How to understand a point of a scheme?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am not quite understand what a point of a scheme really is. It's not like the definition of a point in a usual topology, such as Euclidean space. In Hartshorne's, a point seems to be a prime ideal of a given ring, but I am not quite sure. I hope someone can show me a clear picture. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I am not quite understand what a point of a scheme really is. It's not like the definition of a point in a usual topology, such as Euclidean space. In Hartshorne's, a point seems to be a prime ideal of a given ring, but I am not quite sure. I hope someone can show me a clear picture. Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I am not quite understand what a point of a scheme really is. It's not like the definition of a point in a usual topology, such as Euclidean space. In Hartshorne's, a point seems to be a prime ideal of a given ring, but I am not quite sure. I hope someone can show me a clear picture. Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question













      I am not quite understand what a point of a scheme really is. It's not like the definition of a point in a usual topology, such as Euclidean space. In Hartshorne's, a point seems to be a prime ideal of a given ring, but I am not quite sure. I hope someone can show me a clear picture. Thanks!







      algebraic-geometry schemes






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      Yuyi Zhang

      10416




      10416






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          There are two notions of a point in algebraic geometry. The first one, and the one I think you are most interested in is the following definition.



          The first definition



          First, let's recall the definition of a scheme. A scheme is a locally ringed space which is locally affine (i.e. locally isomorphic to $newcommandSpec{operatorname{Spec}}Spec A$ for a ring $A$). And as a reminder, a locally ringed space is a topological space, $X$, with a sheaf of rings, $mathcal{O}_X$ whose stalks are local rings.



          I've bolded the words topological space, since that part is the relevant part for talking about points of schemes (at least in this first sense). This gives us the definition:



          A point of a scheme $(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ is a point of the underlying topological space $X$. Thus points of a scheme are in fact the points of a topological space.



          Now you may be wondering, well how do prime ideals enter the picture here? And the answer is, if $A$ is a ring, then the underlying topological space of $Spec A$ is the set of all prime ideals of $A$ with the Zariski topology on them. Thus points of $Spec A$ are precisely the prime ideals of $A$. Since general schemes are locally affine, we can think of the points of a general scheme as being a prime ideal in some affine open set containing that point, however the precise prime ideal depends entirely on the choice of neighborhood of the point and the isomorphism with the spectrum of some ring.



          The other definition



          If $X$ and $Y$ are schemes, we call a morphism from $Yto X$ a $Y$-valued point of $X$, or if $Y=Spec A$ is affine, we also say it is an $A$-valued point of $X$. The set of $Y$ valued points of a scheme $X$ is then just $operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$, and the functor $Ymapsto operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$ is called the functor of points of the scheme $X$, since to a given scheme $Y$ it assigns the set of $Y$-valued points.



          I'm not quite sure of the precise history of the usage of the term point for a morphism of schemes, but in many ways it makes sense. For example, if $Y=Spec k$ where $k$ is a field, then a morphism from $Yto X$ is determined by a choice of (topological) point $xin X$ and a choice of map from $kappa(x)to k$, where $kappa(x)$ is the residue field of $X$ at $x$, $mathcal{O}_{X,x}/mathfrak{m}_x$.



          Anyway, I think this second definition is not likely to be what you meant, so I won't say too much more on it.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Later on in the study of algebraic geometry, there is also the notion of a point on a site, which is a functor from the site to Sets which satisfies certain properties. (For example, if the site is a topological space site, then for each point in the underlying set, the functor of taking a sheaf to its stalks at that point is such a functor.)
            – Daniel Schepler
            23 hours ago










          • @DanielSchepler Fair point. I'm not too familiar with the details of ag on sites yet, so I didn't think to say anything about those either, but worth noting.
            – jgon
            23 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004980%2fhow-to-understand-a-point-of-a-scheme%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          There are two notions of a point in algebraic geometry. The first one, and the one I think you are most interested in is the following definition.



          The first definition



          First, let's recall the definition of a scheme. A scheme is a locally ringed space which is locally affine (i.e. locally isomorphic to $newcommandSpec{operatorname{Spec}}Spec A$ for a ring $A$). And as a reminder, a locally ringed space is a topological space, $X$, with a sheaf of rings, $mathcal{O}_X$ whose stalks are local rings.



          I've bolded the words topological space, since that part is the relevant part for talking about points of schemes (at least in this first sense). This gives us the definition:



          A point of a scheme $(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ is a point of the underlying topological space $X$. Thus points of a scheme are in fact the points of a topological space.



          Now you may be wondering, well how do prime ideals enter the picture here? And the answer is, if $A$ is a ring, then the underlying topological space of $Spec A$ is the set of all prime ideals of $A$ with the Zariski topology on them. Thus points of $Spec A$ are precisely the prime ideals of $A$. Since general schemes are locally affine, we can think of the points of a general scheme as being a prime ideal in some affine open set containing that point, however the precise prime ideal depends entirely on the choice of neighborhood of the point and the isomorphism with the spectrum of some ring.



          The other definition



          If $X$ and $Y$ are schemes, we call a morphism from $Yto X$ a $Y$-valued point of $X$, or if $Y=Spec A$ is affine, we also say it is an $A$-valued point of $X$. The set of $Y$ valued points of a scheme $X$ is then just $operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$, and the functor $Ymapsto operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$ is called the functor of points of the scheme $X$, since to a given scheme $Y$ it assigns the set of $Y$-valued points.



          I'm not quite sure of the precise history of the usage of the term point for a morphism of schemes, but in many ways it makes sense. For example, if $Y=Spec k$ where $k$ is a field, then a morphism from $Yto X$ is determined by a choice of (topological) point $xin X$ and a choice of map from $kappa(x)to k$, where $kappa(x)$ is the residue field of $X$ at $x$, $mathcal{O}_{X,x}/mathfrak{m}_x$.



          Anyway, I think this second definition is not likely to be what you meant, so I won't say too much more on it.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Later on in the study of algebraic geometry, there is also the notion of a point on a site, which is a functor from the site to Sets which satisfies certain properties. (For example, if the site is a topological space site, then for each point in the underlying set, the functor of taking a sheaf to its stalks at that point is such a functor.)
            – Daniel Schepler
            23 hours ago










          • @DanielSchepler Fair point. I'm not too familiar with the details of ag on sites yet, so I didn't think to say anything about those either, but worth noting.
            – jgon
            23 hours ago















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          There are two notions of a point in algebraic geometry. The first one, and the one I think you are most interested in is the following definition.



          The first definition



          First, let's recall the definition of a scheme. A scheme is a locally ringed space which is locally affine (i.e. locally isomorphic to $newcommandSpec{operatorname{Spec}}Spec A$ for a ring $A$). And as a reminder, a locally ringed space is a topological space, $X$, with a sheaf of rings, $mathcal{O}_X$ whose stalks are local rings.



          I've bolded the words topological space, since that part is the relevant part for talking about points of schemes (at least in this first sense). This gives us the definition:



          A point of a scheme $(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ is a point of the underlying topological space $X$. Thus points of a scheme are in fact the points of a topological space.



          Now you may be wondering, well how do prime ideals enter the picture here? And the answer is, if $A$ is a ring, then the underlying topological space of $Spec A$ is the set of all prime ideals of $A$ with the Zariski topology on them. Thus points of $Spec A$ are precisely the prime ideals of $A$. Since general schemes are locally affine, we can think of the points of a general scheme as being a prime ideal in some affine open set containing that point, however the precise prime ideal depends entirely on the choice of neighborhood of the point and the isomorphism with the spectrum of some ring.



          The other definition



          If $X$ and $Y$ are schemes, we call a morphism from $Yto X$ a $Y$-valued point of $X$, or if $Y=Spec A$ is affine, we also say it is an $A$-valued point of $X$. The set of $Y$ valued points of a scheme $X$ is then just $operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$, and the functor $Ymapsto operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$ is called the functor of points of the scheme $X$, since to a given scheme $Y$ it assigns the set of $Y$-valued points.



          I'm not quite sure of the precise history of the usage of the term point for a morphism of schemes, but in many ways it makes sense. For example, if $Y=Spec k$ where $k$ is a field, then a morphism from $Yto X$ is determined by a choice of (topological) point $xin X$ and a choice of map from $kappa(x)to k$, where $kappa(x)$ is the residue field of $X$ at $x$, $mathcal{O}_{X,x}/mathfrak{m}_x$.



          Anyway, I think this second definition is not likely to be what you meant, so I won't say too much more on it.






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            Later on in the study of algebraic geometry, there is also the notion of a point on a site, which is a functor from the site to Sets which satisfies certain properties. (For example, if the site is a topological space site, then for each point in the underlying set, the functor of taking a sheaf to its stalks at that point is such a functor.)
            – Daniel Schepler
            23 hours ago










          • @DanielSchepler Fair point. I'm not too familiar with the details of ag on sites yet, so I didn't think to say anything about those either, but worth noting.
            – jgon
            23 hours ago













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          There are two notions of a point in algebraic geometry. The first one, and the one I think you are most interested in is the following definition.



          The first definition



          First, let's recall the definition of a scheme. A scheme is a locally ringed space which is locally affine (i.e. locally isomorphic to $newcommandSpec{operatorname{Spec}}Spec A$ for a ring $A$). And as a reminder, a locally ringed space is a topological space, $X$, with a sheaf of rings, $mathcal{O}_X$ whose stalks are local rings.



          I've bolded the words topological space, since that part is the relevant part for talking about points of schemes (at least in this first sense). This gives us the definition:



          A point of a scheme $(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ is a point of the underlying topological space $X$. Thus points of a scheme are in fact the points of a topological space.



          Now you may be wondering, well how do prime ideals enter the picture here? And the answer is, if $A$ is a ring, then the underlying topological space of $Spec A$ is the set of all prime ideals of $A$ with the Zariski topology on them. Thus points of $Spec A$ are precisely the prime ideals of $A$. Since general schemes are locally affine, we can think of the points of a general scheme as being a prime ideal in some affine open set containing that point, however the precise prime ideal depends entirely on the choice of neighborhood of the point and the isomorphism with the spectrum of some ring.



          The other definition



          If $X$ and $Y$ are schemes, we call a morphism from $Yto X$ a $Y$-valued point of $X$, or if $Y=Spec A$ is affine, we also say it is an $A$-valued point of $X$. The set of $Y$ valued points of a scheme $X$ is then just $operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$, and the functor $Ymapsto operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$ is called the functor of points of the scheme $X$, since to a given scheme $Y$ it assigns the set of $Y$-valued points.



          I'm not quite sure of the precise history of the usage of the term point for a morphism of schemes, but in many ways it makes sense. For example, if $Y=Spec k$ where $k$ is a field, then a morphism from $Yto X$ is determined by a choice of (topological) point $xin X$ and a choice of map from $kappa(x)to k$, where $kappa(x)$ is the residue field of $X$ at $x$, $mathcal{O}_{X,x}/mathfrak{m}_x$.



          Anyway, I think this second definition is not likely to be what you meant, so I won't say too much more on it.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          There are two notions of a point in algebraic geometry. The first one, and the one I think you are most interested in is the following definition.



          The first definition



          First, let's recall the definition of a scheme. A scheme is a locally ringed space which is locally affine (i.e. locally isomorphic to $newcommandSpec{operatorname{Spec}}Spec A$ for a ring $A$). And as a reminder, a locally ringed space is a topological space, $X$, with a sheaf of rings, $mathcal{O}_X$ whose stalks are local rings.



          I've bolded the words topological space, since that part is the relevant part for talking about points of schemes (at least in this first sense). This gives us the definition:



          A point of a scheme $(X,mathcal{O}_X)$ is a point of the underlying topological space $X$. Thus points of a scheme are in fact the points of a topological space.



          Now you may be wondering, well how do prime ideals enter the picture here? And the answer is, if $A$ is a ring, then the underlying topological space of $Spec A$ is the set of all prime ideals of $A$ with the Zariski topology on them. Thus points of $Spec A$ are precisely the prime ideals of $A$. Since general schemes are locally affine, we can think of the points of a general scheme as being a prime ideal in some affine open set containing that point, however the precise prime ideal depends entirely on the choice of neighborhood of the point and the isomorphism with the spectrum of some ring.



          The other definition



          If $X$ and $Y$ are schemes, we call a morphism from $Yto X$ a $Y$-valued point of $X$, or if $Y=Spec A$ is affine, we also say it is an $A$-valued point of $X$. The set of $Y$ valued points of a scheme $X$ is then just $operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$, and the functor $Ymapsto operatorname{Hom}(Y,X)$ is called the functor of points of the scheme $X$, since to a given scheme $Y$ it assigns the set of $Y$-valued points.



          I'm not quite sure of the precise history of the usage of the term point for a morphism of schemes, but in many ways it makes sense. For example, if $Y=Spec k$ where $k$ is a field, then a morphism from $Yto X$ is determined by a choice of (topological) point $xin X$ and a choice of map from $kappa(x)to k$, where $kappa(x)$ is the residue field of $X$ at $x$, $mathcal{O}_{X,x}/mathfrak{m}_x$.



          Anyway, I think this second definition is not likely to be what you meant, so I won't say too much more on it.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 23 hours ago









          jgon

          9,62111538




          9,62111538








          • 1




            Later on in the study of algebraic geometry, there is also the notion of a point on a site, which is a functor from the site to Sets which satisfies certain properties. (For example, if the site is a topological space site, then for each point in the underlying set, the functor of taking a sheaf to its stalks at that point is such a functor.)
            – Daniel Schepler
            23 hours ago










          • @DanielSchepler Fair point. I'm not too familiar with the details of ag on sites yet, so I didn't think to say anything about those either, but worth noting.
            – jgon
            23 hours ago














          • 1




            Later on in the study of algebraic geometry, there is also the notion of a point on a site, which is a functor from the site to Sets which satisfies certain properties. (For example, if the site is a topological space site, then for each point in the underlying set, the functor of taking a sheaf to its stalks at that point is such a functor.)
            – Daniel Schepler
            23 hours ago










          • @DanielSchepler Fair point. I'm not too familiar with the details of ag on sites yet, so I didn't think to say anything about those either, but worth noting.
            – jgon
            23 hours ago








          1




          1




          Later on in the study of algebraic geometry, there is also the notion of a point on a site, which is a functor from the site to Sets which satisfies certain properties. (For example, if the site is a topological space site, then for each point in the underlying set, the functor of taking a sheaf to its stalks at that point is such a functor.)
          – Daniel Schepler
          23 hours ago




          Later on in the study of algebraic geometry, there is also the notion of a point on a site, which is a functor from the site to Sets which satisfies certain properties. (For example, if the site is a topological space site, then for each point in the underlying set, the functor of taking a sheaf to its stalks at that point is such a functor.)
          – Daniel Schepler
          23 hours ago












          @DanielSchepler Fair point. I'm not too familiar with the details of ag on sites yet, so I didn't think to say anything about those either, but worth noting.
          – jgon
          23 hours ago




          @DanielSchepler Fair point. I'm not too familiar with the details of ag on sites yet, so I didn't think to say anything about those either, but worth noting.
          – jgon
          23 hours ago


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004980%2fhow-to-understand-a-point-of-a-scheme%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen