Can we deduce that $M_0$ is a submodule of the limit of the following diagram?
$begingroup$
Let $M_0$ be an R-module, and suppose $M_{n+1}$ is the pushout of the diagram below as shown, for all $n in mathbb{N}$:
$$begin{array}{ccc}M_n&to& M_{n+1}\uparrow &&uparrow\A&to& Bend{array}$$
Define $M:= colim(M_0 rightarrow M_1 rightarrow M_2 rightarrow.....)$
Can we deduce that $M_0$ is a submodule of $M$? What about if the left arrow is surjective and the bottom arrow is injective? Would this help?
I am asking this in order to complete my understanding of the proof that $R-mod$ has enough injectives. In this proof, A and B are given, however there is no justification given for the claim which I am inquiring about, it is just stated to be obvious. Thanks.
category-theory homological-algebra limits-colimits diagram-chasing
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $M_0$ be an R-module, and suppose $M_{n+1}$ is the pushout of the diagram below as shown, for all $n in mathbb{N}$:
$$begin{array}{ccc}M_n&to& M_{n+1}\uparrow &&uparrow\A&to& Bend{array}$$
Define $M:= colim(M_0 rightarrow M_1 rightarrow M_2 rightarrow.....)$
Can we deduce that $M_0$ is a submodule of $M$? What about if the left arrow is surjective and the bottom arrow is injective? Would this help?
I am asking this in order to complete my understanding of the proof that $R-mod$ has enough injectives. In this proof, A and B are given, however there is no justification given for the claim which I am inquiring about, it is just stated to be obvious. Thanks.
category-theory homological-algebra limits-colimits diagram-chasing
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $M_0$ be an R-module, and suppose $M_{n+1}$ is the pushout of the diagram below as shown, for all $n in mathbb{N}$:
$$begin{array}{ccc}M_n&to& M_{n+1}\uparrow &&uparrow\A&to& Bend{array}$$
Define $M:= colim(M_0 rightarrow M_1 rightarrow M_2 rightarrow.....)$
Can we deduce that $M_0$ is a submodule of $M$? What about if the left arrow is surjective and the bottom arrow is injective? Would this help?
I am asking this in order to complete my understanding of the proof that $R-mod$ has enough injectives. In this proof, A and B are given, however there is no justification given for the claim which I am inquiring about, it is just stated to be obvious. Thanks.
category-theory homological-algebra limits-colimits diagram-chasing
$endgroup$
Let $M_0$ be an R-module, and suppose $M_{n+1}$ is the pushout of the diagram below as shown, for all $n in mathbb{N}$:
$$begin{array}{ccc}M_n&to& M_{n+1}\uparrow &&uparrow\A&to& Bend{array}$$
Define $M:= colim(M_0 rightarrow M_1 rightarrow M_2 rightarrow.....)$
Can we deduce that $M_0$ is a submodule of $M$? What about if the left arrow is surjective and the bottom arrow is injective? Would this help?
I am asking this in order to complete my understanding of the proof that $R-mod$ has enough injectives. In this proof, A and B are given, however there is no justification given for the claim which I am inquiring about, it is just stated to be obvious. Thanks.
category-theory homological-algebra limits-colimits diagram-chasing
category-theory homological-algebra limits-colimits diagram-chasing
asked Jan 3 at 15:02
DavenDaven
41229
41229
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If not yet done, convince yourself (by element chasing) that the pushout of an injective module homomorphism is injective.
Then, if $Ato B$ is injective, then $M_i$ embeds to $M_{i+1}$, and it's easy to see that $M':=bigcup_iM_i$ satisfies the universal property of the colimit, hence $Mcong M'$ and the natural arrow $M_ito M$ is injective for all $i$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
$endgroup$
– Daven
Jan 3 at 15:58
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060633%2fcan-we-deduce-that-m-0-is-a-submodule-of-the-limit-of-the-following-diagram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If not yet done, convince yourself (by element chasing) that the pushout of an injective module homomorphism is injective.
Then, if $Ato B$ is injective, then $M_i$ embeds to $M_{i+1}$, and it's easy to see that $M':=bigcup_iM_i$ satisfies the universal property of the colimit, hence $Mcong M'$ and the natural arrow $M_ito M$ is injective for all $i$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
$endgroup$
– Daven
Jan 3 at 15:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If not yet done, convince yourself (by element chasing) that the pushout of an injective module homomorphism is injective.
Then, if $Ato B$ is injective, then $M_i$ embeds to $M_{i+1}$, and it's easy to see that $M':=bigcup_iM_i$ satisfies the universal property of the colimit, hence $Mcong M'$ and the natural arrow $M_ito M$ is injective for all $i$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
$endgroup$
– Daven
Jan 3 at 15:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If not yet done, convince yourself (by element chasing) that the pushout of an injective module homomorphism is injective.
Then, if $Ato B$ is injective, then $M_i$ embeds to $M_{i+1}$, and it's easy to see that $M':=bigcup_iM_i$ satisfies the universal property of the colimit, hence $Mcong M'$ and the natural arrow $M_ito M$ is injective for all $i$.
$endgroup$
If not yet done, convince yourself (by element chasing) that the pushout of an injective module homomorphism is injective.
Then, if $Ato B$ is injective, then $M_i$ embeds to $M_{i+1}$, and it's easy to see that $M':=bigcup_iM_i$ satisfies the universal property of the colimit, hence $Mcong M'$ and the natural arrow $M_ito M$ is injective for all $i$.
answered Jan 3 at 15:19
BerciBerci
61.8k23675
61.8k23675
$begingroup$
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
$endgroup$
– Daven
Jan 3 at 15:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
$endgroup$
– Daven
Jan 3 at 15:58
$begingroup$
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
$endgroup$
– Daven
Jan 3 at 15:58
$begingroup$
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
$endgroup$
– Daven
Jan 3 at 15:58
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060633%2fcan-we-deduce-that-m-0-is-a-submodule-of-the-limit-of-the-following-diagram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown