Choice of volume forms in the Weyl Integration Formula












1














The following proof is adapted from Bump's Lie Groups. I've tried to rewrite the parts I find unclear. However, I seem to end up with a discrepancy. Please help me complete the proof or point out any mistakes.



Theorem: Let $G$ be a compact connected Lie group, and $T$ be a maximal torus. Let $f$ be a function constant on conjugacy classes of $G$. Give $G$ and $T$ normalized Haar measures, and write $mathfrak{g}=mathfrak{p} oplus mathfrak{t}$ where $mathfrak{p}$ is the orthogonal complement of $mathfrak{t}$ for some choice of invariant inner product. Then $$int_G fdg= frac{1}{|W|}int_{T}f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)dt$$ where $W=N(T)/T$, the Weyl group.



Proof: Let $omega$, $beta$ be left-invariant top forms on $G$, $T$ respectively which integrate to give $1$. These then give the Haar measures on $G$, $T$. These forms are also right-invariant since both $G$ and $T$ are compact.



Let $d=dim(G/T)$. We can also construct a left-invariant top form $alpha$ on $G/T$ as follows:



Choose bases $lbrace A_i rbrace$ and $lbrace B_i rbrace$ of $mathfrak{p}$ and $mathfrak{t}$ respectively such that $beta_e(wedge B_i)=1, omega_e(wedge A_i bigwedge wedge B_i)=1$. Identifying $bigwedge^{d} T_{eT}(G/T) = bigwedge^d mathfrak{p}$, define $alpha_{eT}(wedge A_i) = 1$. We then extend $alpha_{eT}$ to a differentiable section by setting $alpha_{xT}left(wedge V_i right) = alpha_{eT}(bigwedge dl_{x^{-1}}V_i)$. Here $V_i$ are tangent vectors at $xT$ and $dl_x$ is the differential of left translation.



It remains to check $alpha$ is well defined and smooth. If $x_1T = x_2T$, then we would have $x_2 = x_1t$ for some $t in T$. so $dl_{x_2^{-1}} = dl_{t^{-1}} circ dl_{x_1^{-1}}$. Thus it suffices to show $bigwedge dl_t (A_i)= wedge A_i$. This follows since we may compute $dl_t = Ad(t)|_mathfrak{p} in Aut(mathfrak{p})$ and since $detleft( Ad(t)|_{mathfrak{p}}right)=1$. $alpha$ is smooth since the left action of $G$ on $G/T$ is smooth. Thus $alpha$ is a left-invariant top form and gives us a left invariant measure on $G/T$. Note, I am aware that left-invariant measures can be constructed using the Riesz representation theorem however, since I intend to use the jacobian change of variables formula, it seems necessary to show that these measures are induced by differential forms.



Define $phi: G/T times T to G, phi(xT,t)=xtx^{-1}$. We now compute the pullback $phi^*omega$ in terms of $alpha wedge beta$ as follows: Fix $(xT,t) in G/T times T$.



Identify $mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t}$ with $T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright)$ by $A_i mapsto frac{d}{ds}(xe^{sA_i}T,t)$ and $B_i mapsto frac{d}{ds}(xT,te^{sB_i})$.



Since $phi(xe^{sA_i}T,t)=xe^{sA_i}te^{-sA_i}x^{-1} = xt(t^{-1}s^{sA_i}t)e^{-sA_i}x^{-1}$ and $phi(xT,te^{sB_i})= xte^{sB_i}x^{-1}$, we see that the differential of $phi$ is given as in the following commutative diagram:
$require{AMScd}$
begin{CD}
T_{(eT,e)}(G/Ttimes T)=mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t} @>{(Ad(t^{-1})-I)oplus I}>> mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t}=T_e(G)\
@VVV @V{dl_{xt}circ dr_x^{-1}}VV \
T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright) @>{dphi}>> T_{xtx^{-1}}(G)
end{CD}



Taking exterior powers we get,



begin{CD}
wedge mathfrak{p}otimes wedgemathfrak{t} @>{detleft(Ad(t^{-1})-Iright)}>> wedge mathfrak{p}otimes wedgemathfrak{t}=wedge T_e(G)\
@VVV @V{wedge (dl_{xt}circ dr_x^{-1})}VV \
wedge T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright) @>{Jphi}>> wedge T_{xtx^{-1}}(G)
end{CD}



After dualizing the above diagram, we see that since $omega$ is bi-invariant, $omega_{xtx^{-1}}$ pulls back vertically to $omega_e$. Since $(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}(wedge A_i otimes wedge B_i)= omega_e(wedge A_i bigwedge wedge B_i)=1$, we see that $omega_e$ pulls back along the top arrow to $detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}$. By the left invariance of $alpha$ and $beta$, we see that $(alpha wedge beta)_{(xT,t)}$ pulls back along the left vertical arrow to $(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}$. The commutativity of the above diagram thus shows $phi^*omega=detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)$.



We now use the following fact: There exist dense open sets $Usubset T$ and $Vsubset G$ such that $G/Ttimes U to V$ is a $|W|$-fold cover and $detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)$ never vanishes on $U$. For a proof, see (Bump's Lie Groups $2$nd Edition, prop. $17.3$).



We now complete the proof by computing:



begin{equation}
int_G fdg=int_G fw=int_V fw = frac{1}{|W|}int_{G/Ttimes U}phi^*(fw) = int_{G/Ttimes U}f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)\
=left(int_T f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)dtright) left(int_{G/T}alpharight).
end{equation}



Question: How do I show the form $alpha$ constructed above integrates to give $1$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • this is in knapp, you herb.
    – Pliny the ill
    Dec 4 '18 at 21:44










  • There's only a heuristic argument in Knapp. The above proof is written with his instructions in mind and it doesn't seem to work. You're an illiterate.
    – Unpud
    Dec 4 '18 at 21:54
















1














The following proof is adapted from Bump's Lie Groups. I've tried to rewrite the parts I find unclear. However, I seem to end up with a discrepancy. Please help me complete the proof or point out any mistakes.



Theorem: Let $G$ be a compact connected Lie group, and $T$ be a maximal torus. Let $f$ be a function constant on conjugacy classes of $G$. Give $G$ and $T$ normalized Haar measures, and write $mathfrak{g}=mathfrak{p} oplus mathfrak{t}$ where $mathfrak{p}$ is the orthogonal complement of $mathfrak{t}$ for some choice of invariant inner product. Then $$int_G fdg= frac{1}{|W|}int_{T}f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)dt$$ where $W=N(T)/T$, the Weyl group.



Proof: Let $omega$, $beta$ be left-invariant top forms on $G$, $T$ respectively which integrate to give $1$. These then give the Haar measures on $G$, $T$. These forms are also right-invariant since both $G$ and $T$ are compact.



Let $d=dim(G/T)$. We can also construct a left-invariant top form $alpha$ on $G/T$ as follows:



Choose bases $lbrace A_i rbrace$ and $lbrace B_i rbrace$ of $mathfrak{p}$ and $mathfrak{t}$ respectively such that $beta_e(wedge B_i)=1, omega_e(wedge A_i bigwedge wedge B_i)=1$. Identifying $bigwedge^{d} T_{eT}(G/T) = bigwedge^d mathfrak{p}$, define $alpha_{eT}(wedge A_i) = 1$. We then extend $alpha_{eT}$ to a differentiable section by setting $alpha_{xT}left(wedge V_i right) = alpha_{eT}(bigwedge dl_{x^{-1}}V_i)$. Here $V_i$ are tangent vectors at $xT$ and $dl_x$ is the differential of left translation.



It remains to check $alpha$ is well defined and smooth. If $x_1T = x_2T$, then we would have $x_2 = x_1t$ for some $t in T$. so $dl_{x_2^{-1}} = dl_{t^{-1}} circ dl_{x_1^{-1}}$. Thus it suffices to show $bigwedge dl_t (A_i)= wedge A_i$. This follows since we may compute $dl_t = Ad(t)|_mathfrak{p} in Aut(mathfrak{p})$ and since $detleft( Ad(t)|_{mathfrak{p}}right)=1$. $alpha$ is smooth since the left action of $G$ on $G/T$ is smooth. Thus $alpha$ is a left-invariant top form and gives us a left invariant measure on $G/T$. Note, I am aware that left-invariant measures can be constructed using the Riesz representation theorem however, since I intend to use the jacobian change of variables formula, it seems necessary to show that these measures are induced by differential forms.



Define $phi: G/T times T to G, phi(xT,t)=xtx^{-1}$. We now compute the pullback $phi^*omega$ in terms of $alpha wedge beta$ as follows: Fix $(xT,t) in G/T times T$.



Identify $mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t}$ with $T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright)$ by $A_i mapsto frac{d}{ds}(xe^{sA_i}T,t)$ and $B_i mapsto frac{d}{ds}(xT,te^{sB_i})$.



Since $phi(xe^{sA_i}T,t)=xe^{sA_i}te^{-sA_i}x^{-1} = xt(t^{-1}s^{sA_i}t)e^{-sA_i}x^{-1}$ and $phi(xT,te^{sB_i})= xte^{sB_i}x^{-1}$, we see that the differential of $phi$ is given as in the following commutative diagram:
$require{AMScd}$
begin{CD}
T_{(eT,e)}(G/Ttimes T)=mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t} @>{(Ad(t^{-1})-I)oplus I}>> mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t}=T_e(G)\
@VVV @V{dl_{xt}circ dr_x^{-1}}VV \
T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright) @>{dphi}>> T_{xtx^{-1}}(G)
end{CD}



Taking exterior powers we get,



begin{CD}
wedge mathfrak{p}otimes wedgemathfrak{t} @>{detleft(Ad(t^{-1})-Iright)}>> wedge mathfrak{p}otimes wedgemathfrak{t}=wedge T_e(G)\
@VVV @V{wedge (dl_{xt}circ dr_x^{-1})}VV \
wedge T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright) @>{Jphi}>> wedge T_{xtx^{-1}}(G)
end{CD}



After dualizing the above diagram, we see that since $omega$ is bi-invariant, $omega_{xtx^{-1}}$ pulls back vertically to $omega_e$. Since $(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}(wedge A_i otimes wedge B_i)= omega_e(wedge A_i bigwedge wedge B_i)=1$, we see that $omega_e$ pulls back along the top arrow to $detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}$. By the left invariance of $alpha$ and $beta$, we see that $(alpha wedge beta)_{(xT,t)}$ pulls back along the left vertical arrow to $(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}$. The commutativity of the above diagram thus shows $phi^*omega=detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)$.



We now use the following fact: There exist dense open sets $Usubset T$ and $Vsubset G$ such that $G/Ttimes U to V$ is a $|W|$-fold cover and $detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)$ never vanishes on $U$. For a proof, see (Bump's Lie Groups $2$nd Edition, prop. $17.3$).



We now complete the proof by computing:



begin{equation}
int_G fdg=int_G fw=int_V fw = frac{1}{|W|}int_{G/Ttimes U}phi^*(fw) = int_{G/Ttimes U}f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)\
=left(int_T f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)dtright) left(int_{G/T}alpharight).
end{equation}



Question: How do I show the form $alpha$ constructed above integrates to give $1$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • this is in knapp, you herb.
    – Pliny the ill
    Dec 4 '18 at 21:44










  • There's only a heuristic argument in Knapp. The above proof is written with his instructions in mind and it doesn't seem to work. You're an illiterate.
    – Unpud
    Dec 4 '18 at 21:54














1












1








1


1





The following proof is adapted from Bump's Lie Groups. I've tried to rewrite the parts I find unclear. However, I seem to end up with a discrepancy. Please help me complete the proof or point out any mistakes.



Theorem: Let $G$ be a compact connected Lie group, and $T$ be a maximal torus. Let $f$ be a function constant on conjugacy classes of $G$. Give $G$ and $T$ normalized Haar measures, and write $mathfrak{g}=mathfrak{p} oplus mathfrak{t}$ where $mathfrak{p}$ is the orthogonal complement of $mathfrak{t}$ for some choice of invariant inner product. Then $$int_G fdg= frac{1}{|W|}int_{T}f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)dt$$ where $W=N(T)/T$, the Weyl group.



Proof: Let $omega$, $beta$ be left-invariant top forms on $G$, $T$ respectively which integrate to give $1$. These then give the Haar measures on $G$, $T$. These forms are also right-invariant since both $G$ and $T$ are compact.



Let $d=dim(G/T)$. We can also construct a left-invariant top form $alpha$ on $G/T$ as follows:



Choose bases $lbrace A_i rbrace$ and $lbrace B_i rbrace$ of $mathfrak{p}$ and $mathfrak{t}$ respectively such that $beta_e(wedge B_i)=1, omega_e(wedge A_i bigwedge wedge B_i)=1$. Identifying $bigwedge^{d} T_{eT}(G/T) = bigwedge^d mathfrak{p}$, define $alpha_{eT}(wedge A_i) = 1$. We then extend $alpha_{eT}$ to a differentiable section by setting $alpha_{xT}left(wedge V_i right) = alpha_{eT}(bigwedge dl_{x^{-1}}V_i)$. Here $V_i$ are tangent vectors at $xT$ and $dl_x$ is the differential of left translation.



It remains to check $alpha$ is well defined and smooth. If $x_1T = x_2T$, then we would have $x_2 = x_1t$ for some $t in T$. so $dl_{x_2^{-1}} = dl_{t^{-1}} circ dl_{x_1^{-1}}$. Thus it suffices to show $bigwedge dl_t (A_i)= wedge A_i$. This follows since we may compute $dl_t = Ad(t)|_mathfrak{p} in Aut(mathfrak{p})$ and since $detleft( Ad(t)|_{mathfrak{p}}right)=1$. $alpha$ is smooth since the left action of $G$ on $G/T$ is smooth. Thus $alpha$ is a left-invariant top form and gives us a left invariant measure on $G/T$. Note, I am aware that left-invariant measures can be constructed using the Riesz representation theorem however, since I intend to use the jacobian change of variables formula, it seems necessary to show that these measures are induced by differential forms.



Define $phi: G/T times T to G, phi(xT,t)=xtx^{-1}$. We now compute the pullback $phi^*omega$ in terms of $alpha wedge beta$ as follows: Fix $(xT,t) in G/T times T$.



Identify $mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t}$ with $T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright)$ by $A_i mapsto frac{d}{ds}(xe^{sA_i}T,t)$ and $B_i mapsto frac{d}{ds}(xT,te^{sB_i})$.



Since $phi(xe^{sA_i}T,t)=xe^{sA_i}te^{-sA_i}x^{-1} = xt(t^{-1}s^{sA_i}t)e^{-sA_i}x^{-1}$ and $phi(xT,te^{sB_i})= xte^{sB_i}x^{-1}$, we see that the differential of $phi$ is given as in the following commutative diagram:
$require{AMScd}$
begin{CD}
T_{(eT,e)}(G/Ttimes T)=mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t} @>{(Ad(t^{-1})-I)oplus I}>> mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t}=T_e(G)\
@VVV @V{dl_{xt}circ dr_x^{-1}}VV \
T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright) @>{dphi}>> T_{xtx^{-1}}(G)
end{CD}



Taking exterior powers we get,



begin{CD}
wedge mathfrak{p}otimes wedgemathfrak{t} @>{detleft(Ad(t^{-1})-Iright)}>> wedge mathfrak{p}otimes wedgemathfrak{t}=wedge T_e(G)\
@VVV @V{wedge (dl_{xt}circ dr_x^{-1})}VV \
wedge T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright) @>{Jphi}>> wedge T_{xtx^{-1}}(G)
end{CD}



After dualizing the above diagram, we see that since $omega$ is bi-invariant, $omega_{xtx^{-1}}$ pulls back vertically to $omega_e$. Since $(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}(wedge A_i otimes wedge B_i)= omega_e(wedge A_i bigwedge wedge B_i)=1$, we see that $omega_e$ pulls back along the top arrow to $detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}$. By the left invariance of $alpha$ and $beta$, we see that $(alpha wedge beta)_{(xT,t)}$ pulls back along the left vertical arrow to $(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}$. The commutativity of the above diagram thus shows $phi^*omega=detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)$.



We now use the following fact: There exist dense open sets $Usubset T$ and $Vsubset G$ such that $G/Ttimes U to V$ is a $|W|$-fold cover and $detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)$ never vanishes on $U$. For a proof, see (Bump's Lie Groups $2$nd Edition, prop. $17.3$).



We now complete the proof by computing:



begin{equation}
int_G fdg=int_G fw=int_V fw = frac{1}{|W|}int_{G/Ttimes U}phi^*(fw) = int_{G/Ttimes U}f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)\
=left(int_T f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)dtright) left(int_{G/T}alpharight).
end{equation}



Question: How do I show the form $alpha$ constructed above integrates to give $1$?










share|cite|improve this question















The following proof is adapted from Bump's Lie Groups. I've tried to rewrite the parts I find unclear. However, I seem to end up with a discrepancy. Please help me complete the proof or point out any mistakes.



Theorem: Let $G$ be a compact connected Lie group, and $T$ be a maximal torus. Let $f$ be a function constant on conjugacy classes of $G$. Give $G$ and $T$ normalized Haar measures, and write $mathfrak{g}=mathfrak{p} oplus mathfrak{t}$ where $mathfrak{p}$ is the orthogonal complement of $mathfrak{t}$ for some choice of invariant inner product. Then $$int_G fdg= frac{1}{|W|}int_{T}f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)dt$$ where $W=N(T)/T$, the Weyl group.



Proof: Let $omega$, $beta$ be left-invariant top forms on $G$, $T$ respectively which integrate to give $1$. These then give the Haar measures on $G$, $T$. These forms are also right-invariant since both $G$ and $T$ are compact.



Let $d=dim(G/T)$. We can also construct a left-invariant top form $alpha$ on $G/T$ as follows:



Choose bases $lbrace A_i rbrace$ and $lbrace B_i rbrace$ of $mathfrak{p}$ and $mathfrak{t}$ respectively such that $beta_e(wedge B_i)=1, omega_e(wedge A_i bigwedge wedge B_i)=1$. Identifying $bigwedge^{d} T_{eT}(G/T) = bigwedge^d mathfrak{p}$, define $alpha_{eT}(wedge A_i) = 1$. We then extend $alpha_{eT}$ to a differentiable section by setting $alpha_{xT}left(wedge V_i right) = alpha_{eT}(bigwedge dl_{x^{-1}}V_i)$. Here $V_i$ are tangent vectors at $xT$ and $dl_x$ is the differential of left translation.



It remains to check $alpha$ is well defined and smooth. If $x_1T = x_2T$, then we would have $x_2 = x_1t$ for some $t in T$. so $dl_{x_2^{-1}} = dl_{t^{-1}} circ dl_{x_1^{-1}}$. Thus it suffices to show $bigwedge dl_t (A_i)= wedge A_i$. This follows since we may compute $dl_t = Ad(t)|_mathfrak{p} in Aut(mathfrak{p})$ and since $detleft( Ad(t)|_{mathfrak{p}}right)=1$. $alpha$ is smooth since the left action of $G$ on $G/T$ is smooth. Thus $alpha$ is a left-invariant top form and gives us a left invariant measure on $G/T$. Note, I am aware that left-invariant measures can be constructed using the Riesz representation theorem however, since I intend to use the jacobian change of variables formula, it seems necessary to show that these measures are induced by differential forms.



Define $phi: G/T times T to G, phi(xT,t)=xtx^{-1}$. We now compute the pullback $phi^*omega$ in terms of $alpha wedge beta$ as follows: Fix $(xT,t) in G/T times T$.



Identify $mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t}$ with $T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright)$ by $A_i mapsto frac{d}{ds}(xe^{sA_i}T,t)$ and $B_i mapsto frac{d}{ds}(xT,te^{sB_i})$.



Since $phi(xe^{sA_i}T,t)=xe^{sA_i}te^{-sA_i}x^{-1} = xt(t^{-1}s^{sA_i}t)e^{-sA_i}x^{-1}$ and $phi(xT,te^{sB_i})= xte^{sB_i}x^{-1}$, we see that the differential of $phi$ is given as in the following commutative diagram:
$require{AMScd}$
begin{CD}
T_{(eT,e)}(G/Ttimes T)=mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t} @>{(Ad(t^{-1})-I)oplus I}>> mathfrak{p}oplus mathfrak{t}=T_e(G)\
@VVV @V{dl_{xt}circ dr_x^{-1}}VV \
T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright) @>{dphi}>> T_{xtx^{-1}}(G)
end{CD}



Taking exterior powers we get,



begin{CD}
wedge mathfrak{p}otimes wedgemathfrak{t} @>{detleft(Ad(t^{-1})-Iright)}>> wedge mathfrak{p}otimes wedgemathfrak{t}=wedge T_e(G)\
@VVV @V{wedge (dl_{xt}circ dr_x^{-1})}VV \
wedge T_{(xT,t)}left(G/Ttimes Tright) @>{Jphi}>> wedge T_{xtx^{-1}}(G)
end{CD}



After dualizing the above diagram, we see that since $omega$ is bi-invariant, $omega_{xtx^{-1}}$ pulls back vertically to $omega_e$. Since $(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}(wedge A_i otimes wedge B_i)= omega_e(wedge A_i bigwedge wedge B_i)=1$, we see that $omega_e$ pulls back along the top arrow to $detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}$. By the left invariance of $alpha$ and $beta$, we see that $(alpha wedge beta)_{(xT,t)}$ pulls back along the left vertical arrow to $(alphawedgebeta)_{(eT,e)}$. The commutativity of the above diagram thus shows $phi^*omega=detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)$.



We now use the following fact: There exist dense open sets $Usubset T$ and $Vsubset G$ such that $G/Ttimes U to V$ is a $|W|$-fold cover and $detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)$ never vanishes on $U$. For a proof, see (Bump's Lie Groups $2$nd Edition, prop. $17.3$).



We now complete the proof by computing:



begin{equation}
int_G fdg=int_G fw=int_V fw = frac{1}{|W|}int_{G/Ttimes U}phi^*(fw) = int_{G/Ttimes U}f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)(alphawedgebeta)\
=left(int_T f(t)detleft(Ad(t^{-1})|_{mathfrak{p}}-I_{mathfrak{p}}right)dtright) left(int_{G/T}alpharight).
end{equation}



Question: How do I show the form $alpha$ constructed above integrates to give $1$?







proof-verification differential-geometry proof-writing lie-groups lie-algebras






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 2 '18 at 11:20

























asked Dec 1 '18 at 22:05









Unpud

428419




428419












  • this is in knapp, you herb.
    – Pliny the ill
    Dec 4 '18 at 21:44










  • There's only a heuristic argument in Knapp. The above proof is written with his instructions in mind and it doesn't seem to work. You're an illiterate.
    – Unpud
    Dec 4 '18 at 21:54


















  • this is in knapp, you herb.
    – Pliny the ill
    Dec 4 '18 at 21:44










  • There's only a heuristic argument in Knapp. The above proof is written with his instructions in mind and it doesn't seem to work. You're an illiterate.
    – Unpud
    Dec 4 '18 at 21:54
















this is in knapp, you herb.
– Pliny the ill
Dec 4 '18 at 21:44




this is in knapp, you herb.
– Pliny the ill
Dec 4 '18 at 21:44












There's only a heuristic argument in Knapp. The above proof is written with his instructions in mind and it doesn't seem to work. You're an illiterate.
– Unpud
Dec 4 '18 at 21:54




There's only a heuristic argument in Knapp. The above proof is written with his instructions in mind and it doesn't seem to work. You're an illiterate.
– Unpud
Dec 4 '18 at 21:54















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021890%2fchoice-of-volume-forms-in-the-weyl-integration-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021890%2fchoice-of-volume-forms-in-the-weyl-integration-formula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen