Why have all negatives been exposed to one frame?
I recently shot a roll of kodak 200 (36 exposures) and got them developed on the high street and all 36 shots have been exposed onto one frame, shown on the attached image; all other 35 frames are blank. What could have caused this? I loaded and unloaded the film as usual but am using a borrowed K1000. This isn't the first time this has happened so could really do with some ideas as to why this happens.
film troubleshooting pentax 35mm pentax-k1000
edited Jan 4 at 8:50
Michael C
134k7152380
asked Jan 3 at 13:31
Jack DoddsJack Dodds
7613
|
show 2 more comments
I recently shot a roll of kodak 200 (36 exposures) and got them developed on the high street and all 36 shots have been exposed onto one frame, shown on the attached image; all other 35 frames are blank. What could have caused this? I loaded and unloaded the film as usual but am using a borrowed K1000. This isn't the first time this has happened so could really do with some ideas as to why this happens.
film troubleshooting pentax 35mm pentax-k1000
edited Jan 4 at 8:50
Michael C
134k7152380
asked Jan 3 at 13:31
Jack DoddsJack Dodds
7613
2
Is the frame counter working? It seems that the film is not advancing - but I'm wondering, are you simply stopping and rewinding the film after 36 frames?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:10
6
Have you checked the camera manual to confirm you are correctly loading and winding the film?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:11
29
As an aside, it's remarkable that you exposed one frame 36 times and still got a discernible image(s) out of it!
– Andy
Jan 3 at 14:40
9
It's a great shot, anyway!
– Strawberry
Jan 3 at 16:06
7
@jcaron On the Pentax K1000 and many other manual cameras, the film advance lever serves dual purposes - to advance the film of course, but also to cock the shutter. It's not possible to take a second (or subsequent) photo without using the film advance lever.
– osullic
Jan 3 at 17:14
|
show 2 more comments
I recently shot a roll of kodak 200 (36 exposures) and got them developed on the high street and all 36 shots have been exposed onto one frame, shown on the attached image; all other 35 frames are blank. What could have caused this? I loaded and unloaded the film as usual but am using a borrowed K1000. This isn't the first time this has happened so could really do with some ideas as to why this happens.
film troubleshooting pentax 35mm pentax-k1000
edited Jan 4 at 8:50
Michael C
134k7152380
asked Jan 3 at 13:31
Jack DoddsJack Dodds
7613
I recently shot a roll of kodak 200 (36 exposures) and got them developed on the high street and all 36 shots have been exposed onto one frame, shown on the attached image; all other 35 frames are blank. What could have caused this? I loaded and unloaded the film as usual but am using a borrowed K1000. This isn't the first time this has happened so could really do with some ideas as to why this happens.
film troubleshooting pentax 35mm pentax-k1000
film troubleshooting pentax 35mm pentax-k1000
edited Jan 4 at 8:50
Michael C
134k7152380
asked Jan 3 at 13:31
Jack DoddsJack Dodds
7613
edited Jan 4 at 8:50
Michael C
134k7152380
asked Jan 3 at 13:31
Jack DoddsJack Dodds
7613
edited Jan 4 at 8:50
Michael C
134k7152380
edited Jan 4 at 8:50
Michael C
134k7152380
edited Jan 4 at 8:50
Michael C
134k7152380
134k7152380
asked Jan 3 at 13:31
Jack DoddsJack Dodds
7613
asked Jan 3 at 13:31
Jack DoddsJack Dodds
7613
asked Jan 3 at 13:31
Jack DoddsJack Dodds
7613
7613
2
Is the frame counter working? It seems that the film is not advancing - but I'm wondering, are you simply stopping and rewinding the film after 36 frames?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:10
6
Have you checked the camera manual to confirm you are correctly loading and winding the film?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:11
29
As an aside, it's remarkable that you exposed one frame 36 times and still got a discernible image(s) out of it!
– Andy
Jan 3 at 14:40
9
It's a great shot, anyway!
– Strawberry
Jan 3 at 16:06
7
@jcaron On the Pentax K1000 and many other manual cameras, the film advance lever serves dual purposes - to advance the film of course, but also to cock the shutter. It's not possible to take a second (or subsequent) photo without using the film advance lever.
– osullic
Jan 3 at 17:14
|
show 2 more comments
2
Is the frame counter working? It seems that the film is not advancing - but I'm wondering, are you simply stopping and rewinding the film after 36 frames?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:10
6
Have you checked the camera manual to confirm you are correctly loading and winding the film?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:11
29
As an aside, it's remarkable that you exposed one frame 36 times and still got a discernible image(s) out of it!
– Andy
Jan 3 at 14:40
9
It's a great shot, anyway!
– Strawberry
Jan 3 at 16:06
7
@jcaron On the Pentax K1000 and many other manual cameras, the film advance lever serves dual purposes - to advance the film of course, but also to cock the shutter. It's not possible to take a second (or subsequent) photo without using the film advance lever.
– osullic
Jan 3 at 17:14
2
2
Is the frame counter working? It seems that the film is not advancing - but I'm wondering, are you simply stopping and rewinding the film after 36 frames?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:10
Is the frame counter working? It seems that the film is not advancing - but I'm wondering, are you simply stopping and rewinding the film after 36 frames?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:10
6
6
Have you checked the camera manual to confirm you are correctly loading and winding the film?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:11
Have you checked the camera manual to confirm you are correctly loading and winding the film?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:11
29
29
As an aside, it's remarkable that you exposed one frame 36 times and still got a discernible image(s) out of it!
– Andy
Jan 3 at 14:40
As an aside, it's remarkable that you exposed one frame 36 times and still got a discernible image(s) out of it!
– Andy
Jan 3 at 14:40
9
9
It's a great shot, anyway!
– Strawberry
Jan 3 at 16:06
It's a great shot, anyway!
– Strawberry
Jan 3 at 16:06
7
7
@jcaron On the Pentax K1000 and many other manual cameras, the film advance lever serves dual purposes - to advance the film of course, but also to cock the shutter. It's not possible to take a second (or subsequent) photo without using the film advance lever.
– osullic
Jan 3 at 17:14
@jcaron On the Pentax K1000 and many other manual cameras, the film advance lever serves dual purposes - to advance the film of course, but also to cock the shutter. It's not possible to take a second (or subsequent) photo without using the film advance lever.
– osullic
Jan 3 at 17:14
|
show 2 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Well, it seems obvious that the film did not advance between shots. Whether that's because of user error (film not installed right so it didn't catch on the advancing mechanism) or a hardware issue with the advance mechanism not working properly can't really be determined without more information and/or inspection of the camera...
Try taking a couple shots with the back open and no film in, and watch the takeup spool when you operate the film advance lever to see if it looks to be operating correctly. Assuming that particular model allows that, anyway - might need to locate and defeat a microswitch or two to make the camera think the back is closed and/or there's film installed. I'm not familiar with that model, so I don't know...
answered Jan 3 at 13:37
twalbergtwalberg
2,710613
4
The k1000 has a meter, aaaand that’s it for electronics. It works just fine with the back cracked. I’d also double check the meters accuracy. I’m skeptical that 36 proper exposures on 1 frame yielded anything but blown.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 15:23
6
The meter is barely even "electronics". It might just be "electrics" :)
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:28
1
@Hueco I'm not super-surprised. Portra 400 can be overexposed by, like, 9 stops, without even really noticing.
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:31
2
@mattdm lulz about the meter. Even with the ability of c41 to tolerate overexposure, a properly exposed highlight in the same spot on the frame should be blown after a few frames at most. I’d have expected sheer chance on 36 frames to put enough highlights over the frame to where the entire frame blew out. I’d love to see the neg’s density. Maybe it was one hell of a salvage by the printer.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 18:30
3
For troubleshooting, I think you can assume the film advance must have worked at some point because if it was completely faulty or misloaded, the single frame would have been exposed to light on loading, so it would be completely ruined.
– user71659
Jan 5 at 2:15
|
show 2 more comments
Doing double exposures with the k1000 requires that you cock the shutter using the lever while simultaneously holding down the release on the camera bottom. This allows the shutter to cock while not advancing the film.
Check to make sure that this release button isn’t sticking in.
edited Jan 3 at 22:11
osullic
6,23411127
answered Jan 3 at 18:33
HuecoHueco
11.9k32857
add a comment |
Like twalberg says, it seems obvious that the film did not advance between shots.
Make sure the film advance mechanism is working properly. When you have no film loaded, open the back and check that both the film take-up spool and the sprocket teeth both turn at the same time when you work the film advance lever. The sprocket teeth should turn, even if you try to (gently) hold them back with your finger.
A couple of other things to check:
Like Hueco says, check that the sprocket release button on the bottom of the camera is not stuck in.
Take a look at the developed film (the strip of negatives), looking
for ripped/damaged sprocket holes.
Also make sure you are loading the film correctly. I came across this manual for the K1000. Page 10 explains loading the film.
When loading the film: after threading the leader onto the take-up spool make sure the sprocket holes on both sides of the film strip are actually aligned with the sprocket teeth before closing the back. Note that the film leader goes under the take-up spool. If you get this wrong the first frame advance will undo your film threading and the sprockets won't engage.
Remember that you should move the film advance lever its full distance to make sure the film advances one full frame between shots.
edited Jan 4 at 8:49
Michael C
134k7152380
answered Jan 3 at 19:18
NickNick
511
I seem to remember having this problem too, of not pulling the lever quite far enough.
– Aaron Brick
Jan 5 at 21:07
add a comment |
When you cock the shutter/advance the film, the rewind knob should spin as it is unwinding film.
If this is not happening, be sure the button underneath the camera to release the advance spool is not stuck and or check to be sure your sprocket holes are lined up with the advance spool and they are not tearing the sprocket holes.
answered Jan 8 at 17:12
DavepixDavepix
1114
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103959%2fwhy-have-all-negatives-been-exposed-to-one-frame%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Well, it seems obvious that the film did not advance between shots. Whether that's because of user error (film not installed right so it didn't catch on the advancing mechanism) or a hardware issue with the advance mechanism not working properly can't really be determined without more information and/or inspection of the camera...
Try taking a couple shots with the back open and no film in, and watch the takeup spool when you operate the film advance lever to see if it looks to be operating correctly. Assuming that particular model allows that, anyway - might need to locate and defeat a microswitch or two to make the camera think the back is closed and/or there's film installed. I'm not familiar with that model, so I don't know...
answered Jan 3 at 13:37
twalbergtwalberg
2,710613
4
The k1000 has a meter, aaaand that’s it for electronics. It works just fine with the back cracked. I’d also double check the meters accuracy. I’m skeptical that 36 proper exposures on 1 frame yielded anything but blown.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 15:23
6
The meter is barely even "electronics". It might just be "electrics" :)
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:28
1
@Hueco I'm not super-surprised. Portra 400 can be overexposed by, like, 9 stops, without even really noticing.
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:31
2
@mattdm lulz about the meter. Even with the ability of c41 to tolerate overexposure, a properly exposed highlight in the same spot on the frame should be blown after a few frames at most. I’d have expected sheer chance on 36 frames to put enough highlights over the frame to where the entire frame blew out. I’d love to see the neg’s density. Maybe it was one hell of a salvage by the printer.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 18:30
3
For troubleshooting, I think you can assume the film advance must have worked at some point because if it was completely faulty or misloaded, the single frame would have been exposed to light on loading, so it would be completely ruined.
– user71659
Jan 5 at 2:15
|
show 2 more comments
Well, it seems obvious that the film did not advance between shots. Whether that's because of user error (film not installed right so it didn't catch on the advancing mechanism) or a hardware issue with the advance mechanism not working properly can't really be determined without more information and/or inspection of the camera...
Try taking a couple shots with the back open and no film in, and watch the takeup spool when you operate the film advance lever to see if it looks to be operating correctly. Assuming that particular model allows that, anyway - might need to locate and defeat a microswitch or two to make the camera think the back is closed and/or there's film installed. I'm not familiar with that model, so I don't know...
answered Jan 3 at 13:37
twalbergtwalberg
2,710613
4
The k1000 has a meter, aaaand that’s it for electronics. It works just fine with the back cracked. I’d also double check the meters accuracy. I’m skeptical that 36 proper exposures on 1 frame yielded anything but blown.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 15:23
6
The meter is barely even "electronics". It might just be "electrics" :)
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:28
1
@Hueco I'm not super-surprised. Portra 400 can be overexposed by, like, 9 stops, without even really noticing.
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:31
2
@mattdm lulz about the meter. Even with the ability of c41 to tolerate overexposure, a properly exposed highlight in the same spot on the frame should be blown after a few frames at most. I’d have expected sheer chance on 36 frames to put enough highlights over the frame to where the entire frame blew out. I’d love to see the neg’s density. Maybe it was one hell of a salvage by the printer.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 18:30
3
For troubleshooting, I think you can assume the film advance must have worked at some point because if it was completely faulty or misloaded, the single frame would have been exposed to light on loading, so it would be completely ruined.
– user71659
Jan 5 at 2:15
|
show 2 more comments
Well, it seems obvious that the film did not advance between shots. Whether that's because of user error (film not installed right so it didn't catch on the advancing mechanism) or a hardware issue with the advance mechanism not working properly can't really be determined without more information and/or inspection of the camera...
Try taking a couple shots with the back open and no film in, and watch the takeup spool when you operate the film advance lever to see if it looks to be operating correctly. Assuming that particular model allows that, anyway - might need to locate and defeat a microswitch or two to make the camera think the back is closed and/or there's film installed. I'm not familiar with that model, so I don't know...
answered Jan 3 at 13:37
twalbergtwalberg
2,710613
Well, it seems obvious that the film did not advance between shots. Whether that's because of user error (film not installed right so it didn't catch on the advancing mechanism) or a hardware issue with the advance mechanism not working properly can't really be determined without more information and/or inspection of the camera...
Try taking a couple shots with the back open and no film in, and watch the takeup spool when you operate the film advance lever to see if it looks to be operating correctly. Assuming that particular model allows that, anyway - might need to locate and defeat a microswitch or two to make the camera think the back is closed and/or there's film installed. I'm not familiar with that model, so I don't know...
answered Jan 3 at 13:37
twalbergtwalberg
2,710613
answered Jan 3 at 13:37
twalbergtwalberg
2,710613
answered Jan 3 at 13:37
twalbergtwalberg
2,710613
answered Jan 3 at 13:37
twalbergtwalberg
2,710613
2,710613
4
The k1000 has a meter, aaaand that’s it for electronics. It works just fine with the back cracked. I’d also double check the meters accuracy. I’m skeptical that 36 proper exposures on 1 frame yielded anything but blown.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 15:23
6
The meter is barely even "electronics". It might just be "electrics" :)
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:28
1
@Hueco I'm not super-surprised. Portra 400 can be overexposed by, like, 9 stops, without even really noticing.
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:31
2
@mattdm lulz about the meter. Even with the ability of c41 to tolerate overexposure, a properly exposed highlight in the same spot on the frame should be blown after a few frames at most. I’d have expected sheer chance on 36 frames to put enough highlights over the frame to where the entire frame blew out. I’d love to see the neg’s density. Maybe it was one hell of a salvage by the printer.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 18:30
3
For troubleshooting, I think you can assume the film advance must have worked at some point because if it was completely faulty or misloaded, the single frame would have been exposed to light on loading, so it would be completely ruined.
– user71659
Jan 5 at 2:15
|
show 2 more comments
4
The k1000 has a meter, aaaand that’s it for electronics. It works just fine with the back cracked. I’d also double check the meters accuracy. I’m skeptical that 36 proper exposures on 1 frame yielded anything but blown.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 15:23
6
The meter is barely even "electronics". It might just be "electrics" :)
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:28
1
@Hueco I'm not super-surprised. Portra 400 can be overexposed by, like, 9 stops, without even really noticing.
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:31
2
@mattdm lulz about the meter. Even with the ability of c41 to tolerate overexposure, a properly exposed highlight in the same spot on the frame should be blown after a few frames at most. I’d have expected sheer chance on 36 frames to put enough highlights over the frame to where the entire frame blew out. I’d love to see the neg’s density. Maybe it was one hell of a salvage by the printer.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 18:30
3
For troubleshooting, I think you can assume the film advance must have worked at some point because if it was completely faulty or misloaded, the single frame would have been exposed to light on loading, so it would be completely ruined.
– user71659
Jan 5 at 2:15
4
4
The k1000 has a meter, aaaand that’s it for electronics. It works just fine with the back cracked. I’d also double check the meters accuracy. I’m skeptical that 36 proper exposures on 1 frame yielded anything but blown.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 15:23
The k1000 has a meter, aaaand that’s it for electronics. It works just fine with the back cracked. I’d also double check the meters accuracy. I’m skeptical that 36 proper exposures on 1 frame yielded anything but blown.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 15:23
6
6
The meter is barely even "electronics". It might just be "electrics" :)
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:28
The meter is barely even "electronics". It might just be "electrics" :)
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:28
1
1
@Hueco I'm not super-surprised. Portra 400 can be overexposed by, like, 9 stops, without even really noticing.
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:31
@Hueco I'm not super-surprised. Portra 400 can be overexposed by, like, 9 stops, without even really noticing.
– mattdm
Jan 3 at 17:31
2
2
@mattdm lulz about the meter. Even with the ability of c41 to tolerate overexposure, a properly exposed highlight in the same spot on the frame should be blown after a few frames at most. I’d have expected sheer chance on 36 frames to put enough highlights over the frame to where the entire frame blew out. I’d love to see the neg’s density. Maybe it was one hell of a salvage by the printer.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 18:30
@mattdm lulz about the meter. Even with the ability of c41 to tolerate overexposure, a properly exposed highlight in the same spot on the frame should be blown after a few frames at most. I’d have expected sheer chance on 36 frames to put enough highlights over the frame to where the entire frame blew out. I’d love to see the neg’s density. Maybe it was one hell of a salvage by the printer.
– Hueco
Jan 3 at 18:30
3
3
For troubleshooting, I think you can assume the film advance must have worked at some point because if it was completely faulty or misloaded, the single frame would have been exposed to light on loading, so it would be completely ruined.
– user71659
Jan 5 at 2:15
For troubleshooting, I think you can assume the film advance must have worked at some point because if it was completely faulty or misloaded, the single frame would have been exposed to light on loading, so it would be completely ruined.
– user71659
Jan 5 at 2:15
|
show 2 more comments
Doing double exposures with the k1000 requires that you cock the shutter using the lever while simultaneously holding down the release on the camera bottom. This allows the shutter to cock while not advancing the film.
Check to make sure that this release button isn’t sticking in.
edited Jan 3 at 22:11
osullic
6,23411127
answered Jan 3 at 18:33
HuecoHueco
11.9k32857
add a comment |
Doing double exposures with the k1000 requires that you cock the shutter using the lever while simultaneously holding down the release on the camera bottom. This allows the shutter to cock while not advancing the film.
Check to make sure that this release button isn’t sticking in.
edited Jan 3 at 22:11
osullic
6,23411127
answered Jan 3 at 18:33
HuecoHueco
11.9k32857
add a comment |
Doing double exposures with the k1000 requires that you cock the shutter using the lever while simultaneously holding down the release on the camera bottom. This allows the shutter to cock while not advancing the film.
Check to make sure that this release button isn’t sticking in.
edited Jan 3 at 22:11
osullic
6,23411127
answered Jan 3 at 18:33
HuecoHueco
11.9k32857
Doing double exposures with the k1000 requires that you cock the shutter using the lever while simultaneously holding down the release on the camera bottom. This allows the shutter to cock while not advancing the film.
Check to make sure that this release button isn’t sticking in.
edited Jan 3 at 22:11
osullic
6,23411127
answered Jan 3 at 18:33
HuecoHueco
11.9k32857
edited Jan 3 at 22:11
osullic
6,23411127
edited Jan 3 at 22:11
osullic
6,23411127
edited Jan 3 at 22:11
osullic
6,23411127
6,23411127
answered Jan 3 at 18:33
HuecoHueco
11.9k32857
answered Jan 3 at 18:33
HuecoHueco
11.9k32857
answered Jan 3 at 18:33
HuecoHueco
11.9k32857
11.9k32857
add a comment |
add a comment |
Like twalberg says, it seems obvious that the film did not advance between shots.
Make sure the film advance mechanism is working properly. When you have no film loaded, open the back and check that both the film take-up spool and the sprocket teeth both turn at the same time when you work the film advance lever. The sprocket teeth should turn, even if you try to (gently) hold them back with your finger.
A couple of other things to check:
Like Hueco says, check that the sprocket release button on the bottom of the camera is not stuck in.
Take a look at the developed film (the strip of negatives), looking
for ripped/damaged sprocket holes.
Also make sure you are loading the film correctly. I came across this manual for the K1000. Page 10 explains loading the film.
When loading the film: after threading the leader onto the take-up spool make sure the sprocket holes on both sides of the film strip are actually aligned with the sprocket teeth before closing the back. Note that the film leader goes under the take-up spool. If you get this wrong the first frame advance will undo your film threading and the sprockets won't engage.
Remember that you should move the film advance lever its full distance to make sure the film advances one full frame between shots.
edited Jan 4 at 8:49
Michael C
134k7152380
answered Jan 3 at 19:18
NickNick
511
I seem to remember having this problem too, of not pulling the lever quite far enough.
– Aaron Brick
Jan 5 at 21:07
add a comment |
Like twalberg says, it seems obvious that the film did not advance between shots.
Make sure the film advance mechanism is working properly. When you have no film loaded, open the back and check that both the film take-up spool and the sprocket teeth both turn at the same time when you work the film advance lever. The sprocket teeth should turn, even if you try to (gently) hold them back with your finger.
A couple of other things to check:
Like Hueco says, check that the sprocket release button on the bottom of the camera is not stuck in.
Take a look at the developed film (the strip of negatives), looking
for ripped/damaged sprocket holes.
Also make sure you are loading the film correctly. I came across this manual for the K1000. Page 10 explains loading the film.
When loading the film: after threading the leader onto the take-up spool make sure the sprocket holes on both sides of the film strip are actually aligned with the sprocket teeth before closing the back. Note that the film leader goes under the take-up spool. If you get this wrong the first frame advance will undo your film threading and the sprockets won't engage.
Remember that you should move the film advance lever its full distance to make sure the film advances one full frame between shots.
edited Jan 4 at 8:49
Michael C
134k7152380
answered Jan 3 at 19:18
NickNick
511
I seem to remember having this problem too, of not pulling the lever quite far enough.
– Aaron Brick
Jan 5 at 21:07
add a comment |
Like twalberg says, it seems obvious that the film did not advance between shots.
Make sure the film advance mechanism is working properly. When you have no film loaded, open the back and check that both the film take-up spool and the sprocket teeth both turn at the same time when you work the film advance lever. The sprocket teeth should turn, even if you try to (gently) hold them back with your finger.
A couple of other things to check:
Like Hueco says, check that the sprocket release button on the bottom of the camera is not stuck in.
Take a look at the developed film (the strip of negatives), looking
for ripped/damaged sprocket holes.
Also make sure you are loading the film correctly. I came across this manual for the K1000. Page 10 explains loading the film.
When loading the film: after threading the leader onto the take-up spool make sure the sprocket holes on both sides of the film strip are actually aligned with the sprocket teeth before closing the back. Note that the film leader goes under the take-up spool. If you get this wrong the first frame advance will undo your film threading and the sprockets won't engage.
Remember that you should move the film advance lever its full distance to make sure the film advances one full frame between shots.
edited Jan 4 at 8:49
Michael C
134k7152380
answered Jan 3 at 19:18
NickNick
511
Like twalberg says, it seems obvious that the film did not advance between shots.
Make sure the film advance mechanism is working properly. When you have no film loaded, open the back and check that both the film take-up spool and the sprocket teeth both turn at the same time when you work the film advance lever. The sprocket teeth should turn, even if you try to (gently) hold them back with your finger.
A couple of other things to check:
Like Hueco says, check that the sprocket release button on the bottom of the camera is not stuck in.
Take a look at the developed film (the strip of negatives), looking
for ripped/damaged sprocket holes.
Also make sure you are loading the film correctly. I came across this manual for the K1000. Page 10 explains loading the film.
When loading the film: after threading the leader onto the take-up spool make sure the sprocket holes on both sides of the film strip are actually aligned with the sprocket teeth before closing the back. Note that the film leader goes under the take-up spool. If you get this wrong the first frame advance will undo your film threading and the sprockets won't engage.
Remember that you should move the film advance lever its full distance to make sure the film advances one full frame between shots.
edited Jan 4 at 8:49
Michael C
134k7152380
answered Jan 3 at 19:18
NickNick
511
edited Jan 4 at 8:49
Michael C
134k7152380
edited Jan 4 at 8:49
Michael C
134k7152380
edited Jan 4 at 8:49
Michael C
134k7152380
134k7152380
answered Jan 3 at 19:18
NickNick
511
answered Jan 3 at 19:18
NickNick
511
answered Jan 3 at 19:18
NickNick
511
511
I seem to remember having this problem too, of not pulling the lever quite far enough.
– Aaron Brick
Jan 5 at 21:07
add a comment |
I seem to remember having this problem too, of not pulling the lever quite far enough.
– Aaron Brick
Jan 5 at 21:07
I seem to remember having this problem too, of not pulling the lever quite far enough.
– Aaron Brick
Jan 5 at 21:07
I seem to remember having this problem too, of not pulling the lever quite far enough.
– Aaron Brick
Jan 5 at 21:07
add a comment |
When you cock the shutter/advance the film, the rewind knob should spin as it is unwinding film.
If this is not happening, be sure the button underneath the camera to release the advance spool is not stuck and or check to be sure your sprocket holes are lined up with the advance spool and they are not tearing the sprocket holes.
answered Jan 8 at 17:12
DavepixDavepix
1114
add a comment |
When you cock the shutter/advance the film, the rewind knob should spin as it is unwinding film.
If this is not happening, be sure the button underneath the camera to release the advance spool is not stuck and or check to be sure your sprocket holes are lined up with the advance spool and they are not tearing the sprocket holes.
answered Jan 8 at 17:12
DavepixDavepix
1114
add a comment |
When you cock the shutter/advance the film, the rewind knob should spin as it is unwinding film.
If this is not happening, be sure the button underneath the camera to release the advance spool is not stuck and or check to be sure your sprocket holes are lined up with the advance spool and they are not tearing the sprocket holes.
answered Jan 8 at 17:12
DavepixDavepix
1114
When you cock the shutter/advance the film, the rewind knob should spin as it is unwinding film.
If this is not happening, be sure the button underneath the camera to release the advance spool is not stuck and or check to be sure your sprocket holes are lined up with the advance spool and they are not tearing the sprocket holes.
answered Jan 8 at 17:12
DavepixDavepix
1114
answered Jan 8 at 17:12
DavepixDavepix
1114
answered Jan 8 at 17:12
DavepixDavepix
1114
answered Jan 8 at 17:12
DavepixDavepix
1114
1114
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103959%2fwhy-have-all-negatives-been-exposed-to-one-frame%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Is the frame counter working? It seems that the film is not advancing - but I'm wondering, are you simply stopping and rewinding the film after 36 frames?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:10
6
Have you checked the camera manual to confirm you are correctly loading and winding the film?
– osullic
Jan 3 at 14:11
29
As an aside, it's remarkable that you exposed one frame 36 times and still got a discernible image(s) out of it!
– Andy
Jan 3 at 14:40
9
It's a great shot, anyway!
– Strawberry
Jan 3 at 16:06
7
@jcaron On the Pentax K1000 and many other manual cameras, the film advance lever serves dual purposes - to advance the film of course, but also to cock the shutter. It's not possible to take a second (or subsequent) photo without using the film advance lever.
– osullic
Jan 3 at 17:14