How do I reproduce a calligraphic Z (that looks like an L) from a text by Abramowitz and Stegun? [duplicate]












16
















This question already has an answer here:




  • How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?

    16 answers




I am trying to produce a type of "Calligraphic L" using LaTeX. Please see the image below. The wobbles are down to me, possibly too much sugar over the Christmas holiday period.



enter image description here



This type of "L" is used in Abramowitz and Stegun , see the reference , in particular in result 9.6.26 which gives recurrence relations for modified Bessel functions.



So, how might I produce this type of "L" using LaTeX?



Other Info.



I have searched using Google, with the search string "latex fancy L" and also used "Detexify" on a mobile phone but did not find anything useful. I also considered other "Math Alphabets" the packages "eufrac" and "rsfso" do not appear to give the type of "L" I am looking for. I have also searched on StackExchange using a mobile phone.



The "L" I want is like that in the package "calrsfs", like the symbol given by the command mathcal{L} but with an extra loop at the top left of the symbol and a little crossing line part way up the main stem of the symbol.



Reference
Handbook Of Mathematical Functions, ninth Dover printing, Ed M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.



Response to duplicate issues.



How to look up a symbol or ...



I recomend the post in question. I think that is where I found out about Detexify from. Apparently the advice in this post should have led to an answer to my question. It's over to the powers that be now ...



How to do the 'curvy L' ...



My question is about a particular symbol, one that appears in an equation in Abramowitz and Stegun. This symbol is not a symbol normally used to represent the Lagrangian or a Laplace transform. In fact it is not even an "L".



Scanned Symbol



enter image description here










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Henri Menke, user31729, Stefan Pinnow, Werner, marmot Jan 9 at 5:20


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.



















  • Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?

    – user151522
    Jan 4 at 20:34











  • How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles

    – Henry
    Jan 4 at 23:33
















16
















This question already has an answer here:




  • How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?

    16 answers




I am trying to produce a type of "Calligraphic L" using LaTeX. Please see the image below. The wobbles are down to me, possibly too much sugar over the Christmas holiday period.



enter image description here



This type of "L" is used in Abramowitz and Stegun , see the reference , in particular in result 9.6.26 which gives recurrence relations for modified Bessel functions.



So, how might I produce this type of "L" using LaTeX?



Other Info.



I have searched using Google, with the search string "latex fancy L" and also used "Detexify" on a mobile phone but did not find anything useful. I also considered other "Math Alphabets" the packages "eufrac" and "rsfso" do not appear to give the type of "L" I am looking for. I have also searched on StackExchange using a mobile phone.



The "L" I want is like that in the package "calrsfs", like the symbol given by the command mathcal{L} but with an extra loop at the top left of the symbol and a little crossing line part way up the main stem of the symbol.



Reference
Handbook Of Mathematical Functions, ninth Dover printing, Ed M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.



Response to duplicate issues.



How to look up a symbol or ...



I recomend the post in question. I think that is where I found out about Detexify from. Apparently the advice in this post should have led to an answer to my question. It's over to the powers that be now ...



How to do the 'curvy L' ...



My question is about a particular symbol, one that appears in an equation in Abramowitz and Stegun. This symbol is not a symbol normally used to represent the Lagrangian or a Laplace transform. In fact it is not even an "L".



Scanned Symbol



enter image description here










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Henri Menke, user31729, Stefan Pinnow, Werner, marmot Jan 9 at 5:20


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.



















  • Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?

    – user151522
    Jan 4 at 20:34











  • How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles

    – Henry
    Jan 4 at 23:33














16












16








16


4







This question already has an answer here:




  • How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?

    16 answers




I am trying to produce a type of "Calligraphic L" using LaTeX. Please see the image below. The wobbles are down to me, possibly too much sugar over the Christmas holiday period.



enter image description here



This type of "L" is used in Abramowitz and Stegun , see the reference , in particular in result 9.6.26 which gives recurrence relations for modified Bessel functions.



So, how might I produce this type of "L" using LaTeX?



Other Info.



I have searched using Google, with the search string "latex fancy L" and also used "Detexify" on a mobile phone but did not find anything useful. I also considered other "Math Alphabets" the packages "eufrac" and "rsfso" do not appear to give the type of "L" I am looking for. I have also searched on StackExchange using a mobile phone.



The "L" I want is like that in the package "calrsfs", like the symbol given by the command mathcal{L} but with an extra loop at the top left of the symbol and a little crossing line part way up the main stem of the symbol.



Reference
Handbook Of Mathematical Functions, ninth Dover printing, Ed M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.



Response to duplicate issues.



How to look up a symbol or ...



I recomend the post in question. I think that is where I found out about Detexify from. Apparently the advice in this post should have led to an answer to my question. It's over to the powers that be now ...



How to do the 'curvy L' ...



My question is about a particular symbol, one that appears in an equation in Abramowitz and Stegun. This symbol is not a symbol normally used to represent the Lagrangian or a Laplace transform. In fact it is not even an "L".



Scanned Symbol



enter image description here










share|improve this question

















This question already has an answer here:




  • How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?

    16 answers




I am trying to produce a type of "Calligraphic L" using LaTeX. Please see the image below. The wobbles are down to me, possibly too much sugar over the Christmas holiday period.



enter image description here



This type of "L" is used in Abramowitz and Stegun , see the reference , in particular in result 9.6.26 which gives recurrence relations for modified Bessel functions.



So, how might I produce this type of "L" using LaTeX?



Other Info.



I have searched using Google, with the search string "latex fancy L" and also used "Detexify" on a mobile phone but did not find anything useful. I also considered other "Math Alphabets" the packages "eufrac" and "rsfso" do not appear to give the type of "L" I am looking for. I have also searched on StackExchange using a mobile phone.



The "L" I want is like that in the package "calrsfs", like the symbol given by the command mathcal{L} but with an extra loop at the top left of the symbol and a little crossing line part way up the main stem of the symbol.



Reference
Handbook Of Mathematical Functions, ninth Dover printing, Ed M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegun, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.



Response to duplicate issues.



How to look up a symbol or ...



I recomend the post in question. I think that is where I found out about Detexify from. Apparently the advice in this post should have led to an answer to my question. It's over to the powers that be now ...



How to do the 'curvy L' ...



My question is about a particular symbol, one that appears in an equation in Abramowitz and Stegun. This symbol is not a symbol normally used to represent the Lagrangian or a Laplace transform. In fact it is not even an "L".



Scanned Symbol



enter image description here





This question already has an answer here:




  • How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?

    16 answers








symbols






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 4 at 14:51







user151522

















asked Jan 3 at 14:29









user151522user151522

19017




19017




marked as duplicate by Henri Menke, user31729, Stefan Pinnow, Werner, marmot Jan 9 at 5:20


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Henri Menke, user31729, Stefan Pinnow, Werner, marmot Jan 9 at 5:20


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?

    – user151522
    Jan 4 at 20:34











  • How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles

    – Henry
    Jan 4 at 23:33



















  • Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?

    – user151522
    Jan 4 at 20:34











  • How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles

    – Henry
    Jan 4 at 23:33

















Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?

– user151522
Jan 4 at 20:34





Could someone comment, giving the names of any fonts or any set of symbols, used in the reference, Abramowitz and Stegun?

– user151522
Jan 4 at 20:34













How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles

– Henry
Jan 4 at 23:33





How about the symbol £ (pound sterling symbol), which is certainly a curly L with a bar. Then there are the Polish Ł and the Saanich Ƚ which might be available in cursive styles

– Henry
Jan 4 at 23:33










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















36














This letter is not an L but a Z. According to Detexify, you can typeset it using



usepackage{mathrsfs}
mathscr{Z}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


























  • The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.

    – user151522
    Jan 4 at 12:47











  • @user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"

    – albert
    Jan 4 at 14:17











  • Scanned symbol has been added to question.

    – user151522
    Jan 4 at 14:52






  • 1





    @albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing

    – Henry
    Jan 4 at 23:50













  • @henry Thanks, looks like I looked in an electronic book marked at my place with the name abramovitz but in fact is a much newer version of "NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions" first printed in 2010, so not the original.

    – albert
    Jan 5 at 9:13



















21














I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters.



frcursive



documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry}
usepackage{frcursive}
begin{document}
begin{cursive}I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters: end{cursive}

textcursive{L Z}

begin{cursive}A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Zend{cursive}
end{document}





share|improve this answer































    8














    The following also works



    usepackage{calrsfs}
    mathcal{Z}





    share|improve this answer

































      5














      I recommend you use unicode-math when you can, and legacy NFSS fonts when you have to. One wrinkle here is that, by default, it sets mathcal and mathscr to the same alphabet. Another is that many fonts, including XITS, STIX Two and Asana, do contain a separate calligraphic or script alphabet, but as a stylistic set.



      For example, to get this symbol from STIX Two, while also leaving mathcal available, you would do something like:



      documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
      usepackage{unicode-math}
      defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchUppercase}

      setmathfont{STIX Two Math}
      setmathfont[range = {scr, bfscr}, StylisticSet = 1]{STIX Two Math}

      begin{document}
      ( mathscr{Z} )
      end{document}


      Script Z



      You can instead load any system font as your mathscr and mathcal fonts.



      If you want to stay compatible with PDFLaTeX, I recommend you load your script, calligraphic, Fraktur and blackboard alphabets through mathalfa. The documentation has font samples of every available alphabet, gives them a consistent interface, and allows you to scale them. You might try either rsfso or boondoxo for a less-slanted version than mathrsfs.



      documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
      usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
      usepackage{textcomp}
      usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % The default since 2018
      usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}

      begin{document}
      ( mathscr{Z} )
      end{document}


      Boondoxo sample






      share|improve this answer

































        2














        You can use mathcal



        usepackage{unicode-math}

        mathcal{Z}





        share|improve this answer
































          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          36














          This letter is not an L but a Z. According to Detexify, you can typeset it using



          usepackage{mathrsfs}
          mathscr{Z}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.

            – user151522
            Jan 4 at 12:47











          • @user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"

            – albert
            Jan 4 at 14:17











          • Scanned symbol has been added to question.

            – user151522
            Jan 4 at 14:52






          • 1





            @albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing

            – Henry
            Jan 4 at 23:50













          • @henry Thanks, looks like I looked in an electronic book marked at my place with the name abramovitz but in fact is a much newer version of "NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions" first printed in 2010, so not the original.

            – albert
            Jan 5 at 9:13
















          36














          This letter is not an L but a Z. According to Detexify, you can typeset it using



          usepackage{mathrsfs}
          mathscr{Z}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer


























          • The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.

            – user151522
            Jan 4 at 12:47











          • @user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"

            – albert
            Jan 4 at 14:17











          • Scanned symbol has been added to question.

            – user151522
            Jan 4 at 14:52






          • 1





            @albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing

            – Henry
            Jan 4 at 23:50













          • @henry Thanks, looks like I looked in an electronic book marked at my place with the name abramovitz but in fact is a much newer version of "NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions" first printed in 2010, so not the original.

            – albert
            Jan 5 at 9:13














          36












          36








          36







          This letter is not an L but a Z. According to Detexify, you can typeset it using



          usepackage{mathrsfs}
          mathscr{Z}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          This letter is not an L but a Z. According to Detexify, you can typeset it using



          usepackage{mathrsfs}
          mathscr{Z}


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 3 at 18:55









          Camille Goudeseune

          201110




          201110










          answered Jan 3 at 14:37









          KarloKarlo

          1,56821528




          1,56821528













          • The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.

            – user151522
            Jan 4 at 12:47











          • @user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"

            – albert
            Jan 4 at 14:17











          • Scanned symbol has been added to question.

            – user151522
            Jan 4 at 14:52






          • 1





            @albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing

            – Henry
            Jan 4 at 23:50













          • @henry Thanks, looks like I looked in an electronic book marked at my place with the name abramovitz but in fact is a much newer version of "NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions" first printed in 2010, so not the original.

            – albert
            Jan 5 at 9:13



















          • The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.

            – user151522
            Jan 4 at 12:47











          • @user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"

            – albert
            Jan 4 at 14:17











          • Scanned symbol has been added to question.

            – user151522
            Jan 4 at 14:52






          • 1





            @albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing

            – Henry
            Jan 4 at 23:50













          • @henry Thanks, looks like I looked in an electronic book marked at my place with the name abramovitz but in fact is a much newer version of "NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions" first printed in 2010, so not the original.

            – albert
            Jan 5 at 9:13

















          The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.

          – user151522
          Jan 4 at 12:47





          The top left of the symbol in Abramowitz and Stegun, appears to have a completely joined up loop.

          – user151522
          Jan 4 at 12:47













          @user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"

          – albert
          Jan 4 at 14:17





          @user151522 maybe a good idea to scan the relevant part of the equation and post it in your question or otherwise give more information about the 9.6.26 formula (i.e. the name of the chapter / paragraph and the text just on top of the formula. Not everybody will have the mentioned version of the book (but maybe another version), in my case the paragraph with the mentioned formula is "9.6(iii) Airy Functions as Confluent Hypergeometric Functions"

          – albert
          Jan 4 at 14:17













          Scanned symbol has been added to question.

          – user151522
          Jan 4 at 14:52





          Scanned symbol has been added to question.

          – user151522
          Jan 4 at 14:52




          1




          1





          @albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing

          – Henry
          Jan 4 at 23:50







          @albert: 9.2.6 is in the bottom left of archive.org/details/AandS-mono600/page/n389 - at least one of the examples is not joined up and the others may be scanning artifacts. Wikipedia uses Z for the same thing

          – Henry
          Jan 4 at 23:50















          @henry Thanks, looks like I looked in an electronic book marked at my place with the name abramovitz but in fact is a much newer version of "NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions" first printed in 2010, so not the original.

          – albert
          Jan 5 at 9:13





          @henry Thanks, looks like I looked in an electronic book marked at my place with the name abramovitz but in fact is a much newer version of "NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions" first printed in 2010, so not the original.

          – albert
          Jan 5 at 9:13











          21














          I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters.



          frcursive



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry}
          usepackage{frcursive}
          begin{document}
          begin{cursive}I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters: end{cursive}

          textcursive{L Z}

          begin{cursive}A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Zend{cursive}
          end{document}





          share|improve this answer




























            21














            I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters.



            frcursive



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry}
            usepackage{frcursive}
            begin{document}
            begin{cursive}I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters: end{cursive}

            textcursive{L Z}

            begin{cursive}A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Zend{cursive}
            end{document}





            share|improve this answer


























              21












              21








              21







              I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters.



              frcursive



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry}
              usepackage{frcursive}
              begin{document}
              begin{cursive}I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters: end{cursive}

              textcursive{L Z}

              begin{cursive}A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Zend{cursive}
              end{document}





              share|improve this answer













              I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters.



              frcursive



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage[margin=1cm]{geometry}
              usepackage{frcursive}
              begin{document}
              begin{cursive}I can't resist showing you a French calligraphic school writing font and its pretty capital letters: end{cursive}

              textcursive{L Z}

              begin{cursive}A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Zend{cursive}
              end{document}






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Jan 3 at 17:19









              AndréCAndréC

              10.5k11548




              10.5k11548























                  8














                  The following also works



                  usepackage{calrsfs}
                  mathcal{Z}





                  share|improve this answer






























                    8














                    The following also works



                    usepackage{calrsfs}
                    mathcal{Z}





                    share|improve this answer




























                      8












                      8








                      8







                      The following also works



                      usepackage{calrsfs}
                      mathcal{Z}





                      share|improve this answer















                      The following also works



                      usepackage{calrsfs}
                      mathcal{Z}






                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 3 at 17:06

























                      answered Jan 3 at 16:55









                      user151522user151522

                      19017




                      19017























                          5














                          I recommend you use unicode-math when you can, and legacy NFSS fonts when you have to. One wrinkle here is that, by default, it sets mathcal and mathscr to the same alphabet. Another is that many fonts, including XITS, STIX Two and Asana, do contain a separate calligraphic or script alphabet, but as a stylistic set.



                          For example, to get this symbol from STIX Two, while also leaving mathcal available, you would do something like:



                          documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
                          usepackage{unicode-math}
                          defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchUppercase}

                          setmathfont{STIX Two Math}
                          setmathfont[range = {scr, bfscr}, StylisticSet = 1]{STIX Two Math}

                          begin{document}
                          ( mathscr{Z} )
                          end{document}


                          Script Z



                          You can instead load any system font as your mathscr and mathcal fonts.



                          If you want to stay compatible with PDFLaTeX, I recommend you load your script, calligraphic, Fraktur and blackboard alphabets through mathalfa. The documentation has font samples of every available alphabet, gives them a consistent interface, and allows you to scale them. You might try either rsfso or boondoxo for a less-slanted version than mathrsfs.



                          documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
                          usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
                          usepackage{textcomp}
                          usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % The default since 2018
                          usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}

                          begin{document}
                          ( mathscr{Z} )
                          end{document}


                          Boondoxo sample






                          share|improve this answer






























                            5














                            I recommend you use unicode-math when you can, and legacy NFSS fonts when you have to. One wrinkle here is that, by default, it sets mathcal and mathscr to the same alphabet. Another is that many fonts, including XITS, STIX Two and Asana, do contain a separate calligraphic or script alphabet, but as a stylistic set.



                            For example, to get this symbol from STIX Two, while also leaving mathcal available, you would do something like:



                            documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
                            usepackage{unicode-math}
                            defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchUppercase}

                            setmathfont{STIX Two Math}
                            setmathfont[range = {scr, bfscr}, StylisticSet = 1]{STIX Two Math}

                            begin{document}
                            ( mathscr{Z} )
                            end{document}


                            Script Z



                            You can instead load any system font as your mathscr and mathcal fonts.



                            If you want to stay compatible with PDFLaTeX, I recommend you load your script, calligraphic, Fraktur and blackboard alphabets through mathalfa. The documentation has font samples of every available alphabet, gives them a consistent interface, and allows you to scale them. You might try either rsfso or boondoxo for a less-slanted version than mathrsfs.



                            documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
                            usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
                            usepackage{textcomp}
                            usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % The default since 2018
                            usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}

                            begin{document}
                            ( mathscr{Z} )
                            end{document}


                            Boondoxo sample






                            share|improve this answer




























                              5












                              5








                              5







                              I recommend you use unicode-math when you can, and legacy NFSS fonts when you have to. One wrinkle here is that, by default, it sets mathcal and mathscr to the same alphabet. Another is that many fonts, including XITS, STIX Two and Asana, do contain a separate calligraphic or script alphabet, but as a stylistic set.



                              For example, to get this symbol from STIX Two, while also leaving mathcal available, you would do something like:



                              documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
                              usepackage{unicode-math}
                              defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchUppercase}

                              setmathfont{STIX Two Math}
                              setmathfont[range = {scr, bfscr}, StylisticSet = 1]{STIX Two Math}

                              begin{document}
                              ( mathscr{Z} )
                              end{document}


                              Script Z



                              You can instead load any system font as your mathscr and mathcal fonts.



                              If you want to stay compatible with PDFLaTeX, I recommend you load your script, calligraphic, Fraktur and blackboard alphabets through mathalfa. The documentation has font samples of every available alphabet, gives them a consistent interface, and allows you to scale them. You might try either rsfso or boondoxo for a less-slanted version than mathrsfs.



                              documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
                              usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
                              usepackage{textcomp}
                              usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % The default since 2018
                              usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}

                              begin{document}
                              ( mathscr{Z} )
                              end{document}


                              Boondoxo sample






                              share|improve this answer















                              I recommend you use unicode-math when you can, and legacy NFSS fonts when you have to. One wrinkle here is that, by default, it sets mathcal and mathscr to the same alphabet. Another is that many fonts, including XITS, STIX Two and Asana, do contain a separate calligraphic or script alphabet, but as a stylistic set.



                              For example, to get this symbol from STIX Two, while also leaving mathcal available, you would do something like:



                              documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
                              usepackage{unicode-math}
                              defaultfontfeatures{Scale=MatchUppercase}

                              setmathfont{STIX Two Math}
                              setmathfont[range = {scr, bfscr}, StylisticSet = 1]{STIX Two Math}

                              begin{document}
                              ( mathscr{Z} )
                              end{document}


                              Script Z



                              You can instead load any system font as your mathscr and mathcal fonts.



                              If you want to stay compatible with PDFLaTeX, I recommend you load your script, calligraphic, Fraktur and blackboard alphabets through mathalfa. The documentation has font samples of every available alphabet, gives them a consistent interface, and allows you to scale them. You might try either rsfso or boondoxo for a less-slanted version than mathrsfs.



                              documentclass[varwidth]{standalone}
                              usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
                              usepackage{textcomp}
                              usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % The default since 2018
                              usepackage[scr=boondoxo]{mathalfa}

                              begin{document}
                              ( mathscr{Z} )
                              end{document}


                              Boondoxo sample







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited Jan 4 at 14:01

























                              answered Jan 4 at 0:34









                              DavislorDavislor

                              7,1091431




                              7,1091431























                                  2














                                  You can use mathcal



                                  usepackage{unicode-math}

                                  mathcal{Z}





                                  share|improve this answer






























                                    2














                                    You can use mathcal



                                    usepackage{unicode-math}

                                    mathcal{Z}





                                    share|improve this answer




























                                      2












                                      2








                                      2







                                      You can use mathcal



                                      usepackage{unicode-math}

                                      mathcal{Z}





                                      share|improve this answer















                                      You can use mathcal



                                      usepackage{unicode-math}

                                      mathcal{Z}






                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Jan 4 at 15:28









                                      CarLaTeX

                                      34.4k552141




                                      34.4k552141










                                      answered Jan 4 at 15:06









                                      Ahmet Furkan YILMAZAhmet Furkan YILMAZ

                                      193




                                      193















                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Wiesbaden

                                          Marschland

                                          Dieringhausen