Python solution to Advent of Code, day 3












3












$begingroup$


In an effort to stretch my programming muscles, I'm doing the Advent of Code 2018 in a language new to me: Python. Coming from a C# background, I'm probably making all kinds of mistakes or are unaware of some usefull things in Python. This is my solution to day 3, and I would like to get a review on my code. I'm interested in both better ways to solve the problem using Python's tools, but also anything that has to do with style (I tried applying PEP8 rules), readability, etc. Thanks!



The full challenge is here and a bit involved, I'll try to keep it a bit shorter here.




The challenge



The Elves managed to locate the chimney-squeeze prototype fabric for Santa's suit. Unfortunately, nobody can even agree on how to cut the fabric. The whole piece of fabric they're working on is a very large square - at least 1000 inches on each side.



Each Elf has made a claim about which area of fabric would be ideal for Santa's suit. All claims have an ID and consist of a single rectangle with edges parallel to the edges of the fabric. Each claim's rectangle is defined as follows:




  • The number of inches between the left edge of the fabric and the left edge of the rectangle.

  • The number of inches between the top edge of the fabric and the top edge of the rectangle.

  • The width of the rectangle in inches.

  • The height of the rectangle in inches.


A claim like #123 @ 3,2: 5x4 means that claim ID 123 specifies a rectangle 3 inches from the left edge, 2 inches from the top edge, 5 inches wide, and 4 inches tall. The problem is that many of the claims overlap, causing two or more claims to cover part of the same areas. For example, consider the following claims:



- #1 @ 1,3: 4x4
- #2 @ 3,1: 4x4
- #3 @ 5,5: 2x2


Visually, these claim the following areas:



........
...2222.
...2222.
.11XX22.
.11XX22.
.111133.
.111133.
........


The four square inches marked with X are claimed by both 1 and 2. (Claim 3, while adjacent to the others, does not overlap either of them.) If the Elves all proceed with their own plans, none of them will have enough fabric. How many square inches of fabric are within two or more claims?




This puzzle also comes with custom puzzle input. I can provide mine, but it's 1350 lines long. The example above provides the way the input is formatted.



Day3.py



class Claim(object):
id = None
x = None
y = None
width = None
height = None

def __init__(self, claim_id, x, y, width, height):
self.id = claim_id
self.x = x
self.y = y
self.width = width
self.height = height

def __repr__(self):
return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)


def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
""" Reads the specified file and returns it's lines an array
file_path: the path to the file
strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

Returns: An array of the lines in the file as string
"""
with open(file_path, "r") as f:
if strip_lines:
return [l.strip() for l in f.readlines()]

return [l for l in f.readlines()]


def parse_input(lines):
claims =
for line in lines:
parts = line.split(" ")

id = int(parts[0][1:])
x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

claims.append(Claim(id, x, y, width, height))

return claims


def generate_matrix(size):
return [[0]*size for _ in range(size)]


def print_matrix(matrix):
line = ""
for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
line = line + str(y) + ": "
for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
line = line + str(matrix[x][y])
print(line)
line = ""


if __name__ == '__main__':
content = read_file_lines("input.txt")
claims = parse_input(content)

matrix = generate_matrix(1000)
print_matrix(matrix)

for claim in claims:
x_indexes = range(claim.x, claim.x + claim.width)
y_indexes = range(claim.y, claim.y + claim.height)

for x in x_indexes:
for y in y_indexes:
matrix[x][y] = matrix[x][y] + 1

print_matrix(matrix)

inches_double_claimed = 0
for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
if matrix[x][y] >= 2:
inches_double_claimed += 1

print("Inches claimed by two or more claims:", inches_double_claimed)









share|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    In an effort to stretch my programming muscles, I'm doing the Advent of Code 2018 in a language new to me: Python. Coming from a C# background, I'm probably making all kinds of mistakes or are unaware of some usefull things in Python. This is my solution to day 3, and I would like to get a review on my code. I'm interested in both better ways to solve the problem using Python's tools, but also anything that has to do with style (I tried applying PEP8 rules), readability, etc. Thanks!



    The full challenge is here and a bit involved, I'll try to keep it a bit shorter here.




    The challenge



    The Elves managed to locate the chimney-squeeze prototype fabric for Santa's suit. Unfortunately, nobody can even agree on how to cut the fabric. The whole piece of fabric they're working on is a very large square - at least 1000 inches on each side.



    Each Elf has made a claim about which area of fabric would be ideal for Santa's suit. All claims have an ID and consist of a single rectangle with edges parallel to the edges of the fabric. Each claim's rectangle is defined as follows:




    • The number of inches between the left edge of the fabric and the left edge of the rectangle.

    • The number of inches between the top edge of the fabric and the top edge of the rectangle.

    • The width of the rectangle in inches.

    • The height of the rectangle in inches.


    A claim like #123 @ 3,2: 5x4 means that claim ID 123 specifies a rectangle 3 inches from the left edge, 2 inches from the top edge, 5 inches wide, and 4 inches tall. The problem is that many of the claims overlap, causing two or more claims to cover part of the same areas. For example, consider the following claims:



    - #1 @ 1,3: 4x4
    - #2 @ 3,1: 4x4
    - #3 @ 5,5: 2x2


    Visually, these claim the following areas:



    ........
    ...2222.
    ...2222.
    .11XX22.
    .11XX22.
    .111133.
    .111133.
    ........


    The four square inches marked with X are claimed by both 1 and 2. (Claim 3, while adjacent to the others, does not overlap either of them.) If the Elves all proceed with their own plans, none of them will have enough fabric. How many square inches of fabric are within two or more claims?




    This puzzle also comes with custom puzzle input. I can provide mine, but it's 1350 lines long. The example above provides the way the input is formatted.



    Day3.py



    class Claim(object):
    id = None
    x = None
    y = None
    width = None
    height = None

    def __init__(self, claim_id, x, y, width, height):
    self.id = claim_id
    self.x = x
    self.y = y
    self.width = width
    self.height = height

    def __repr__(self):
    return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)


    def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
    """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines an array
    file_path: the path to the file
    strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

    Returns: An array of the lines in the file as string
    """
    with open(file_path, "r") as f:
    if strip_lines:
    return [l.strip() for l in f.readlines()]

    return [l for l in f.readlines()]


    def parse_input(lines):
    claims =
    for line in lines:
    parts = line.split(" ")

    id = int(parts[0][1:])
    x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
    y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
    width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
    height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

    claims.append(Claim(id, x, y, width, height))

    return claims


    def generate_matrix(size):
    return [[0]*size for _ in range(size)]


    def print_matrix(matrix):
    line = ""
    for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
    line = line + str(y) + ": "
    for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
    line = line + str(matrix[x][y])
    print(line)
    line = ""


    if __name__ == '__main__':
    content = read_file_lines("input.txt")
    claims = parse_input(content)

    matrix = generate_matrix(1000)
    print_matrix(matrix)

    for claim in claims:
    x_indexes = range(claim.x, claim.x + claim.width)
    y_indexes = range(claim.y, claim.y + claim.height)

    for x in x_indexes:
    for y in y_indexes:
    matrix[x][y] = matrix[x][y] + 1

    print_matrix(matrix)

    inches_double_claimed = 0
    for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
    for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
    if matrix[x][y] >= 2:
    inches_double_claimed += 1

    print("Inches claimed by two or more claims:", inches_double_claimed)









    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      In an effort to stretch my programming muscles, I'm doing the Advent of Code 2018 in a language new to me: Python. Coming from a C# background, I'm probably making all kinds of mistakes or are unaware of some usefull things in Python. This is my solution to day 3, and I would like to get a review on my code. I'm interested in both better ways to solve the problem using Python's tools, but also anything that has to do with style (I tried applying PEP8 rules), readability, etc. Thanks!



      The full challenge is here and a bit involved, I'll try to keep it a bit shorter here.




      The challenge



      The Elves managed to locate the chimney-squeeze prototype fabric for Santa's suit. Unfortunately, nobody can even agree on how to cut the fabric. The whole piece of fabric they're working on is a very large square - at least 1000 inches on each side.



      Each Elf has made a claim about which area of fabric would be ideal for Santa's suit. All claims have an ID and consist of a single rectangle with edges parallel to the edges of the fabric. Each claim's rectangle is defined as follows:




      • The number of inches between the left edge of the fabric and the left edge of the rectangle.

      • The number of inches between the top edge of the fabric and the top edge of the rectangle.

      • The width of the rectangle in inches.

      • The height of the rectangle in inches.


      A claim like #123 @ 3,2: 5x4 means that claim ID 123 specifies a rectangle 3 inches from the left edge, 2 inches from the top edge, 5 inches wide, and 4 inches tall. The problem is that many of the claims overlap, causing two or more claims to cover part of the same areas. For example, consider the following claims:



      - #1 @ 1,3: 4x4
      - #2 @ 3,1: 4x4
      - #3 @ 5,5: 2x2


      Visually, these claim the following areas:



      ........
      ...2222.
      ...2222.
      .11XX22.
      .11XX22.
      .111133.
      .111133.
      ........


      The four square inches marked with X are claimed by both 1 and 2. (Claim 3, while adjacent to the others, does not overlap either of them.) If the Elves all proceed with their own plans, none of them will have enough fabric. How many square inches of fabric are within two or more claims?




      This puzzle also comes with custom puzzle input. I can provide mine, but it's 1350 lines long. The example above provides the way the input is formatted.



      Day3.py



      class Claim(object):
      id = None
      x = None
      y = None
      width = None
      height = None

      def __init__(self, claim_id, x, y, width, height):
      self.id = claim_id
      self.x = x
      self.y = y
      self.width = width
      self.height = height

      def __repr__(self):
      return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)


      def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
      """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines an array
      file_path: the path to the file
      strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

      Returns: An array of the lines in the file as string
      """
      with open(file_path, "r") as f:
      if strip_lines:
      return [l.strip() for l in f.readlines()]

      return [l for l in f.readlines()]


      def parse_input(lines):
      claims =
      for line in lines:
      parts = line.split(" ")

      id = int(parts[0][1:])
      x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
      y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
      width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
      height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

      claims.append(Claim(id, x, y, width, height))

      return claims


      def generate_matrix(size):
      return [[0]*size for _ in range(size)]


      def print_matrix(matrix):
      line = ""
      for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
      line = line + str(y) + ": "
      for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
      line = line + str(matrix[x][y])
      print(line)
      line = ""


      if __name__ == '__main__':
      content = read_file_lines("input.txt")
      claims = parse_input(content)

      matrix = generate_matrix(1000)
      print_matrix(matrix)

      for claim in claims:
      x_indexes = range(claim.x, claim.x + claim.width)
      y_indexes = range(claim.y, claim.y + claim.height)

      for x in x_indexes:
      for y in y_indexes:
      matrix[x][y] = matrix[x][y] + 1

      print_matrix(matrix)

      inches_double_claimed = 0
      for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
      for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
      if matrix[x][y] >= 2:
      inches_double_claimed += 1

      print("Inches claimed by two or more claims:", inches_double_claimed)









      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In an effort to stretch my programming muscles, I'm doing the Advent of Code 2018 in a language new to me: Python. Coming from a C# background, I'm probably making all kinds of mistakes or are unaware of some usefull things in Python. This is my solution to day 3, and I would like to get a review on my code. I'm interested in both better ways to solve the problem using Python's tools, but also anything that has to do with style (I tried applying PEP8 rules), readability, etc. Thanks!



      The full challenge is here and a bit involved, I'll try to keep it a bit shorter here.




      The challenge



      The Elves managed to locate the chimney-squeeze prototype fabric for Santa's suit. Unfortunately, nobody can even agree on how to cut the fabric. The whole piece of fabric they're working on is a very large square - at least 1000 inches on each side.



      Each Elf has made a claim about which area of fabric would be ideal for Santa's suit. All claims have an ID and consist of a single rectangle with edges parallel to the edges of the fabric. Each claim's rectangle is defined as follows:




      • The number of inches between the left edge of the fabric and the left edge of the rectangle.

      • The number of inches between the top edge of the fabric and the top edge of the rectangle.

      • The width of the rectangle in inches.

      • The height of the rectangle in inches.


      A claim like #123 @ 3,2: 5x4 means that claim ID 123 specifies a rectangle 3 inches from the left edge, 2 inches from the top edge, 5 inches wide, and 4 inches tall. The problem is that many of the claims overlap, causing two or more claims to cover part of the same areas. For example, consider the following claims:



      - #1 @ 1,3: 4x4
      - #2 @ 3,1: 4x4
      - #3 @ 5,5: 2x2


      Visually, these claim the following areas:



      ........
      ...2222.
      ...2222.
      .11XX22.
      .11XX22.
      .111133.
      .111133.
      ........


      The four square inches marked with X are claimed by both 1 and 2. (Claim 3, while adjacent to the others, does not overlap either of them.) If the Elves all proceed with their own plans, none of them will have enough fabric. How many square inches of fabric are within two or more claims?




      This puzzle also comes with custom puzzle input. I can provide mine, but it's 1350 lines long. The example above provides the way the input is formatted.



      Day3.py



      class Claim(object):
      id = None
      x = None
      y = None
      width = None
      height = None

      def __init__(self, claim_id, x, y, width, height):
      self.id = claim_id
      self.x = x
      self.y = y
      self.width = width
      self.height = height

      def __repr__(self):
      return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)


      def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
      """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines an array
      file_path: the path to the file
      strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

      Returns: An array of the lines in the file as string
      """
      with open(file_path, "r") as f:
      if strip_lines:
      return [l.strip() for l in f.readlines()]

      return [l for l in f.readlines()]


      def parse_input(lines):
      claims =
      for line in lines:
      parts = line.split(" ")

      id = int(parts[0][1:])
      x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
      y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
      width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
      height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

      claims.append(Claim(id, x, y, width, height))

      return claims


      def generate_matrix(size):
      return [[0]*size for _ in range(size)]


      def print_matrix(matrix):
      line = ""
      for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
      line = line + str(y) + ": "
      for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
      line = line + str(matrix[x][y])
      print(line)
      line = ""


      if __name__ == '__main__':
      content = read_file_lines("input.txt")
      claims = parse_input(content)

      matrix = generate_matrix(1000)
      print_matrix(matrix)

      for claim in claims:
      x_indexes = range(claim.x, claim.x + claim.width)
      y_indexes = range(claim.y, claim.y + claim.height)

      for x in x_indexes:
      for y in y_indexes:
      matrix[x][y] = matrix[x][y] + 1

      print_matrix(matrix)

      inches_double_claimed = 0
      for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
      for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
      if matrix[x][y] >= 2:
      inches_double_claimed += 1

      print("Inches claimed by two or more claims:", inches_double_claimed)






      python python-3.x






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 30 '18 at 0:03









      Jamal

      30.4k11121227




      30.4k11121227










      asked Dec 28 '18 at 8:35









      Céryl WiltinkCéryl Wiltink

      1183




      1183






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          This is rather good Python, pleasant to read and using good practices already. I'll just focus on making it more Pythonic.






              def __repr__(self):
          return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)



          This should be __str__, as it is meant for "fancy" formatting like this. Ideally, __repr__ should be build such as eval(repr(x)) will reconstruct x.




          class Claim(object):
          id = None
          x = None
          y = None
          width = None
          height = None

          def __init__(self, claim_id, x, y, width, height):
          self.id = claim_id
          self.x = x
          self.y = y
          self.width = width
          self.height = height

          def __repr__(self):
          return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)



          This whole class could be replaced by a namedtuple. Considering the previous remark, I’d write:



          from collections import namedtuple


          class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', 'id x y width height')):
          def __str__(self):
          return "<Claim #{} - {}, {} - {}x{}>".format(self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)


          Note that I replaced old-school % formating with the prefered str.format method. Note that there is also f-strings available if you are using Python 3.6+.



          Also note that in your original class you defined class variables that were overriden in the constructor. Don't. There is no gain in doing so as these class variables will never be used anyway.






          def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
          """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines an array
          file_path: the path to the file
          strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

          Returns: An array of the lines in the file as string
          """
          with open(file_path, "r") as f:
          if strip_lines:
          return [l.strip() for l in f.readlines()]

          return [l for l in f.readlines()]



          You don't need to read the whole file in memory at once and then create an array of the same content again. Instead, I’d suggest using a generator since you are transforming the output of this function anyway, so rather keep it nice with the memory:



          def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
          """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines
          file_path: the path to the file
          strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

          Generates the lines in the file as string
          """
          with open(file_path, "r") as f:
          for line in f:
          if strip_lines:
          yield line.strip()
          else:
          yield line





          def parse_input(lines):
          claims =
          for line in lines:
          parts = line.split(" ")

          id = int(parts[0][1:])
          x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
          y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
          width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
          height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

          claims.append(Claim(id, x, y, width, height))

          return claims



          You used list-comprehensions in other places so you know how to use them. You should try to extract the parsing logic out of the loop so you can use them here too. I’d write this function as:



          def parse_input(lines):
          return [Claim.from_input(line) for line in lines]


          and rework the Claim class into:



          class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', 'id x y width height')):
          def __str__(self):
          return "<Claim #{} - {}, {} - {}x{}>".format(self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)

          @classmethod
          def from_input(cls, line):
          parts = line.split(" ")

          id = int(parts[0][1:])
          x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
          y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
          width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
          height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

          return cls(id, x, y, width, height)


          In fact, I'd probably merge the two previous functions into a single one, but there is no harm in keeping both:



          def parse_input(filename):
          with open(filename) as f:
          return [Claim.from_input(line.strip()) for line in f]





          def generate_matrix(size):
          return [[0]*size for _ in range(size)]



          Nothing to say here, you didn't fall in the trap of writting [[0] * size] * size.






          def print_matrix(matrix):
          line = ""
          for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
          line = line + str(y) + ": "
          for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
          line = line + str(matrix[x][y])
          print(line)
          line = ""



          Time to learn to use str.join:



          def print_matrix(matrix):
          string = 'n'.join(
          'line {}: {}'.format(i, ''.join(map(str, line)))
          for i, line in enumerate(matrix))
          print(string)





          if __name__ == '__main__':
          content = read_file_lines("input.txt")
          claims = parse_input(content)

          matrix = generate_matrix(1000)
          print_matrix(matrix)

          for claim in claims:
          x_indexes = range(claim.x, claim.x + claim.width)
          y_indexes = range(claim.y, claim.y + claim.height)

          for x in x_indexes:
          for y in y_indexes:
          matrix[x][y] = matrix[x][y] + 1

          print_matrix(matrix)

          inches_double_claimed = 0
          for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
          for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
          if matrix[x][y] >= 2:
          inches_double_claimed += 1

          print("Inches claimed by two or more claims:", inches_double_claimed)



          As you made in the print_matrix function, you are iterating over indices to access content of the matrix. Instead, you should iterate over the content directly if you need it:



          for line in matrix:
          for claims in line:
          if claims > 1:
          inches_double_claimed += 1


          And, in fact, these loops could be written in a single generator expression fed to sum:



          inches_double_claimed = sum(claims > 1 for line in matrix for claims in line)


          I would also advice you to wrap this code in a main function parametrized by the file name to read.





          There is still room for improvement: maybe defining a Matrix class to abstract your functions manipulating it, using re to simplify input parsing, using a defaultdict(defaultdict(int)) to support arbitrary sizes of fabric (and avoid wasting memory on small problems); but it is still fine as it is.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks so much! Very comprehensable and a lot of things to absorb!
            $endgroup$
            – Céryl Wiltink
            Dec 31 '18 at 8:01



















          2












          $begingroup$

          I wrote about Pythonic constructs in an other answer, so I'll focus in introducing helpful modules in this one. All in all, I'd say that converting the input to Claim objects is wasting resources and you should focus on your intermediate matrix representation instead. Or maybe as intermediate representation for documentation purposes, but you don't need to store them all at once in memory.



          As such, I would only use the re module to parse a line and immediately store it into the matrix.



          Such matrix should not be pre-allocated and allowed to be arbitrarily large if need be. For such cases, the collections module features two helpful classes: defaultdict and Counter.



          Lastly, the fileinput module make it easy to use a/several file names on the command line or standard input.



          My take on this would be:



          import re
          import fileinput
          from collections import namedtuple, defaultdict, Counter


          INPUT_PATTERN = re.compile(r'#d+ @ (d+),(d+): (d+)x(d+)')


          class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', ['x', 'y', 'width', 'height'])):
          @property
          def horizontal(self):
          return range(self.x, self.x + self.width)

          @property
          def vertical(self):
          return range(self.y, self.y + self.height)


          def parse_input(stream):
          for line in stream:
          match = INPUT_PATTERN.match(line)
          if match:
          yield Claim(*map(int, match.groups()))


          def claim_fabric(claims):
          fabric = defaultdict(Counter)
          for claim in claims:
          for line in claim.horizontal:
          fabric[line].update(claim.vertical)
          return fabric


          def count_overlaping_claims(fabric):
          return sum(
          claims > 1
          for line in fabric.values()
          for claims in line.values())


          if __name__ == '__main__':
          fabric = claim_fabric(parse_input(fileinput.input()))
          print(count_overlaping_claims(fabric))





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I'm used to C# so Objects are my knee-jerk reaction to anything. I see a lot of cool new stuff in here for me to research. I'll approve the other answer because of the completeness, but at the very least: Have an upvote!
            $endgroup$
            – Céryl Wiltink
            Dec 31 '18 at 8:00



















          0












          $begingroup$

          Another python feature crying to be used is scatter/gather assignments. You can replace:



              parts = line.split(" ")

          id = int(parts[0][1:])
          x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
          y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
          width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
          height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])


          with the at least slightly more readable:



              line = line[1:].replace(':','') # nuke extra punctuation
          id, _, xy, size = line.split(" ")
          id = int(id)
          x, y = [int(i) for i in xy.split(',')]
          width, height = [int(i) for i in size.split('x')]


          The first and second lines can of course be combined if you're going for more brevity, but I thought breaking the cleanup away from the breakup clarified it a little.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "196"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210470%2fpython-solution-to-advent-of-code-day-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            This is rather good Python, pleasant to read and using good practices already. I'll just focus on making it more Pythonic.






                def __repr__(self):
            return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)



            This should be __str__, as it is meant for "fancy" formatting like this. Ideally, __repr__ should be build such as eval(repr(x)) will reconstruct x.




            class Claim(object):
            id = None
            x = None
            y = None
            width = None
            height = None

            def __init__(self, claim_id, x, y, width, height):
            self.id = claim_id
            self.x = x
            self.y = y
            self.width = width
            self.height = height

            def __repr__(self):
            return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)



            This whole class could be replaced by a namedtuple. Considering the previous remark, I’d write:



            from collections import namedtuple


            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', 'id x y width height')):
            def __str__(self):
            return "<Claim #{} - {}, {} - {}x{}>".format(self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)


            Note that I replaced old-school % formating with the prefered str.format method. Note that there is also f-strings available if you are using Python 3.6+.



            Also note that in your original class you defined class variables that were overriden in the constructor. Don't. There is no gain in doing so as these class variables will never be used anyway.






            def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
            """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines an array
            file_path: the path to the file
            strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

            Returns: An array of the lines in the file as string
            """
            with open(file_path, "r") as f:
            if strip_lines:
            return [l.strip() for l in f.readlines()]

            return [l for l in f.readlines()]



            You don't need to read the whole file in memory at once and then create an array of the same content again. Instead, I’d suggest using a generator since you are transforming the output of this function anyway, so rather keep it nice with the memory:



            def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
            """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines
            file_path: the path to the file
            strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

            Generates the lines in the file as string
            """
            with open(file_path, "r") as f:
            for line in f:
            if strip_lines:
            yield line.strip()
            else:
            yield line





            def parse_input(lines):
            claims =
            for line in lines:
            parts = line.split(" ")

            id = int(parts[0][1:])
            x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
            y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
            width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
            height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

            claims.append(Claim(id, x, y, width, height))

            return claims



            You used list-comprehensions in other places so you know how to use them. You should try to extract the parsing logic out of the loop so you can use them here too. I’d write this function as:



            def parse_input(lines):
            return [Claim.from_input(line) for line in lines]


            and rework the Claim class into:



            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', 'id x y width height')):
            def __str__(self):
            return "<Claim #{} - {}, {} - {}x{}>".format(self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)

            @classmethod
            def from_input(cls, line):
            parts = line.split(" ")

            id = int(parts[0][1:])
            x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
            y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
            width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
            height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

            return cls(id, x, y, width, height)


            In fact, I'd probably merge the two previous functions into a single one, but there is no harm in keeping both:



            def parse_input(filename):
            with open(filename) as f:
            return [Claim.from_input(line.strip()) for line in f]





            def generate_matrix(size):
            return [[0]*size for _ in range(size)]



            Nothing to say here, you didn't fall in the trap of writting [[0] * size] * size.






            def print_matrix(matrix):
            line = ""
            for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            line = line + str(y) + ": "
            for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            line = line + str(matrix[x][y])
            print(line)
            line = ""



            Time to learn to use str.join:



            def print_matrix(matrix):
            string = 'n'.join(
            'line {}: {}'.format(i, ''.join(map(str, line)))
            for i, line in enumerate(matrix))
            print(string)





            if __name__ == '__main__':
            content = read_file_lines("input.txt")
            claims = parse_input(content)

            matrix = generate_matrix(1000)
            print_matrix(matrix)

            for claim in claims:
            x_indexes = range(claim.x, claim.x + claim.width)
            y_indexes = range(claim.y, claim.y + claim.height)

            for x in x_indexes:
            for y in y_indexes:
            matrix[x][y] = matrix[x][y] + 1

            print_matrix(matrix)

            inches_double_claimed = 0
            for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            if matrix[x][y] >= 2:
            inches_double_claimed += 1

            print("Inches claimed by two or more claims:", inches_double_claimed)



            As you made in the print_matrix function, you are iterating over indices to access content of the matrix. Instead, you should iterate over the content directly if you need it:



            for line in matrix:
            for claims in line:
            if claims > 1:
            inches_double_claimed += 1


            And, in fact, these loops could be written in a single generator expression fed to sum:



            inches_double_claimed = sum(claims > 1 for line in matrix for claims in line)


            I would also advice you to wrap this code in a main function parametrized by the file name to read.





            There is still room for improvement: maybe defining a Matrix class to abstract your functions manipulating it, using re to simplify input parsing, using a defaultdict(defaultdict(int)) to support arbitrary sizes of fabric (and avoid wasting memory on small problems); but it is still fine as it is.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks so much! Very comprehensable and a lot of things to absorb!
              $endgroup$
              – Céryl Wiltink
              Dec 31 '18 at 8:01
















            4












            $begingroup$

            This is rather good Python, pleasant to read and using good practices already. I'll just focus on making it more Pythonic.






                def __repr__(self):
            return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)



            This should be __str__, as it is meant for "fancy" formatting like this. Ideally, __repr__ should be build such as eval(repr(x)) will reconstruct x.




            class Claim(object):
            id = None
            x = None
            y = None
            width = None
            height = None

            def __init__(self, claim_id, x, y, width, height):
            self.id = claim_id
            self.x = x
            self.y = y
            self.width = width
            self.height = height

            def __repr__(self):
            return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)



            This whole class could be replaced by a namedtuple. Considering the previous remark, I’d write:



            from collections import namedtuple


            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', 'id x y width height')):
            def __str__(self):
            return "<Claim #{} - {}, {} - {}x{}>".format(self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)


            Note that I replaced old-school % formating with the prefered str.format method. Note that there is also f-strings available if you are using Python 3.6+.



            Also note that in your original class you defined class variables that were overriden in the constructor. Don't. There is no gain in doing so as these class variables will never be used anyway.






            def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
            """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines an array
            file_path: the path to the file
            strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

            Returns: An array of the lines in the file as string
            """
            with open(file_path, "r") as f:
            if strip_lines:
            return [l.strip() for l in f.readlines()]

            return [l for l in f.readlines()]



            You don't need to read the whole file in memory at once and then create an array of the same content again. Instead, I’d suggest using a generator since you are transforming the output of this function anyway, so rather keep it nice with the memory:



            def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
            """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines
            file_path: the path to the file
            strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

            Generates the lines in the file as string
            """
            with open(file_path, "r") as f:
            for line in f:
            if strip_lines:
            yield line.strip()
            else:
            yield line





            def parse_input(lines):
            claims =
            for line in lines:
            parts = line.split(" ")

            id = int(parts[0][1:])
            x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
            y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
            width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
            height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

            claims.append(Claim(id, x, y, width, height))

            return claims



            You used list-comprehensions in other places so you know how to use them. You should try to extract the parsing logic out of the loop so you can use them here too. I’d write this function as:



            def parse_input(lines):
            return [Claim.from_input(line) for line in lines]


            and rework the Claim class into:



            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', 'id x y width height')):
            def __str__(self):
            return "<Claim #{} - {}, {} - {}x{}>".format(self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)

            @classmethod
            def from_input(cls, line):
            parts = line.split(" ")

            id = int(parts[0][1:])
            x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
            y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
            width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
            height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

            return cls(id, x, y, width, height)


            In fact, I'd probably merge the two previous functions into a single one, but there is no harm in keeping both:



            def parse_input(filename):
            with open(filename) as f:
            return [Claim.from_input(line.strip()) for line in f]





            def generate_matrix(size):
            return [[0]*size for _ in range(size)]



            Nothing to say here, you didn't fall in the trap of writting [[0] * size] * size.






            def print_matrix(matrix):
            line = ""
            for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            line = line + str(y) + ": "
            for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            line = line + str(matrix[x][y])
            print(line)
            line = ""



            Time to learn to use str.join:



            def print_matrix(matrix):
            string = 'n'.join(
            'line {}: {}'.format(i, ''.join(map(str, line)))
            for i, line in enumerate(matrix))
            print(string)





            if __name__ == '__main__':
            content = read_file_lines("input.txt")
            claims = parse_input(content)

            matrix = generate_matrix(1000)
            print_matrix(matrix)

            for claim in claims:
            x_indexes = range(claim.x, claim.x + claim.width)
            y_indexes = range(claim.y, claim.y + claim.height)

            for x in x_indexes:
            for y in y_indexes:
            matrix[x][y] = matrix[x][y] + 1

            print_matrix(matrix)

            inches_double_claimed = 0
            for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            if matrix[x][y] >= 2:
            inches_double_claimed += 1

            print("Inches claimed by two or more claims:", inches_double_claimed)



            As you made in the print_matrix function, you are iterating over indices to access content of the matrix. Instead, you should iterate over the content directly if you need it:



            for line in matrix:
            for claims in line:
            if claims > 1:
            inches_double_claimed += 1


            And, in fact, these loops could be written in a single generator expression fed to sum:



            inches_double_claimed = sum(claims > 1 for line in matrix for claims in line)


            I would also advice you to wrap this code in a main function parametrized by the file name to read.





            There is still room for improvement: maybe defining a Matrix class to abstract your functions manipulating it, using re to simplify input parsing, using a defaultdict(defaultdict(int)) to support arbitrary sizes of fabric (and avoid wasting memory on small problems); but it is still fine as it is.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks so much! Very comprehensable and a lot of things to absorb!
              $endgroup$
              – Céryl Wiltink
              Dec 31 '18 at 8:01














            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            This is rather good Python, pleasant to read and using good practices already. I'll just focus on making it more Pythonic.






                def __repr__(self):
            return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)



            This should be __str__, as it is meant for "fancy" formatting like this. Ideally, __repr__ should be build such as eval(repr(x)) will reconstruct x.




            class Claim(object):
            id = None
            x = None
            y = None
            width = None
            height = None

            def __init__(self, claim_id, x, y, width, height):
            self.id = claim_id
            self.x = x
            self.y = y
            self.width = width
            self.height = height

            def __repr__(self):
            return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)



            This whole class could be replaced by a namedtuple. Considering the previous remark, I’d write:



            from collections import namedtuple


            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', 'id x y width height')):
            def __str__(self):
            return "<Claim #{} - {}, {} - {}x{}>".format(self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)


            Note that I replaced old-school % formating with the prefered str.format method. Note that there is also f-strings available if you are using Python 3.6+.



            Also note that in your original class you defined class variables that were overriden in the constructor. Don't. There is no gain in doing so as these class variables will never be used anyway.






            def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
            """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines an array
            file_path: the path to the file
            strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

            Returns: An array of the lines in the file as string
            """
            with open(file_path, "r") as f:
            if strip_lines:
            return [l.strip() for l in f.readlines()]

            return [l for l in f.readlines()]



            You don't need to read the whole file in memory at once and then create an array of the same content again. Instead, I’d suggest using a generator since you are transforming the output of this function anyway, so rather keep it nice with the memory:



            def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
            """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines
            file_path: the path to the file
            strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

            Generates the lines in the file as string
            """
            with open(file_path, "r") as f:
            for line in f:
            if strip_lines:
            yield line.strip()
            else:
            yield line





            def parse_input(lines):
            claims =
            for line in lines:
            parts = line.split(" ")

            id = int(parts[0][1:])
            x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
            y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
            width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
            height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

            claims.append(Claim(id, x, y, width, height))

            return claims



            You used list-comprehensions in other places so you know how to use them. You should try to extract the parsing logic out of the loop so you can use them here too. I’d write this function as:



            def parse_input(lines):
            return [Claim.from_input(line) for line in lines]


            and rework the Claim class into:



            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', 'id x y width height')):
            def __str__(self):
            return "<Claim #{} - {}, {} - {}x{}>".format(self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)

            @classmethod
            def from_input(cls, line):
            parts = line.split(" ")

            id = int(parts[0][1:])
            x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
            y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
            width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
            height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

            return cls(id, x, y, width, height)


            In fact, I'd probably merge the two previous functions into a single one, but there is no harm in keeping both:



            def parse_input(filename):
            with open(filename) as f:
            return [Claim.from_input(line.strip()) for line in f]





            def generate_matrix(size):
            return [[0]*size for _ in range(size)]



            Nothing to say here, you didn't fall in the trap of writting [[0] * size] * size.






            def print_matrix(matrix):
            line = ""
            for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            line = line + str(y) + ": "
            for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            line = line + str(matrix[x][y])
            print(line)
            line = ""



            Time to learn to use str.join:



            def print_matrix(matrix):
            string = 'n'.join(
            'line {}: {}'.format(i, ''.join(map(str, line)))
            for i, line in enumerate(matrix))
            print(string)





            if __name__ == '__main__':
            content = read_file_lines("input.txt")
            claims = parse_input(content)

            matrix = generate_matrix(1000)
            print_matrix(matrix)

            for claim in claims:
            x_indexes = range(claim.x, claim.x + claim.width)
            y_indexes = range(claim.y, claim.y + claim.height)

            for x in x_indexes:
            for y in y_indexes:
            matrix[x][y] = matrix[x][y] + 1

            print_matrix(matrix)

            inches_double_claimed = 0
            for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            if matrix[x][y] >= 2:
            inches_double_claimed += 1

            print("Inches claimed by two or more claims:", inches_double_claimed)



            As you made in the print_matrix function, you are iterating over indices to access content of the matrix. Instead, you should iterate over the content directly if you need it:



            for line in matrix:
            for claims in line:
            if claims > 1:
            inches_double_claimed += 1


            And, in fact, these loops could be written in a single generator expression fed to sum:



            inches_double_claimed = sum(claims > 1 for line in matrix for claims in line)


            I would also advice you to wrap this code in a main function parametrized by the file name to read.





            There is still room for improvement: maybe defining a Matrix class to abstract your functions manipulating it, using re to simplify input parsing, using a defaultdict(defaultdict(int)) to support arbitrary sizes of fabric (and avoid wasting memory on small problems); but it is still fine as it is.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            This is rather good Python, pleasant to read and using good practices already. I'll just focus on making it more Pythonic.






                def __repr__(self):
            return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)



            This should be __str__, as it is meant for "fancy" formatting like this. Ideally, __repr__ should be build such as eval(repr(x)) will reconstruct x.




            class Claim(object):
            id = None
            x = None
            y = None
            width = None
            height = None

            def __init__(self, claim_id, x, y, width, height):
            self.id = claim_id
            self.x = x
            self.y = y
            self.width = width
            self.height = height

            def __repr__(self):
            return "<Claim #%s - %s, %s - %sx%s>" % (self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)



            This whole class could be replaced by a namedtuple. Considering the previous remark, I’d write:



            from collections import namedtuple


            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', 'id x y width height')):
            def __str__(self):
            return "<Claim #{} - {}, {} - {}x{}>".format(self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)


            Note that I replaced old-school % formating with the prefered str.format method. Note that there is also f-strings available if you are using Python 3.6+.



            Also note that in your original class you defined class variables that were overriden in the constructor. Don't. There is no gain in doing so as these class variables will never be used anyway.






            def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
            """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines an array
            file_path: the path to the file
            strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

            Returns: An array of the lines in the file as string
            """
            with open(file_path, "r") as f:
            if strip_lines:
            return [l.strip() for l in f.readlines()]

            return [l for l in f.readlines()]



            You don't need to read the whole file in memory at once and then create an array of the same content again. Instead, I’d suggest using a generator since you are transforming the output of this function anyway, so rather keep it nice with the memory:



            def read_file_lines(file_path, strip_lines=True):
            """ Reads the specified file and returns it's lines
            file_path: the path to the file
            strip_lines (default: true): boolean to indicate whether or not to strip leading and trailing whitespace from each line

            Generates the lines in the file as string
            """
            with open(file_path, "r") as f:
            for line in f:
            if strip_lines:
            yield line.strip()
            else:
            yield line





            def parse_input(lines):
            claims =
            for line in lines:
            parts = line.split(" ")

            id = int(parts[0][1:])
            x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
            y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
            width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
            height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

            claims.append(Claim(id, x, y, width, height))

            return claims



            You used list-comprehensions in other places so you know how to use them. You should try to extract the parsing logic out of the loop so you can use them here too. I’d write this function as:



            def parse_input(lines):
            return [Claim.from_input(line) for line in lines]


            and rework the Claim class into:



            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', 'id x y width height')):
            def __str__(self):
            return "<Claim #{} - {}, {} - {}x{}>".format(self.id, self.x, self.y, self.width, self.height)

            @classmethod
            def from_input(cls, line):
            parts = line.split(" ")

            id = int(parts[0][1:])
            x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
            y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
            width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
            height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])

            return cls(id, x, y, width, height)


            In fact, I'd probably merge the two previous functions into a single one, but there is no harm in keeping both:



            def parse_input(filename):
            with open(filename) as f:
            return [Claim.from_input(line.strip()) for line in f]





            def generate_matrix(size):
            return [[0]*size for _ in range(size)]



            Nothing to say here, you didn't fall in the trap of writting [[0] * size] * size.






            def print_matrix(matrix):
            line = ""
            for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            line = line + str(y) + ": "
            for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            line = line + str(matrix[x][y])
            print(line)
            line = ""



            Time to learn to use str.join:



            def print_matrix(matrix):
            string = 'n'.join(
            'line {}: {}'.format(i, ''.join(map(str, line)))
            for i, line in enumerate(matrix))
            print(string)





            if __name__ == '__main__':
            content = read_file_lines("input.txt")
            claims = parse_input(content)

            matrix = generate_matrix(1000)
            print_matrix(matrix)

            for claim in claims:
            x_indexes = range(claim.x, claim.x + claim.width)
            y_indexes = range(claim.y, claim.y + claim.height)

            for x in x_indexes:
            for y in y_indexes:
            matrix[x][y] = matrix[x][y] + 1

            print_matrix(matrix)

            inches_double_claimed = 0
            for x in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            for y in range(0, len(matrix[0])):
            if matrix[x][y] >= 2:
            inches_double_claimed += 1

            print("Inches claimed by two or more claims:", inches_double_claimed)



            As you made in the print_matrix function, you are iterating over indices to access content of the matrix. Instead, you should iterate over the content directly if you need it:



            for line in matrix:
            for claims in line:
            if claims > 1:
            inches_double_claimed += 1


            And, in fact, these loops could be written in a single generator expression fed to sum:



            inches_double_claimed = sum(claims > 1 for line in matrix for claims in line)


            I would also advice you to wrap this code in a main function parametrized by the file name to read.





            There is still room for improvement: maybe defining a Matrix class to abstract your functions manipulating it, using re to simplify input parsing, using a defaultdict(defaultdict(int)) to support arbitrary sizes of fabric (and avoid wasting memory on small problems); but it is still fine as it is.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Dec 28 '18 at 11:03

























            answered Dec 28 '18 at 9:42









            Mathias EttingerMathias Ettinger

            25.1k33185




            25.1k33185












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks so much! Very comprehensable and a lot of things to absorb!
              $endgroup$
              – Céryl Wiltink
              Dec 31 '18 at 8:01


















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks so much! Very comprehensable and a lot of things to absorb!
              $endgroup$
              – Céryl Wiltink
              Dec 31 '18 at 8:01
















            $begingroup$
            Thanks so much! Very comprehensable and a lot of things to absorb!
            $endgroup$
            – Céryl Wiltink
            Dec 31 '18 at 8:01




            $begingroup$
            Thanks so much! Very comprehensable and a lot of things to absorb!
            $endgroup$
            – Céryl Wiltink
            Dec 31 '18 at 8:01













            2












            $begingroup$

            I wrote about Pythonic constructs in an other answer, so I'll focus in introducing helpful modules in this one. All in all, I'd say that converting the input to Claim objects is wasting resources and you should focus on your intermediate matrix representation instead. Or maybe as intermediate representation for documentation purposes, but you don't need to store them all at once in memory.



            As such, I would only use the re module to parse a line and immediately store it into the matrix.



            Such matrix should not be pre-allocated and allowed to be arbitrarily large if need be. For such cases, the collections module features two helpful classes: defaultdict and Counter.



            Lastly, the fileinput module make it easy to use a/several file names on the command line or standard input.



            My take on this would be:



            import re
            import fileinput
            from collections import namedtuple, defaultdict, Counter


            INPUT_PATTERN = re.compile(r'#d+ @ (d+),(d+): (d+)x(d+)')


            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', ['x', 'y', 'width', 'height'])):
            @property
            def horizontal(self):
            return range(self.x, self.x + self.width)

            @property
            def vertical(self):
            return range(self.y, self.y + self.height)


            def parse_input(stream):
            for line in stream:
            match = INPUT_PATTERN.match(line)
            if match:
            yield Claim(*map(int, match.groups()))


            def claim_fabric(claims):
            fabric = defaultdict(Counter)
            for claim in claims:
            for line in claim.horizontal:
            fabric[line].update(claim.vertical)
            return fabric


            def count_overlaping_claims(fabric):
            return sum(
            claims > 1
            for line in fabric.values()
            for claims in line.values())


            if __name__ == '__main__':
            fabric = claim_fabric(parse_input(fileinput.input()))
            print(count_overlaping_claims(fabric))





            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! I'm used to C# so Objects are my knee-jerk reaction to anything. I see a lot of cool new stuff in here for me to research. I'll approve the other answer because of the completeness, but at the very least: Have an upvote!
              $endgroup$
              – Céryl Wiltink
              Dec 31 '18 at 8:00
















            2












            $begingroup$

            I wrote about Pythonic constructs in an other answer, so I'll focus in introducing helpful modules in this one. All in all, I'd say that converting the input to Claim objects is wasting resources and you should focus on your intermediate matrix representation instead. Or maybe as intermediate representation for documentation purposes, but you don't need to store them all at once in memory.



            As such, I would only use the re module to parse a line and immediately store it into the matrix.



            Such matrix should not be pre-allocated and allowed to be arbitrarily large if need be. For such cases, the collections module features two helpful classes: defaultdict and Counter.



            Lastly, the fileinput module make it easy to use a/several file names on the command line or standard input.



            My take on this would be:



            import re
            import fileinput
            from collections import namedtuple, defaultdict, Counter


            INPUT_PATTERN = re.compile(r'#d+ @ (d+),(d+): (d+)x(d+)')


            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', ['x', 'y', 'width', 'height'])):
            @property
            def horizontal(self):
            return range(self.x, self.x + self.width)

            @property
            def vertical(self):
            return range(self.y, self.y + self.height)


            def parse_input(stream):
            for line in stream:
            match = INPUT_PATTERN.match(line)
            if match:
            yield Claim(*map(int, match.groups()))


            def claim_fabric(claims):
            fabric = defaultdict(Counter)
            for claim in claims:
            for line in claim.horizontal:
            fabric[line].update(claim.vertical)
            return fabric


            def count_overlaping_claims(fabric):
            return sum(
            claims > 1
            for line in fabric.values()
            for claims in line.values())


            if __name__ == '__main__':
            fabric = claim_fabric(parse_input(fileinput.input()))
            print(count_overlaping_claims(fabric))





            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! I'm used to C# so Objects are my knee-jerk reaction to anything. I see a lot of cool new stuff in here for me to research. I'll approve the other answer because of the completeness, but at the very least: Have an upvote!
              $endgroup$
              – Céryl Wiltink
              Dec 31 '18 at 8:00














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            I wrote about Pythonic constructs in an other answer, so I'll focus in introducing helpful modules in this one. All in all, I'd say that converting the input to Claim objects is wasting resources and you should focus on your intermediate matrix representation instead. Or maybe as intermediate representation for documentation purposes, but you don't need to store them all at once in memory.



            As such, I would only use the re module to parse a line and immediately store it into the matrix.



            Such matrix should not be pre-allocated and allowed to be arbitrarily large if need be. For such cases, the collections module features two helpful classes: defaultdict and Counter.



            Lastly, the fileinput module make it easy to use a/several file names on the command line or standard input.



            My take on this would be:



            import re
            import fileinput
            from collections import namedtuple, defaultdict, Counter


            INPUT_PATTERN = re.compile(r'#d+ @ (d+),(d+): (d+)x(d+)')


            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', ['x', 'y', 'width', 'height'])):
            @property
            def horizontal(self):
            return range(self.x, self.x + self.width)

            @property
            def vertical(self):
            return range(self.y, self.y + self.height)


            def parse_input(stream):
            for line in stream:
            match = INPUT_PATTERN.match(line)
            if match:
            yield Claim(*map(int, match.groups()))


            def claim_fabric(claims):
            fabric = defaultdict(Counter)
            for claim in claims:
            for line in claim.horizontal:
            fabric[line].update(claim.vertical)
            return fabric


            def count_overlaping_claims(fabric):
            return sum(
            claims > 1
            for line in fabric.values()
            for claims in line.values())


            if __name__ == '__main__':
            fabric = claim_fabric(parse_input(fileinput.input()))
            print(count_overlaping_claims(fabric))





            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            I wrote about Pythonic constructs in an other answer, so I'll focus in introducing helpful modules in this one. All in all, I'd say that converting the input to Claim objects is wasting resources and you should focus on your intermediate matrix representation instead. Or maybe as intermediate representation for documentation purposes, but you don't need to store them all at once in memory.



            As such, I would only use the re module to parse a line and immediately store it into the matrix.



            Such matrix should not be pre-allocated and allowed to be arbitrarily large if need be. For such cases, the collections module features two helpful classes: defaultdict and Counter.



            Lastly, the fileinput module make it easy to use a/several file names on the command line or standard input.



            My take on this would be:



            import re
            import fileinput
            from collections import namedtuple, defaultdict, Counter


            INPUT_PATTERN = re.compile(r'#d+ @ (d+),(d+): (d+)x(d+)')


            class Claim(namedtuple('Claim', ['x', 'y', 'width', 'height'])):
            @property
            def horizontal(self):
            return range(self.x, self.x + self.width)

            @property
            def vertical(self):
            return range(self.y, self.y + self.height)


            def parse_input(stream):
            for line in stream:
            match = INPUT_PATTERN.match(line)
            if match:
            yield Claim(*map(int, match.groups()))


            def claim_fabric(claims):
            fabric = defaultdict(Counter)
            for claim in claims:
            for line in claim.horizontal:
            fabric[line].update(claim.vertical)
            return fabric


            def count_overlaping_claims(fabric):
            return sum(
            claims > 1
            for line in fabric.values()
            for claims in line.values())


            if __name__ == '__main__':
            fabric = claim_fabric(parse_input(fileinput.input()))
            print(count_overlaping_claims(fabric))






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Dec 30 '18 at 10:56

























            answered Dec 28 '18 at 11:35









            Mathias EttingerMathias Ettinger

            25.1k33185




            25.1k33185












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! I'm used to C# so Objects are my knee-jerk reaction to anything. I see a lot of cool new stuff in here for me to research. I'll approve the other answer because of the completeness, but at the very least: Have an upvote!
              $endgroup$
              – Céryl Wiltink
              Dec 31 '18 at 8:00


















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! I'm used to C# so Objects are my knee-jerk reaction to anything. I see a lot of cool new stuff in here for me to research. I'll approve the other answer because of the completeness, but at the very least: Have an upvote!
              $endgroup$
              – Céryl Wiltink
              Dec 31 '18 at 8:00
















            $begingroup$
            Thanks! I'm used to C# so Objects are my knee-jerk reaction to anything. I see a lot of cool new stuff in here for me to research. I'll approve the other answer because of the completeness, but at the very least: Have an upvote!
            $endgroup$
            – Céryl Wiltink
            Dec 31 '18 at 8:00




            $begingroup$
            Thanks! I'm used to C# so Objects are my knee-jerk reaction to anything. I see a lot of cool new stuff in here for me to research. I'll approve the other answer because of the completeness, but at the very least: Have an upvote!
            $endgroup$
            – Céryl Wiltink
            Dec 31 '18 at 8:00











            0












            $begingroup$

            Another python feature crying to be used is scatter/gather assignments. You can replace:



                parts = line.split(" ")

            id = int(parts[0][1:])
            x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
            y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
            width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
            height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])


            with the at least slightly more readable:



                line = line[1:].replace(':','') # nuke extra punctuation
            id, _, xy, size = line.split(" ")
            id = int(id)
            x, y = [int(i) for i in xy.split(',')]
            width, height = [int(i) for i in size.split('x')]


            The first and second lines can of course be combined if you're going for more brevity, but I thought breaking the cleanup away from the breakup clarified it a little.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Another python feature crying to be used is scatter/gather assignments. You can replace:



                  parts = line.split(" ")

              id = int(parts[0][1:])
              x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
              y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
              width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
              height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])


              with the at least slightly more readable:



                  line = line[1:].replace(':','') # nuke extra punctuation
              id, _, xy, size = line.split(" ")
              id = int(id)
              x, y = [int(i) for i in xy.split(',')]
              width, height = [int(i) for i in size.split('x')]


              The first and second lines can of course be combined if you're going for more brevity, but I thought breaking the cleanup away from the breakup clarified it a little.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Another python feature crying to be used is scatter/gather assignments. You can replace:



                    parts = line.split(" ")

                id = int(parts[0][1:])
                x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
                y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
                width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
                height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])


                with the at least slightly more readable:



                    line = line[1:].replace(':','') # nuke extra punctuation
                id, _, xy, size = line.split(" ")
                id = int(id)
                x, y = [int(i) for i in xy.split(',')]
                width, height = [int(i) for i in size.split('x')]


                The first and second lines can of course be combined if you're going for more brevity, but I thought breaking the cleanup away from the breakup clarified it a little.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Another python feature crying to be used is scatter/gather assignments. You can replace:



                    parts = line.split(" ")

                id = int(parts[0][1:])
                x = int(parts[2].split(",")[0])
                y = int(parts[2].split(",")[1][:-1])
                width = int(parts[3].split("x")[0])
                height = int(parts[3].split("x")[1])


                with the at least slightly more readable:



                    line = line[1:].replace(':','') # nuke extra punctuation
                id, _, xy, size = line.split(" ")
                id = int(id)
                x, y = [int(i) for i in xy.split(',')]
                width, height = [int(i) for i in size.split('x')]


                The first and second lines can of course be combined if you're going for more brevity, but I thought breaking the cleanup away from the breakup clarified it a little.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jan 4 at 5:13









                pjzpjz

                2,191815




                2,191815






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210470%2fpython-solution-to-advent-of-code-day-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen