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$



    However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:



    $$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$



    Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:



    $$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$



    At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:



    $$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$



    Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:



      $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$



      However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:



      $$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$



      Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:



      $$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$



      At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:



      $$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$



      Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:



        $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$



        However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:



        $$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$



        Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:



        $$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$



        At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:



        $$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$



        Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:



        $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$



        However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:



        $$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$



        Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:



        $$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$



        At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:



        $$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$



        Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 5 at 17:18









        Noble MushtakNoble Mushtak

        15.3k1835




        15.3k1835















            Popular posts from this blog

            To store a contact into the json file from server.js file using a class in NodeJS

            Redirect URL with Chrome Remote Debugging Android Devices

            Dieringhausen