Constellations in $Bbb P^n$












2














In one of his papers, Tao shows that set of Gaussian primes $Bbb P[i]$ contains arbitrarily shaped constellations (where "shape" is any set of Gaussian integers and "constellation" of that shape is scaled and translated version of it).



I'm almost sure that I have seen the similar claim involving Cartestian product of set of (real) primes with itself, i.e. $Bbb P^n$. However, I don't seem to be able to find any reference for that, and such reference is what I'm asking for. I might have also seen this as a conjecture somewhere.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Can you please post a reference to the Tao paper?
    – Klangen
    Nov 28 at 14:27






  • 1




    @Flermat arxiv.org/abs/math/0501314
    – Wojowu
    Nov 28 at 14:37










  • Thank you for the link.
    – Klangen
    Nov 28 at 14:39
















2














In one of his papers, Tao shows that set of Gaussian primes $Bbb P[i]$ contains arbitrarily shaped constellations (where "shape" is any set of Gaussian integers and "constellation" of that shape is scaled and translated version of it).



I'm almost sure that I have seen the similar claim involving Cartestian product of set of (real) primes with itself, i.e. $Bbb P^n$. However, I don't seem to be able to find any reference for that, and such reference is what I'm asking for. I might have also seen this as a conjecture somewhere.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Can you please post a reference to the Tao paper?
    – Klangen
    Nov 28 at 14:27






  • 1




    @Flermat arxiv.org/abs/math/0501314
    – Wojowu
    Nov 28 at 14:37










  • Thank you for the link.
    – Klangen
    Nov 28 at 14:39














2












2








2







In one of his papers, Tao shows that set of Gaussian primes $Bbb P[i]$ contains arbitrarily shaped constellations (where "shape" is any set of Gaussian integers and "constellation" of that shape is scaled and translated version of it).



I'm almost sure that I have seen the similar claim involving Cartestian product of set of (real) primes with itself, i.e. $Bbb P^n$. However, I don't seem to be able to find any reference for that, and such reference is what I'm asking for. I might have also seen this as a conjecture somewhere.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question















In one of his papers, Tao shows that set of Gaussian primes $Bbb P[i]$ contains arbitrarily shaped constellations (where "shape" is any set of Gaussian integers and "constellation" of that shape is scaled and translated version of it).



I'm almost sure that I have seen the similar claim involving Cartestian product of set of (real) primes with itself, i.e. $Bbb P^n$. However, I don't seem to be able to find any reference for that, and such reference is what I'm asking for. I might have also seen this as a conjecture somewhere.



Thanks in advance.







reference-request prime-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 28 at 14:35









amWhy

191k28224439




191k28224439










asked Dec 9 '14 at 21:33









Wojowu

16.9k22564




16.9k22564












  • Can you please post a reference to the Tao paper?
    – Klangen
    Nov 28 at 14:27






  • 1




    @Flermat arxiv.org/abs/math/0501314
    – Wojowu
    Nov 28 at 14:37










  • Thank you for the link.
    – Klangen
    Nov 28 at 14:39


















  • Can you please post a reference to the Tao paper?
    – Klangen
    Nov 28 at 14:27






  • 1




    @Flermat arxiv.org/abs/math/0501314
    – Wojowu
    Nov 28 at 14:37










  • Thank you for the link.
    – Klangen
    Nov 28 at 14:39
















Can you please post a reference to the Tao paper?
– Klangen
Nov 28 at 14:27




Can you please post a reference to the Tao paper?
– Klangen
Nov 28 at 14:27




1




1




@Flermat arxiv.org/abs/math/0501314
– Wojowu
Nov 28 at 14:37




@Flermat arxiv.org/abs/math/0501314
– Wojowu
Nov 28 at 14:37












Thank you for the link.
– Klangen
Nov 28 at 14:39




Thank you for the link.
– Klangen
Nov 28 at 14:39










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














If you can scale and translate a collection $(a_1,b_1),ldots,(a_k,b_k)$ to $(Aa_1+alpha,Bb_1+beta),ldots,(Aa_k+alpha,Bb_k+beta)$, asking for all of the latter to be pairs of primes, then the $a_i$ and $b_i$ are entirely independent—it's no different from the one-dimensional problem. So I would credit this conjecture to Dickson.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1059874%2fconstellations-in-bbb-pn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    If you can scale and translate a collection $(a_1,b_1),ldots,(a_k,b_k)$ to $(Aa_1+alpha,Bb_1+beta),ldots,(Aa_k+alpha,Bb_k+beta)$, asking for all of the latter to be pairs of primes, then the $a_i$ and $b_i$ are entirely independent—it's no different from the one-dimensional problem. So I would credit this conjecture to Dickson.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      2














      If you can scale and translate a collection $(a_1,b_1),ldots,(a_k,b_k)$ to $(Aa_1+alpha,Bb_1+beta),ldots,(Aa_k+alpha,Bb_k+beta)$, asking for all of the latter to be pairs of primes, then the $a_i$ and $b_i$ are entirely independent—it's no different from the one-dimensional problem. So I would credit this conjecture to Dickson.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        2












        2








        2






        If you can scale and translate a collection $(a_1,b_1),ldots,(a_k,b_k)$ to $(Aa_1+alpha,Bb_1+beta),ldots,(Aa_k+alpha,Bb_k+beta)$, asking for all of the latter to be pairs of primes, then the $a_i$ and $b_i$ are entirely independent—it's no different from the one-dimensional problem. So I would credit this conjecture to Dickson.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        If you can scale and translate a collection $(a_1,b_1),ldots,(a_k,b_k)$ to $(Aa_1+alpha,Bb_1+beta),ldots,(Aa_k+alpha,Bb_k+beta)$, asking for all of the latter to be pairs of primes, then the $a_i$ and $b_i$ are entirely independent—it's no different from the one-dimensional problem. So I would credit this conjecture to Dickson.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 10 '14 at 17:38









        Charles

        23.7k451113




        23.7k451113






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1059874%2fconstellations-in-bbb-pn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen