A polynomial $p(x) in Bbb R_{2n-1}[x]$, $p(0) = 0$, $p(x) geq 0 forall x geq 0$, can be written as $p(x) =...
Let $p(x) in Bbb R_{2n-1}[x]$ be a polynomial such that $p(0)= 0$
and $p(x) geq 0 forall x geq 0$. Then there exists $q_1, q_2 in
Bbb R_{n-1}[x]$ such that $p(x) = xq_1(x)^2 + q_2(x)^2$.
Here, $Bbb R_{k}[x]$ is the set of polynomials with real coefficients of degree less than or equal to $k$.
Note that we always have $p(x) = xp_o(x^2) + p_e(x^2)$ for some $p_o, p_e in
Bbb R_{n-1}[x]$ by separating the terms of even and odd degree of $p$.
It is related to Prove that a positive polynomial function can be written as the squares of two polynomial functions but does not seem to follow from it.
This is stated without proof and reference at page 77 from The Classical Moment Problem, Oliver and Boyd Ltd, 1965, by Akhiezer.
polynomials roots
add a comment |
Let $p(x) in Bbb R_{2n-1}[x]$ be a polynomial such that $p(0)= 0$
and $p(x) geq 0 forall x geq 0$. Then there exists $q_1, q_2 in
Bbb R_{n-1}[x]$ such that $p(x) = xq_1(x)^2 + q_2(x)^2$.
Here, $Bbb R_{k}[x]$ is the set of polynomials with real coefficients of degree less than or equal to $k$.
Note that we always have $p(x) = xp_o(x^2) + p_e(x^2)$ for some $p_o, p_e in
Bbb R_{n-1}[x]$ by separating the terms of even and odd degree of $p$.
It is related to Prove that a positive polynomial function can be written as the squares of two polynomial functions but does not seem to follow from it.
This is stated without proof and reference at page 77 from The Classical Moment Problem, Oliver and Boyd Ltd, 1965, by Akhiezer.
polynomials roots
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2966594/…
– greedoid
Dec 4 '18 at 22:09
@greedoid Thank you for directing me to this.
– Desura
Dec 4 '18 at 22:10
add a comment |
Let $p(x) in Bbb R_{2n-1}[x]$ be a polynomial such that $p(0)= 0$
and $p(x) geq 0 forall x geq 0$. Then there exists $q_1, q_2 in
Bbb R_{n-1}[x]$ such that $p(x) = xq_1(x)^2 + q_2(x)^2$.
Here, $Bbb R_{k}[x]$ is the set of polynomials with real coefficients of degree less than or equal to $k$.
Note that we always have $p(x) = xp_o(x^2) + p_e(x^2)$ for some $p_o, p_e in
Bbb R_{n-1}[x]$ by separating the terms of even and odd degree of $p$.
It is related to Prove that a positive polynomial function can be written as the squares of two polynomial functions but does not seem to follow from it.
This is stated without proof and reference at page 77 from The Classical Moment Problem, Oliver and Boyd Ltd, 1965, by Akhiezer.
polynomials roots
Let $p(x) in Bbb R_{2n-1}[x]$ be a polynomial such that $p(0)= 0$
and $p(x) geq 0 forall x geq 0$. Then there exists $q_1, q_2 in
Bbb R_{n-1}[x]$ such that $p(x) = xq_1(x)^2 + q_2(x)^2$.
Here, $Bbb R_{k}[x]$ is the set of polynomials with real coefficients of degree less than or equal to $k$.
Note that we always have $p(x) = xp_o(x^2) + p_e(x^2)$ for some $p_o, p_e in
Bbb R_{n-1}[x]$ by separating the terms of even and odd degree of $p$.
It is related to Prove that a positive polynomial function can be written as the squares of two polynomial functions but does not seem to follow from it.
This is stated without proof and reference at page 77 from The Classical Moment Problem, Oliver and Boyd Ltd, 1965, by Akhiezer.
polynomials roots
polynomials roots
edited Dec 4 '18 at 22:05
asked Dec 2 '18 at 14:32
Desura
901514
901514
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2966594/…
– greedoid
Dec 4 '18 at 22:09
@greedoid Thank you for directing me to this.
– Desura
Dec 4 '18 at 22:10
add a comment |
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2966594/…
– greedoid
Dec 4 '18 at 22:09
@greedoid Thank you for directing me to this.
– Desura
Dec 4 '18 at 22:10
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2966594/…
– greedoid
Dec 4 '18 at 22:09
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2966594/…
– greedoid
Dec 4 '18 at 22:09
@greedoid Thank you for directing me to this.
– Desura
Dec 4 '18 at 22:10
@greedoid Thank you for directing me to this.
– Desura
Dec 4 '18 at 22:10
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The key to the solution is the identity
$$ (a^2x+b^2)(c^2x+d^2) = (ad-bc)^2x + (acx+bd)^2. tag1$$
You can put polynomials for $a,b,c,d$.
Let $mathcal{P} = Big{ xq_1(x)^2+q_2(x)^2 Big}$; we need to prove $p(x)inmathcal{P}$.
Notice that all complete squares and all nonnegative constants are elements of $mathcal{P}$.
The identity $(1)$ shows that $mathcal{P}$ is closed for multiplication.
Consider the prime factorization of $p(x)$:
$$ p(x) = A cdot prod(x+a_i)^{alpha_i} prod (x^2+c_ix+d_i). $$
From $xtoinfty$ we find that the leading coefficient $A$ is nonnegative, so $Ainmathcal{P}$.
All prime factors $x+a_i$ with $age0$ are in $mathcal{P}$.
In every irreducible factor $x^2+cx+d=(x-sqrt{d})^2+(2sqrt{d}-c)x$ we have $2sqrt{d}-c>0$, so they are in $mathcal{P}$.
Finally, the positive roots of $p(x)$ must have even multiplicities, so
every factor $(x+a_i)^{alpha_i}$ with $a_i<0$ is a complete square.
Hence $p(x)$, being the product of some elements of $mathcal{P}$, is an element of $mathcal{P}$.
Nice and simple $(+1).$
– Yuri Negometyanov
Dec 10 '18 at 9:48
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022705%2fa-polynomial-px-in-bbb-r-2n-1x-p0-0-px-geq-0-forall-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The key to the solution is the identity
$$ (a^2x+b^2)(c^2x+d^2) = (ad-bc)^2x + (acx+bd)^2. tag1$$
You can put polynomials for $a,b,c,d$.
Let $mathcal{P} = Big{ xq_1(x)^2+q_2(x)^2 Big}$; we need to prove $p(x)inmathcal{P}$.
Notice that all complete squares and all nonnegative constants are elements of $mathcal{P}$.
The identity $(1)$ shows that $mathcal{P}$ is closed for multiplication.
Consider the prime factorization of $p(x)$:
$$ p(x) = A cdot prod(x+a_i)^{alpha_i} prod (x^2+c_ix+d_i). $$
From $xtoinfty$ we find that the leading coefficient $A$ is nonnegative, so $Ainmathcal{P}$.
All prime factors $x+a_i$ with $age0$ are in $mathcal{P}$.
In every irreducible factor $x^2+cx+d=(x-sqrt{d})^2+(2sqrt{d}-c)x$ we have $2sqrt{d}-c>0$, so they are in $mathcal{P}$.
Finally, the positive roots of $p(x)$ must have even multiplicities, so
every factor $(x+a_i)^{alpha_i}$ with $a_i<0$ is a complete square.
Hence $p(x)$, being the product of some elements of $mathcal{P}$, is an element of $mathcal{P}$.
Nice and simple $(+1).$
– Yuri Negometyanov
Dec 10 '18 at 9:48
add a comment |
The key to the solution is the identity
$$ (a^2x+b^2)(c^2x+d^2) = (ad-bc)^2x + (acx+bd)^2. tag1$$
You can put polynomials for $a,b,c,d$.
Let $mathcal{P} = Big{ xq_1(x)^2+q_2(x)^2 Big}$; we need to prove $p(x)inmathcal{P}$.
Notice that all complete squares and all nonnegative constants are elements of $mathcal{P}$.
The identity $(1)$ shows that $mathcal{P}$ is closed for multiplication.
Consider the prime factorization of $p(x)$:
$$ p(x) = A cdot prod(x+a_i)^{alpha_i} prod (x^2+c_ix+d_i). $$
From $xtoinfty$ we find that the leading coefficient $A$ is nonnegative, so $Ainmathcal{P}$.
All prime factors $x+a_i$ with $age0$ are in $mathcal{P}$.
In every irreducible factor $x^2+cx+d=(x-sqrt{d})^2+(2sqrt{d}-c)x$ we have $2sqrt{d}-c>0$, so they are in $mathcal{P}$.
Finally, the positive roots of $p(x)$ must have even multiplicities, so
every factor $(x+a_i)^{alpha_i}$ with $a_i<0$ is a complete square.
Hence $p(x)$, being the product of some elements of $mathcal{P}$, is an element of $mathcal{P}$.
Nice and simple $(+1).$
– Yuri Negometyanov
Dec 10 '18 at 9:48
add a comment |
The key to the solution is the identity
$$ (a^2x+b^2)(c^2x+d^2) = (ad-bc)^2x + (acx+bd)^2. tag1$$
You can put polynomials for $a,b,c,d$.
Let $mathcal{P} = Big{ xq_1(x)^2+q_2(x)^2 Big}$; we need to prove $p(x)inmathcal{P}$.
Notice that all complete squares and all nonnegative constants are elements of $mathcal{P}$.
The identity $(1)$ shows that $mathcal{P}$ is closed for multiplication.
Consider the prime factorization of $p(x)$:
$$ p(x) = A cdot prod(x+a_i)^{alpha_i} prod (x^2+c_ix+d_i). $$
From $xtoinfty$ we find that the leading coefficient $A$ is nonnegative, so $Ainmathcal{P}$.
All prime factors $x+a_i$ with $age0$ are in $mathcal{P}$.
In every irreducible factor $x^2+cx+d=(x-sqrt{d})^2+(2sqrt{d}-c)x$ we have $2sqrt{d}-c>0$, so they are in $mathcal{P}$.
Finally, the positive roots of $p(x)$ must have even multiplicities, so
every factor $(x+a_i)^{alpha_i}$ with $a_i<0$ is a complete square.
Hence $p(x)$, being the product of some elements of $mathcal{P}$, is an element of $mathcal{P}$.
The key to the solution is the identity
$$ (a^2x+b^2)(c^2x+d^2) = (ad-bc)^2x + (acx+bd)^2. tag1$$
You can put polynomials for $a,b,c,d$.
Let $mathcal{P} = Big{ xq_1(x)^2+q_2(x)^2 Big}$; we need to prove $p(x)inmathcal{P}$.
Notice that all complete squares and all nonnegative constants are elements of $mathcal{P}$.
The identity $(1)$ shows that $mathcal{P}$ is closed for multiplication.
Consider the prime factorization of $p(x)$:
$$ p(x) = A cdot prod(x+a_i)^{alpha_i} prod (x^2+c_ix+d_i). $$
From $xtoinfty$ we find that the leading coefficient $A$ is nonnegative, so $Ainmathcal{P}$.
All prime factors $x+a_i$ with $age0$ are in $mathcal{P}$.
In every irreducible factor $x^2+cx+d=(x-sqrt{d})^2+(2sqrt{d}-c)x$ we have $2sqrt{d}-c>0$, so they are in $mathcal{P}$.
Finally, the positive roots of $p(x)$ must have even multiplicities, so
every factor $(x+a_i)^{alpha_i}$ with $a_i<0$ is a complete square.
Hence $p(x)$, being the product of some elements of $mathcal{P}$, is an element of $mathcal{P}$.
edited Dec 10 '18 at 9:30
answered Dec 5 '18 at 12:50
user141614
12.2k925
12.2k925
Nice and simple $(+1).$
– Yuri Negometyanov
Dec 10 '18 at 9:48
add a comment |
Nice and simple $(+1).$
– Yuri Negometyanov
Dec 10 '18 at 9:48
Nice and simple $(+1).$
– Yuri Negometyanov
Dec 10 '18 at 9:48
Nice and simple $(+1).$
– Yuri Negometyanov
Dec 10 '18 at 9:48
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022705%2fa-polynomial-px-in-bbb-r-2n-1x-p0-0-px-geq-0-forall-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
math.stackexchange.com/questions/2966594/…
– greedoid
Dec 4 '18 at 22:09
@greedoid Thank you for directing me to this.
– Desura
Dec 4 '18 at 22:10