Is C# .NET Serializer Atomic?












-2















Straight forward question. If CPU crashes during serialization, will the file be corrupted?



Example of .NET Serialization C#:



    public bool TrySerializeToXML<T>(String FilePath, T t, XmlAttributeOverrides XmlAttributeOverrides = null)
{
lock (SerializationLock)
{
XmlSerializer Serializer = null;
try
{
if (XmlAttributeOverrides == null) Serializer = new XmlSerializer(t.GetType());
else Serializer = new XmlSerializer(t.GetType(), XmlAttributeOverrides);
using (TextWriter TextWriter = new StreamWriter(FilePath))
{
Serializer.Serialize(TextWriter, t);
}
}
catch
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
}









share|improve this question


















  • 6





    The CPU never crashes, it merely tells you what you did wrong when you use C#. Use C++ if you favor an undiagnosable crash that nobody can help you with.

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:59











  • Thanks for the reply. Yes i understand... jeez.. common sense. I mean anything that happens during the operation will it cause the written file to be corrupted? or partially written

    – user1034912
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:03






  • 3





    The file will be corru

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:10






  • 1





    That was a lot funnier then I intended it to be, sorry. My wife give me funny looks. I ought to be more helpful: use transactional saves. First save to a file with a temporary name. If nothing went wrong then rename it to the file it should be. The File.Replace() overload with three arguments is important to get this right.

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:21













  • There should be League Tables of comments of the day, i think that would win for today

    – TheGeneral
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:24


















-2















Straight forward question. If CPU crashes during serialization, will the file be corrupted?



Example of .NET Serialization C#:



    public bool TrySerializeToXML<T>(String FilePath, T t, XmlAttributeOverrides XmlAttributeOverrides = null)
{
lock (SerializationLock)
{
XmlSerializer Serializer = null;
try
{
if (XmlAttributeOverrides == null) Serializer = new XmlSerializer(t.GetType());
else Serializer = new XmlSerializer(t.GetType(), XmlAttributeOverrides);
using (TextWriter TextWriter = new StreamWriter(FilePath))
{
Serializer.Serialize(TextWriter, t);
}
}
catch
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
}









share|improve this question


















  • 6





    The CPU never crashes, it merely tells you what you did wrong when you use C#. Use C++ if you favor an undiagnosable crash that nobody can help you with.

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:59











  • Thanks for the reply. Yes i understand... jeez.. common sense. I mean anything that happens during the operation will it cause the written file to be corrupted? or partially written

    – user1034912
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:03






  • 3





    The file will be corru

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:10






  • 1





    That was a lot funnier then I intended it to be, sorry. My wife give me funny looks. I ought to be more helpful: use transactional saves. First save to a file with a temporary name. If nothing went wrong then rename it to the file it should be. The File.Replace() overload with three arguments is important to get this right.

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:21













  • There should be League Tables of comments of the day, i think that would win for today

    – TheGeneral
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:24
















-2












-2








-2








Straight forward question. If CPU crashes during serialization, will the file be corrupted?



Example of .NET Serialization C#:



    public bool TrySerializeToXML<T>(String FilePath, T t, XmlAttributeOverrides XmlAttributeOverrides = null)
{
lock (SerializationLock)
{
XmlSerializer Serializer = null;
try
{
if (XmlAttributeOverrides == null) Serializer = new XmlSerializer(t.GetType());
else Serializer = new XmlSerializer(t.GetType(), XmlAttributeOverrides);
using (TextWriter TextWriter = new StreamWriter(FilePath))
{
Serializer.Serialize(TextWriter, t);
}
}
catch
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
}









share|improve this question














Straight forward question. If CPU crashes during serialization, will the file be corrupted?



Example of .NET Serialization C#:



    public bool TrySerializeToXML<T>(String FilePath, T t, XmlAttributeOverrides XmlAttributeOverrides = null)
{
lock (SerializationLock)
{
XmlSerializer Serializer = null;
try
{
if (XmlAttributeOverrides == null) Serializer = new XmlSerializer(t.GetType());
else Serializer = new XmlSerializer(t.GetType(), XmlAttributeOverrides);
using (TextWriter TextWriter = new StreamWriter(FilePath))
{
Serializer.Serialize(TextWriter, t);
}
}
catch
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
}






c# .net serialization






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 21 '18 at 23:56









user1034912user1034912

74122336




74122336








  • 6





    The CPU never crashes, it merely tells you what you did wrong when you use C#. Use C++ if you favor an undiagnosable crash that nobody can help you with.

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:59











  • Thanks for the reply. Yes i understand... jeez.. common sense. I mean anything that happens during the operation will it cause the written file to be corrupted? or partially written

    – user1034912
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:03






  • 3





    The file will be corru

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:10






  • 1





    That was a lot funnier then I intended it to be, sorry. My wife give me funny looks. I ought to be more helpful: use transactional saves. First save to a file with a temporary name. If nothing went wrong then rename it to the file it should be. The File.Replace() overload with three arguments is important to get this right.

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:21













  • There should be League Tables of comments of the day, i think that would win for today

    – TheGeneral
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:24
















  • 6





    The CPU never crashes, it merely tells you what you did wrong when you use C#. Use C++ if you favor an undiagnosable crash that nobody can help you with.

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 21 '18 at 23:59











  • Thanks for the reply. Yes i understand... jeez.. common sense. I mean anything that happens during the operation will it cause the written file to be corrupted? or partially written

    – user1034912
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:03






  • 3





    The file will be corru

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:10






  • 1





    That was a lot funnier then I intended it to be, sorry. My wife give me funny looks. I ought to be more helpful: use transactional saves. First save to a file with a temporary name. If nothing went wrong then rename it to the file it should be. The File.Replace() overload with three arguments is important to get this right.

    – Hans Passant
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:21













  • There should be League Tables of comments of the day, i think that would win for today

    – TheGeneral
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:24










6




6





The CPU never crashes, it merely tells you what you did wrong when you use C#. Use C++ if you favor an undiagnosable crash that nobody can help you with.

– Hans Passant
Nov 21 '18 at 23:59





The CPU never crashes, it merely tells you what you did wrong when you use C#. Use C++ if you favor an undiagnosable crash that nobody can help you with.

– Hans Passant
Nov 21 '18 at 23:59













Thanks for the reply. Yes i understand... jeez.. common sense. I mean anything that happens during the operation will it cause the written file to be corrupted? or partially written

– user1034912
Nov 22 '18 at 0:03





Thanks for the reply. Yes i understand... jeez.. common sense. I mean anything that happens during the operation will it cause the written file to be corrupted? or partially written

– user1034912
Nov 22 '18 at 0:03




3




3





The file will be corru

– Hans Passant
Nov 22 '18 at 0:10





The file will be corru

– Hans Passant
Nov 22 '18 at 0:10




1




1





That was a lot funnier then I intended it to be, sorry. My wife give me funny looks. I ought to be more helpful: use transactional saves. First save to a file with a temporary name. If nothing went wrong then rename it to the file it should be. The File.Replace() overload with three arguments is important to get this right.

– Hans Passant
Nov 22 '18 at 0:21







That was a lot funnier then I intended it to be, sorry. My wife give me funny looks. I ought to be more helpful: use transactional saves. First save to a file with a temporary name. If nothing went wrong then rename it to the file it should be. The File.Replace() overload with three arguments is important to get this right.

– Hans Passant
Nov 22 '18 at 0:21















There should be League Tables of comments of the day, i think that would win for today

– TheGeneral
Nov 22 '18 at 0:24







There should be League Tables of comments of the day, i think that would win for today

– TheGeneral
Nov 22 '18 at 0:24














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2















  1. XmlSerializer works on a stream


  2. That stream in this case is a FileStream


  3. A FileStream works on a flushable Buffer (of default 4k), meaning when the buffer reaches its max it will flush it to disk



If application crashes or serialisation error happens during serialisation you are likely to have no (or only partial data) flushed to disk



Also Atomic is debatably the wrong word to use here, either way it definitely is'nt Atomic






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53422097%2fis-c-sharp-net-serializer-atomic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2















    1. XmlSerializer works on a stream


    2. That stream in this case is a FileStream


    3. A FileStream works on a flushable Buffer (of default 4k), meaning when the buffer reaches its max it will flush it to disk



    If application crashes or serialisation error happens during serialisation you are likely to have no (or only partial data) flushed to disk



    Also Atomic is debatably the wrong word to use here, either way it definitely is'nt Atomic






    share|improve this answer




























      2















      1. XmlSerializer works on a stream


      2. That stream in this case is a FileStream


      3. A FileStream works on a flushable Buffer (of default 4k), meaning when the buffer reaches its max it will flush it to disk



      If application crashes or serialisation error happens during serialisation you are likely to have no (or only partial data) flushed to disk



      Also Atomic is debatably the wrong word to use here, either way it definitely is'nt Atomic






      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2








        1. XmlSerializer works on a stream


        2. That stream in this case is a FileStream


        3. A FileStream works on a flushable Buffer (of default 4k), meaning when the buffer reaches its max it will flush it to disk



        If application crashes or serialisation error happens during serialisation you are likely to have no (or only partial data) flushed to disk



        Also Atomic is debatably the wrong word to use here, either way it definitely is'nt Atomic






        share|improve this answer














        1. XmlSerializer works on a stream


        2. That stream in this case is a FileStream


        3. A FileStream works on a flushable Buffer (of default 4k), meaning when the buffer reaches its max it will flush it to disk



        If application crashes or serialisation error happens during serialisation you are likely to have no (or only partial data) flushed to disk



        Also Atomic is debatably the wrong word to use here, either way it definitely is'nt Atomic







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 22 '18 at 0:20









        TheGeneralTheGeneral

        28.8k63365




        28.8k63365






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53422097%2fis-c-sharp-net-serializer-atomic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen