Why didn't Saruman break Gandalf's staff on Orthanc as Gandalf broke Saruman's?












50














In The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers after becoming Gandalf the White, Gandalf cast Saruman from the Order and the Council. He also got the power to break Saruman's staff, which was very powerful.



So when Saruman captured Gandalf the Grey on Orthanc, why didn't Saruman do the same? He meant to find the One Ring's location from Gandalf. He could have broken Gandalf's staff, thereby decreasing Gandalf's power.










share|improve this question




















  • 14




    I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
    – Mixxiphoid
    Nov 28 at 7:25










  • @Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
    – the-profile-that-was-promised
    Nov 28 at 11:55






  • 10




    Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 28 at 14:42












  • Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
    – RedBaron
    Nov 29 at 4:43










  • Because he underestimated him?
    – RobbyReindeer
    Nov 30 at 9:32
















50














In The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers after becoming Gandalf the White, Gandalf cast Saruman from the Order and the Council. He also got the power to break Saruman's staff, which was very powerful.



So when Saruman captured Gandalf the Grey on Orthanc, why didn't Saruman do the same? He meant to find the One Ring's location from Gandalf. He could have broken Gandalf's staff, thereby decreasing Gandalf's power.










share|improve this question




















  • 14




    I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
    – Mixxiphoid
    Nov 28 at 7:25










  • @Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
    – the-profile-that-was-promised
    Nov 28 at 11:55






  • 10




    Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 28 at 14:42












  • Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
    – RedBaron
    Nov 29 at 4:43










  • Because he underestimated him?
    – RobbyReindeer
    Nov 30 at 9:32














50












50








50


9





In The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers after becoming Gandalf the White, Gandalf cast Saruman from the Order and the Council. He also got the power to break Saruman's staff, which was very powerful.



So when Saruman captured Gandalf the Grey on Orthanc, why didn't Saruman do the same? He meant to find the One Ring's location from Gandalf. He could have broken Gandalf's staff, thereby decreasing Gandalf's power.










share|improve this question















In The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers after becoming Gandalf the White, Gandalf cast Saruman from the Order and the Council. He also got the power to break Saruman's staff, which was very powerful.



So when Saruman captured Gandalf the Grey on Orthanc, why didn't Saruman do the same? He meant to find the One Ring's location from Gandalf. He could have broken Gandalf's staff, thereby decreasing Gandalf's power.







tolkiens-legendarium the-lord-of-the-rings gandalf saruman






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 28 at 10:24









TheLethalCarrot

37.9k15206247




37.9k15206247










asked Nov 28 at 6:30









the-profile-that-was-promised

1,65831323




1,65831323








  • 14




    I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
    – Mixxiphoid
    Nov 28 at 7:25










  • @Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
    – the-profile-that-was-promised
    Nov 28 at 11:55






  • 10




    Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 28 at 14:42












  • Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
    – RedBaron
    Nov 29 at 4:43










  • Because he underestimated him?
    – RobbyReindeer
    Nov 30 at 9:32














  • 14




    I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
    – Mixxiphoid
    Nov 28 at 7:25










  • @Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
    – the-profile-that-was-promised
    Nov 28 at 11:55






  • 10




    Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 28 at 14:42












  • Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
    – RedBaron
    Nov 29 at 4:43










  • Because he underestimated him?
    – RobbyReindeer
    Nov 30 at 9:32








14




14




I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
– Mixxiphoid
Nov 28 at 7:25




I always assumed he wanted to turn Gandalf to join his cause. If Gandalf would lose his wand, he wouldn't be as useful. I got nothing to back that up though.
– Mixxiphoid
Nov 28 at 7:25












@Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
– the-profile-that-was-promised
Nov 28 at 11:55




@Mixxiphoid He could get the One Ring's location from him. That could be done without his staff.
– the-profile-that-was-promised
Nov 28 at 11:55




10




10




Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
– Eric Lippert
Nov 28 at 14:42






Do we have reason to believe that Saruman did not break or confiscate Gandalf's staff, and Gandalf just picked up a new one in Rivendell after his escape from the roof? There is also the question of Gandalf's sword, Glamdring; is he not carrying it when he has his encounter with Saruman? In the movie it is on his horse, which is not Shadowfax, so why doesn't Saruman now have Glamdring?
– Eric Lippert
Nov 28 at 14:42














Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
– RedBaron
Nov 29 at 4:43




Somewhat related scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/85706/…
– RedBaron
Nov 29 at 4:43












Because he underestimated him?
– RobbyReindeer
Nov 30 at 9:32




Because he underestimated him?
– RobbyReindeer
Nov 30 at 9:32










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















69














A wizard's staff is symbolic rather than a source of actual power, and so breaking a wizard's staff has no effect on the wizard's power.



How do we know this? Because Gandalf was able to defeat the Balrog without his staff.




At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him. The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand.




This was before his battle with the Balrog.



Saruman therefore didn't break Gandalf's staff because there was no need for him to do so and also because doing so would not have accomplished anything.






share|improve this answer



















  • 13




    @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
    – Mark Olson
    Nov 28 at 12:56






  • 60




    I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
    – user1643723
    Nov 28 at 13:11






  • 31




    +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
    – molnarm
    Nov 28 at 13:28






  • 45




    Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
    – nunya
    Nov 28 at 15:28






  • 33




    The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
    – nunya
    Nov 28 at 15:30





















28














Presumably because Gandalf was sent back by the Powers with greater power specifically for the purpose of fulfilling the role that Saruman had forsaken, to contest Sauron.



From The Two Towers (emphasis mine):




Naked I was sent back - for a brief time, until my task is done.




Then to Saruman later:




'Come back, Saruman!' Gandalf said in a commanding voice. To the amazement of the others, Saruman turned back as if dragged against his will...




Since the Istari were Maiar, an increase in power would only have come from some greater being (i.e. the Illuvatar) so Gandalf is able to do what he did to Saruman (a reversal of their earlier position) because he is an agent of a greater Power still, and was granted that authority by his divine master.






share|improve this answer



















  • 4




    Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
    – Rad80
    Nov 28 at 22:02










  • @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
    – Jared Smith
    Nov 28 at 22:14






  • 15




    It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
    – Rad80
    Nov 28 at 22:17










  • @Rad80 thanks, edited.
    – Jared Smith
    Nov 29 at 12:28



















8














I always saw sundering said staff as simply a sign of supremacy.



Saruman already outranked Gandalf when he defeated him. Breaking Gandalf's staff wouldn't serve any additional purpose; the higher-ranking wizard should have been expected to win anyway.



When Gandalf later defeats Saruman, Gandalf breaks the staff as a symbol that his power has become greater, and he assumes the dominant rank.



As to the staffs themselves... I think a wizard does gain benefit from their staff, but it's not because of power in the staff itself. It's merely the benefit you get from a tool that has become comfortable with long use, but still one you could make again if need be.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
    – Pete Kirkham
    Nov 29 at 13:20



















5














Saruman didn't break the staff, because he managed to take it whole from Gandalf and kept it (check out the end of the fight where Saruman has both staffs).



When Gandalf flees Orthanc he does so without his staff (revisit the scene here) and later on gets another staff. This differs in the films from the books. The accounts of how he gets another staff in the movie universe differ a bit and maybe this is worth a separate question, but he clearly loses his staff in the fight with Saruman.



Somewhat authoritative sources for this answer are this IMDB FAQ (check out How did Gandalf get his staff back from Saruman? He simply leaps off of Orthanc without it) and the Lotr wiki.



The flight scene also shows that Saruman still hoped he could turn Gandalf until that moment, so it was reasonable to keep his staff intact, but out of reach of Gandalf. Also note that in the movie universe, wizards obviously can make use of the staffs of other wizards (perhaps less efficiently). So, even if he would not convince Gandalf it might be prudent to keep the staff just like you might keep a spare sword around, if you have it anyway.






share|improve this answer



















  • 8




    are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
    – NKCampbell
    Nov 28 at 19:32










  • @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
    – Darkwing
    Nov 28 at 20:28










  • The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
    – Nathan Hughes
    Nov 29 at 14:30



















4














Poetry and drama. Gandalf's line, "Saruman, your staff is broken," is the only quote I remember from The Two Towers. It is not a direct command, it is as just as much a comment on how the positions have changed between these two wizards as well as destructive magic.



The storyline now apparently finishes with Saruman and the struggle for Middle-earth now turns towards Mordor.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
    – TheLethalCarrot
    Nov 28 at 13:37










  • newbie here, thank you for a very the polite description of my post. Admiring the prose and atmosphere is the main way I enjoy Tolkien otherwise I just wonder why Frodo could not have made the outward journey by deus ex machina eagles.
    – narratorjay
    Dec 1 at 13:59



















1














It appears, from the Lord of the Rings books, that a wizard's staff is a method of channelling their respective energies.



For instance, in The Fellowship of the Ring, Book 1:




..."The figure lifted his arms and a light flashed from the staff that he wielded. A mighty eagle swept down and bore him away."...




In Book 2:




..."...he thrust the end of his staff into the midst of it. At once a great spout of green and blue flame sprang out,..."




There are also many mentions of Gandalf lighting the way through Moria using his staff, and guiding the party (using the staff as a beacon).



As pointed out by Victim of Circumstance, Gandalf strikes the bridge with his power, most likely channelled through his staff to a point of force at the staff's end, so much power that it destroyed the staff. user1643723 is absolutely right in his comment - there is a power there, but maybe not within the staff itself.



Later, in The Two Towers, Book 3, we find Gandalf in Edoras. Háma states:




"The staff in the hand of a wizard may be more than just a prop for age."




There are many more references to the power of the staff throughout the books (a Kindle is a great resource!).



So, it could be that the wizard's staff is more than just an emblem of power - it could be a conduit to channel such power to a fine point, or a focus to bring that power to bear.






share|improve this answer































    0














    It might be that Saruman, possessing the staff of Gandalf, could have more control over him. While Gandalf broke his staff since he did not care about having control over Saruman.






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "186"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199432%2fwhy-didnt-saruman-break-gandalfs-staff-on-orthanc-as-gandalf-broke-sarumans%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      7 Answers
      7






      active

      oldest

      votes








      7 Answers
      7






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      69














      A wizard's staff is symbolic rather than a source of actual power, and so breaking a wizard's staff has no effect on the wizard's power.



      How do we know this? Because Gandalf was able to defeat the Balrog without his staff.




      At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him. The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand.




      This was before his battle with the Balrog.



      Saruman therefore didn't break Gandalf's staff because there was no need for him to do so and also because doing so would not have accomplished anything.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 13




        @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
        – Mark Olson
        Nov 28 at 12:56






      • 60




        I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
        – user1643723
        Nov 28 at 13:11






      • 31




        +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
        – molnarm
        Nov 28 at 13:28






      • 45




        Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
        – nunya
        Nov 28 at 15:28






      • 33




        The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
        – nunya
        Nov 28 at 15:30


















      69














      A wizard's staff is symbolic rather than a source of actual power, and so breaking a wizard's staff has no effect on the wizard's power.



      How do we know this? Because Gandalf was able to defeat the Balrog without his staff.




      At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him. The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand.




      This was before his battle with the Balrog.



      Saruman therefore didn't break Gandalf's staff because there was no need for him to do so and also because doing so would not have accomplished anything.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 13




        @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
        – Mark Olson
        Nov 28 at 12:56






      • 60




        I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
        – user1643723
        Nov 28 at 13:11






      • 31




        +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
        – molnarm
        Nov 28 at 13:28






      • 45




        Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
        – nunya
        Nov 28 at 15:28






      • 33




        The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
        – nunya
        Nov 28 at 15:30
















      69












      69








      69






      A wizard's staff is symbolic rather than a source of actual power, and so breaking a wizard's staff has no effect on the wizard's power.



      How do we know this? Because Gandalf was able to defeat the Balrog without his staff.




      At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him. The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand.




      This was before his battle with the Balrog.



      Saruman therefore didn't break Gandalf's staff because there was no need for him to do so and also because doing so would not have accomplished anything.






      share|improve this answer














      A wizard's staff is symbolic rather than a source of actual power, and so breaking a wizard's staff has no effect on the wizard's power.



      How do we know this? Because Gandalf was able to defeat the Balrog without his staff.




      At that moment Gandalf lifted his staff, and crying aloud he smote the bridge before him. The staff broke asunder and fell from his hand.




      This was before his battle with the Balrog.



      Saruman therefore didn't break Gandalf's staff because there was no need for him to do so and also because doing so would not have accomplished anything.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 28 at 14:20









      Mat Cauthon

      16.2k480132




      16.2k480132










      answered Nov 28 at 9:58









      Victim of Circumstance

      63233




      63233








      • 13




        @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
        – Mark Olson
        Nov 28 at 12:56






      • 60




        I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
        – user1643723
        Nov 28 at 13:11






      • 31




        +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
        – molnarm
        Nov 28 at 13:28






      • 45




        Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
        – nunya
        Nov 28 at 15:28






      • 33




        The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
        – nunya
        Nov 28 at 15:30
















      • 13




        @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
        – Mark Olson
        Nov 28 at 12:56






      • 60




        I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
        – user1643723
        Nov 28 at 13:11






      • 31




        +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
        – molnarm
        Nov 28 at 13:28






      • 45




        Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
        – nunya
        Nov 28 at 15:28






      • 33




        The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
        – nunya
        Nov 28 at 15:30










      13




      13




      @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
      – Mark Olson
      Nov 28 at 12:56




      @Asif Iqubal: Symbolism, both for the good guys and to make the point to Saruman himself. While breaking Saruman's staff had no effect on Saruman's powers, it did make the point to S. that Gandalf, not he, was the more powerful. Remember, that Gandalf still hoped for S.'s redemption and aid in the fight against Sauron. Saruman understanding that he had lost his position as Chief Wizard was a necessary step in that direction. It also made the point to Rohan, the Ents and everyone else that Gandalf had changed. (Remember that G. was not allowed to lead by domination, people had to follow.)
      – Mark Olson
      Nov 28 at 12:56




      60




      60




      I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
      – user1643723
      Nov 28 at 13:11




      I disagree. If Gandalf's staff was decorative, why did it broke after demolishing Moria bridge? Why did Gandalf insist to retain his staff during audience with Theoden?
      – user1643723
      Nov 28 at 13:11




      31




      31




      +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
      – molnarm
      Nov 28 at 13:28




      +1 on @user1643723; Gandalf needed to trick/convince the guards into letting him keep his staff in Edoras. He defeated the Balrog using his sword (and the cold waters).
      – molnarm
      Nov 28 at 13:28




      45




      45




      Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
      – nunya
      Nov 28 at 15:28




      Certainly a wizard doesn't need his staff to perform magic...but that doesn't mean the staff is symbolic. Anymore than the elven rings were symbolic. Clearly these staves are important to these wizards, and equally clearly, Gandalf is empowered to break Saruman's stuff in a way that Saruman was not so empowered. The wizard's staff is a vestment of authority, and the source of that authority comes from the Valar and ultimately, Illuvatar. and as Saruman was corrupt and fallen, authority was granted to Mithrandir. So I've always read between the lines, anyway.
      – nunya
      Nov 28 at 15:28




      33




      33




      The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
      – nunya
      Nov 28 at 15:30






      The breaking of Saruman's staff serves to excommunicate him. It is a withdrawal of Saruman's divine authority, enacted by Gandalf, as the loyal earthly agent of the Valar.
      – nunya
      Nov 28 at 15:30















      28














      Presumably because Gandalf was sent back by the Powers with greater power specifically for the purpose of fulfilling the role that Saruman had forsaken, to contest Sauron.



      From The Two Towers (emphasis mine):




      Naked I was sent back - for a brief time, until my task is done.




      Then to Saruman later:




      'Come back, Saruman!' Gandalf said in a commanding voice. To the amazement of the others, Saruman turned back as if dragged against his will...




      Since the Istari were Maiar, an increase in power would only have come from some greater being (i.e. the Illuvatar) so Gandalf is able to do what he did to Saruman (a reversal of their earlier position) because he is an agent of a greater Power still, and was granted that authority by his divine master.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 4




        Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
        – Rad80
        Nov 28 at 22:02










      • @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
        – Jared Smith
        Nov 28 at 22:14






      • 15




        It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
        – Rad80
        Nov 28 at 22:17










      • @Rad80 thanks, edited.
        – Jared Smith
        Nov 29 at 12:28
















      28














      Presumably because Gandalf was sent back by the Powers with greater power specifically for the purpose of fulfilling the role that Saruman had forsaken, to contest Sauron.



      From The Two Towers (emphasis mine):




      Naked I was sent back - for a brief time, until my task is done.




      Then to Saruman later:




      'Come back, Saruman!' Gandalf said in a commanding voice. To the amazement of the others, Saruman turned back as if dragged against his will...




      Since the Istari were Maiar, an increase in power would only have come from some greater being (i.e. the Illuvatar) so Gandalf is able to do what he did to Saruman (a reversal of their earlier position) because he is an agent of a greater Power still, and was granted that authority by his divine master.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 4




        Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
        – Rad80
        Nov 28 at 22:02










      • @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
        – Jared Smith
        Nov 28 at 22:14






      • 15




        It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
        – Rad80
        Nov 28 at 22:17










      • @Rad80 thanks, edited.
        – Jared Smith
        Nov 29 at 12:28














      28












      28








      28






      Presumably because Gandalf was sent back by the Powers with greater power specifically for the purpose of fulfilling the role that Saruman had forsaken, to contest Sauron.



      From The Two Towers (emphasis mine):




      Naked I was sent back - for a brief time, until my task is done.




      Then to Saruman later:




      'Come back, Saruman!' Gandalf said in a commanding voice. To the amazement of the others, Saruman turned back as if dragged against his will...




      Since the Istari were Maiar, an increase in power would only have come from some greater being (i.e. the Illuvatar) so Gandalf is able to do what he did to Saruman (a reversal of their earlier position) because he is an agent of a greater Power still, and was granted that authority by his divine master.






      share|improve this answer














      Presumably because Gandalf was sent back by the Powers with greater power specifically for the purpose of fulfilling the role that Saruman had forsaken, to contest Sauron.



      From The Two Towers (emphasis mine):




      Naked I was sent back - for a brief time, until my task is done.




      Then to Saruman later:




      'Come back, Saruman!' Gandalf said in a commanding voice. To the amazement of the others, Saruman turned back as if dragged against his will...




      Since the Istari were Maiar, an increase in power would only have come from some greater being (i.e. the Illuvatar) so Gandalf is able to do what he did to Saruman (a reversal of their earlier position) because he is an agent of a greater Power still, and was granted that authority by his divine master.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 29 at 12:27

























      answered Nov 28 at 15:25









      Jared Smith

      61138




      61138








      • 4




        Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
        – Rad80
        Nov 28 at 22:02










      • @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
        – Jared Smith
        Nov 28 at 22:14






      • 15




        It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
        – Rad80
        Nov 28 at 22:17










      • @Rad80 thanks, edited.
        – Jared Smith
        Nov 29 at 12:28














      • 4




        Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
        – Rad80
        Nov 28 at 22:02










      • @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
        – Jared Smith
        Nov 28 at 22:14






      • 15




        It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
        – Rad80
        Nov 28 at 22:17










      • @Rad80 thanks, edited.
        – Jared Smith
        Nov 29 at 12:28








      4




      4




      Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
      – Rad80
      Nov 28 at 22:02




      Nitpick: Gandalf was not brought back by the valar but by Eru Ilúvatar himself.
      – Rad80
      Nov 28 at 22:02












      @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
      – Jared Smith
      Nov 28 at 22:14




      @Rad80 do you have a source? I don't recall that in the books/appendicies/silmarilion but I haven't read any of the other books (e.g. unfinished tales).
      – Jared Smith
      Nov 28 at 22:14




      15




      15




      It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
      – Rad80
      Nov 28 at 22:17




      It's in Tolkien's letters, I found out from this answer: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/109214/…
      – Rad80
      Nov 28 at 22:17












      @Rad80 thanks, edited.
      – Jared Smith
      Nov 29 at 12:28




      @Rad80 thanks, edited.
      – Jared Smith
      Nov 29 at 12:28











      8














      I always saw sundering said staff as simply a sign of supremacy.



      Saruman already outranked Gandalf when he defeated him. Breaking Gandalf's staff wouldn't serve any additional purpose; the higher-ranking wizard should have been expected to win anyway.



      When Gandalf later defeats Saruman, Gandalf breaks the staff as a symbol that his power has become greater, and he assumes the dominant rank.



      As to the staffs themselves... I think a wizard does gain benefit from their staff, but it's not because of power in the staff itself. It's merely the benefit you get from a tool that has become comfortable with long use, but still one you could make again if need be.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1




        Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
        – Pete Kirkham
        Nov 29 at 13:20
















      8














      I always saw sundering said staff as simply a sign of supremacy.



      Saruman already outranked Gandalf when he defeated him. Breaking Gandalf's staff wouldn't serve any additional purpose; the higher-ranking wizard should have been expected to win anyway.



      When Gandalf later defeats Saruman, Gandalf breaks the staff as a symbol that his power has become greater, and he assumes the dominant rank.



      As to the staffs themselves... I think a wizard does gain benefit from their staff, but it's not because of power in the staff itself. It's merely the benefit you get from a tool that has become comfortable with long use, but still one you could make again if need be.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1




        Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
        – Pete Kirkham
        Nov 29 at 13:20














      8












      8








      8






      I always saw sundering said staff as simply a sign of supremacy.



      Saruman already outranked Gandalf when he defeated him. Breaking Gandalf's staff wouldn't serve any additional purpose; the higher-ranking wizard should have been expected to win anyway.



      When Gandalf later defeats Saruman, Gandalf breaks the staff as a symbol that his power has become greater, and he assumes the dominant rank.



      As to the staffs themselves... I think a wizard does gain benefit from their staff, but it's not because of power in the staff itself. It's merely the benefit you get from a tool that has become comfortable with long use, but still one you could make again if need be.






      share|improve this answer














      I always saw sundering said staff as simply a sign of supremacy.



      Saruman already outranked Gandalf when he defeated him. Breaking Gandalf's staff wouldn't serve any additional purpose; the higher-ranking wizard should have been expected to win anyway.



      When Gandalf later defeats Saruman, Gandalf breaks the staff as a symbol that his power has become greater, and he assumes the dominant rank.



      As to the staffs themselves... I think a wizard does gain benefit from their staff, but it's not because of power in the staff itself. It's merely the benefit you get from a tool that has become comfortable with long use, but still one you could make again if need be.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Dec 11 at 21:55

























      answered Nov 28 at 20:28









      Joel Coehoorn

      2,1921317




      2,1921317








      • 1




        Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
        – Pete Kirkham
        Nov 29 at 13:20














      • 1




        Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
        – Pete Kirkham
        Nov 29 at 13:20








      1




      1




      Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
      – Pete Kirkham
      Nov 29 at 13:20




      Yes, staff is a symbol of office rather than just a tool. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staff_of_office
      – Pete Kirkham
      Nov 29 at 13:20











      5














      Saruman didn't break the staff, because he managed to take it whole from Gandalf and kept it (check out the end of the fight where Saruman has both staffs).



      When Gandalf flees Orthanc he does so without his staff (revisit the scene here) and later on gets another staff. This differs in the films from the books. The accounts of how he gets another staff in the movie universe differ a bit and maybe this is worth a separate question, but he clearly loses his staff in the fight with Saruman.



      Somewhat authoritative sources for this answer are this IMDB FAQ (check out How did Gandalf get his staff back from Saruman? He simply leaps off of Orthanc without it) and the Lotr wiki.



      The flight scene also shows that Saruman still hoped he could turn Gandalf until that moment, so it was reasonable to keep his staff intact, but out of reach of Gandalf. Also note that in the movie universe, wizards obviously can make use of the staffs of other wizards (perhaps less efficiently). So, even if he would not convince Gandalf it might be prudent to keep the staff just like you might keep a spare sword around, if you have it anyway.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 8




        are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
        – NKCampbell
        Nov 28 at 19:32










      • @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
        – Darkwing
        Nov 28 at 20:28










      • The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
        – Nathan Hughes
        Nov 29 at 14:30
















      5














      Saruman didn't break the staff, because he managed to take it whole from Gandalf and kept it (check out the end of the fight where Saruman has both staffs).



      When Gandalf flees Orthanc he does so without his staff (revisit the scene here) and later on gets another staff. This differs in the films from the books. The accounts of how he gets another staff in the movie universe differ a bit and maybe this is worth a separate question, but he clearly loses his staff in the fight with Saruman.



      Somewhat authoritative sources for this answer are this IMDB FAQ (check out How did Gandalf get his staff back from Saruman? He simply leaps off of Orthanc without it) and the Lotr wiki.



      The flight scene also shows that Saruman still hoped he could turn Gandalf until that moment, so it was reasonable to keep his staff intact, but out of reach of Gandalf. Also note that in the movie universe, wizards obviously can make use of the staffs of other wizards (perhaps less efficiently). So, even if he would not convince Gandalf it might be prudent to keep the staff just like you might keep a spare sword around, if you have it anyway.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 8




        are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
        – NKCampbell
        Nov 28 at 19:32










      • @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
        – Darkwing
        Nov 28 at 20:28










      • The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
        – Nathan Hughes
        Nov 29 at 14:30














      5












      5








      5






      Saruman didn't break the staff, because he managed to take it whole from Gandalf and kept it (check out the end of the fight where Saruman has both staffs).



      When Gandalf flees Orthanc he does so without his staff (revisit the scene here) and later on gets another staff. This differs in the films from the books. The accounts of how he gets another staff in the movie universe differ a bit and maybe this is worth a separate question, but he clearly loses his staff in the fight with Saruman.



      Somewhat authoritative sources for this answer are this IMDB FAQ (check out How did Gandalf get his staff back from Saruman? He simply leaps off of Orthanc without it) and the Lotr wiki.



      The flight scene also shows that Saruman still hoped he could turn Gandalf until that moment, so it was reasonable to keep his staff intact, but out of reach of Gandalf. Also note that in the movie universe, wizards obviously can make use of the staffs of other wizards (perhaps less efficiently). So, even if he would not convince Gandalf it might be prudent to keep the staff just like you might keep a spare sword around, if you have it anyway.






      share|improve this answer














      Saruman didn't break the staff, because he managed to take it whole from Gandalf and kept it (check out the end of the fight where Saruman has both staffs).



      When Gandalf flees Orthanc he does so without his staff (revisit the scene here) and later on gets another staff. This differs in the films from the books. The accounts of how he gets another staff in the movie universe differ a bit and maybe this is worth a separate question, but he clearly loses his staff in the fight with Saruman.



      Somewhat authoritative sources for this answer are this IMDB FAQ (check out How did Gandalf get his staff back from Saruman? He simply leaps off of Orthanc without it) and the Lotr wiki.



      The flight scene also shows that Saruman still hoped he could turn Gandalf until that moment, so it was reasonable to keep his staff intact, but out of reach of Gandalf. Also note that in the movie universe, wizards obviously can make use of the staffs of other wizards (perhaps less efficiently). So, even if he would not convince Gandalf it might be prudent to keep the staff just like you might keep a spare sword around, if you have it anyway.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 28 at 22:17









      Community

      1




      1










      answered Nov 28 at 17:14









      Darkwing

      31416




      31416








      • 8




        are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
        – NKCampbell
        Nov 28 at 19:32










      • @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
        – Darkwing
        Nov 28 at 20:28










      • The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
        – Nathan Hughes
        Nov 29 at 14:30














      • 8




        are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
        – NKCampbell
        Nov 28 at 19:32










      • @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
        – Darkwing
        Nov 28 at 20:28










      • The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
        – Nathan Hughes
        Nov 29 at 14:30








      8




      8




      are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
      – NKCampbell
      Nov 28 at 19:32




      are we certain OP is asking about the films? Seems like it's re: the books
      – NKCampbell
      Nov 28 at 19:32












      @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
      – Darkwing
      Nov 28 at 20:28




      @NKCampbell good point, for some reason I assumed it was clearly the movies, but you are right, there is no specific indication in that regard. Will see if I can later extend for the books.
      – Darkwing
      Nov 28 at 20:28












      The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
      – Nathan Hughes
      Nov 29 at 14:30




      The last paragraph is the key part here, +1. Saruman wanted Gandalf's help and hoped he would come around after a night thinking about the looming alternative.
      – Nathan Hughes
      Nov 29 at 14:30











      4














      Poetry and drama. Gandalf's line, "Saruman, your staff is broken," is the only quote I remember from The Two Towers. It is not a direct command, it is as just as much a comment on how the positions have changed between these two wizards as well as destructive magic.



      The storyline now apparently finishes with Saruman and the struggle for Middle-earth now turns towards Mordor.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1




        This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
        – TheLethalCarrot
        Nov 28 at 13:37










      • newbie here, thank you for a very the polite description of my post. Admiring the prose and atmosphere is the main way I enjoy Tolkien otherwise I just wonder why Frodo could not have made the outward journey by deus ex machina eagles.
        – narratorjay
        Dec 1 at 13:59
















      4














      Poetry and drama. Gandalf's line, "Saruman, your staff is broken," is the only quote I remember from The Two Towers. It is not a direct command, it is as just as much a comment on how the positions have changed between these two wizards as well as destructive magic.



      The storyline now apparently finishes with Saruman and the struggle for Middle-earth now turns towards Mordor.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1




        This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
        – TheLethalCarrot
        Nov 28 at 13:37










      • newbie here, thank you for a very the polite description of my post. Admiring the prose and atmosphere is the main way I enjoy Tolkien otherwise I just wonder why Frodo could not have made the outward journey by deus ex machina eagles.
        – narratorjay
        Dec 1 at 13:59














      4












      4








      4






      Poetry and drama. Gandalf's line, "Saruman, your staff is broken," is the only quote I remember from The Two Towers. It is not a direct command, it is as just as much a comment on how the positions have changed between these two wizards as well as destructive magic.



      The storyline now apparently finishes with Saruman and the struggle for Middle-earth now turns towards Mordor.






      share|improve this answer














      Poetry and drama. Gandalf's line, "Saruman, your staff is broken," is the only quote I remember from The Two Towers. It is not a direct command, it is as just as much a comment on how the positions have changed between these two wizards as well as destructive magic.



      The storyline now apparently finishes with Saruman and the struggle for Middle-earth now turns towards Mordor.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 28 at 13:36









      TheLethalCarrot

      37.9k15206247




      37.9k15206247










      answered Nov 28 at 13:34









      narratorjay

      491




      491








      • 1




        This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
        – TheLethalCarrot
        Nov 28 at 13:37










      • newbie here, thank you for a very the polite description of my post. Admiring the prose and atmosphere is the main way I enjoy Tolkien otherwise I just wonder why Frodo could not have made the outward journey by deus ex machina eagles.
        – narratorjay
        Dec 1 at 13:59














      • 1




        This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
        – TheLethalCarrot
        Nov 28 at 13:37










      • newbie here, thank you for a very the polite description of my post. Admiring the prose and atmosphere is the main way I enjoy Tolkien otherwise I just wonder why Frodo could not have made the outward journey by deus ex machina eagles.
        – narratorjay
        Dec 1 at 13:59








      1




      1




      This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
      – TheLethalCarrot
      Nov 28 at 13:37




      This, appears, to be an answer from an out of universe perspective whereas I got the impression the OP was after in universe answers. This is of course fine as an answer just though it was worth mentioning.
      – TheLethalCarrot
      Nov 28 at 13:37












      newbie here, thank you for a very the polite description of my post. Admiring the prose and atmosphere is the main way I enjoy Tolkien otherwise I just wonder why Frodo could not have made the outward journey by deus ex machina eagles.
      – narratorjay
      Dec 1 at 13:59




      newbie here, thank you for a very the polite description of my post. Admiring the prose and atmosphere is the main way I enjoy Tolkien otherwise I just wonder why Frodo could not have made the outward journey by deus ex machina eagles.
      – narratorjay
      Dec 1 at 13:59











      1














      It appears, from the Lord of the Rings books, that a wizard's staff is a method of channelling their respective energies.



      For instance, in The Fellowship of the Ring, Book 1:




      ..."The figure lifted his arms and a light flashed from the staff that he wielded. A mighty eagle swept down and bore him away."...




      In Book 2:




      ..."...he thrust the end of his staff into the midst of it. At once a great spout of green and blue flame sprang out,..."




      There are also many mentions of Gandalf lighting the way through Moria using his staff, and guiding the party (using the staff as a beacon).



      As pointed out by Victim of Circumstance, Gandalf strikes the bridge with his power, most likely channelled through his staff to a point of force at the staff's end, so much power that it destroyed the staff. user1643723 is absolutely right in his comment - there is a power there, but maybe not within the staff itself.



      Later, in The Two Towers, Book 3, we find Gandalf in Edoras. Háma states:




      "The staff in the hand of a wizard may be more than just a prop for age."




      There are many more references to the power of the staff throughout the books (a Kindle is a great resource!).



      So, it could be that the wizard's staff is more than just an emblem of power - it could be a conduit to channel such power to a fine point, or a focus to bring that power to bear.






      share|improve this answer




























        1














        It appears, from the Lord of the Rings books, that a wizard's staff is a method of channelling their respective energies.



        For instance, in The Fellowship of the Ring, Book 1:




        ..."The figure lifted his arms and a light flashed from the staff that he wielded. A mighty eagle swept down and bore him away."...




        In Book 2:




        ..."...he thrust the end of his staff into the midst of it. At once a great spout of green and blue flame sprang out,..."




        There are also many mentions of Gandalf lighting the way through Moria using his staff, and guiding the party (using the staff as a beacon).



        As pointed out by Victim of Circumstance, Gandalf strikes the bridge with his power, most likely channelled through his staff to a point of force at the staff's end, so much power that it destroyed the staff. user1643723 is absolutely right in his comment - there is a power there, but maybe not within the staff itself.



        Later, in The Two Towers, Book 3, we find Gandalf in Edoras. Háma states:




        "The staff in the hand of a wizard may be more than just a prop for age."




        There are many more references to the power of the staff throughout the books (a Kindle is a great resource!).



        So, it could be that the wizard's staff is more than just an emblem of power - it could be a conduit to channel such power to a fine point, or a focus to bring that power to bear.






        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1






          It appears, from the Lord of the Rings books, that a wizard's staff is a method of channelling their respective energies.



          For instance, in The Fellowship of the Ring, Book 1:




          ..."The figure lifted his arms and a light flashed from the staff that he wielded. A mighty eagle swept down and bore him away."...




          In Book 2:




          ..."...he thrust the end of his staff into the midst of it. At once a great spout of green and blue flame sprang out,..."




          There are also many mentions of Gandalf lighting the way through Moria using his staff, and guiding the party (using the staff as a beacon).



          As pointed out by Victim of Circumstance, Gandalf strikes the bridge with his power, most likely channelled through his staff to a point of force at the staff's end, so much power that it destroyed the staff. user1643723 is absolutely right in his comment - there is a power there, but maybe not within the staff itself.



          Later, in The Two Towers, Book 3, we find Gandalf in Edoras. Háma states:




          "The staff in the hand of a wizard may be more than just a prop for age."




          There are many more references to the power of the staff throughout the books (a Kindle is a great resource!).



          So, it could be that the wizard's staff is more than just an emblem of power - it could be a conduit to channel such power to a fine point, or a focus to bring that power to bear.






          share|improve this answer














          It appears, from the Lord of the Rings books, that a wizard's staff is a method of channelling their respective energies.



          For instance, in The Fellowship of the Ring, Book 1:




          ..."The figure lifted his arms and a light flashed from the staff that he wielded. A mighty eagle swept down and bore him away."...




          In Book 2:




          ..."...he thrust the end of his staff into the midst of it. At once a great spout of green and blue flame sprang out,..."




          There are also many mentions of Gandalf lighting the way through Moria using his staff, and guiding the party (using the staff as a beacon).



          As pointed out by Victim of Circumstance, Gandalf strikes the bridge with his power, most likely channelled through his staff to a point of force at the staff's end, so much power that it destroyed the staff. user1643723 is absolutely right in his comment - there is a power there, but maybe not within the staff itself.



          Later, in The Two Towers, Book 3, we find Gandalf in Edoras. Háma states:




          "The staff in the hand of a wizard may be more than just a prop for age."




          There are many more references to the power of the staff throughout the books (a Kindle is a great resource!).



          So, it could be that the wizard's staff is more than just an emblem of power - it could be a conduit to channel such power to a fine point, or a focus to bring that power to bear.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 1 at 22:40

























          answered Dec 1 at 20:44









          Paul

          1115




          1115























              0














              It might be that Saruman, possessing the staff of Gandalf, could have more control over him. While Gandalf broke his staff since he did not care about having control over Saruman.






              share|improve this answer


























                0














                It might be that Saruman, possessing the staff of Gandalf, could have more control over him. While Gandalf broke his staff since he did not care about having control over Saruman.






                share|improve this answer
























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  It might be that Saruman, possessing the staff of Gandalf, could have more control over him. While Gandalf broke his staff since he did not care about having control over Saruman.






                  share|improve this answer












                  It might be that Saruman, possessing the staff of Gandalf, could have more control over him. While Gandalf broke his staff since he did not care about having control over Saruman.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 30 at 11:10









                  მამუკა ჯიბლაძე

                  1514




                  1514






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199432%2fwhy-didnt-saruman-break-gandalfs-staff-on-orthanc-as-gandalf-broke-sarumans%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Wiesbaden

                      Marschland

                      Dieringhausen