Using Green's Theorem to find the flux
$F(x,y)=langle y^2+e^x,x^2+e^yrangle$. Using green's theorem in its circulation and flux forms, determine the flux and circulation of $F$ around the triangle $T$, where $T$ is the triangle with vertices $(0,0),(1,0),$ and $(0,1)$, oriented counterclockwise.
My Try:
$f=y^2+e^x$
$g=x^2+e^y$
$$frac{partial f}{partial y}=2y$$
$$frac{partial g}{partial x}=2x$$
$$int Fcdot dr=intint_R(2x-2y)dA$$
$$int^{1}_{0}int_{0}^{1-x}(2x-2y)dydx=0$$
My quesiton: Is my above attempt correct? Because I got the answer as $0$
calculus integration multivariable-calculus definite-integrals greens-theorem
add a comment |
$F(x,y)=langle y^2+e^x,x^2+e^yrangle$. Using green's theorem in its circulation and flux forms, determine the flux and circulation of $F$ around the triangle $T$, where $T$ is the triangle with vertices $(0,0),(1,0),$ and $(0,1)$, oriented counterclockwise.
My Try:
$f=y^2+e^x$
$g=x^2+e^y$
$$frac{partial f}{partial y}=2y$$
$$frac{partial g}{partial x}=2x$$
$$int Fcdot dr=intint_R(2x-2y)dA$$
$$int^{1}_{0}int_{0}^{1-x}(2x-2y)dydx=0$$
My quesiton: Is my above attempt correct? Because I got the answer as $0$
calculus integration multivariable-calculus definite-integrals greens-theorem
add a comment |
$F(x,y)=langle y^2+e^x,x^2+e^yrangle$. Using green's theorem in its circulation and flux forms, determine the flux and circulation of $F$ around the triangle $T$, where $T$ is the triangle with vertices $(0,0),(1,0),$ and $(0,1)$, oriented counterclockwise.
My Try:
$f=y^2+e^x$
$g=x^2+e^y$
$$frac{partial f}{partial y}=2y$$
$$frac{partial g}{partial x}=2x$$
$$int Fcdot dr=intint_R(2x-2y)dA$$
$$int^{1}_{0}int_{0}^{1-x}(2x-2y)dydx=0$$
My quesiton: Is my above attempt correct? Because I got the answer as $0$
calculus integration multivariable-calculus definite-integrals greens-theorem
$F(x,y)=langle y^2+e^x,x^2+e^yrangle$. Using green's theorem in its circulation and flux forms, determine the flux and circulation of $F$ around the triangle $T$, where $T$ is the triangle with vertices $(0,0),(1,0),$ and $(0,1)$, oriented counterclockwise.
My Try:
$f=y^2+e^x$
$g=x^2+e^y$
$$frac{partial f}{partial y}=2y$$
$$frac{partial g}{partial x}=2x$$
$$int Fcdot dr=intint_R(2x-2y)dA$$
$$int^{1}_{0}int_{0}^{1-x}(2x-2y)dydx=0$$
My quesiton: Is my above attempt correct? Because I got the answer as $0$
calculus integration multivariable-calculus definite-integrals greens-theorem
calculus integration multivariable-calculus definite-integrals greens-theorem
edited Dec 1 '18 at 21:27
Masacroso
12.9k41746
12.9k41746
asked Dec 1 '18 at 21:19
user982787
1117
1117
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The result is correct indeed we have that the region is symmetric with respect to $y=x$ and the integral for $2x$ is equal to the integral for $2y$ that is
$$intint_R 2x,dA=intint_R2y,dA implies intint_R(2x-2y)dA=0$$
How did you get $int_0^x$? Can you please elaborate the answer.
– user982787
Dec 1 '18 at 21:26
@user982787 Sorry I had assumed the third vertex in $(1,1)$. Your result seems correct.
– gimusi
Dec 1 '18 at 21:30
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021844%2fusing-greens-theorem-to-find-the-flux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The result is correct indeed we have that the region is symmetric with respect to $y=x$ and the integral for $2x$ is equal to the integral for $2y$ that is
$$intint_R 2x,dA=intint_R2y,dA implies intint_R(2x-2y)dA=0$$
How did you get $int_0^x$? Can you please elaborate the answer.
– user982787
Dec 1 '18 at 21:26
@user982787 Sorry I had assumed the third vertex in $(1,1)$. Your result seems correct.
– gimusi
Dec 1 '18 at 21:30
add a comment |
The result is correct indeed we have that the region is symmetric with respect to $y=x$ and the integral for $2x$ is equal to the integral for $2y$ that is
$$intint_R 2x,dA=intint_R2y,dA implies intint_R(2x-2y)dA=0$$
How did you get $int_0^x$? Can you please elaborate the answer.
– user982787
Dec 1 '18 at 21:26
@user982787 Sorry I had assumed the third vertex in $(1,1)$. Your result seems correct.
– gimusi
Dec 1 '18 at 21:30
add a comment |
The result is correct indeed we have that the region is symmetric with respect to $y=x$ and the integral for $2x$ is equal to the integral for $2y$ that is
$$intint_R 2x,dA=intint_R2y,dA implies intint_R(2x-2y)dA=0$$
The result is correct indeed we have that the region is symmetric with respect to $y=x$ and the integral for $2x$ is equal to the integral for $2y$ that is
$$intint_R 2x,dA=intint_R2y,dA implies intint_R(2x-2y)dA=0$$
edited Dec 1 '18 at 21:29
answered Dec 1 '18 at 21:24
gimusi
1
1
How did you get $int_0^x$? Can you please elaborate the answer.
– user982787
Dec 1 '18 at 21:26
@user982787 Sorry I had assumed the third vertex in $(1,1)$. Your result seems correct.
– gimusi
Dec 1 '18 at 21:30
add a comment |
How did you get $int_0^x$? Can you please elaborate the answer.
– user982787
Dec 1 '18 at 21:26
@user982787 Sorry I had assumed the third vertex in $(1,1)$. Your result seems correct.
– gimusi
Dec 1 '18 at 21:30
How did you get $int_0^x$? Can you please elaborate the answer.
– user982787
Dec 1 '18 at 21:26
How did you get $int_0^x$? Can you please elaborate the answer.
– user982787
Dec 1 '18 at 21:26
@user982787 Sorry I had assumed the third vertex in $(1,1)$. Your result seems correct.
– gimusi
Dec 1 '18 at 21:30
@user982787 Sorry I had assumed the third vertex in $(1,1)$. Your result seems correct.
– gimusi
Dec 1 '18 at 21:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021844%2fusing-greens-theorem-to-find-the-flux%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown