$I = int_{- infty}^{infty} delta (n - ||mathbf{x}||^2) mathrm d mathbf{x} $ should not diverge












3














I'm having trouble evaluating this integral:



$$I = int_{-infty}^infty delta (n - ||mathbf{x}||^2) mathrm d mathbf{x} $$



where $delta(x)$ is Dirac delta function, $mathbf x$ is the real $n$-dimensional vector $(x_1,...,x_n)$, and $||mathbf{x}||^2 = sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2$. Here I use the short-hand notation:



$$int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d mathbf{x} = int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d x_1 dots int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d x_n$$



Here is what I tried to do. Using the integral representation of Dirac's delta function $delta (x) = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{d lambda}{2 pi} e^{i lambda x}$, I get



$$I = int_{- infty}^{infty} d mathbf{x} int_{-infty}^{infty}
frac{dlambda}{2pi} mathrm e^{ilambda(n - ||
mathbf{x}||^2)} = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{dlambda}{2pi} e^{-i lambda n} left( int_{- infty}^{infty} e^{ilambda
x^2} dx right)^n$$



I evaluated the inner integral with Mathematica:



$$int_{- infty}^{infty} e^{ilambda
x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{2}} frac{1 +i mathrm{sgn}(lambda)}{sqrt{|lambda
|}}$$



But then when I try to substitute this I get a diverging integral in $lambda$.



What did I do wrong?



Note that the original integral is well behaved. Using polar coordinates it can be shown that $I = n^{n/2-1} pi^{n/2} / Gamma(n/2)$ (see https://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/12.1.165, or my answer below). Some step of my derivation leads to a fictitious divergence.



Update: @user587192's answer found the error in my calculation. I cannot exchange the order of integrations on $x$ and $lambda$. My next question is whether there is a way to rescue this calculation? Manipulations with the Fourier transform of the Dirac delta are very convenient in more complicated situations. This is evident from the algebraic complexity of the spherical coordinates appraoch. Is there way to exploit the convenience of the Fourier representation of the Dirac delta here?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – Aloizio Macedo
    Nov 30 at 21:58
















3














I'm having trouble evaluating this integral:



$$I = int_{-infty}^infty delta (n - ||mathbf{x}||^2) mathrm d mathbf{x} $$



where $delta(x)$ is Dirac delta function, $mathbf x$ is the real $n$-dimensional vector $(x_1,...,x_n)$, and $||mathbf{x}||^2 = sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2$. Here I use the short-hand notation:



$$int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d mathbf{x} = int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d x_1 dots int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d x_n$$



Here is what I tried to do. Using the integral representation of Dirac's delta function $delta (x) = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{d lambda}{2 pi} e^{i lambda x}$, I get



$$I = int_{- infty}^{infty} d mathbf{x} int_{-infty}^{infty}
frac{dlambda}{2pi} mathrm e^{ilambda(n - ||
mathbf{x}||^2)} = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{dlambda}{2pi} e^{-i lambda n} left( int_{- infty}^{infty} e^{ilambda
x^2} dx right)^n$$



I evaluated the inner integral with Mathematica:



$$int_{- infty}^{infty} e^{ilambda
x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{2}} frac{1 +i mathrm{sgn}(lambda)}{sqrt{|lambda
|}}$$



But then when I try to substitute this I get a diverging integral in $lambda$.



What did I do wrong?



Note that the original integral is well behaved. Using polar coordinates it can be shown that $I = n^{n/2-1} pi^{n/2} / Gamma(n/2)$ (see https://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/12.1.165, or my answer below). Some step of my derivation leads to a fictitious divergence.



Update: @user587192's answer found the error in my calculation. I cannot exchange the order of integrations on $x$ and $lambda$. My next question is whether there is a way to rescue this calculation? Manipulations with the Fourier transform of the Dirac delta are very convenient in more complicated situations. This is evident from the algebraic complexity of the spherical coordinates appraoch. Is there way to exploit the convenience of the Fourier representation of the Dirac delta here?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – Aloizio Macedo
    Nov 30 at 21:58














3












3








3


1





I'm having trouble evaluating this integral:



$$I = int_{-infty}^infty delta (n - ||mathbf{x}||^2) mathrm d mathbf{x} $$



where $delta(x)$ is Dirac delta function, $mathbf x$ is the real $n$-dimensional vector $(x_1,...,x_n)$, and $||mathbf{x}||^2 = sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2$. Here I use the short-hand notation:



$$int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d mathbf{x} = int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d x_1 dots int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d x_n$$



Here is what I tried to do. Using the integral representation of Dirac's delta function $delta (x) = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{d lambda}{2 pi} e^{i lambda x}$, I get



$$I = int_{- infty}^{infty} d mathbf{x} int_{-infty}^{infty}
frac{dlambda}{2pi} mathrm e^{ilambda(n - ||
mathbf{x}||^2)} = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{dlambda}{2pi} e^{-i lambda n} left( int_{- infty}^{infty} e^{ilambda
x^2} dx right)^n$$



I evaluated the inner integral with Mathematica:



$$int_{- infty}^{infty} e^{ilambda
x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{2}} frac{1 +i mathrm{sgn}(lambda)}{sqrt{|lambda
|}}$$



But then when I try to substitute this I get a diverging integral in $lambda$.



What did I do wrong?



Note that the original integral is well behaved. Using polar coordinates it can be shown that $I = n^{n/2-1} pi^{n/2} / Gamma(n/2)$ (see https://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/12.1.165, or my answer below). Some step of my derivation leads to a fictitious divergence.



Update: @user587192's answer found the error in my calculation. I cannot exchange the order of integrations on $x$ and $lambda$. My next question is whether there is a way to rescue this calculation? Manipulations with the Fourier transform of the Dirac delta are very convenient in more complicated situations. This is evident from the algebraic complexity of the spherical coordinates appraoch. Is there way to exploit the convenience of the Fourier representation of the Dirac delta here?










share|cite|improve this question















I'm having trouble evaluating this integral:



$$I = int_{-infty}^infty delta (n - ||mathbf{x}||^2) mathrm d mathbf{x} $$



where $delta(x)$ is Dirac delta function, $mathbf x$ is the real $n$-dimensional vector $(x_1,...,x_n)$, and $||mathbf{x}||^2 = sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2$. Here I use the short-hand notation:



$$int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d mathbf{x} = int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d x_1 dots int_{-infty}^inftymathrm d x_n$$



Here is what I tried to do. Using the integral representation of Dirac's delta function $delta (x) = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{d lambda}{2 pi} e^{i lambda x}$, I get



$$I = int_{- infty}^{infty} d mathbf{x} int_{-infty}^{infty}
frac{dlambda}{2pi} mathrm e^{ilambda(n - ||
mathbf{x}||^2)} = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{dlambda}{2pi} e^{-i lambda n} left( int_{- infty}^{infty} e^{ilambda
x^2} dx right)^n$$



I evaluated the inner integral with Mathematica:



$$int_{- infty}^{infty} e^{ilambda
x^2} dx = sqrt{frac{pi}{2}} frac{1 +i mathrm{sgn}(lambda)}{sqrt{|lambda
|}}$$



But then when I try to substitute this I get a diverging integral in $lambda$.



What did I do wrong?



Note that the original integral is well behaved. Using polar coordinates it can be shown that $I = n^{n/2-1} pi^{n/2} / Gamma(n/2)$ (see https://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/12.1.165, or my answer below). Some step of my derivation leads to a fictitious divergence.



Update: @user587192's answer found the error in my calculation. I cannot exchange the order of integrations on $x$ and $lambda$. My next question is whether there is a way to rescue this calculation? Manipulations with the Fourier transform of the Dirac delta are very convenient in more complicated situations. This is evident from the algebraic complexity of the spherical coordinates appraoch. Is there way to exploit the convenience of the Fourier representation of the Dirac delta here?







definite-integrals area surfaces dirac-delta spheres






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 30 at 16:00

























asked Nov 29 at 23:16









becko

2,34431942




2,34431942












  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – Aloizio Macedo
    Nov 30 at 21:58


















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – Aloizio Macedo
    Nov 30 at 21:58
















Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Aloizio Macedo
Nov 30 at 21:58




Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Aloizio Macedo
Nov 30 at 21:58










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














Here is the solution in (hyper)spherical coordinates, proving that $I$ should be well behaved. The spherical coordinates are defined by:



$$x_1 = r cos(phi_1),quad x_2 = r sin(phi_1)cos(phi_2),dots,quad x_n = r sin(phi_1)dotssin(phi_{n-2})sin(theta)$$



where $0lephi_ilepi$, $0lethetale2pi$ and $0le r<infty$. The volume element is then:



$$mathrm d x_1 dots mathrm d x_n = r^{n-1}sin^{n-2}(phi_1)dotssin(phi_{n-2}) mathrm dr mathrm dphi_1dotsmathrm dphi_{n-2}mathrm dtheta$$



We have:



$$begin{aligned}
I & = int_{mathbb{R}^n} delta (n - | mathbf{x} |^2) mathrm d
mathbf{x}\
& = int_0^{pi} mathrm d phi_1 ldots int_0^{pi}mathrm d phi_{n - 2} int_0^{2 pi}
mathrm d theta int_0^{infty} mathrm d r , delta (n - r^2) r^{n - 1} sin^{n -
2} (phi_1) ldots sin (phi_{n - 2})\
& = left( int_0^{infty} delta (n - r^2) r^{n - 1} mathrm d r right)
left( int_0^{2 pi} mathrm d theta mathrm d theta right) left(
int_0^{pi} sin^{n - 2} (phi_1) mathrm d phi_1 right) ldots left(
int_0^{pi} sin (phi_{n - 2}) mathrm d phi_{n - 2} right)\
& = frac{pi^{n / 2} n^{n / 2 - 1}}{Gamma (n / 2)}
end{aligned}$$



This is not an answer to my question. My question is: What did I do wrong to that leads to a divergent integral?






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    This is not an answer to your question. I think you'd better add it to your post instead of here.
    – user587192
    Nov 30 at 14:03






  • 1




    @user587192 It is not an answer. But it is customary on this site to sometimes post solution attempts as (incomplete) answers.
    – becko
    Nov 30 at 14:08



















0














There is a trick one can do to use the Fourier transform and still have converging integrals. The trick is to multiply the integrand by $mathrm e^{(1-||mathbf x||^2)} = 1$. Then



$$begin{aligned}
int_{- infty}^{infty} delta (1 - ||mathbf x||^2) mathrm d
mathbf x & = int_{- infty}^{infty} mathrm d mathbf x
int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{(1
+mathfrak{i} lambda) (1 - ||mathbf x||^2)}\
& = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{1
+mathfrak{i} lambda} left( int_{- infty}^{infty} mathrm e^{- (1
+mathfrak{i} lambda) x^2} mathrm dx right)^N\
& = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{1
+mathfrak{i} lambda} left( frac{pi}{1 +mathfrak{i} lambda} right)^{N
/ 2}\
& = pi^{N / 2} / Gamma (N / 2)
end{aligned}$$



which is the correct result. Here all intermediate integrals converge and the integration order can be exchanged.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019373%2fi-int-infty-infty-delta-n-mathbfx2-mathrm-d-mathbfx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Here is the solution in (hyper)spherical coordinates, proving that $I$ should be well behaved. The spherical coordinates are defined by:



    $$x_1 = r cos(phi_1),quad x_2 = r sin(phi_1)cos(phi_2),dots,quad x_n = r sin(phi_1)dotssin(phi_{n-2})sin(theta)$$



    where $0lephi_ilepi$, $0lethetale2pi$ and $0le r<infty$. The volume element is then:



    $$mathrm d x_1 dots mathrm d x_n = r^{n-1}sin^{n-2}(phi_1)dotssin(phi_{n-2}) mathrm dr mathrm dphi_1dotsmathrm dphi_{n-2}mathrm dtheta$$



    We have:



    $$begin{aligned}
    I & = int_{mathbb{R}^n} delta (n - | mathbf{x} |^2) mathrm d
    mathbf{x}\
    & = int_0^{pi} mathrm d phi_1 ldots int_0^{pi}mathrm d phi_{n - 2} int_0^{2 pi}
    mathrm d theta int_0^{infty} mathrm d r , delta (n - r^2) r^{n - 1} sin^{n -
    2} (phi_1) ldots sin (phi_{n - 2})\
    & = left( int_0^{infty} delta (n - r^2) r^{n - 1} mathrm d r right)
    left( int_0^{2 pi} mathrm d theta mathrm d theta right) left(
    int_0^{pi} sin^{n - 2} (phi_1) mathrm d phi_1 right) ldots left(
    int_0^{pi} sin (phi_{n - 2}) mathrm d phi_{n - 2} right)\
    & = frac{pi^{n / 2} n^{n / 2 - 1}}{Gamma (n / 2)}
    end{aligned}$$



    This is not an answer to my question. My question is: What did I do wrong to that leads to a divergent integral?






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      This is not an answer to your question. I think you'd better add it to your post instead of here.
      – user587192
      Nov 30 at 14:03






    • 1




      @user587192 It is not an answer. But it is customary on this site to sometimes post solution attempts as (incomplete) answers.
      – becko
      Nov 30 at 14:08
















    1














    Here is the solution in (hyper)spherical coordinates, proving that $I$ should be well behaved. The spherical coordinates are defined by:



    $$x_1 = r cos(phi_1),quad x_2 = r sin(phi_1)cos(phi_2),dots,quad x_n = r sin(phi_1)dotssin(phi_{n-2})sin(theta)$$



    where $0lephi_ilepi$, $0lethetale2pi$ and $0le r<infty$. The volume element is then:



    $$mathrm d x_1 dots mathrm d x_n = r^{n-1}sin^{n-2}(phi_1)dotssin(phi_{n-2}) mathrm dr mathrm dphi_1dotsmathrm dphi_{n-2}mathrm dtheta$$



    We have:



    $$begin{aligned}
    I & = int_{mathbb{R}^n} delta (n - | mathbf{x} |^2) mathrm d
    mathbf{x}\
    & = int_0^{pi} mathrm d phi_1 ldots int_0^{pi}mathrm d phi_{n - 2} int_0^{2 pi}
    mathrm d theta int_0^{infty} mathrm d r , delta (n - r^2) r^{n - 1} sin^{n -
    2} (phi_1) ldots sin (phi_{n - 2})\
    & = left( int_0^{infty} delta (n - r^2) r^{n - 1} mathrm d r right)
    left( int_0^{2 pi} mathrm d theta mathrm d theta right) left(
    int_0^{pi} sin^{n - 2} (phi_1) mathrm d phi_1 right) ldots left(
    int_0^{pi} sin (phi_{n - 2}) mathrm d phi_{n - 2} right)\
    & = frac{pi^{n / 2} n^{n / 2 - 1}}{Gamma (n / 2)}
    end{aligned}$$



    This is not an answer to my question. My question is: What did I do wrong to that leads to a divergent integral?






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      This is not an answer to your question. I think you'd better add it to your post instead of here.
      – user587192
      Nov 30 at 14:03






    • 1




      @user587192 It is not an answer. But it is customary on this site to sometimes post solution attempts as (incomplete) answers.
      – becko
      Nov 30 at 14:08














    1












    1








    1






    Here is the solution in (hyper)spherical coordinates, proving that $I$ should be well behaved. The spherical coordinates are defined by:



    $$x_1 = r cos(phi_1),quad x_2 = r sin(phi_1)cos(phi_2),dots,quad x_n = r sin(phi_1)dotssin(phi_{n-2})sin(theta)$$



    where $0lephi_ilepi$, $0lethetale2pi$ and $0le r<infty$. The volume element is then:



    $$mathrm d x_1 dots mathrm d x_n = r^{n-1}sin^{n-2}(phi_1)dotssin(phi_{n-2}) mathrm dr mathrm dphi_1dotsmathrm dphi_{n-2}mathrm dtheta$$



    We have:



    $$begin{aligned}
    I & = int_{mathbb{R}^n} delta (n - | mathbf{x} |^2) mathrm d
    mathbf{x}\
    & = int_0^{pi} mathrm d phi_1 ldots int_0^{pi}mathrm d phi_{n - 2} int_0^{2 pi}
    mathrm d theta int_0^{infty} mathrm d r , delta (n - r^2) r^{n - 1} sin^{n -
    2} (phi_1) ldots sin (phi_{n - 2})\
    & = left( int_0^{infty} delta (n - r^2) r^{n - 1} mathrm d r right)
    left( int_0^{2 pi} mathrm d theta mathrm d theta right) left(
    int_0^{pi} sin^{n - 2} (phi_1) mathrm d phi_1 right) ldots left(
    int_0^{pi} sin (phi_{n - 2}) mathrm d phi_{n - 2} right)\
    & = frac{pi^{n / 2} n^{n / 2 - 1}}{Gamma (n / 2)}
    end{aligned}$$



    This is not an answer to my question. My question is: What did I do wrong to that leads to a divergent integral?






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Here is the solution in (hyper)spherical coordinates, proving that $I$ should be well behaved. The spherical coordinates are defined by:



    $$x_1 = r cos(phi_1),quad x_2 = r sin(phi_1)cos(phi_2),dots,quad x_n = r sin(phi_1)dotssin(phi_{n-2})sin(theta)$$



    where $0lephi_ilepi$, $0lethetale2pi$ and $0le r<infty$. The volume element is then:



    $$mathrm d x_1 dots mathrm d x_n = r^{n-1}sin^{n-2}(phi_1)dotssin(phi_{n-2}) mathrm dr mathrm dphi_1dotsmathrm dphi_{n-2}mathrm dtheta$$



    We have:



    $$begin{aligned}
    I & = int_{mathbb{R}^n} delta (n - | mathbf{x} |^2) mathrm d
    mathbf{x}\
    & = int_0^{pi} mathrm d phi_1 ldots int_0^{pi}mathrm d phi_{n - 2} int_0^{2 pi}
    mathrm d theta int_0^{infty} mathrm d r , delta (n - r^2) r^{n - 1} sin^{n -
    2} (phi_1) ldots sin (phi_{n - 2})\
    & = left( int_0^{infty} delta (n - r^2) r^{n - 1} mathrm d r right)
    left( int_0^{2 pi} mathrm d theta mathrm d theta right) left(
    int_0^{pi} sin^{n - 2} (phi_1) mathrm d phi_1 right) ldots left(
    int_0^{pi} sin (phi_{n - 2}) mathrm d phi_{n - 2} right)\
    & = frac{pi^{n / 2} n^{n / 2 - 1}}{Gamma (n / 2)}
    end{aligned}$$



    This is not an answer to my question. My question is: What did I do wrong to that leads to a divergent integral?







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Nov 30 at 14:53

























    answered Nov 30 at 14:00









    becko

    2,34431942




    2,34431942








    • 1




      This is not an answer to your question. I think you'd better add it to your post instead of here.
      – user587192
      Nov 30 at 14:03






    • 1




      @user587192 It is not an answer. But it is customary on this site to sometimes post solution attempts as (incomplete) answers.
      – becko
      Nov 30 at 14:08














    • 1




      This is not an answer to your question. I think you'd better add it to your post instead of here.
      – user587192
      Nov 30 at 14:03






    • 1




      @user587192 It is not an answer. But it is customary on this site to sometimes post solution attempts as (incomplete) answers.
      – becko
      Nov 30 at 14:08








    1




    1




    This is not an answer to your question. I think you'd better add it to your post instead of here.
    – user587192
    Nov 30 at 14:03




    This is not an answer to your question. I think you'd better add it to your post instead of here.
    – user587192
    Nov 30 at 14:03




    1




    1




    @user587192 It is not an answer. But it is customary on this site to sometimes post solution attempts as (incomplete) answers.
    – becko
    Nov 30 at 14:08




    @user587192 It is not an answer. But it is customary on this site to sometimes post solution attempts as (incomplete) answers.
    – becko
    Nov 30 at 14:08











    0














    There is a trick one can do to use the Fourier transform and still have converging integrals. The trick is to multiply the integrand by $mathrm e^{(1-||mathbf x||^2)} = 1$. Then



    $$begin{aligned}
    int_{- infty}^{infty} delta (1 - ||mathbf x||^2) mathrm d
    mathbf x & = int_{- infty}^{infty} mathrm d mathbf x
    int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{(1
    +mathfrak{i} lambda) (1 - ||mathbf x||^2)}\
    & = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{1
    +mathfrak{i} lambda} left( int_{- infty}^{infty} mathrm e^{- (1
    +mathfrak{i} lambda) x^2} mathrm dx right)^N\
    & = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{1
    +mathfrak{i} lambda} left( frac{pi}{1 +mathfrak{i} lambda} right)^{N
    / 2}\
    & = pi^{N / 2} / Gamma (N / 2)
    end{aligned}$$



    which is the correct result. Here all intermediate integrals converge and the integration order can be exchanged.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      0














      There is a trick one can do to use the Fourier transform and still have converging integrals. The trick is to multiply the integrand by $mathrm e^{(1-||mathbf x||^2)} = 1$. Then



      $$begin{aligned}
      int_{- infty}^{infty} delta (1 - ||mathbf x||^2) mathrm d
      mathbf x & = int_{- infty}^{infty} mathrm d mathbf x
      int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{(1
      +mathfrak{i} lambda) (1 - ||mathbf x||^2)}\
      & = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{1
      +mathfrak{i} lambda} left( int_{- infty}^{infty} mathrm e^{- (1
      +mathfrak{i} lambda) x^2} mathrm dx right)^N\
      & = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{1
      +mathfrak{i} lambda} left( frac{pi}{1 +mathfrak{i} lambda} right)^{N
      / 2}\
      & = pi^{N / 2} / Gamma (N / 2)
      end{aligned}$$



      which is the correct result. Here all intermediate integrals converge and the integration order can be exchanged.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0






        There is a trick one can do to use the Fourier transform and still have converging integrals. The trick is to multiply the integrand by $mathrm e^{(1-||mathbf x||^2)} = 1$. Then



        $$begin{aligned}
        int_{- infty}^{infty} delta (1 - ||mathbf x||^2) mathrm d
        mathbf x & = int_{- infty}^{infty} mathrm d mathbf x
        int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{(1
        +mathfrak{i} lambda) (1 - ||mathbf x||^2)}\
        & = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{1
        +mathfrak{i} lambda} left( int_{- infty}^{infty} mathrm e^{- (1
        +mathfrak{i} lambda) x^2} mathrm dx right)^N\
        & = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{1
        +mathfrak{i} lambda} left( frac{pi}{1 +mathfrak{i} lambda} right)^{N
        / 2}\
        & = pi^{N / 2} / Gamma (N / 2)
        end{aligned}$$



        which is the correct result. Here all intermediate integrals converge and the integration order can be exchanged.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        There is a trick one can do to use the Fourier transform and still have converging integrals. The trick is to multiply the integrand by $mathrm e^{(1-||mathbf x||^2)} = 1$. Then



        $$begin{aligned}
        int_{- infty}^{infty} delta (1 - ||mathbf x||^2) mathrm d
        mathbf x & = int_{- infty}^{infty} mathrm d mathbf x
        int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{(1
        +mathfrak{i} lambda) (1 - ||mathbf x||^2)}\
        & = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{1
        +mathfrak{i} lambda} left( int_{- infty}^{infty} mathrm e^{- (1
        +mathfrak{i} lambda) x^2} mathrm dx right)^N\
        & = int_{- infty}^{infty} frac{mathrm d lambda}{2 pi} mathrm e^{1
        +mathfrak{i} lambda} left( frac{pi}{1 +mathfrak{i} lambda} right)^{N
        / 2}\
        & = pi^{N / 2} / Gamma (N / 2)
        end{aligned}$$



        which is the correct result. Here all intermediate integrals converge and the integration order can be exchanged.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 30 at 18:46

























        answered Nov 30 at 17:44









        becko

        2,34431942




        2,34431942






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019373%2fi-int-infty-infty-delta-n-mathbfx2-mathrm-d-mathbfx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen