Automorphisms of a Cyclic Group











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
3












To show that,




$operatorname{Aut}(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})cong (mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^times.$




What I feel is that if we show that "any automorphism $phi:mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}longrightarrowmathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ is of the form $phi_a([k]_n):=[ak]_n$ for some $ainmathbb{Z}$ such that gcd$(a,n)=1.$ then we are done.



But I am not sure how to do this?
Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You have all the parts to prove your assertion.
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 25 at 16:31










  • Can you think of a map from $(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^times$ to $mathrm{Aut}(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})$? The first one that you can think of is an isomorphism: you just need to prove it. That it's a homomorphism is easy, as is injectivity. Surjectivity is slightly harder, and is essentially what's in your thought process. As a hint for that, consider where $varphi$ sends $[1]_n$.
    – user3482749
    Nov 25 at 16:50












  • As for LaTeX on here: see here.
    – user3482749
    Nov 25 at 16:51















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
3












To show that,




$operatorname{Aut}(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})cong (mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^times.$




What I feel is that if we show that "any automorphism $phi:mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}longrightarrowmathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ is of the form $phi_a([k]_n):=[ak]_n$ for some $ainmathbb{Z}$ such that gcd$(a,n)=1.$ then we are done.



But I am not sure how to do this?
Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You have all the parts to prove your assertion.
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 25 at 16:31










  • Can you think of a map from $(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^times$ to $mathrm{Aut}(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})$? The first one that you can think of is an isomorphism: you just need to prove it. That it's a homomorphism is easy, as is injectivity. Surjectivity is slightly harder, and is essentially what's in your thought process. As a hint for that, consider where $varphi$ sends $[1]_n$.
    – user3482749
    Nov 25 at 16:50












  • As for LaTeX on here: see here.
    – user3482749
    Nov 25 at 16:51













up vote
0
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
3






3





To show that,




$operatorname{Aut}(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})cong (mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^times.$




What I feel is that if we show that "any automorphism $phi:mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}longrightarrowmathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ is of the form $phi_a([k]_n):=[ak]_n$ for some $ainmathbb{Z}$ such that gcd$(a,n)=1.$ then we are done.



But I am not sure how to do this?
Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question















To show that,




$operatorname{Aut}(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})cong (mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^times.$




What I feel is that if we show that "any automorphism $phi:mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}longrightarrowmathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ is of the form $phi_a([k]_n):=[ak]_n$ for some $ainmathbb{Z}$ such that gcd$(a,n)=1.$ then we are done.



But I am not sure how to do this?
Thanks in advance.







abstract-algebra group-theory automorphism-group






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 25 at 17:13









amWhy

191k28223439




191k28223439










asked Nov 25 at 16:14









WhatsDUI

317112




317112












  • You have all the parts to prove your assertion.
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 25 at 16:31










  • Can you think of a map from $(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^times$ to $mathrm{Aut}(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})$? The first one that you can think of is an isomorphism: you just need to prove it. That it's a homomorphism is easy, as is injectivity. Surjectivity is slightly harder, and is essentially what's in your thought process. As a hint for that, consider where $varphi$ sends $[1]_n$.
    – user3482749
    Nov 25 at 16:50












  • As for LaTeX on here: see here.
    – user3482749
    Nov 25 at 16:51


















  • You have all the parts to prove your assertion.
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 25 at 16:31










  • Can you think of a map from $(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^times$ to $mathrm{Aut}(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})$? The first one that you can think of is an isomorphism: you just need to prove it. That it's a homomorphism is easy, as is injectivity. Surjectivity is slightly harder, and is essentially what's in your thought process. As a hint for that, consider where $varphi$ sends $[1]_n$.
    – user3482749
    Nov 25 at 16:50












  • As for LaTeX on here: see here.
    – user3482749
    Nov 25 at 16:51
















You have all the parts to prove your assertion.
– Joel Pereira
Nov 25 at 16:31




You have all the parts to prove your assertion.
– Joel Pereira
Nov 25 at 16:31












Can you think of a map from $(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^times$ to $mathrm{Aut}(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})$? The first one that you can think of is an isomorphism: you just need to prove it. That it's a homomorphism is easy, as is injectivity. Surjectivity is slightly harder, and is essentially what's in your thought process. As a hint for that, consider where $varphi$ sends $[1]_n$.
– user3482749
Nov 25 at 16:50






Can you think of a map from $(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^times$ to $mathrm{Aut}(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})$? The first one that you can think of is an isomorphism: you just need to prove it. That it's a homomorphism is easy, as is injectivity. Surjectivity is slightly harder, and is essentially what's in your thought process. As a hint for that, consider where $varphi$ sends $[1]_n$.
– user3482749
Nov 25 at 16:50














As for LaTeX on here: see here.
– user3482749
Nov 25 at 16:51




As for LaTeX on here: see here.
– user3482749
Nov 25 at 16:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













$mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ is cyclic generated by $1$. So an isomorphism $phi$ is completely determined by what 1 gets map to. Because suppose $phi(1)=k$ then $phi(m)=phi(1+1+1+...+1)=phi(1)+phi(1)+...+phi(1)= m*k$. Also, you need to make sure $0$ is the only element that gets map to $0$ as we have a isomorphism not a homomorphism. So you can't have $f(1)=k$ where $k$ is a zero divisor as then f(z)=zk=0 for some $z neq 0$. Which means $f(1)$ has to be invertible. Now you can check that $alpha :Aut(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}) rightarrow (mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^*$ by $alpha(f)=f(1)$ is an isomorphism.



Automorphism ring is a way to construct ring from groups. you can check that the reason why multiplication of two negative numbers is positive is because the ring of integers is actually automorphism of the abelian additive group $mathbb{Z}$. Because when you compose $f,g$ where $f(1)=-k$(sends all positive to negative),$g(1)=-n$(sends all positive to negative and vice-versa), you get that the composition of the two map sends all positive to all positive. Hope I got it right.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013033%2fautomorphisms-of-a-cyclic-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ is cyclic generated by $1$. So an isomorphism $phi$ is completely determined by what 1 gets map to. Because suppose $phi(1)=k$ then $phi(m)=phi(1+1+1+...+1)=phi(1)+phi(1)+...+phi(1)= m*k$. Also, you need to make sure $0$ is the only element that gets map to $0$ as we have a isomorphism not a homomorphism. So you can't have $f(1)=k$ where $k$ is a zero divisor as then f(z)=zk=0 for some $z neq 0$. Which means $f(1)$ has to be invertible. Now you can check that $alpha :Aut(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}) rightarrow (mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^*$ by $alpha(f)=f(1)$ is an isomorphism.



    Automorphism ring is a way to construct ring from groups. you can check that the reason why multiplication of two negative numbers is positive is because the ring of integers is actually automorphism of the abelian additive group $mathbb{Z}$. Because when you compose $f,g$ where $f(1)=-k$(sends all positive to negative),$g(1)=-n$(sends all positive to negative and vice-versa), you get that the composition of the two map sends all positive to all positive. Hope I got it right.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ is cyclic generated by $1$. So an isomorphism $phi$ is completely determined by what 1 gets map to. Because suppose $phi(1)=k$ then $phi(m)=phi(1+1+1+...+1)=phi(1)+phi(1)+...+phi(1)= m*k$. Also, you need to make sure $0$ is the only element that gets map to $0$ as we have a isomorphism not a homomorphism. So you can't have $f(1)=k$ where $k$ is a zero divisor as then f(z)=zk=0 for some $z neq 0$. Which means $f(1)$ has to be invertible. Now you can check that $alpha :Aut(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}) rightarrow (mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^*$ by $alpha(f)=f(1)$ is an isomorphism.



      Automorphism ring is a way to construct ring from groups. you can check that the reason why multiplication of two negative numbers is positive is because the ring of integers is actually automorphism of the abelian additive group $mathbb{Z}$. Because when you compose $f,g$ where $f(1)=-k$(sends all positive to negative),$g(1)=-n$(sends all positive to negative and vice-versa), you get that the composition of the two map sends all positive to all positive. Hope I got it right.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ is cyclic generated by $1$. So an isomorphism $phi$ is completely determined by what 1 gets map to. Because suppose $phi(1)=k$ then $phi(m)=phi(1+1+1+...+1)=phi(1)+phi(1)+...+phi(1)= m*k$. Also, you need to make sure $0$ is the only element that gets map to $0$ as we have a isomorphism not a homomorphism. So you can't have $f(1)=k$ where $k$ is a zero divisor as then f(z)=zk=0 for some $z neq 0$. Which means $f(1)$ has to be invertible. Now you can check that $alpha :Aut(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}) rightarrow (mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^*$ by $alpha(f)=f(1)$ is an isomorphism.



        Automorphism ring is a way to construct ring from groups. you can check that the reason why multiplication of two negative numbers is positive is because the ring of integers is actually automorphism of the abelian additive group $mathbb{Z}$. Because when you compose $f,g$ where $f(1)=-k$(sends all positive to negative),$g(1)=-n$(sends all positive to negative and vice-versa), you get that the composition of the two map sends all positive to all positive. Hope I got it right.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ is cyclic generated by $1$. So an isomorphism $phi$ is completely determined by what 1 gets map to. Because suppose $phi(1)=k$ then $phi(m)=phi(1+1+1+...+1)=phi(1)+phi(1)+...+phi(1)= m*k$. Also, you need to make sure $0$ is the only element that gets map to $0$ as we have a isomorphism not a homomorphism. So you can't have $f(1)=k$ where $k$ is a zero divisor as then f(z)=zk=0 for some $z neq 0$. Which means $f(1)$ has to be invertible. Now you can check that $alpha :Aut(mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}) rightarrow (mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z})^*$ by $alpha(f)=f(1)$ is an isomorphism.



        Automorphism ring is a way to construct ring from groups. you can check that the reason why multiplication of two negative numbers is positive is because the ring of integers is actually automorphism of the abelian additive group $mathbb{Z}$. Because when you compose $f,g$ where $f(1)=-k$(sends all positive to negative),$g(1)=-n$(sends all positive to negative and vice-versa), you get that the composition of the two map sends all positive to all positive. Hope I got it right.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 25 at 17:00









        mathnoob

        1,562320




        1,562320






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013033%2fautomorphisms-of-a-cyclic-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Tonle Sap (See)

            I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

            Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft