How can I select one No-unicode symbol from one font?
I am using Asea font http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/Textfonts.zip
From http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/
And I want to pick some characters that are not encoded in unicode, but are present in the font, like these:
The alpha with macron and smooth breathing appear in position "1114698 (0x11024a)" (I saw at FontForge), but does not have an unicode (U + XXXX) number. How can I select this symbol using fontspec package (the symbol command)?
fonts luatex fontspec unicode font-encodings
add a comment |
I am using Asea font http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/Textfonts.zip
From http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/
And I want to pick some characters that are not encoded in unicode, but are present in the font, like these:
The alpha with macron and smooth breathing appear in position "1114698 (0x11024a)" (I saw at FontForge), but does not have an unicode (U + XXXX) number. How can I select this symbol using fontspec package (the symbol command)?
fonts luatex fontspec unicode font-encodings
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/questions/98188/… (although Ulrike Fischer came up with a great answer specific to your question, so it’s not really a duplicate).
– Davislor
Dec 28 '18 at 20:39
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/420167.
– stone-zeng
Jan 1 at 15:22
add a comment |
I am using Asea font http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/Textfonts.zip
From http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/
And I want to pick some characters that are not encoded in unicode, but are present in the font, like these:
The alpha with macron and smooth breathing appear in position "1114698 (0x11024a)" (I saw at FontForge), but does not have an unicode (U + XXXX) number. How can I select this symbol using fontspec package (the symbol command)?
fonts luatex fontspec unicode font-encodings
I am using Asea font http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/Textfonts.zip
From http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/
And I want to pick some characters that are not encoded in unicode, but are present in the font, like these:
The alpha with macron and smooth breathing appear in position "1114698 (0x11024a)" (I saw at FontForge), but does not have an unicode (U + XXXX) number. How can I select this symbol using fontspec package (the symbol command)?
fonts luatex fontspec unicode font-encodings
fonts luatex fontspec unicode font-encodings
edited Dec 28 '18 at 14:28
AboAmmar
34.4k32985
34.4k32985
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:09
John StewartJohn Stewart
233
233
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/questions/98188/… (although Ulrike Fischer came up with a great answer specific to your question, so it’s not really a duplicate).
– Davislor
Dec 28 '18 at 20:39
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/420167.
– stone-zeng
Jan 1 at 15:22
add a comment |
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/questions/98188/… (although Ulrike Fischer came up with a great answer specific to your question, so it’s not really a duplicate).
– Davislor
Dec 28 '18 at 20:39
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/420167.
– stone-zeng
Jan 1 at 15:22
1
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/questions/98188/… (although Ulrike Fischer came up with a great answer specific to your question, so it’s not really a duplicate).
– Davislor
Dec 28 '18 at 20:39
See also tex.stackexchange.com/questions/98188/… (although Ulrike Fischer came up with a great answer specific to your question, so it’s not really a duplicate).
– Davislor
Dec 28 '18 at 20:39
1
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/420167.
– stone-zeng
Jan 1 at 15:22
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/420167.
– stone-zeng
Jan 1 at 15:22
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The glyphs can be accessed through a ligature with the macron accent (U+0304):
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
setmainfont{Asea.ttf}[Script=Greek]
begin{document}
ᾱ^^^^0304 ά^^^^0304 ὰ^^^^0304 ἀ^^^^0304 ἁ^^^^0304 ἄ^^^^0304 ἂ^^^^0304
ἅ^^^^0304 ἃ^^^^0304
end{document}
While that works for this particular font, what if there were no ligature combination to access it? (unlikely but, that would make the answer a lot more general, if it's possible)
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 17:43
@guifa there is no general answer. It depends on the font how glyph can be accessed - sometimes such glyphs are stylistic variants, here they are used in ligatures.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 17:46
It's also possible to store glyphs in a font without having a way to access them via ligatures, variants, etc, and thus only access than by glyph ID. That would be the general answer, but I don't know if fontspec gives that level of access.
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 18:42
1
@guifa you can dochar 983627
(with luatex, xelatex would need some other number) you can also access by glyphname.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 19:02
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467667%2fhow-can-i-select-one-no-unicode-symbol-from-one-font%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The glyphs can be accessed through a ligature with the macron accent (U+0304):
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
setmainfont{Asea.ttf}[Script=Greek]
begin{document}
ᾱ^^^^0304 ά^^^^0304 ὰ^^^^0304 ἀ^^^^0304 ἁ^^^^0304 ἄ^^^^0304 ἂ^^^^0304
ἅ^^^^0304 ἃ^^^^0304
end{document}
While that works for this particular font, what if there were no ligature combination to access it? (unlikely but, that would make the answer a lot more general, if it's possible)
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 17:43
@guifa there is no general answer. It depends on the font how glyph can be accessed - sometimes such glyphs are stylistic variants, here they are used in ligatures.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 17:46
It's also possible to store glyphs in a font without having a way to access them via ligatures, variants, etc, and thus only access than by glyph ID. That would be the general answer, but I don't know if fontspec gives that level of access.
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 18:42
1
@guifa you can dochar 983627
(with luatex, xelatex would need some other number) you can also access by glyphname.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 19:02
add a comment |
The glyphs can be accessed through a ligature with the macron accent (U+0304):
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
setmainfont{Asea.ttf}[Script=Greek]
begin{document}
ᾱ^^^^0304 ά^^^^0304 ὰ^^^^0304 ἀ^^^^0304 ἁ^^^^0304 ἄ^^^^0304 ἂ^^^^0304
ἅ^^^^0304 ἃ^^^^0304
end{document}
While that works for this particular font, what if there were no ligature combination to access it? (unlikely but, that would make the answer a lot more general, if it's possible)
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 17:43
@guifa there is no general answer. It depends on the font how glyph can be accessed - sometimes such glyphs are stylistic variants, here they are used in ligatures.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 17:46
It's also possible to store glyphs in a font without having a way to access them via ligatures, variants, etc, and thus only access than by glyph ID. That would be the general answer, but I don't know if fontspec gives that level of access.
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 18:42
1
@guifa you can dochar 983627
(with luatex, xelatex would need some other number) you can also access by glyphname.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 19:02
add a comment |
The glyphs can be accessed through a ligature with the macron accent (U+0304):
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
setmainfont{Asea.ttf}[Script=Greek]
begin{document}
ᾱ^^^^0304 ά^^^^0304 ὰ^^^^0304 ἀ^^^^0304 ἁ^^^^0304 ἄ^^^^0304 ἂ^^^^0304
ἅ^^^^0304 ἃ^^^^0304
end{document}
The glyphs can be accessed through a ligature with the macron accent (U+0304):
documentclass{article}
usepackage{fontspec}
setmainfont{Asea.ttf}[Script=Greek]
begin{document}
ᾱ^^^^0304 ά^^^^0304 ὰ^^^^0304 ἀ^^^^0304 ἁ^^^^0304 ἄ^^^^0304 ἂ^^^^0304
ἅ^^^^0304 ἃ^^^^0304
end{document}
edited Dec 28 '18 at 15:36
answered Dec 28 '18 at 15:22
Ulrike FischerUlrike Fischer
196k8302689
196k8302689
While that works for this particular font, what if there were no ligature combination to access it? (unlikely but, that would make the answer a lot more general, if it's possible)
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 17:43
@guifa there is no general answer. It depends on the font how glyph can be accessed - sometimes such glyphs are stylistic variants, here they are used in ligatures.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 17:46
It's also possible to store glyphs in a font without having a way to access them via ligatures, variants, etc, and thus only access than by glyph ID. That would be the general answer, but I don't know if fontspec gives that level of access.
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 18:42
1
@guifa you can dochar 983627
(with luatex, xelatex would need some other number) you can also access by glyphname.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 19:02
add a comment |
While that works for this particular font, what if there were no ligature combination to access it? (unlikely but, that would make the answer a lot more general, if it's possible)
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 17:43
@guifa there is no general answer. It depends on the font how glyph can be accessed - sometimes such glyphs are stylistic variants, here they are used in ligatures.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 17:46
It's also possible to store glyphs in a font without having a way to access them via ligatures, variants, etc, and thus only access than by glyph ID. That would be the general answer, but I don't know if fontspec gives that level of access.
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 18:42
1
@guifa you can dochar 983627
(with luatex, xelatex would need some other number) you can also access by glyphname.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 19:02
While that works for this particular font, what if there were no ligature combination to access it? (unlikely but, that would make the answer a lot more general, if it's possible)
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 17:43
While that works for this particular font, what if there were no ligature combination to access it? (unlikely but, that would make the answer a lot more general, if it's possible)
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 17:43
@guifa there is no general answer. It depends on the font how glyph can be accessed - sometimes such glyphs are stylistic variants, here they are used in ligatures.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 17:46
@guifa there is no general answer. It depends on the font how glyph can be accessed - sometimes such glyphs are stylistic variants, here they are used in ligatures.
– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 17:46
It's also possible to store glyphs in a font without having a way to access them via ligatures, variants, etc, and thus only access than by glyph ID. That would be the general answer, but I don't know if fontspec gives that level of access.
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 18:42
It's also possible to store glyphs in a font without having a way to access them via ligatures, variants, etc, and thus only access than by glyph ID. That would be the general answer, but I don't know if fontspec gives that level of access.
– guifa
Dec 28 '18 at 18:42
1
1
@guifa you can do
char 983627
(with luatex, xelatex would need some other number) you can also access by glyphname.– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 19:02
@guifa you can do
char 983627
(with luatex, xelatex would need some other number) you can also access by glyphname.– Ulrike Fischer
Dec 28 '18 at 19:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467667%2fhow-can-i-select-one-no-unicode-symbol-from-one-font%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/questions/98188/… (although Ulrike Fischer came up with a great answer specific to your question, so it’s not really a duplicate).
– Davislor
Dec 28 '18 at 20:39
1
See also tex.stackexchange.com/q/420167.
– stone-zeng
Jan 1 at 15:22