General solution of a specific eigenvalue problem.
$begingroup$
Consider a Schroedinger-like equation with a generalized harmonic potential:
$$
left(sum_imu_i^2frac{partial^2}{partial x_i^2}-sum_{ij}Omega_{ij}x_ix_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
where indices run from 1 to $N$, $x_i$ are real coordinates, $mu_i$ are positive real numbers, and $Omega$ is a positive-definite symmetric real matrix.
Is the following statement valid:
Any eigenvalue of the problem is determined by a $N$-tuple of non-negative integer numbers $(n_1,n_2,dots,n_N)$ as
$$
E_{n_1n_2dots n_N}=sum_{i=1}^Nleft(1+2n_iright)omega_i,
$$
where $omega$'s are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the matrix $tildeOmega$:
$$tildeOmega_{ij}=mu_imu_jOmega_{ij}$$?
If the general solution of the problem is known I would be thankful for corresponding hints and/or references.
pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors quantum-mechanics sturm-liouville linear-pde
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a Schroedinger-like equation with a generalized harmonic potential:
$$
left(sum_imu_i^2frac{partial^2}{partial x_i^2}-sum_{ij}Omega_{ij}x_ix_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
where indices run from 1 to $N$, $x_i$ are real coordinates, $mu_i$ are positive real numbers, and $Omega$ is a positive-definite symmetric real matrix.
Is the following statement valid:
Any eigenvalue of the problem is determined by a $N$-tuple of non-negative integer numbers $(n_1,n_2,dots,n_N)$ as
$$
E_{n_1n_2dots n_N}=sum_{i=1}^Nleft(1+2n_iright)omega_i,
$$
where $omega$'s are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the matrix $tildeOmega$:
$$tildeOmega_{ij}=mu_imu_jOmega_{ij}$$?
If the general solution of the problem is known I would be thankful for corresponding hints and/or references.
pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors quantum-mechanics sturm-liouville linear-pde
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jun 13 '17 at 18:34
1
$begingroup$
I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 7:52
1
$begingroup$
The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 13:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider a Schroedinger-like equation with a generalized harmonic potential:
$$
left(sum_imu_i^2frac{partial^2}{partial x_i^2}-sum_{ij}Omega_{ij}x_ix_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
where indices run from 1 to $N$, $x_i$ are real coordinates, $mu_i$ are positive real numbers, and $Omega$ is a positive-definite symmetric real matrix.
Is the following statement valid:
Any eigenvalue of the problem is determined by a $N$-tuple of non-negative integer numbers $(n_1,n_2,dots,n_N)$ as
$$
E_{n_1n_2dots n_N}=sum_{i=1}^Nleft(1+2n_iright)omega_i,
$$
where $omega$'s are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the matrix $tildeOmega$:
$$tildeOmega_{ij}=mu_imu_jOmega_{ij}$$?
If the general solution of the problem is known I would be thankful for corresponding hints and/or references.
pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors quantum-mechanics sturm-liouville linear-pde
$endgroup$
Consider a Schroedinger-like equation with a generalized harmonic potential:
$$
left(sum_imu_i^2frac{partial^2}{partial x_i^2}-sum_{ij}Omega_{ij}x_ix_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
where indices run from 1 to $N$, $x_i$ are real coordinates, $mu_i$ are positive real numbers, and $Omega$ is a positive-definite symmetric real matrix.
Is the following statement valid:
Any eigenvalue of the problem is determined by a $N$-tuple of non-negative integer numbers $(n_1,n_2,dots,n_N)$ as
$$
E_{n_1n_2dots n_N}=sum_{i=1}^Nleft(1+2n_iright)omega_i,
$$
where $omega$'s are the square roots of the eigenvalues of the matrix $tildeOmega$:
$$tildeOmega_{ij}=mu_imu_jOmega_{ij}$$?
If the general solution of the problem is known I would be thankful for corresponding hints and/or references.
pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors quantum-mechanics sturm-liouville linear-pde
pde eigenvalues-eigenvectors quantum-mechanics sturm-liouville linear-pde
edited Jun 13 '17 at 18:30
Robert Lewis
48.1k23167
48.1k23167
asked Jun 13 '17 at 16:48
useruser
5,45411030
5,45411030
$begingroup$
I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jun 13 '17 at 18:34
1
$begingroup$
I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 7:52
1
$begingroup$
The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 13:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jun 13 '17 at 18:34
1
$begingroup$
I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 7:52
1
$begingroup$
The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 13:10
$begingroup$
I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jun 13 '17 at 18:34
$begingroup$
I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jun 13 '17 at 18:34
1
1
$begingroup$
I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 7:52
$begingroup$
I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 7:52
1
1
$begingroup$
The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 13:10
$begingroup$
The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 13:10
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is just a bunch of N linear oscillators, a system readily diagonalizable, upon defining real coordinates $y_iequiv x_i/mu_i$, so you have
$$
left(sum_i frac{partial^2}{partial y_i^2}-sum_{ij}tilde Omega_{ij}y_iy_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
with $tilde Omega$ real, symmetric (symmetrize by the ys) and positive.
As such, it is orthogonally diagonalizable to its real positive eigenvalues' matrix $tilde { tilde Omega}_{ij}=delta_{ij}omega^2_i$, with eigenvectors $z_i$, to wit
$$
left(sum_i ( frac{partial^2}{partial z_i^2}- omega_{i}^2 z_i^2)+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
N decoupled harmonic oscillators.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2321229%2fgeneral-solution-of-a-specific-eigenvalue-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is just a bunch of N linear oscillators, a system readily diagonalizable, upon defining real coordinates $y_iequiv x_i/mu_i$, so you have
$$
left(sum_i frac{partial^2}{partial y_i^2}-sum_{ij}tilde Omega_{ij}y_iy_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
with $tilde Omega$ real, symmetric (symmetrize by the ys) and positive.
As such, it is orthogonally diagonalizable to its real positive eigenvalues' matrix $tilde { tilde Omega}_{ij}=delta_{ij}omega^2_i$, with eigenvectors $z_i$, to wit
$$
left(sum_i ( frac{partial^2}{partial z_i^2}- omega_{i}^2 z_i^2)+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
N decoupled harmonic oscillators.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is just a bunch of N linear oscillators, a system readily diagonalizable, upon defining real coordinates $y_iequiv x_i/mu_i$, so you have
$$
left(sum_i frac{partial^2}{partial y_i^2}-sum_{ij}tilde Omega_{ij}y_iy_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
with $tilde Omega$ real, symmetric (symmetrize by the ys) and positive.
As such, it is orthogonally diagonalizable to its real positive eigenvalues' matrix $tilde { tilde Omega}_{ij}=delta_{ij}omega^2_i$, with eigenvectors $z_i$, to wit
$$
left(sum_i ( frac{partial^2}{partial z_i^2}- omega_{i}^2 z_i^2)+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
N decoupled harmonic oscillators.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is just a bunch of N linear oscillators, a system readily diagonalizable, upon defining real coordinates $y_iequiv x_i/mu_i$, so you have
$$
left(sum_i frac{partial^2}{partial y_i^2}-sum_{ij}tilde Omega_{ij}y_iy_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
with $tilde Omega$ real, symmetric (symmetrize by the ys) and positive.
As such, it is orthogonally diagonalizable to its real positive eigenvalues' matrix $tilde { tilde Omega}_{ij}=delta_{ij}omega^2_i$, with eigenvectors $z_i$, to wit
$$
left(sum_i ( frac{partial^2}{partial z_i^2}- omega_{i}^2 z_i^2)+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
N decoupled harmonic oscillators.
$endgroup$
This is just a bunch of N linear oscillators, a system readily diagonalizable, upon defining real coordinates $y_iequiv x_i/mu_i$, so you have
$$
left(sum_i frac{partial^2}{partial y_i^2}-sum_{ij}tilde Omega_{ij}y_iy_j+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
with $tilde Omega$ real, symmetric (symmetrize by the ys) and positive.
As such, it is orthogonally diagonalizable to its real positive eigenvalues' matrix $tilde { tilde Omega}_{ij}=delta_{ij}omega^2_i$, with eigenvectors $z_i$, to wit
$$
left(sum_i ( frac{partial^2}{partial z_i^2}- omega_{i}^2 z_i^2)+Eright)Psi=0,
$$
N decoupled harmonic oscillators.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 16:25
Cosmas ZachosCosmas Zachos
1,810522
1,810522
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2321229%2fgeneral-solution-of-a-specific-eigenvalue-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I made a small edit to your post and added a few tags. Hope this is OK.
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jun 13 '17 at 18:34
1
$begingroup$
I think I was able to prove the statement, except for showing that $tildeOmega$ is positive-definite. I would be thankful for any hint concerning a proof of the latter property.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 7:52
1
$begingroup$
The proof of the positive definiteness has appeared to be trivial.
$endgroup$
– user
Jun 14 '17 at 13:10