Does Virus affected Node Modules transfer in Contents of SPFx deployment package
When we scaffold an SPFx webpart/Extension we get many Node Modules as part of dependencies. These can be seen in node_modules folder and there are also entries in package-lock.json file.
I know these are dependencies for development.
Now assume a case where one of the Node Modules contains Virus (like in flatmap-stream and event-stream). Does the package files generated from commands gulp bundle --ship and gulp package-solution --ship will contain any of the code from all or effected Node Modules?
sharepoint-online spfx spfx-webparts spfx-extensions anti-virus
add a comment |
When we scaffold an SPFx webpart/Extension we get many Node Modules as part of dependencies. These can be seen in node_modules folder and there are also entries in package-lock.json file.
I know these are dependencies for development.
Now assume a case where one of the Node Modules contains Virus (like in flatmap-stream and event-stream). Does the package files generated from commands gulp bundle --ship and gulp package-solution --ship will contain any of the code from all or effected Node Modules?
sharepoint-online spfx spfx-webparts spfx-extensions anti-virus
add a comment |
When we scaffold an SPFx webpart/Extension we get many Node Modules as part of dependencies. These can be seen in node_modules folder and there are also entries in package-lock.json file.
I know these are dependencies for development.
Now assume a case where one of the Node Modules contains Virus (like in flatmap-stream and event-stream). Does the package files generated from commands gulp bundle --ship and gulp package-solution --ship will contain any of the code from all or effected Node Modules?
sharepoint-online spfx spfx-webparts spfx-extensions anti-virus
When we scaffold an SPFx webpart/Extension we get many Node Modules as part of dependencies. These can be seen in node_modules folder and there are also entries in package-lock.json file.
I know these are dependencies for development.
Now assume a case where one of the Node Modules contains Virus (like in flatmap-stream and event-stream). Does the package files generated from commands gulp bundle --ship and gulp package-solution --ship will contain any of the code from all or effected Node Modules?
sharepoint-online spfx spfx-webparts spfx-extensions anti-virus
sharepoint-online spfx spfx-webparts spfx-extensions anti-virus
edited Jan 3 at 10:58
Vardhaman Deshpande
9,89811950
9,89811950
asked Jan 2 at 12:09
Asad RefaiAsad Refai
5,24282350
5,24282350
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
TLDR;
The short answer is no, the package doesn't contain all of the code from node_modules, yet it contains some very small amount of proven code (mostly css-loader code from corresponding webpack loader).
Long answer
SharePoint Framework uses webpack to bundle your code into a single file (aka package). Apart your code SharePoint Framework contains a lot of components which you reference in your code via imports (import smth from '@microsoft/sp-webpart-base' etc.), however, those components are not included in your code. They serve as "externals" and are loaded by SharePoint Framework at runtime.
If you take a look at webpack configuration, you will see below picture:
....
devtool: 'source-map',
entry:
{ 'hello-world-web-part':
'C:\temp\spfx-test\lib\webparts\helloWorld\HelloWorldWebPart.js',
'my-new-wp-web-part':
'C:\temp\spfx-test\lib\webparts\myNewWp\MyNewWpWebPart.js' },
externals:
[ '@microsoft/sp-lodash-subset',
'@microsoft/sp-core-library',
'@microsoft/decorators',
'@microsoft/office-ui-fabric-react-bundle',
'@microsoft/sp-diagnostics',
'@microsoft/sp-dynamic-data',
'@microsoft/sp-polyfills',
'@microsoft/sp-http',
'@microsoft/sp-page-context',
'@microsoft/sp-loader',
'@microsoft/sp-component-base',
'@microsoft/sp-webpart-base',
'@microsoft/sp-office-ui-fabric-core',
'@microsoft/sp-extension-base',
'@microsoft/sp-application-base',
'@microsoft/sp-client-preview',
'@microsoft/sp-webpart-workbench',
'react',
'react-dom',
'HelloWorldWebPartStrings',
'MyNewWpWebPartStrings' ],
output:
....
Everything which is in the external section won't be included into the resulting bundle, yet it will be served at runtime by Microsoft. Your package contains only your code (plus a bit of code from webpack's css-loader like mentioned earlier). You can run gulp clean then gulp bundle and open ./dist folder to review the generated bundle. Only your code will be included.
Which basically means that you shouldn't care about such things like viruses, etc. However, Microsoft should care that all externals modules they use (aka @microsoft/* and react*) are virus-free and safe.
From your side, you should only care about any external modules you install after scaffolding your project. For example react modules, or helpers, or whatever else.
Additional reading:
250+ vulnerabilities in a new SharePoint Framework project
Don't be alarmed by vulnerabilities after running NPM Install
Code Security Audit using “npm audit”
There is the possibility that thewebpackor one of it plugins has "evil" code in and injects this into your build result (like in XcodeGhost). But the size and importance makes likely that such an attack would be detect fast
– sschoof
Jan 4 at 8:18
That's true, but this is the task for Microsoft, because like mentioned all webpack modules as well as node modules with dependencies are externals and controlled by Microsoft. So technically "evil" code won't be in your bundle unless you add it explicitly.
– Sergei Sergeev
Jan 4 at 8:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "232"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsharepoint.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f255059%2fdoes-virus-affected-node-modules-transfer-in-contents-of-spfx-deployment-package%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
TLDR;
The short answer is no, the package doesn't contain all of the code from node_modules, yet it contains some very small amount of proven code (mostly css-loader code from corresponding webpack loader).
Long answer
SharePoint Framework uses webpack to bundle your code into a single file (aka package). Apart your code SharePoint Framework contains a lot of components which you reference in your code via imports (import smth from '@microsoft/sp-webpart-base' etc.), however, those components are not included in your code. They serve as "externals" and are loaded by SharePoint Framework at runtime.
If you take a look at webpack configuration, you will see below picture:
....
devtool: 'source-map',
entry:
{ 'hello-world-web-part':
'C:\temp\spfx-test\lib\webparts\helloWorld\HelloWorldWebPart.js',
'my-new-wp-web-part':
'C:\temp\spfx-test\lib\webparts\myNewWp\MyNewWpWebPart.js' },
externals:
[ '@microsoft/sp-lodash-subset',
'@microsoft/sp-core-library',
'@microsoft/decorators',
'@microsoft/office-ui-fabric-react-bundle',
'@microsoft/sp-diagnostics',
'@microsoft/sp-dynamic-data',
'@microsoft/sp-polyfills',
'@microsoft/sp-http',
'@microsoft/sp-page-context',
'@microsoft/sp-loader',
'@microsoft/sp-component-base',
'@microsoft/sp-webpart-base',
'@microsoft/sp-office-ui-fabric-core',
'@microsoft/sp-extension-base',
'@microsoft/sp-application-base',
'@microsoft/sp-client-preview',
'@microsoft/sp-webpart-workbench',
'react',
'react-dom',
'HelloWorldWebPartStrings',
'MyNewWpWebPartStrings' ],
output:
....
Everything which is in the external section won't be included into the resulting bundle, yet it will be served at runtime by Microsoft. Your package contains only your code (plus a bit of code from webpack's css-loader like mentioned earlier). You can run gulp clean then gulp bundle and open ./dist folder to review the generated bundle. Only your code will be included.
Which basically means that you shouldn't care about such things like viruses, etc. However, Microsoft should care that all externals modules they use (aka @microsoft/* and react*) are virus-free and safe.
From your side, you should only care about any external modules you install after scaffolding your project. For example react modules, or helpers, or whatever else.
Additional reading:
250+ vulnerabilities in a new SharePoint Framework project
Don't be alarmed by vulnerabilities after running NPM Install
Code Security Audit using “npm audit”
There is the possibility that thewebpackor one of it plugins has "evil" code in and injects this into your build result (like in XcodeGhost). But the size and importance makes likely that such an attack would be detect fast
– sschoof
Jan 4 at 8:18
That's true, but this is the task for Microsoft, because like mentioned all webpack modules as well as node modules with dependencies are externals and controlled by Microsoft. So technically "evil" code won't be in your bundle unless you add it explicitly.
– Sergei Sergeev
Jan 4 at 8:32
add a comment |
TLDR;
The short answer is no, the package doesn't contain all of the code from node_modules, yet it contains some very small amount of proven code (mostly css-loader code from corresponding webpack loader).
Long answer
SharePoint Framework uses webpack to bundle your code into a single file (aka package). Apart your code SharePoint Framework contains a lot of components which you reference in your code via imports (import smth from '@microsoft/sp-webpart-base' etc.), however, those components are not included in your code. They serve as "externals" and are loaded by SharePoint Framework at runtime.
If you take a look at webpack configuration, you will see below picture:
....
devtool: 'source-map',
entry:
{ 'hello-world-web-part':
'C:\temp\spfx-test\lib\webparts\helloWorld\HelloWorldWebPart.js',
'my-new-wp-web-part':
'C:\temp\spfx-test\lib\webparts\myNewWp\MyNewWpWebPart.js' },
externals:
[ '@microsoft/sp-lodash-subset',
'@microsoft/sp-core-library',
'@microsoft/decorators',
'@microsoft/office-ui-fabric-react-bundle',
'@microsoft/sp-diagnostics',
'@microsoft/sp-dynamic-data',
'@microsoft/sp-polyfills',
'@microsoft/sp-http',
'@microsoft/sp-page-context',
'@microsoft/sp-loader',
'@microsoft/sp-component-base',
'@microsoft/sp-webpart-base',
'@microsoft/sp-office-ui-fabric-core',
'@microsoft/sp-extension-base',
'@microsoft/sp-application-base',
'@microsoft/sp-client-preview',
'@microsoft/sp-webpart-workbench',
'react',
'react-dom',
'HelloWorldWebPartStrings',
'MyNewWpWebPartStrings' ],
output:
....
Everything which is in the external section won't be included into the resulting bundle, yet it will be served at runtime by Microsoft. Your package contains only your code (plus a bit of code from webpack's css-loader like mentioned earlier). You can run gulp clean then gulp bundle and open ./dist folder to review the generated bundle. Only your code will be included.
Which basically means that you shouldn't care about such things like viruses, etc. However, Microsoft should care that all externals modules they use (aka @microsoft/* and react*) are virus-free and safe.
From your side, you should only care about any external modules you install after scaffolding your project. For example react modules, or helpers, or whatever else.
Additional reading:
250+ vulnerabilities in a new SharePoint Framework project
Don't be alarmed by vulnerabilities after running NPM Install
Code Security Audit using “npm audit”
There is the possibility that thewebpackor one of it plugins has "evil" code in and injects this into your build result (like in XcodeGhost). But the size and importance makes likely that such an attack would be detect fast
– sschoof
Jan 4 at 8:18
That's true, but this is the task for Microsoft, because like mentioned all webpack modules as well as node modules with dependencies are externals and controlled by Microsoft. So technically "evil" code won't be in your bundle unless you add it explicitly.
– Sergei Sergeev
Jan 4 at 8:32
add a comment |
TLDR;
The short answer is no, the package doesn't contain all of the code from node_modules, yet it contains some very small amount of proven code (mostly css-loader code from corresponding webpack loader).
Long answer
SharePoint Framework uses webpack to bundle your code into a single file (aka package). Apart your code SharePoint Framework contains a lot of components which you reference in your code via imports (import smth from '@microsoft/sp-webpart-base' etc.), however, those components are not included in your code. They serve as "externals" and are loaded by SharePoint Framework at runtime.
If you take a look at webpack configuration, you will see below picture:
....
devtool: 'source-map',
entry:
{ 'hello-world-web-part':
'C:\temp\spfx-test\lib\webparts\helloWorld\HelloWorldWebPart.js',
'my-new-wp-web-part':
'C:\temp\spfx-test\lib\webparts\myNewWp\MyNewWpWebPart.js' },
externals:
[ '@microsoft/sp-lodash-subset',
'@microsoft/sp-core-library',
'@microsoft/decorators',
'@microsoft/office-ui-fabric-react-bundle',
'@microsoft/sp-diagnostics',
'@microsoft/sp-dynamic-data',
'@microsoft/sp-polyfills',
'@microsoft/sp-http',
'@microsoft/sp-page-context',
'@microsoft/sp-loader',
'@microsoft/sp-component-base',
'@microsoft/sp-webpart-base',
'@microsoft/sp-office-ui-fabric-core',
'@microsoft/sp-extension-base',
'@microsoft/sp-application-base',
'@microsoft/sp-client-preview',
'@microsoft/sp-webpart-workbench',
'react',
'react-dom',
'HelloWorldWebPartStrings',
'MyNewWpWebPartStrings' ],
output:
....
Everything which is in the external section won't be included into the resulting bundle, yet it will be served at runtime by Microsoft. Your package contains only your code (plus a bit of code from webpack's css-loader like mentioned earlier). You can run gulp clean then gulp bundle and open ./dist folder to review the generated bundle. Only your code will be included.
Which basically means that you shouldn't care about such things like viruses, etc. However, Microsoft should care that all externals modules they use (aka @microsoft/* and react*) are virus-free and safe.
From your side, you should only care about any external modules you install after scaffolding your project. For example react modules, or helpers, or whatever else.
Additional reading:
250+ vulnerabilities in a new SharePoint Framework project
Don't be alarmed by vulnerabilities after running NPM Install
Code Security Audit using “npm audit”
TLDR;
The short answer is no, the package doesn't contain all of the code from node_modules, yet it contains some very small amount of proven code (mostly css-loader code from corresponding webpack loader).
Long answer
SharePoint Framework uses webpack to bundle your code into a single file (aka package). Apart your code SharePoint Framework contains a lot of components which you reference in your code via imports (import smth from '@microsoft/sp-webpart-base' etc.), however, those components are not included in your code. They serve as "externals" and are loaded by SharePoint Framework at runtime.
If you take a look at webpack configuration, you will see below picture:
....
devtool: 'source-map',
entry:
{ 'hello-world-web-part':
'C:\temp\spfx-test\lib\webparts\helloWorld\HelloWorldWebPart.js',
'my-new-wp-web-part':
'C:\temp\spfx-test\lib\webparts\myNewWp\MyNewWpWebPart.js' },
externals:
[ '@microsoft/sp-lodash-subset',
'@microsoft/sp-core-library',
'@microsoft/decorators',
'@microsoft/office-ui-fabric-react-bundle',
'@microsoft/sp-diagnostics',
'@microsoft/sp-dynamic-data',
'@microsoft/sp-polyfills',
'@microsoft/sp-http',
'@microsoft/sp-page-context',
'@microsoft/sp-loader',
'@microsoft/sp-component-base',
'@microsoft/sp-webpart-base',
'@microsoft/sp-office-ui-fabric-core',
'@microsoft/sp-extension-base',
'@microsoft/sp-application-base',
'@microsoft/sp-client-preview',
'@microsoft/sp-webpart-workbench',
'react',
'react-dom',
'HelloWorldWebPartStrings',
'MyNewWpWebPartStrings' ],
output:
....
Everything which is in the external section won't be included into the resulting bundle, yet it will be served at runtime by Microsoft. Your package contains only your code (plus a bit of code from webpack's css-loader like mentioned earlier). You can run gulp clean then gulp bundle and open ./dist folder to review the generated bundle. Only your code will be included.
Which basically means that you shouldn't care about such things like viruses, etc. However, Microsoft should care that all externals modules they use (aka @microsoft/* and react*) are virus-free and safe.
From your side, you should only care about any external modules you install after scaffolding your project. For example react modules, or helpers, or whatever else.
Additional reading:
250+ vulnerabilities in a new SharePoint Framework project
Don't be alarmed by vulnerabilities after running NPM Install
Code Security Audit using “npm audit”
answered Jan 2 at 13:00
Sergei SergeevSergei Sergeev
10.4k52542
10.4k52542
There is the possibility that thewebpackor one of it plugins has "evil" code in and injects this into your build result (like in XcodeGhost). But the size and importance makes likely that such an attack would be detect fast
– sschoof
Jan 4 at 8:18
That's true, but this is the task for Microsoft, because like mentioned all webpack modules as well as node modules with dependencies are externals and controlled by Microsoft. So technically "evil" code won't be in your bundle unless you add it explicitly.
– Sergei Sergeev
Jan 4 at 8:32
add a comment |
There is the possibility that thewebpackor one of it plugins has "evil" code in and injects this into your build result (like in XcodeGhost). But the size and importance makes likely that such an attack would be detect fast
– sschoof
Jan 4 at 8:18
That's true, but this is the task for Microsoft, because like mentioned all webpack modules as well as node modules with dependencies are externals and controlled by Microsoft. So technically "evil" code won't be in your bundle unless you add it explicitly.
– Sergei Sergeev
Jan 4 at 8:32
There is the possibility that the
webpack or one of it plugins has "evil" code in and injects this into your build result (like in XcodeGhost). But the size and importance makes likely that such an attack would be detect fast– sschoof
Jan 4 at 8:18
There is the possibility that the
webpack or one of it plugins has "evil" code in and injects this into your build result (like in XcodeGhost). But the size and importance makes likely that such an attack would be detect fast– sschoof
Jan 4 at 8:18
That's true, but this is the task for Microsoft, because like mentioned all webpack modules as well as node modules with dependencies are externals and controlled by Microsoft. So technically "evil" code won't be in your bundle unless you add it explicitly.
– Sergei Sergeev
Jan 4 at 8:32
That's true, but this is the task for Microsoft, because like mentioned all webpack modules as well as node modules with dependencies are externals and controlled by Microsoft. So technically "evil" code won't be in your bundle unless you add it explicitly.
– Sergei Sergeev
Jan 4 at 8:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to SharePoint Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsharepoint.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f255059%2fdoes-virus-affected-node-modules-transfer-in-contents-of-spfx-deployment-package%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown