Simple math for Amoeba's survival type problems
$begingroup$
Here's an example but it can be different too, like about people and their children, etc.
http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Probability/AmoebaSurvival.shtml
A population starts with a single amoeba. For this one and for the generations thereafter, there is a probability of 3/4 that an individual amoeba will split to create two amoebas, and a 1/4 probability that it will die out without producing offspring. What is the probability that the family tree of the original amoeba will go on forever?
The solution is stated but I can not make sense of it. I once found a site that explained it in very great detail, using a family tree, but unfortunately do not recall the address. My problem is I keep getting confused between the small $p$ and large $P$, the formula used makes no sense to me: "The probability that at least one of them will have an infinite family tree is $1 - (1 - P)^2$, because $(1 - P)^2$ is the probability that both of them will perish undivided. Therefore, $P = p(1 - (1 - P)^2)$."
My level of math is first year college (though that was long ago). So when I looked up similar problems, I got real complicated explanations, like with branching process and Markov chain and all that. I appreciate it if someone, perhaps with help of a picture or something, can explain this to me baby steps?
p.s. I hope the formula shows up okay, I don't know how to write math forumlae in text like fashion.
probability statistics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's an example but it can be different too, like about people and their children, etc.
http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Probability/AmoebaSurvival.shtml
A population starts with a single amoeba. For this one and for the generations thereafter, there is a probability of 3/4 that an individual amoeba will split to create two amoebas, and a 1/4 probability that it will die out without producing offspring. What is the probability that the family tree of the original amoeba will go on forever?
The solution is stated but I can not make sense of it. I once found a site that explained it in very great detail, using a family tree, but unfortunately do not recall the address. My problem is I keep getting confused between the small $p$ and large $P$, the formula used makes no sense to me: "The probability that at least one of them will have an infinite family tree is $1 - (1 - P)^2$, because $(1 - P)^2$ is the probability that both of them will perish undivided. Therefore, $P = p(1 - (1 - P)^2)$."
My level of math is first year college (though that was long ago). So when I looked up similar problems, I got real complicated explanations, like with branching process and Markov chain and all that. I appreciate it if someone, perhaps with help of a picture or something, can explain this to me baby steps?
p.s. I hope the formula shows up okay, I don't know how to write math forumlae in text like fashion.
probability statistics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's an example but it can be different too, like about people and their children, etc.
http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Probability/AmoebaSurvival.shtml
A population starts with a single amoeba. For this one and for the generations thereafter, there is a probability of 3/4 that an individual amoeba will split to create two amoebas, and a 1/4 probability that it will die out without producing offspring. What is the probability that the family tree of the original amoeba will go on forever?
The solution is stated but I can not make sense of it. I once found a site that explained it in very great detail, using a family tree, but unfortunately do not recall the address. My problem is I keep getting confused between the small $p$ and large $P$, the formula used makes no sense to me: "The probability that at least one of them will have an infinite family tree is $1 - (1 - P)^2$, because $(1 - P)^2$ is the probability that both of them will perish undivided. Therefore, $P = p(1 - (1 - P)^2)$."
My level of math is first year college (though that was long ago). So when I looked up similar problems, I got real complicated explanations, like with branching process and Markov chain and all that. I appreciate it if someone, perhaps with help of a picture or something, can explain this to me baby steps?
p.s. I hope the formula shows up okay, I don't know how to write math forumlae in text like fashion.
probability statistics
$endgroup$
Here's an example but it can be different too, like about people and their children, etc.
http://www.cut-the-knot.org/Probability/AmoebaSurvival.shtml
A population starts with a single amoeba. For this one and for the generations thereafter, there is a probability of 3/4 that an individual amoeba will split to create two amoebas, and a 1/4 probability that it will die out without producing offspring. What is the probability that the family tree of the original amoeba will go on forever?
The solution is stated but I can not make sense of it. I once found a site that explained it in very great detail, using a family tree, but unfortunately do not recall the address. My problem is I keep getting confused between the small $p$ and large $P$, the formula used makes no sense to me: "The probability that at least one of them will have an infinite family tree is $1 - (1 - P)^2$, because $(1 - P)^2$ is the probability that both of them will perish undivided. Therefore, $P = p(1 - (1 - P)^2)$."
My level of math is first year college (though that was long ago). So when I looked up similar problems, I got real complicated explanations, like with branching process and Markov chain and all that. I appreciate it if someone, perhaps with help of a picture or something, can explain this to me baby steps?
p.s. I hope the formula shows up okay, I don't know how to write math forumlae in text like fashion.
probability statistics
probability statistics
edited Jun 10 '15 at 0:58
Graham Kemp
86.8k43579
86.8k43579
asked Jun 10 '15 at 0:42
ryan C.ryan C.
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Little $p$ is the probability that a given amoeba produces two descendants, and big $P$ is the probability that a given amoeba produces a line that never dies out. Since the latter implies the former, we can assume that $P leq p$.
The analysis examines the situation recursively: In order for a given amoeba's line not to die out, it must (a) produce two offspring, and (b) at least one of those offspring must produce a line that never dies out. In this way, we create an expression for $P$ in terms of itself.
The probability (a) is trivial; it's stated in the problem description as $3/4$. Once the two offspring are produced—let's call them A and B—the probability (b) that at least one of them produces a line that never dies out is the probability that A does and B doesn't (probability $P(1-P)$), plus the probability that B does and A doesn't (probability $(1-P)P$), plus the probability that both A and B do (probability $P^2$). That sums up to $2P-P^2$. (Alternatively, we could express that as one minus the probability that neither A nor B produces a line that never dies out: $1-(1-P)^2 = 2P-P^2$.)
So now we have an expression for $P$ in terms of itself:
$$
P = frac{3}{4} left(2P-P^2right)
$$
We can rewrite that as
$$
3P^2-2P = 0
$$
which gives us two solutions, $P = 0$ and $P = 2/3$. Since the average number of amoebas in each generation goes up by a factor of $2 times 3/4 = 3/2$, the amoeba line must have some positive chance of survival, and we choose the larger solution, $P = 2/3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My problem is I keep getting confused between the small $p$ and large $P$,
Then to avoid that, let $p$ be the probability that an amoeba divides into daughters and $Q$ the probability that the amoeba will spawn an eternal family tree.
Now, $;1-Q;$ is the probability that an amoeba does not spawn an eternal tree. That is that eventually there will be no descendants of this amoeba. An application of the rule of complements.
Then, $;(1-Q)^2;$ is the probability that two amoeba will both not spawn eternal trees. An application of the product rule for independent events.
So, $;1-(1-Q)^2;$ is the probability that of two amoeba at least one will spawn an eternal tree. Another application of the rule of complements.
Finally, $;p,(1-(1-Q)^2);$ is the probability that one amoeba will divide and that at least one of its daughters will spawn an eternal family tree. This is the probability that that amoeba itself spawns an eternal family tree.
$$Q = p;(1-(1-Q)^2)$$
Expanding and rearranging to solve for $Q$ gives the solutions:$$left[Q = 2-frac 1 p wedge pneq 0right] ; vee ; [Q=0]$$
Now since we need $0leq Qleq 1$, (to be a valid probability) then to have a non-zero solution requires $frac 1 2lt p leq 1$. This is the case for our given probability.
As $p=3/4$ we thus have $Q = 2/3$ as the non-zero solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1319336%2fsimple-math-for-amoebas-survival-type-problems%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Little $p$ is the probability that a given amoeba produces two descendants, and big $P$ is the probability that a given amoeba produces a line that never dies out. Since the latter implies the former, we can assume that $P leq p$.
The analysis examines the situation recursively: In order for a given amoeba's line not to die out, it must (a) produce two offspring, and (b) at least one of those offspring must produce a line that never dies out. In this way, we create an expression for $P$ in terms of itself.
The probability (a) is trivial; it's stated in the problem description as $3/4$. Once the two offspring are produced—let's call them A and B—the probability (b) that at least one of them produces a line that never dies out is the probability that A does and B doesn't (probability $P(1-P)$), plus the probability that B does and A doesn't (probability $(1-P)P$), plus the probability that both A and B do (probability $P^2$). That sums up to $2P-P^2$. (Alternatively, we could express that as one minus the probability that neither A nor B produces a line that never dies out: $1-(1-P)^2 = 2P-P^2$.)
So now we have an expression for $P$ in terms of itself:
$$
P = frac{3}{4} left(2P-P^2right)
$$
We can rewrite that as
$$
3P^2-2P = 0
$$
which gives us two solutions, $P = 0$ and $P = 2/3$. Since the average number of amoebas in each generation goes up by a factor of $2 times 3/4 = 3/2$, the amoeba line must have some positive chance of survival, and we choose the larger solution, $P = 2/3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Little $p$ is the probability that a given amoeba produces two descendants, and big $P$ is the probability that a given amoeba produces a line that never dies out. Since the latter implies the former, we can assume that $P leq p$.
The analysis examines the situation recursively: In order for a given amoeba's line not to die out, it must (a) produce two offspring, and (b) at least one of those offspring must produce a line that never dies out. In this way, we create an expression for $P$ in terms of itself.
The probability (a) is trivial; it's stated in the problem description as $3/4$. Once the two offspring are produced—let's call them A and B—the probability (b) that at least one of them produces a line that never dies out is the probability that A does and B doesn't (probability $P(1-P)$), plus the probability that B does and A doesn't (probability $(1-P)P$), plus the probability that both A and B do (probability $P^2$). That sums up to $2P-P^2$. (Alternatively, we could express that as one minus the probability that neither A nor B produces a line that never dies out: $1-(1-P)^2 = 2P-P^2$.)
So now we have an expression for $P$ in terms of itself:
$$
P = frac{3}{4} left(2P-P^2right)
$$
We can rewrite that as
$$
3P^2-2P = 0
$$
which gives us two solutions, $P = 0$ and $P = 2/3$. Since the average number of amoebas in each generation goes up by a factor of $2 times 3/4 = 3/2$, the amoeba line must have some positive chance of survival, and we choose the larger solution, $P = 2/3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Little $p$ is the probability that a given amoeba produces two descendants, and big $P$ is the probability that a given amoeba produces a line that never dies out. Since the latter implies the former, we can assume that $P leq p$.
The analysis examines the situation recursively: In order for a given amoeba's line not to die out, it must (a) produce two offspring, and (b) at least one of those offspring must produce a line that never dies out. In this way, we create an expression for $P$ in terms of itself.
The probability (a) is trivial; it's stated in the problem description as $3/4$. Once the two offspring are produced—let's call them A and B—the probability (b) that at least one of them produces a line that never dies out is the probability that A does and B doesn't (probability $P(1-P)$), plus the probability that B does and A doesn't (probability $(1-P)P$), plus the probability that both A and B do (probability $P^2$). That sums up to $2P-P^2$. (Alternatively, we could express that as one minus the probability that neither A nor B produces a line that never dies out: $1-(1-P)^2 = 2P-P^2$.)
So now we have an expression for $P$ in terms of itself:
$$
P = frac{3}{4} left(2P-P^2right)
$$
We can rewrite that as
$$
3P^2-2P = 0
$$
which gives us two solutions, $P = 0$ and $P = 2/3$. Since the average number of amoebas in each generation goes up by a factor of $2 times 3/4 = 3/2$, the amoeba line must have some positive chance of survival, and we choose the larger solution, $P = 2/3$.
$endgroup$
Little $p$ is the probability that a given amoeba produces two descendants, and big $P$ is the probability that a given amoeba produces a line that never dies out. Since the latter implies the former, we can assume that $P leq p$.
The analysis examines the situation recursively: In order for a given amoeba's line not to die out, it must (a) produce two offspring, and (b) at least one of those offspring must produce a line that never dies out. In this way, we create an expression for $P$ in terms of itself.
The probability (a) is trivial; it's stated in the problem description as $3/4$. Once the two offspring are produced—let's call them A and B—the probability (b) that at least one of them produces a line that never dies out is the probability that A does and B doesn't (probability $P(1-P)$), plus the probability that B does and A doesn't (probability $(1-P)P$), plus the probability that both A and B do (probability $P^2$). That sums up to $2P-P^2$. (Alternatively, we could express that as one minus the probability that neither A nor B produces a line that never dies out: $1-(1-P)^2 = 2P-P^2$.)
So now we have an expression for $P$ in terms of itself:
$$
P = frac{3}{4} left(2P-P^2right)
$$
We can rewrite that as
$$
3P^2-2P = 0
$$
which gives us two solutions, $P = 0$ and $P = 2/3$. Since the average number of amoebas in each generation goes up by a factor of $2 times 3/4 = 3/2$, the amoeba line must have some positive chance of survival, and we choose the larger solution, $P = 2/3$.
answered Jun 10 '15 at 0:58
Brian TungBrian Tung
26.2k32655
26.2k32655
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My problem is I keep getting confused between the small $p$ and large $P$,
Then to avoid that, let $p$ be the probability that an amoeba divides into daughters and $Q$ the probability that the amoeba will spawn an eternal family tree.
Now, $;1-Q;$ is the probability that an amoeba does not spawn an eternal tree. That is that eventually there will be no descendants of this amoeba. An application of the rule of complements.
Then, $;(1-Q)^2;$ is the probability that two amoeba will both not spawn eternal trees. An application of the product rule for independent events.
So, $;1-(1-Q)^2;$ is the probability that of two amoeba at least one will spawn an eternal tree. Another application of the rule of complements.
Finally, $;p,(1-(1-Q)^2);$ is the probability that one amoeba will divide and that at least one of its daughters will spawn an eternal family tree. This is the probability that that amoeba itself spawns an eternal family tree.
$$Q = p;(1-(1-Q)^2)$$
Expanding and rearranging to solve for $Q$ gives the solutions:$$left[Q = 2-frac 1 p wedge pneq 0right] ; vee ; [Q=0]$$
Now since we need $0leq Qleq 1$, (to be a valid probability) then to have a non-zero solution requires $frac 1 2lt p leq 1$. This is the case for our given probability.
As $p=3/4$ we thus have $Q = 2/3$ as the non-zero solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My problem is I keep getting confused between the small $p$ and large $P$,
Then to avoid that, let $p$ be the probability that an amoeba divides into daughters and $Q$ the probability that the amoeba will spawn an eternal family tree.
Now, $;1-Q;$ is the probability that an amoeba does not spawn an eternal tree. That is that eventually there will be no descendants of this amoeba. An application of the rule of complements.
Then, $;(1-Q)^2;$ is the probability that two amoeba will both not spawn eternal trees. An application of the product rule for independent events.
So, $;1-(1-Q)^2;$ is the probability that of two amoeba at least one will spawn an eternal tree. Another application of the rule of complements.
Finally, $;p,(1-(1-Q)^2);$ is the probability that one amoeba will divide and that at least one of its daughters will spawn an eternal family tree. This is the probability that that amoeba itself spawns an eternal family tree.
$$Q = p;(1-(1-Q)^2)$$
Expanding and rearranging to solve for $Q$ gives the solutions:$$left[Q = 2-frac 1 p wedge pneq 0right] ; vee ; [Q=0]$$
Now since we need $0leq Qleq 1$, (to be a valid probability) then to have a non-zero solution requires $frac 1 2lt p leq 1$. This is the case for our given probability.
As $p=3/4$ we thus have $Q = 2/3$ as the non-zero solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My problem is I keep getting confused between the small $p$ and large $P$,
Then to avoid that, let $p$ be the probability that an amoeba divides into daughters and $Q$ the probability that the amoeba will spawn an eternal family tree.
Now, $;1-Q;$ is the probability that an amoeba does not spawn an eternal tree. That is that eventually there will be no descendants of this amoeba. An application of the rule of complements.
Then, $;(1-Q)^2;$ is the probability that two amoeba will both not spawn eternal trees. An application of the product rule for independent events.
So, $;1-(1-Q)^2;$ is the probability that of two amoeba at least one will spawn an eternal tree. Another application of the rule of complements.
Finally, $;p,(1-(1-Q)^2);$ is the probability that one amoeba will divide and that at least one of its daughters will spawn an eternal family tree. This is the probability that that amoeba itself spawns an eternal family tree.
$$Q = p;(1-(1-Q)^2)$$
Expanding and rearranging to solve for $Q$ gives the solutions:$$left[Q = 2-frac 1 p wedge pneq 0right] ; vee ; [Q=0]$$
Now since we need $0leq Qleq 1$, (to be a valid probability) then to have a non-zero solution requires $frac 1 2lt p leq 1$. This is the case for our given probability.
As $p=3/4$ we thus have $Q = 2/3$ as the non-zero solution.
$endgroup$
My problem is I keep getting confused between the small $p$ and large $P$,
Then to avoid that, let $p$ be the probability that an amoeba divides into daughters and $Q$ the probability that the amoeba will spawn an eternal family tree.
Now, $;1-Q;$ is the probability that an amoeba does not spawn an eternal tree. That is that eventually there will be no descendants of this amoeba. An application of the rule of complements.
Then, $;(1-Q)^2;$ is the probability that two amoeba will both not spawn eternal trees. An application of the product rule for independent events.
So, $;1-(1-Q)^2;$ is the probability that of two amoeba at least one will spawn an eternal tree. Another application of the rule of complements.
Finally, $;p,(1-(1-Q)^2);$ is the probability that one amoeba will divide and that at least one of its daughters will spawn an eternal family tree. This is the probability that that amoeba itself spawns an eternal family tree.
$$Q = p;(1-(1-Q)^2)$$
Expanding and rearranging to solve for $Q$ gives the solutions:$$left[Q = 2-frac 1 p wedge pneq 0right] ; vee ; [Q=0]$$
Now since we need $0leq Qleq 1$, (to be a valid probability) then to have a non-zero solution requires $frac 1 2lt p leq 1$. This is the case for our given probability.
As $p=3/4$ we thus have $Q = 2/3$ as the non-zero solution.
edited Jun 10 '15 at 4:17
answered Jun 10 '15 at 1:25
Graham KempGraham Kemp
86.8k43579
86.8k43579
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1319336%2fsimple-math-for-amoebas-survival-type-problems%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown