Changing number bases for expansion of fractions












0














Okay, so my question is, say if I have $141_{10}$ and I convert it into hexadecimal, I get $8D_{16}$ but if it I have $0.141_{10}$ and I convert it to hexadecimal, I get $0.24189374BC6A7EF9E$, why is there this discrepancy?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Are you asking why you don't get $.8d$ in hex? If so, it's because $.8d = {8dover 256_{10}}$ not ${8dover 1000_{10}}$
    – saulspatz
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:47












  • Okay, but then how am I supposed to change such values?
    – AryanSonwatikar
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:51
















0














Okay, so my question is, say if I have $141_{10}$ and I convert it into hexadecimal, I get $8D_{16}$ but if it I have $0.141_{10}$ and I convert it to hexadecimal, I get $0.24189374BC6A7EF9E$, why is there this discrepancy?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Are you asking why you don't get $.8d$ in hex? If so, it's because $.8d = {8dover 256_{10}}$ not ${8dover 1000_{10}}$
    – saulspatz
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:47












  • Okay, but then how am I supposed to change such values?
    – AryanSonwatikar
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:51














0












0








0


1





Okay, so my question is, say if I have $141_{10}$ and I convert it into hexadecimal, I get $8D_{16}$ but if it I have $0.141_{10}$ and I convert it to hexadecimal, I get $0.24189374BC6A7EF9E$, why is there this discrepancy?










share|cite|improve this question















Okay, so my question is, say if I have $141_{10}$ and I convert it into hexadecimal, I get $8D_{16}$ but if it I have $0.141_{10}$ and I convert it to hexadecimal, I get $0.24189374BC6A7EF9E$, why is there this discrepancy?







number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 '18 at 13:48









saulspatz

14k21329




14k21329










asked Dec 2 '18 at 13:28









AryanSonwatikar

31312




31312








  • 1




    Are you asking why you don't get $.8d$ in hex? If so, it's because $.8d = {8dover 256_{10}}$ not ${8dover 1000_{10}}$
    – saulspatz
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:47












  • Okay, but then how am I supposed to change such values?
    – AryanSonwatikar
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:51














  • 1




    Are you asking why you don't get $.8d$ in hex? If so, it's because $.8d = {8dover 256_{10}}$ not ${8dover 1000_{10}}$
    – saulspatz
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:47












  • Okay, but then how am I supposed to change such values?
    – AryanSonwatikar
    Dec 2 '18 at 13:51








1




1




Are you asking why you don't get $.8d$ in hex? If so, it's because $.8d = {8dover 256_{10}}$ not ${8dover 1000_{10}}$
– saulspatz
Dec 2 '18 at 13:47






Are you asking why you don't get $.8d$ in hex? If so, it's because $.8d = {8dover 256_{10}}$ not ${8dover 1000_{10}}$
– saulspatz
Dec 2 '18 at 13:47














Okay, but then how am I supposed to change such values?
– AryanSonwatikar
Dec 2 '18 at 13:51




Okay, but then how am I supposed to change such values?
– AryanSonwatikar
Dec 2 '18 at 13:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Suppose that the hexadecimal fraction is $f=.a_1a_2a_3..._{16}$ Then $$16f = a_1.a_2a_3.._{16}.$$ So, if we multiply the fraction by $16,$ the integer part of the result is the first hexadecimal digit. $$16cdot.141=2.256,$$ so the first hex digit after the "hexadecimal point" is $2.$ To get the second digit, ignore the integer part of the last result, and multiply by $16$ again.$$16cdot.256=4.096,$$ so the second digit is $4$. Then $$16cdot.096=1.536$$ and so on. $$boxed{.141_{10}=.241..._{16}}$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022641%2fchanging-number-bases-for-expansion-of-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Suppose that the hexadecimal fraction is $f=.a_1a_2a_3..._{16}$ Then $$16f = a_1.a_2a_3.._{16}.$$ So, if we multiply the fraction by $16,$ the integer part of the result is the first hexadecimal digit. $$16cdot.141=2.256,$$ so the first hex digit after the "hexadecimal point" is $2.$ To get the second digit, ignore the integer part of the last result, and multiply by $16$ again.$$16cdot.256=4.096,$$ so the second digit is $4$. Then $$16cdot.096=1.536$$ and so on. $$boxed{.141_{10}=.241..._{16}}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      1














      Suppose that the hexadecimal fraction is $f=.a_1a_2a_3..._{16}$ Then $$16f = a_1.a_2a_3.._{16}.$$ So, if we multiply the fraction by $16,$ the integer part of the result is the first hexadecimal digit. $$16cdot.141=2.256,$$ so the first hex digit after the "hexadecimal point" is $2.$ To get the second digit, ignore the integer part of the last result, and multiply by $16$ again.$$16cdot.256=4.096,$$ so the second digit is $4$. Then $$16cdot.096=1.536$$ and so on. $$boxed{.141_{10}=.241..._{16}}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        Suppose that the hexadecimal fraction is $f=.a_1a_2a_3..._{16}$ Then $$16f = a_1.a_2a_3.._{16}.$$ So, if we multiply the fraction by $16,$ the integer part of the result is the first hexadecimal digit. $$16cdot.141=2.256,$$ so the first hex digit after the "hexadecimal point" is $2.$ To get the second digit, ignore the integer part of the last result, and multiply by $16$ again.$$16cdot.256=4.096,$$ so the second digit is $4$. Then $$16cdot.096=1.536$$ and so on. $$boxed{.141_{10}=.241..._{16}}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Suppose that the hexadecimal fraction is $f=.a_1a_2a_3..._{16}$ Then $$16f = a_1.a_2a_3.._{16}.$$ So, if we multiply the fraction by $16,$ the integer part of the result is the first hexadecimal digit. $$16cdot.141=2.256,$$ so the first hex digit after the "hexadecimal point" is $2.$ To get the second digit, ignore the integer part of the last result, and multiply by $16$ again.$$16cdot.256=4.096,$$ so the second digit is $4$. Then $$16cdot.096=1.536$$ and so on. $$boxed{.141_{10}=.241..._{16}}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 2 '18 at 14:58









        saulspatz

        14k21329




        14k21329






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022641%2fchanging-number-bases-for-expansion-of-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen