Is a Change of Basis Matrix equivalent to the matrix inverse in this case?












1












$begingroup$


I was looking at how to construct a change of basis so that when given a system of linear equations one could change the associated matrix into a diagonal matrix -- thus making the system easier to solve.



Assume a $n times n$ matrix $A$ has all linearly independent columns that form a basis in the vector space. Then if we found a change of basis matrix using those linearly independent columns that should yield the identity matrix, correct? Each column in $A$ is now represented by itself as a basis element, so this should yield the identity matrix. We would also have to convert the $n times 1$ solution vector to this new basis, and that would be done by multiplying by the change of basis matrix.



It would seem the process I've described is exactly how an inverse matrix would act when trying to solve a system of equations. In particular, the change of basis matrix would change from the standard basis to the basis that is the set of n-linearly independent columns in the original matrix A.



Thanks in advance for reviewing!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I was looking at how to construct a change of basis so that when given a system of linear equations one could change the associated matrix into a diagonal matrix -- thus making the system easier to solve.



    Assume a $n times n$ matrix $A$ has all linearly independent columns that form a basis in the vector space. Then if we found a change of basis matrix using those linearly independent columns that should yield the identity matrix, correct? Each column in $A$ is now represented by itself as a basis element, so this should yield the identity matrix. We would also have to convert the $n times 1$ solution vector to this new basis, and that would be done by multiplying by the change of basis matrix.



    It would seem the process I've described is exactly how an inverse matrix would act when trying to solve a system of equations. In particular, the change of basis matrix would change from the standard basis to the basis that is the set of n-linearly independent columns in the original matrix A.



    Thanks in advance for reviewing!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I was looking at how to construct a change of basis so that when given a system of linear equations one could change the associated matrix into a diagonal matrix -- thus making the system easier to solve.



      Assume a $n times n$ matrix $A$ has all linearly independent columns that form a basis in the vector space. Then if we found a change of basis matrix using those linearly independent columns that should yield the identity matrix, correct? Each column in $A$ is now represented by itself as a basis element, so this should yield the identity matrix. We would also have to convert the $n times 1$ solution vector to this new basis, and that would be done by multiplying by the change of basis matrix.



      It would seem the process I've described is exactly how an inverse matrix would act when trying to solve a system of equations. In particular, the change of basis matrix would change from the standard basis to the basis that is the set of n-linearly independent columns in the original matrix A.



      Thanks in advance for reviewing!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I was looking at how to construct a change of basis so that when given a system of linear equations one could change the associated matrix into a diagonal matrix -- thus making the system easier to solve.



      Assume a $n times n$ matrix $A$ has all linearly independent columns that form a basis in the vector space. Then if we found a change of basis matrix using those linearly independent columns that should yield the identity matrix, correct? Each column in $A$ is now represented by itself as a basis element, so this should yield the identity matrix. We would also have to convert the $n times 1$ solution vector to this new basis, and that would be done by multiplying by the change of basis matrix.



      It would seem the process I've described is exactly how an inverse matrix would act when trying to solve a system of equations. In particular, the change of basis matrix would change from the standard basis to the basis that is the set of n-linearly independent columns in the original matrix A.



      Thanks in advance for reviewing!







      linear-algebra change-of-basis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 17 '18 at 6:31









      Zeekless

      577111




      577111










      asked Dec 17 '18 at 5:41









      H_1317H_1317

      1309




      1309






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Indeed, multiplying by $A^{-1}$ changes basis from the standard basis to the basis consisting of columns of $A$. This useful fact is emphasized in Trefethen's popular textbook Numerical Linear Algebra.



          If $x = A^{-1} y$, then $y = Ax$. This tells us that $y$ can be written as a linear combination of the columns of $A$, using the coefficients stored in $x$. In other words, $x$ is the coordinate vector of $y$ with respect to the basis consisting of columns of $A$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043572%2fis-a-change-of-basis-matrix-equivalent-to-the-matrix-inverse-in-this-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Indeed, multiplying by $A^{-1}$ changes basis from the standard basis to the basis consisting of columns of $A$. This useful fact is emphasized in Trefethen's popular textbook Numerical Linear Algebra.



            If $x = A^{-1} y$, then $y = Ax$. This tells us that $y$ can be written as a linear combination of the columns of $A$, using the coefficients stored in $x$. In other words, $x$ is the coordinate vector of $y$ with respect to the basis consisting of columns of $A$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Indeed, multiplying by $A^{-1}$ changes basis from the standard basis to the basis consisting of columns of $A$. This useful fact is emphasized in Trefethen's popular textbook Numerical Linear Algebra.



              If $x = A^{-1} y$, then $y = Ax$. This tells us that $y$ can be written as a linear combination of the columns of $A$, using the coefficients stored in $x$. In other words, $x$ is the coordinate vector of $y$ with respect to the basis consisting of columns of $A$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Indeed, multiplying by $A^{-1}$ changes basis from the standard basis to the basis consisting of columns of $A$. This useful fact is emphasized in Trefethen's popular textbook Numerical Linear Algebra.



                If $x = A^{-1} y$, then $y = Ax$. This tells us that $y$ can be written as a linear combination of the columns of $A$, using the coefficients stored in $x$. In other words, $x$ is the coordinate vector of $y$ with respect to the basis consisting of columns of $A$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Indeed, multiplying by $A^{-1}$ changes basis from the standard basis to the basis consisting of columns of $A$. This useful fact is emphasized in Trefethen's popular textbook Numerical Linear Algebra.



                If $x = A^{-1} y$, then $y = Ax$. This tells us that $y$ can be written as a linear combination of the columns of $A$, using the coefficients stored in $x$. In other words, $x$ is the coordinate vector of $y$ with respect to the basis consisting of columns of $A$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 17 '18 at 5:59









                littleOlittleO

                29.8k646109




                29.8k646109






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043572%2fis-a-change-of-basis-matrix-equivalent-to-the-matrix-inverse-in-this-case%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen