OpenAPI multimodule EAR deployment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to package 2 openapi.yaml definition files with it's corresponding implementation, each one in it's own war file into one ear and deploy it to openliberty. So war this works and when openliberty start up it shows me the url for ~/openapi/ui and the corresponding REST-Services ~/converter1 and ~/converter2. When I use openapi/ui I only can see one Service definition, the second one I can not see. Do I something wrong? Should my scenario work with openliberty?
My general UseCase is to have severel REST-Services defined by OpenApi's grouped together as long as they are in a common domain. Until now I can run each openapi.yaml on its own OpenLiberty but I like to group my REST-Services together into one OpenLiberty Server.
Does somebody knows a solution to my problem?
open-liberty
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to package 2 openapi.yaml definition files with it's corresponding implementation, each one in it's own war file into one ear and deploy it to openliberty. So war this works and when openliberty start up it shows me the url for ~/openapi/ui and the corresponding REST-Services ~/converter1 and ~/converter2. When I use openapi/ui I only can see one Service definition, the second one I can not see. Do I something wrong? Should my scenario work with openliberty?
My general UseCase is to have severel REST-Services defined by OpenApi's grouped together as long as they are in a common domain. Until now I can run each openapi.yaml on its own OpenLiberty but I like to group my REST-Services together into one OpenLiberty Server.
Does somebody knows a solution to my problem?
open-liberty
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to package 2 openapi.yaml definition files with it's corresponding implementation, each one in it's own war file into one ear and deploy it to openliberty. So war this works and when openliberty start up it shows me the url for ~/openapi/ui and the corresponding REST-Services ~/converter1 and ~/converter2. When I use openapi/ui I only can see one Service definition, the second one I can not see. Do I something wrong? Should my scenario work with openliberty?
My general UseCase is to have severel REST-Services defined by OpenApi's grouped together as long as they are in a common domain. Until now I can run each openapi.yaml on its own OpenLiberty but I like to group my REST-Services together into one OpenLiberty Server.
Does somebody knows a solution to my problem?
open-liberty
I would like to package 2 openapi.yaml definition files with it's corresponding implementation, each one in it's own war file into one ear and deploy it to openliberty. So war this works and when openliberty start up it shows me the url for ~/openapi/ui and the corresponding REST-Services ~/converter1 and ~/converter2. When I use openapi/ui I only can see one Service definition, the second one I can not see. Do I something wrong? Should my scenario work with openliberty?
My general UseCase is to have severel REST-Services defined by OpenApi's grouped together as long as they are in a common domain. Until now I can run each openapi.yaml on its own OpenLiberty but I like to group my REST-Services together into one OpenLiberty Server.
Does somebody knows a solution to my problem?
open-liberty
open-liberty
asked Nov 20 at 7:33
Igor
213
213
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
As you have noted, Open Liberty's MicroProfile OpenAPI support (via the mpOpenAPI-1.0 feature) only supports a single application per server.
If you want to aggregate multiple OpenAPI documents in a single server you have to use WebSphere Liberty's openapi-3.1 feature. See these docs for more info.
As I understand nowopenapi-3.1is only able to be used with IBM Liberty Server, OpenLiberty does not provide this support, am I right? Or is it possible to add this feature to OpenLiberty using another way?
– Igor
Nov 21 at 15:04
That's right. The best way to get this functionality into Open Liberty is to open a feature request at github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/issues and get a few votes behind that idea.
– ArthurDM
Nov 22 at 21:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
As you have noted, Open Liberty's MicroProfile OpenAPI support (via the mpOpenAPI-1.0 feature) only supports a single application per server.
If you want to aggregate multiple OpenAPI documents in a single server you have to use WebSphere Liberty's openapi-3.1 feature. See these docs for more info.
As I understand nowopenapi-3.1is only able to be used with IBM Liberty Server, OpenLiberty does not provide this support, am I right? Or is it possible to add this feature to OpenLiberty using another way?
– Igor
Nov 21 at 15:04
That's right. The best way to get this functionality into Open Liberty is to open a feature request at github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/issues and get a few votes behind that idea.
– ArthurDM
Nov 22 at 21:05
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
As you have noted, Open Liberty's MicroProfile OpenAPI support (via the mpOpenAPI-1.0 feature) only supports a single application per server.
If you want to aggregate multiple OpenAPI documents in a single server you have to use WebSphere Liberty's openapi-3.1 feature. See these docs for more info.
As I understand nowopenapi-3.1is only able to be used with IBM Liberty Server, OpenLiberty does not provide this support, am I right? Or is it possible to add this feature to OpenLiberty using another way?
– Igor
Nov 21 at 15:04
That's right. The best way to get this functionality into Open Liberty is to open a feature request at github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/issues and get a few votes behind that idea.
– ArthurDM
Nov 22 at 21:05
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
As you have noted, Open Liberty's MicroProfile OpenAPI support (via the mpOpenAPI-1.0 feature) only supports a single application per server.
If you want to aggregate multiple OpenAPI documents in a single server you have to use WebSphere Liberty's openapi-3.1 feature. See these docs for more info.
As you have noted, Open Liberty's MicroProfile OpenAPI support (via the mpOpenAPI-1.0 feature) only supports a single application per server.
If you want to aggregate multiple OpenAPI documents in a single server you have to use WebSphere Liberty's openapi-3.1 feature. See these docs for more info.
answered Nov 20 at 15:41
ArthurDM
34326
34326
As I understand nowopenapi-3.1is only able to be used with IBM Liberty Server, OpenLiberty does not provide this support, am I right? Or is it possible to add this feature to OpenLiberty using another way?
– Igor
Nov 21 at 15:04
That's right. The best way to get this functionality into Open Liberty is to open a feature request at github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/issues and get a few votes behind that idea.
– ArthurDM
Nov 22 at 21:05
add a comment |
As I understand nowopenapi-3.1is only able to be used with IBM Liberty Server, OpenLiberty does not provide this support, am I right? Or is it possible to add this feature to OpenLiberty using another way?
– Igor
Nov 21 at 15:04
That's right. The best way to get this functionality into Open Liberty is to open a feature request at github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/issues and get a few votes behind that idea.
– ArthurDM
Nov 22 at 21:05
As I understand now
openapi-3.1 is only able to be used with IBM Liberty Server, OpenLiberty does not provide this support, am I right? Or is it possible to add this feature to OpenLiberty using another way?– Igor
Nov 21 at 15:04
As I understand now
openapi-3.1 is only able to be used with IBM Liberty Server, OpenLiberty does not provide this support, am I right? Or is it possible to add this feature to OpenLiberty using another way?– Igor
Nov 21 at 15:04
That's right. The best way to get this functionality into Open Liberty is to open a feature request at github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/issues and get a few votes behind that idea.
– ArthurDM
Nov 22 at 21:05
That's right. The best way to get this functionality into Open Liberty is to open a feature request at github.com/OpenLiberty/open-liberty/issues and get a few votes behind that idea.
– ArthurDM
Nov 22 at 21:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53388213%2fopenapi-multimodule-ear-deployment%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown