integrate $F(x)$: NO complex analysis, NO multivariable calculus












8












$begingroup$


Suppose I have an elementary function $F(x)$ for which $int_{-infty}^infty F(x) , text{d}x $ has an elementary value. Here 'elementary value' means anything generated by $0,1,+,-,div,times,exp,sin$.



Suppose, indeed, I can compute this value by means of complex contours or multivariable calculus — the latter being involved, say, in Feynman's trick or in the Fourier transform.



Can it be proved that I could have given a proof that the integral has that exact value, by 'single-variable methods' alone? That is to say, without differentiating or integrating anything with two real variables $x,y$? Will it suffice to work in the language of single-variable calculus?



I don't profess to know any model theory, so do help me to formulate the question more precisely.



I'm astounded to learn that for $F(x)=frac{sin(x)}{x}$, there are such methods: Evaluating the integral $int_0^infty frac{sin x} x dx = frac pi 2$?



But a general result would be all the more fascinating.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:00










  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Dec 7 '18 at 14:48












  • $begingroup$
    sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Sanders
    Dec 7 '18 at 14:59










  • $begingroup$
    I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Dec 7 '18 at 15:20










  • $begingroup$
    @ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Dec 7 '18 at 21:26


















8












$begingroup$


Suppose I have an elementary function $F(x)$ for which $int_{-infty}^infty F(x) , text{d}x $ has an elementary value. Here 'elementary value' means anything generated by $0,1,+,-,div,times,exp,sin$.



Suppose, indeed, I can compute this value by means of complex contours or multivariable calculus — the latter being involved, say, in Feynman's trick or in the Fourier transform.



Can it be proved that I could have given a proof that the integral has that exact value, by 'single-variable methods' alone? That is to say, without differentiating or integrating anything with two real variables $x,y$? Will it suffice to work in the language of single-variable calculus?



I don't profess to know any model theory, so do help me to formulate the question more precisely.



I'm astounded to learn that for $F(x)=frac{sin(x)}{x}$, there are such methods: Evaluating the integral $int_0^infty frac{sin x} x dx = frac pi 2$?



But a general result would be all the more fascinating.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:00










  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Dec 7 '18 at 14:48












  • $begingroup$
    sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Sanders
    Dec 7 '18 at 14:59










  • $begingroup$
    I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Dec 7 '18 at 15:20










  • $begingroup$
    @ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Dec 7 '18 at 21:26
















8












8








8


1



$begingroup$


Suppose I have an elementary function $F(x)$ for which $int_{-infty}^infty F(x) , text{d}x $ has an elementary value. Here 'elementary value' means anything generated by $0,1,+,-,div,times,exp,sin$.



Suppose, indeed, I can compute this value by means of complex contours or multivariable calculus — the latter being involved, say, in Feynman's trick or in the Fourier transform.



Can it be proved that I could have given a proof that the integral has that exact value, by 'single-variable methods' alone? That is to say, without differentiating or integrating anything with two real variables $x,y$? Will it suffice to work in the language of single-variable calculus?



I don't profess to know any model theory, so do help me to formulate the question more precisely.



I'm astounded to learn that for $F(x)=frac{sin(x)}{x}$, there are such methods: Evaluating the integral $int_0^infty frac{sin x} x dx = frac pi 2$?



But a general result would be all the more fascinating.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Suppose I have an elementary function $F(x)$ for which $int_{-infty}^infty F(x) , text{d}x $ has an elementary value. Here 'elementary value' means anything generated by $0,1,+,-,div,times,exp,sin$.



Suppose, indeed, I can compute this value by means of complex contours or multivariable calculus — the latter being involved, say, in Feynman's trick or in the Fourier transform.



Can it be proved that I could have given a proof that the integral has that exact value, by 'single-variable methods' alone? That is to say, without differentiating or integrating anything with two real variables $x,y$? Will it suffice to work in the language of single-variable calculus?



I don't profess to know any model theory, so do help me to formulate the question more precisely.



I'm astounded to learn that for $F(x)=frac{sin(x)}{x}$, there are such methods: Evaluating the integral $int_0^infty frac{sin x} x dx = frac pi 2$?



But a general result would be all the more fascinating.







integration improper-integrals elementary-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 7 '18 at 15:39









egreg

180k1485202




180k1485202










asked Dec 6 '18 at 3:29









Chris SandersChris Sanders

1,203217




1,203217








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:00










  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Dec 7 '18 at 14:48












  • $begingroup$
    sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Sanders
    Dec 7 '18 at 14:59










  • $begingroup$
    I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Dec 7 '18 at 15:20










  • $begingroup$
    @ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Dec 7 '18 at 21:26
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
    $endgroup$
    – GEdgar
    Dec 6 '18 at 12:00










  • $begingroup$
    It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Dec 7 '18 at 14:48












  • $begingroup$
    sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Sanders
    Dec 7 '18 at 14:59










  • $begingroup$
    I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Dec 7 '18 at 15:20










  • $begingroup$
    @ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
    $endgroup$
    – tomasz
    Dec 7 '18 at 21:26










1




1




$begingroup$
My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 12:00




$begingroup$
My guess: to your "Can it be proved" question the answer is NO.
$endgroup$
– GEdgar
Dec 6 '18 at 12:00












$begingroup$
It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 14:48






$begingroup$
It is not clear what you mean by "compute". I don't see how the standard meanings of "computation" would apply here (unless you give a list of permissible transformations or something). It is also not clear what you mean by "elementary value". I don't think it matters at all what the value is (you can make it zero by subtracting an elementary function from $F$), no matter how you interpret the rest of the question.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 14:48














$begingroup$
sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
$endgroup$
– Chris Sanders
Dec 7 '18 at 14:59




$begingroup$
sorry @tomasz I've now made some clarificatory edits. I didn't mean 'compute', but rather 'give a proof of that exact value'.
$endgroup$
– Chris Sanders
Dec 7 '18 at 14:59












$begingroup$
I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 7 '18 at 15:20




$begingroup$
I was going to say that I didn't think the integral of the Gaussian over $mathbb{R}$ could be calculated this way, but no, here are eleven proofs that the result is $sqrt{pi}$. At least three of them only rely on single-variable calculus.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
Dec 7 '18 at 15:20












$begingroup$
@ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 21:26






$begingroup$
@ChrisSanders: This is better. Still, I don't think the value matters at all. Suppose the value is $alpha$ for some $alpha$. Then replace $F$ with $G=F-frac{1}{x^2}cdot (-alpha)/ int_{-infty}^infty frac{1}{x^2}$. Then $int_{-infty}^infty G=0$ and $G$ is elementary, and as soon as you prove that the integral evaluates to $0$, you know that the integral of $F$ evaluates to $alpha$.
$endgroup$
– tomasz
Dec 7 '18 at 21:26












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027996%2fintegrate-fx-no-complex-analysis-no-multivariable-calculus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027996%2fintegrate-fx-no-complex-analysis-no-multivariable-calculus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen