Is every homology map induced by a chain map












1














If I have a chain map $f:Cto D$, I know that there is an induced map $f_ast: H(C)to H(D)$ on homology.



Is the other way around also true: If I start with a map $g:H(C)to H(D)$ with $C$ and $D$ chain complexes, can I always find a chain map $Cto D$ that induces $g$? I am interested in that question in the special case of homology/chain complexes over a (finite) field, so the question should boil down to linear algebra, but I fail to see an argument in either direction.



If the answer to my question is negative, does it change if $g$ is an isomorphism?










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    If I have a chain map $f:Cto D$, I know that there is an induced map $f_ast: H(C)to H(D)$ on homology.



    Is the other way around also true: If I start with a map $g:H(C)to H(D)$ with $C$ and $D$ chain complexes, can I always find a chain map $Cto D$ that induces $g$? I am interested in that question in the special case of homology/chain complexes over a (finite) field, so the question should boil down to linear algebra, but I fail to see an argument in either direction.



    If the answer to my question is negative, does it change if $g$ is an isomorphism?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      If I have a chain map $f:Cto D$, I know that there is an induced map $f_ast: H(C)to H(D)$ on homology.



      Is the other way around also true: If I start with a map $g:H(C)to H(D)$ with $C$ and $D$ chain complexes, can I always find a chain map $Cto D$ that induces $g$? I am interested in that question in the special case of homology/chain complexes over a (finite) field, so the question should boil down to linear algebra, but I fail to see an argument in either direction.



      If the answer to my question is negative, does it change if $g$ is an isomorphism?










      share|cite|improve this question













      If I have a chain map $f:Cto D$, I know that there is an induced map $f_ast: H(C)to H(D)$ on homology.



      Is the other way around also true: If I start with a map $g:H(C)to H(D)$ with $C$ and $D$ chain complexes, can I always find a chain map $Cto D$ that induces $g$? I am interested in that question in the special case of homology/chain complexes over a (finite) field, so the question should boil down to linear algebra, but I fail to see an argument in either direction.



      If the answer to my question is negative, does it change if $g$ is an isomorphism?







      homological-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 2 '18 at 13:56









      mike

      61




      61






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          First, without your requirement to work over a field, this is false. The chain complex $0 to mathbb{F}_2 to 0$ has the same homology as the chain complex $0 to mathbb{Z} xrightarrow{times 2} mathbb{Z} to 0$, but there is no map from the first to the second inducing this.



          Once you work over a field, the answer is yes. The following is inspired by Tyler Lawson's answer to https://mathoverflow.net/questions/10974/does-homology-detect-chain-homotopy-equivalence.



          If you have a chain complex $... to V_n to V_{n-1} to ...$ of vector spaces over a field, then for each $n$ you have a surjective vector space map $V_n to B_{n-1}$, where $B_{n-1}$ is the boundaries, the image of the boundary map. Since these are vector spaces, we can choose a vector space complement (equivalently, a splitting of this map), which is necessarily isomorphic to $Z_n$, the $n$-cycles. That is, $V_n cong Z_n oplus B_{n-1}$. Similarly, since $H_n = Z_n/B_n$, then $Z_n$ is isomorphic to $H_n oplus B_n$. So putting these together, we have $V_n cong (B_n oplus H_n) oplus B_{n-1}$. The boundary map
          $$
          B_n oplus H_n oplus B_{n-1} to B_{n-1} oplus H_{n-1} oplus B_{n-2}
          $$

          sends the summand $B_{n-1}$ by the identity to the summand $B_{n-1}$, and is zero on the other summands.



          Now the question is, if you have two chain complexes, say $... to V_n to ...$ and $... to V'_n to ...$, and if you have maps $H_n to H'_n$ for each $n$, is there a chain map that induces it? Yes, just decompose $V_n$ and $V'_n$ as above, send the $H_n$ summand to $H'_n$ using the desired map, and send the other summands $B_n$ and $B_{n-1}$ to zero.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022668%2fis-every-homology-map-induced-by-a-chain-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            First, without your requirement to work over a field, this is false. The chain complex $0 to mathbb{F}_2 to 0$ has the same homology as the chain complex $0 to mathbb{Z} xrightarrow{times 2} mathbb{Z} to 0$, but there is no map from the first to the second inducing this.



            Once you work over a field, the answer is yes. The following is inspired by Tyler Lawson's answer to https://mathoverflow.net/questions/10974/does-homology-detect-chain-homotopy-equivalence.



            If you have a chain complex $... to V_n to V_{n-1} to ...$ of vector spaces over a field, then for each $n$ you have a surjective vector space map $V_n to B_{n-1}$, where $B_{n-1}$ is the boundaries, the image of the boundary map. Since these are vector spaces, we can choose a vector space complement (equivalently, a splitting of this map), which is necessarily isomorphic to $Z_n$, the $n$-cycles. That is, $V_n cong Z_n oplus B_{n-1}$. Similarly, since $H_n = Z_n/B_n$, then $Z_n$ is isomorphic to $H_n oplus B_n$. So putting these together, we have $V_n cong (B_n oplus H_n) oplus B_{n-1}$. The boundary map
            $$
            B_n oplus H_n oplus B_{n-1} to B_{n-1} oplus H_{n-1} oplus B_{n-2}
            $$

            sends the summand $B_{n-1}$ by the identity to the summand $B_{n-1}$, and is zero on the other summands.



            Now the question is, if you have two chain complexes, say $... to V_n to ...$ and $... to V'_n to ...$, and if you have maps $H_n to H'_n$ for each $n$, is there a chain map that induces it? Yes, just decompose $V_n$ and $V'_n$ as above, send the $H_n$ summand to $H'_n$ using the desired map, and send the other summands $B_n$ and $B_{n-1}$ to zero.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              0














              First, without your requirement to work over a field, this is false. The chain complex $0 to mathbb{F}_2 to 0$ has the same homology as the chain complex $0 to mathbb{Z} xrightarrow{times 2} mathbb{Z} to 0$, but there is no map from the first to the second inducing this.



              Once you work over a field, the answer is yes. The following is inspired by Tyler Lawson's answer to https://mathoverflow.net/questions/10974/does-homology-detect-chain-homotopy-equivalence.



              If you have a chain complex $... to V_n to V_{n-1} to ...$ of vector spaces over a field, then for each $n$ you have a surjective vector space map $V_n to B_{n-1}$, where $B_{n-1}$ is the boundaries, the image of the boundary map. Since these are vector spaces, we can choose a vector space complement (equivalently, a splitting of this map), which is necessarily isomorphic to $Z_n$, the $n$-cycles. That is, $V_n cong Z_n oplus B_{n-1}$. Similarly, since $H_n = Z_n/B_n$, then $Z_n$ is isomorphic to $H_n oplus B_n$. So putting these together, we have $V_n cong (B_n oplus H_n) oplus B_{n-1}$. The boundary map
              $$
              B_n oplus H_n oplus B_{n-1} to B_{n-1} oplus H_{n-1} oplus B_{n-2}
              $$

              sends the summand $B_{n-1}$ by the identity to the summand $B_{n-1}$, and is zero on the other summands.



              Now the question is, if you have two chain complexes, say $... to V_n to ...$ and $... to V'_n to ...$, and if you have maps $H_n to H'_n$ for each $n$, is there a chain map that induces it? Yes, just decompose $V_n$ and $V'_n$ as above, send the $H_n$ summand to $H'_n$ using the desired map, and send the other summands $B_n$ and $B_{n-1}$ to zero.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                First, without your requirement to work over a field, this is false. The chain complex $0 to mathbb{F}_2 to 0$ has the same homology as the chain complex $0 to mathbb{Z} xrightarrow{times 2} mathbb{Z} to 0$, but there is no map from the first to the second inducing this.



                Once you work over a field, the answer is yes. The following is inspired by Tyler Lawson's answer to https://mathoverflow.net/questions/10974/does-homology-detect-chain-homotopy-equivalence.



                If you have a chain complex $... to V_n to V_{n-1} to ...$ of vector spaces over a field, then for each $n$ you have a surjective vector space map $V_n to B_{n-1}$, where $B_{n-1}$ is the boundaries, the image of the boundary map. Since these are vector spaces, we can choose a vector space complement (equivalently, a splitting of this map), which is necessarily isomorphic to $Z_n$, the $n$-cycles. That is, $V_n cong Z_n oplus B_{n-1}$. Similarly, since $H_n = Z_n/B_n$, then $Z_n$ is isomorphic to $H_n oplus B_n$. So putting these together, we have $V_n cong (B_n oplus H_n) oplus B_{n-1}$. The boundary map
                $$
                B_n oplus H_n oplus B_{n-1} to B_{n-1} oplus H_{n-1} oplus B_{n-2}
                $$

                sends the summand $B_{n-1}$ by the identity to the summand $B_{n-1}$, and is zero on the other summands.



                Now the question is, if you have two chain complexes, say $... to V_n to ...$ and $... to V'_n to ...$, and if you have maps $H_n to H'_n$ for each $n$, is there a chain map that induces it? Yes, just decompose $V_n$ and $V'_n$ as above, send the $H_n$ summand to $H'_n$ using the desired map, and send the other summands $B_n$ and $B_{n-1}$ to zero.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                First, without your requirement to work over a field, this is false. The chain complex $0 to mathbb{F}_2 to 0$ has the same homology as the chain complex $0 to mathbb{Z} xrightarrow{times 2} mathbb{Z} to 0$, but there is no map from the first to the second inducing this.



                Once you work over a field, the answer is yes. The following is inspired by Tyler Lawson's answer to https://mathoverflow.net/questions/10974/does-homology-detect-chain-homotopy-equivalence.



                If you have a chain complex $... to V_n to V_{n-1} to ...$ of vector spaces over a field, then for each $n$ you have a surjective vector space map $V_n to B_{n-1}$, where $B_{n-1}$ is the boundaries, the image of the boundary map. Since these are vector spaces, we can choose a vector space complement (equivalently, a splitting of this map), which is necessarily isomorphic to $Z_n$, the $n$-cycles. That is, $V_n cong Z_n oplus B_{n-1}$. Similarly, since $H_n = Z_n/B_n$, then $Z_n$ is isomorphic to $H_n oplus B_n$. So putting these together, we have $V_n cong (B_n oplus H_n) oplus B_{n-1}$. The boundary map
                $$
                B_n oplus H_n oplus B_{n-1} to B_{n-1} oplus H_{n-1} oplus B_{n-2}
                $$

                sends the summand $B_{n-1}$ by the identity to the summand $B_{n-1}$, and is zero on the other summands.



                Now the question is, if you have two chain complexes, say $... to V_n to ...$ and $... to V'_n to ...$, and if you have maps $H_n to H'_n$ for each $n$, is there a chain map that induces it? Yes, just decompose $V_n$ and $V'_n$ as above, send the $H_n$ summand to $H'_n$ using the desired map, and send the other summands $B_n$ and $B_{n-1}$ to zero.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 3 '18 at 0:34









                John Palmieri

                69339




                69339






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022668%2fis-every-homology-map-induced-by-a-chain-map%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen