Counterexamples: Integral over the interior of a bounded set
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This is basically this question:
Function integrable over the interior but not over the set
I was wondering: is there an easier counterexample that does not involve an obese Cantor set?
integration measure-theory lebesgue-integral
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This is basically this question:
Function integrable over the interior but not over the set
I was wondering: is there an easier counterexample that does not involve an obese Cantor set?
integration measure-theory lebesgue-integral
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This is basically this question:
Function integrable over the interior but not over the set
I was wondering: is there an easier counterexample that does not involve an obese Cantor set?
integration measure-theory lebesgue-integral
This is basically this question:
Function integrable over the interior but not over the set
I was wondering: is there an easier counterexample that does not involve an obese Cantor set?
integration measure-theory lebesgue-integral
integration measure-theory lebesgue-integral
asked Nov 20 at 15:27
B. Pasternak
1,131720
1,131720
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30
add a comment |
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006457%2fcounterexamples-integral-over-the-interior-of-a-bounded-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You need a set with relatively large boundary (i.e. positive measure). So a fat Cantor set is about as simple as it can get, I think.
– Arthur
Nov 20 at 15:30