nuclear $C^*$ algebra
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If $(A_i)$ is a sequence of nuclear $C^*$ algebras,Is $oplus_{c_0}A_i$ ($c_0$ direct sum)and $prod A_i$($ell ^infty $ direct sum) also nuclear?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If $(A_i)$ is a sequence of nuclear $C^*$ algebras,Is $oplus_{c_0}A_i$ ($c_0$ direct sum)and $prod A_i$($ell ^infty $ direct sum) also nuclear?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If $(A_i)$ is a sequence of nuclear $C^*$ algebras,Is $oplus_{c_0}A_i$ ($c_0$ direct sum)and $prod A_i$($ell ^infty $ direct sum) also nuclear?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
If $(A_i)$ is a sequence of nuclear $C^*$ algebras,Is $oplus_{c_0}A_i$ ($c_0$ direct sum)and $prod A_i$($ell ^infty $ direct sum) also nuclear?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
asked Nov 19 at 3:31
mathrookie
697512
697512
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Fix $ain bigoplus_nA_n$ and $varepsilon>0$. For each $n$, there exist ucp maps $varphi_n:A_nto M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)$ and $psi_varepsilon:M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to A_n$ such that $|psi_ncircvarphi_n(a_n)-a_n|<varepsilon$.
There is also $m$ such that $|a_n|<varepsilon$ for all $ngeq m$. Write $a_0$ for the truncation of $a$ to its first $m$ entries; then $|a-a_0|<varepsilon$. Then the maps
$$
varphi:bigoplus_nA_nto bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C), psi:bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to bigoplus_nA_n
$$
given by $$varphi(b)=bigoplus_{n=1}^mvarphi_n(b_n), psi(bigoplus_{n=1}^m c_n)=bigoplus_{n=1}^m psi_n(c_n)$$
satisfy
begin{align}
|psicircvarphi(a)-a|
&leq|psicircvarphi(a)-psicircvarphi(a_0)|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|+|a_0-a|\ \
&leq 2|a_0-a|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|<3varepsilon.
end{align}
By making this work over the finite sets $Fsubset bigoplus_nA_n$ we obtain net ${varphi_F}$ and ${psi_F}$ such that $|psi_Fcircvarphi_F(a)-a|to0$ for all $ain bigoplus_nA_n$.
The diret product, on the other hand is not nuclear; it's not even exact. For instance $M=prod_n M_n(mathbb C)$ is not nuclear. It is well-known that nuclear algebras are exact, and that exactness passes to subalgebras. The full C$^*$-algebra of $mathbb F_2$ is known to be non-exact, and to be residually finite; this means that there exists a faithful representation $pi:C^*(mathbb F_2)to M=prod_nM_n(mathbb C)$. So $M$ cannot be exact, and in particular it is not nuclear.
I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
– mathrookie
Nov 19 at 4:46
Exsctly. $ $
– Martin Argerami
Nov 19 at 10:16
Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 20 at 12:49
@Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
– Martin Argerami
Nov 20 at 15:36
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Fix $ain bigoplus_nA_n$ and $varepsilon>0$. For each $n$, there exist ucp maps $varphi_n:A_nto M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)$ and $psi_varepsilon:M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to A_n$ such that $|psi_ncircvarphi_n(a_n)-a_n|<varepsilon$.
There is also $m$ such that $|a_n|<varepsilon$ for all $ngeq m$. Write $a_0$ for the truncation of $a$ to its first $m$ entries; then $|a-a_0|<varepsilon$. Then the maps
$$
varphi:bigoplus_nA_nto bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C), psi:bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to bigoplus_nA_n
$$
given by $$varphi(b)=bigoplus_{n=1}^mvarphi_n(b_n), psi(bigoplus_{n=1}^m c_n)=bigoplus_{n=1}^m psi_n(c_n)$$
satisfy
begin{align}
|psicircvarphi(a)-a|
&leq|psicircvarphi(a)-psicircvarphi(a_0)|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|+|a_0-a|\ \
&leq 2|a_0-a|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|<3varepsilon.
end{align}
By making this work over the finite sets $Fsubset bigoplus_nA_n$ we obtain net ${varphi_F}$ and ${psi_F}$ such that $|psi_Fcircvarphi_F(a)-a|to0$ for all $ain bigoplus_nA_n$.
The diret product, on the other hand is not nuclear; it's not even exact. For instance $M=prod_n M_n(mathbb C)$ is not nuclear. It is well-known that nuclear algebras are exact, and that exactness passes to subalgebras. The full C$^*$-algebra of $mathbb F_2$ is known to be non-exact, and to be residually finite; this means that there exists a faithful representation $pi:C^*(mathbb F_2)to M=prod_nM_n(mathbb C)$. So $M$ cannot be exact, and in particular it is not nuclear.
I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
– mathrookie
Nov 19 at 4:46
Exsctly. $ $
– Martin Argerami
Nov 19 at 10:16
Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 20 at 12:49
@Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
– Martin Argerami
Nov 20 at 15:36
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Fix $ain bigoplus_nA_n$ and $varepsilon>0$. For each $n$, there exist ucp maps $varphi_n:A_nto M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)$ and $psi_varepsilon:M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to A_n$ such that $|psi_ncircvarphi_n(a_n)-a_n|<varepsilon$.
There is also $m$ such that $|a_n|<varepsilon$ for all $ngeq m$. Write $a_0$ for the truncation of $a$ to its first $m$ entries; then $|a-a_0|<varepsilon$. Then the maps
$$
varphi:bigoplus_nA_nto bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C), psi:bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to bigoplus_nA_n
$$
given by $$varphi(b)=bigoplus_{n=1}^mvarphi_n(b_n), psi(bigoplus_{n=1}^m c_n)=bigoplus_{n=1}^m psi_n(c_n)$$
satisfy
begin{align}
|psicircvarphi(a)-a|
&leq|psicircvarphi(a)-psicircvarphi(a_0)|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|+|a_0-a|\ \
&leq 2|a_0-a|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|<3varepsilon.
end{align}
By making this work over the finite sets $Fsubset bigoplus_nA_n$ we obtain net ${varphi_F}$ and ${psi_F}$ such that $|psi_Fcircvarphi_F(a)-a|to0$ for all $ain bigoplus_nA_n$.
The diret product, on the other hand is not nuclear; it's not even exact. For instance $M=prod_n M_n(mathbb C)$ is not nuclear. It is well-known that nuclear algebras are exact, and that exactness passes to subalgebras. The full C$^*$-algebra of $mathbb F_2$ is known to be non-exact, and to be residually finite; this means that there exists a faithful representation $pi:C^*(mathbb F_2)to M=prod_nM_n(mathbb C)$. So $M$ cannot be exact, and in particular it is not nuclear.
I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
– mathrookie
Nov 19 at 4:46
Exsctly. $ $
– Martin Argerami
Nov 19 at 10:16
Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 20 at 12:49
@Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
– Martin Argerami
Nov 20 at 15:36
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Fix $ain bigoplus_nA_n$ and $varepsilon>0$. For each $n$, there exist ucp maps $varphi_n:A_nto M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)$ and $psi_varepsilon:M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to A_n$ such that $|psi_ncircvarphi_n(a_n)-a_n|<varepsilon$.
There is also $m$ such that $|a_n|<varepsilon$ for all $ngeq m$. Write $a_0$ for the truncation of $a$ to its first $m$ entries; then $|a-a_0|<varepsilon$. Then the maps
$$
varphi:bigoplus_nA_nto bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C), psi:bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to bigoplus_nA_n
$$
given by $$varphi(b)=bigoplus_{n=1}^mvarphi_n(b_n), psi(bigoplus_{n=1}^m c_n)=bigoplus_{n=1}^m psi_n(c_n)$$
satisfy
begin{align}
|psicircvarphi(a)-a|
&leq|psicircvarphi(a)-psicircvarphi(a_0)|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|+|a_0-a|\ \
&leq 2|a_0-a|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|<3varepsilon.
end{align}
By making this work over the finite sets $Fsubset bigoplus_nA_n$ we obtain net ${varphi_F}$ and ${psi_F}$ such that $|psi_Fcircvarphi_F(a)-a|to0$ for all $ain bigoplus_nA_n$.
The diret product, on the other hand is not nuclear; it's not even exact. For instance $M=prod_n M_n(mathbb C)$ is not nuclear. It is well-known that nuclear algebras are exact, and that exactness passes to subalgebras. The full C$^*$-algebra of $mathbb F_2$ is known to be non-exact, and to be residually finite; this means that there exists a faithful representation $pi:C^*(mathbb F_2)to M=prod_nM_n(mathbb C)$. So $M$ cannot be exact, and in particular it is not nuclear.
Fix $ain bigoplus_nA_n$ and $varepsilon>0$. For each $n$, there exist ucp maps $varphi_n:A_nto M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)$ and $psi_varepsilon:M_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to A_n$ such that $|psi_ncircvarphi_n(a_n)-a_n|<varepsilon$.
There is also $m$ such that $|a_n|<varepsilon$ for all $ngeq m$. Write $a_0$ for the truncation of $a$ to its first $m$ entries; then $|a-a_0|<varepsilon$. Then the maps
$$
varphi:bigoplus_nA_nto bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C), psi:bigoplus_{n=1}^mM_{k(n)}(mathbb C)to bigoplus_nA_n
$$
given by $$varphi(b)=bigoplus_{n=1}^mvarphi_n(b_n), psi(bigoplus_{n=1}^m c_n)=bigoplus_{n=1}^m psi_n(c_n)$$
satisfy
begin{align}
|psicircvarphi(a)-a|
&leq|psicircvarphi(a)-psicircvarphi(a_0)|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|+|a_0-a|\ \
&leq 2|a_0-a|+|psicircvarphi(a_0)-a_0|<3varepsilon.
end{align}
By making this work over the finite sets $Fsubset bigoplus_nA_n$ we obtain net ${varphi_F}$ and ${psi_F}$ such that $|psi_Fcircvarphi_F(a)-a|to0$ for all $ain bigoplus_nA_n$.
The diret product, on the other hand is not nuclear; it's not even exact. For instance $M=prod_n M_n(mathbb C)$ is not nuclear. It is well-known that nuclear algebras are exact, and that exactness passes to subalgebras. The full C$^*$-algebra of $mathbb F_2$ is known to be non-exact, and to be residually finite; this means that there exists a faithful representation $pi:C^*(mathbb F_2)to M=prod_nM_n(mathbb C)$. So $M$ cannot be exact, and in particular it is not nuclear.
edited Nov 20 at 15:37
answered Nov 19 at 4:19
Martin Argerami
121k1073172
121k1073172
I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
– mathrookie
Nov 19 at 4:46
Exsctly. $ $
– Martin Argerami
Nov 19 at 10:16
Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 20 at 12:49
@Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
– Martin Argerami
Nov 20 at 15:36
add a comment |
I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
– mathrookie
Nov 19 at 4:46
Exsctly. $ $
– Martin Argerami
Nov 19 at 10:16
Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 20 at 12:49
@Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
– Martin Argerami
Nov 20 at 15:36
I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
– mathrookie
Nov 19 at 4:46
I made a mistake.I thought "exact" and "nuclear" were the same concept.nuclear implies exact,but exact cannot imply nuclear?
– mathrookie
Nov 19 at 4:46
Exsctly. $ $
– Martin Argerami
Nov 19 at 10:16
Exsctly. $ $
– Martin Argerami
Nov 19 at 10:16
Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 20 at 12:49
Do you mean "the universal $C^ast$ algebra of $mathbb F_2$", right? The reduced $C^ast$-algebra is exact and simple, therefore can not be residually finite.
– Adrián González-Pérez
Nov 20 at 12:49
@Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
– Martin Argerami
Nov 20 at 15:36
@Adríán: indeed, thanks for noticing.
– Martin Argerami
Nov 20 at 15:36
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004484%2fnuclear-c-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown