Let $S$ be the set of all the numbers of the form $sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac{a_k}{3^k}$ where $a_k=0text{, }2$.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $S$ be the set of all the numbers of the form $sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac{a_k}{3^k}$ where $a_k=0text{, }2$.
I want to answer the following question about $S$?
Is $S$ uncountable?
Is $S$ closed?
Attempt:
If I consider the ternary representation of reals, then $S=[0,2]-$ {all those expression where $a_k=1$}
When $a_k=1$ then we have $$sum_{k=0}^{infty}3^{-k}$$ which is a basic geometric series with common ratio $1/3$ and initial term 1. So it adds up to $3/2$
Then $S=[0,2]-{3/2}$ so it is uncountable.
Am I going the right way?
real-analysis
asked Nov 26 at 13:27
StammeringMathematician
2,1911322
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $S$ be the set of all the numbers of the form $sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac{a_k}{3^k}$ where $a_k=0text{, }2$.
I want to answer the following question about $S$?
Is $S$ uncountable?
Is $S$ closed?
Attempt:
If I consider the ternary representation of reals, then $S=[0,2]-$ {all those expression where $a_k=1$}
When $a_k=1$ then we have $$sum_{k=0}^{infty}3^{-k}$$ which is a basic geometric series with common ratio $1/3$ and initial term 1. So it adds up to $3/2$
Then $S=[0,2]-{3/2}$ so it is uncountable.
Am I going the right way?
real-analysis
asked Nov 26 at 13:27
StammeringMathematician
2,1911322
Hint: argue that it is in bijection with the usual binary representations of numbers on $[0,1]$
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:32
@lulu Suppose I take the expression where a_k=2 for all $k$ then we have $sum 23^{-k}$ and this sums to $4/3$ which is not in $[0,1]$ ??
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:36
1
So, change the bijection. Your string is just a string of $0's$ and $2's$ and such strings are clearly in bijection with strings of $0's$ and $1's$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:42
@lulu I have understood what you are trying to say. Thanks for that. Can you please check my approach and whatever I have written in the OP. I will be thankful.
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:50
I don't understand what you wrote. Amongst the ternary numbers, the complement of those for which no $a_i=1$ is not just the single element for which all the $a_i=1$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:52
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $S$ be the set of all the numbers of the form $sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac{a_k}{3^k}$ where $a_k=0text{, }2$.
I want to answer the following question about $S$?
Is $S$ uncountable?
Is $S$ closed?
Attempt:
If I consider the ternary representation of reals, then $S=[0,2]-$ {all those expression where $a_k=1$}
When $a_k=1$ then we have $$sum_{k=0}^{infty}3^{-k}$$ which is a basic geometric series with common ratio $1/3$ and initial term 1. So it adds up to $3/2$
Then $S=[0,2]-{3/2}$ so it is uncountable.
Am I going the right way?
real-analysis
asked Nov 26 at 13:27
StammeringMathematician
2,1911322
Let $S$ be the set of all the numbers of the form $sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac{a_k}{3^k}$ where $a_k=0text{, }2$.
I want to answer the following question about $S$?
Is $S$ uncountable?
Is $S$ closed?
Attempt:
If I consider the ternary representation of reals, then $S=[0,2]-$ {all those expression where $a_k=1$}
When $a_k=1$ then we have $$sum_{k=0}^{infty}3^{-k}$$ which is a basic geometric series with common ratio $1/3$ and initial term 1. So it adds up to $3/2$
Then $S=[0,2]-{3/2}$ so it is uncountable.
Am I going the right way?
real-analysis
real-analysis
asked Nov 26 at 13:27
StammeringMathematician
2,1911322
asked Nov 26 at 13:27
StammeringMathematician
2,1911322
asked Nov 26 at 13:27
StammeringMathematician
2,1911322
asked Nov 26 at 13:27
StammeringMathematician
2,1911322
asked Nov 26 at 13:27
StammeringMathematician
2,1911322
2,1911322
Hint: argue that it is in bijection with the usual binary representations of numbers on $[0,1]$
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:32
@lulu Suppose I take the expression where a_k=2 for all $k$ then we have $sum 23^{-k}$ and this sums to $4/3$ which is not in $[0,1]$ ??
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:36
1
So, change the bijection. Your string is just a string of $0's$ and $2's$ and such strings are clearly in bijection with strings of $0's$ and $1's$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:42
@lulu I have understood what you are trying to say. Thanks for that. Can you please check my approach and whatever I have written in the OP. I will be thankful.
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:50
I don't understand what you wrote. Amongst the ternary numbers, the complement of those for which no $a_i=1$ is not just the single element for which all the $a_i=1$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:52
|
show 1 more comment
Hint: argue that it is in bijection with the usual binary representations of numbers on $[0,1]$
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:32
@lulu Suppose I take the expression where a_k=2 for all $k$ then we have $sum 23^{-k}$ and this sums to $4/3$ which is not in $[0,1]$ ??
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:36
1
So, change the bijection. Your string is just a string of $0's$ and $2's$ and such strings are clearly in bijection with strings of $0's$ and $1's$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:42
@lulu I have understood what you are trying to say. Thanks for that. Can you please check my approach and whatever I have written in the OP. I will be thankful.
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:50
I don't understand what you wrote. Amongst the ternary numbers, the complement of those for which no $a_i=1$ is not just the single element for which all the $a_i=1$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:52
Hint: argue that it is in bijection with the usual binary representations of numbers on $[0,1]$
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:32
Hint: argue that it is in bijection with the usual binary representations of numbers on $[0,1]$
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:32
@lulu Suppose I take the expression where a_k=2 for all $k$ then we have $sum 23^{-k}$ and this sums to $4/3$ which is not in $[0,1]$ ??
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:36
@lulu Suppose I take the expression where a_k=2 for all $k$ then we have $sum 23^{-k}$ and this sums to $4/3$ which is not in $[0,1]$ ??
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:36
1
1
So, change the bijection. Your string is just a string of $0's$ and $2's$ and such strings are clearly in bijection with strings of $0's$ and $1's$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:42
So, change the bijection. Your string is just a string of $0's$ and $2's$ and such strings are clearly in bijection with strings of $0's$ and $1's$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:42
@lulu I have understood what you are trying to say. Thanks for that. Can you please check my approach and whatever I have written in the OP. I will be thankful.
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:50
@lulu I have understood what you are trying to say. Thanks for that. Can you please check my approach and whatever I have written in the OP. I will be thankful.
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:50
I don't understand what you wrote. Amongst the ternary numbers, the complement of those for which no $a_i=1$ is not just the single element for which all the $a_i=1$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:52
I don't understand what you wrote. Amongst the ternary numbers, the complement of those for which no $a_i=1$ is not just the single element for which all the $a_i=1$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:52
|
show 1 more comment
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014333%2flet-s-be-the-set-of-all-the-numbers-of-the-form-sum-k-0-infty-fraca-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3014333%2flet-s-be-the-set-of-all-the-numbers-of-the-form-sum-k-0-infty-fraca-k%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Hint: argue that it is in bijection with the usual binary representations of numbers on $[0,1]$
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:32
@lulu Suppose I take the expression where a_k=2 for all $k$ then we have $sum 23^{-k}$ and this sums to $4/3$ which is not in $[0,1]$ ??
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:36
1
So, change the bijection. Your string is just a string of $0's$ and $2's$ and such strings are clearly in bijection with strings of $0's$ and $1's$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:42
@lulu I have understood what you are trying to say. Thanks for that. Can you please check my approach and whatever I have written in the OP. I will be thankful.
– StammeringMathematician
Nov 26 at 13:50
I don't understand what you wrote. Amongst the ternary numbers, the complement of those for which no $a_i=1$ is not just the single element for which all the $a_i=1$.
– lulu
Nov 26 at 13:52