integrate $F(x)$: NO complex analysis, NO multivariable calculus
$begingroup$
Suppose I have an elementary function $F(x)$ for which $int_{-infty}^infty F(x) , text{d}x $ has an elementary value. Here 'elementary value' means anything generated by $0,1,+,-,div,times,exp,sin$.
Suppose, indeed, I can compute this value by means of complex contours or multivariable calculus — the latter being involved, say, in Feynman's trick or in the Fourier transform.
Can it be proved that I could have given a proof that the integral has that exact value, by 'single-variable methods' alone? That is to say, without differentiating or integrating anything with two real variables $x,y$? Will it suffice to work in the language of single-variable calculus?
I don't profess to know any model theory, so do help me to formulate the question more precisely.
I'm astounded to learn that for $F(x)=frac{sin(x)}{x}$, there are such methods: Evaluating the integral $int_0^infty frac{sin x} x dx = frac pi 2$?
But a general result would be all the more fascinating.
integration improper-integrals elementary-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose I have an elementary function $F(x)$ for which $int_{-infty}^infty F(x) , text{d}x $ has an elementary value. Here 'elementary value' means anything generated by $0,1,+,-,div,times,exp,sin$.
Suppose, indeed, I can compute this value by means of complex contours or multivariable calculus — the latter being involved, say, in Feynman's trick or in the Fourier transform.
Can it be proved that I could have given a proof that the integral has that exact value, by 'single-variable methods' alone? That is to say, without differentiating or integrating anything with two real variables $x,y$? Will it suffice to work in the language of single-variable calculus?
I don't profess to know any model theory, so do help me to formulate the question more precisely.
I'm astounded to learn that for $F(x)=frac{sin(x)}{x}$, there are such methods: Evaluating the integral $int_0^infty frac{sin x} x dx = frac pi 2$?
But a general result would be all the more fascinating.
integration improper-integrals elementary-functions
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 12:00
$begingroup$
It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
$endgroup$
– Chris Sanders
Dec 7 '18 at 14:59
$begingroup$
I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 7 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
@ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 21:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose I have an elementary function $F(x)$ for which $int_{-infty}^infty F(x) , text{d}x $ has an elementary value. Here 'elementary value' means anything generated by $0,1,+,-,div,times,exp,sin$.
Suppose, indeed, I can compute this value by means of complex contours or multivariable calculus — the latter being involved, say, in Feynman's trick or in the Fourier transform.
Can it be proved that I could have given a proof that the integral has that exact value, by 'single-variable methods' alone? That is to say, without differentiating or integrating anything with two real variables $x,y$? Will it suffice to work in the language of single-variable calculus?
I don't profess to know any model theory, so do help me to formulate the question more precisely.
I'm astounded to learn that for $F(x)=frac{sin(x)}{x}$, there are such methods: Evaluating the integral $int_0^infty frac{sin x} x dx = frac pi 2$?
But a general result would be all the more fascinating.
integration improper-integrals elementary-functions
$endgroup$
Suppose I have an elementary function $F(x)$ for which $int_{-infty}^infty F(x) , text{d}x $ has an elementary value. Here 'elementary value' means anything generated by $0,1,+,-,div,times,exp,sin$.
Suppose, indeed, I can compute this value by means of complex contours or multivariable calculus — the latter being involved, say, in Feynman's trick or in the Fourier transform.
Can it be proved that I could have given a proof that the integral has that exact value, by 'single-variable methods' alone? That is to say, without differentiating or integrating anything with two real variables $x,y$? Will it suffice to work in the language of single-variable calculus?
I don't profess to know any model theory, so do help me to formulate the question more precisely.
I'm astounded to learn that for $F(x)=frac{sin(x)}{x}$, there are such methods: Evaluating the integral $int_0^infty frac{sin x} x dx = frac pi 2$?
But a general result would be all the more fascinating.
integration improper-integrals elementary-functions
integration improper-integrals elementary-functions
edited Dec 7 '18 at 15:39
egreg
180k1485202
180k1485202
asked Dec 6 '18 at 3:29
Chris SandersChris Sanders
1,203217
1,203217
1
$begingroup$
My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 12:00
$begingroup$
It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
$endgroup$
– Chris Sanders
Dec 7 '18 at 14:59
$begingroup$
I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 7 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
@ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 21:26
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 12:00
$begingroup$
It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
$endgroup$
– Chris Sanders
Dec 7 '18 at 14:59
$begingroup$
I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 7 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
@ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 21:26
1
1
$begingroup$
My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 12:00
$begingroup$
My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 12:00
$begingroup$
It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
$endgroup$
– Chris Sanders
Dec 7 '18 at 14:59
$begingroup$
sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
$endgroup$
– Chris Sanders
Dec 7 '18 at 14:59
$begingroup$
I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 7 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 7 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
@ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 21:26
$begingroup$
@ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 21:26
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027996%2fintegrate-fx-no-complex-analysis-no-multivariable-calculus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027996%2fintegrate-fx-no-complex-analysis-no-multivariable-calculus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 12:00
$begingroup$
It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 14:48
$begingroup$
sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
$endgroup$
– Chris Sanders
Dec 7 '18 at 14:59
$begingroup$
I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 7 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
@ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 21:26