Fundamental Theorem on Homomorphisms - Application












1












$begingroup$


I want to show



1.) For $n,min mathbb Z$ with $m|n$ there exists a ring homomorphism between $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$.



I know that there is the canonical homomorphism $f: mathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. The Fundamental theorem on homomorphisms for rings now allows me, because $nmathbb{Z}$ is an ideal in $mathbb Z$, to conclude the existence of a ring homomorphism $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. But here is the problem: $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ has to be a subset of $ker(f)$ for that conclusion. Is that the case and if so: why?



2.) A restriction of the above Homomorphism on the unity groups $(mathbb Z/nmathbb Z)^* rightarrow (mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)^*$ is a group homomorphism.



I believe that one can solve this easily if 1.) is solved.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I want to show



    1.) For $n,min mathbb Z$ with $m|n$ there exists a ring homomorphism between $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$.



    I know that there is the canonical homomorphism $f: mathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. The Fundamental theorem on homomorphisms for rings now allows me, because $nmathbb{Z}$ is an ideal in $mathbb Z$, to conclude the existence of a ring homomorphism $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. But here is the problem: $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ has to be a subset of $ker(f)$ for that conclusion. Is that the case and if so: why?



    2.) A restriction of the above Homomorphism on the unity groups $(mathbb Z/nmathbb Z)^* rightarrow (mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)^*$ is a group homomorphism.



    I believe that one can solve this easily if 1.) is solved.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I want to show



      1.) For $n,min mathbb Z$ with $m|n$ there exists a ring homomorphism between $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$.



      I know that there is the canonical homomorphism $f: mathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. The Fundamental theorem on homomorphisms for rings now allows me, because $nmathbb{Z}$ is an ideal in $mathbb Z$, to conclude the existence of a ring homomorphism $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. But here is the problem: $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ has to be a subset of $ker(f)$ for that conclusion. Is that the case and if so: why?



      2.) A restriction of the above Homomorphism on the unity groups $(mathbb Z/nmathbb Z)^* rightarrow (mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)^*$ is a group homomorphism.



      I believe that one can solve this easily if 1.) is solved.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I want to show



      1.) For $n,min mathbb Z$ with $m|n$ there exists a ring homomorphism between $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$.



      I know that there is the canonical homomorphism $f: mathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. The Fundamental theorem on homomorphisms for rings now allows me, because $nmathbb{Z}$ is an ideal in $mathbb Z$, to conclude the existence of a ring homomorphism $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z} rightarrow mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. But here is the problem: $mathbb{Z}/nmathbb{Z}$ has to be a subset of $ker(f)$ for that conclusion. Is that the case and if so: why?



      2.) A restriction of the above Homomorphism on the unity groups $(mathbb Z/nmathbb Z)^* rightarrow (mathbb Z/mmathbb Z)^*$ is a group homomorphism.



      I believe that one can solve this easily if 1.) is solved.







      abstract-algebra ring-theory modules ideals






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 3 at 15:39









      Antonios-Alexandros Robotis

      10.6k41741




      10.6k41741










      asked Jan 3 at 15:25









      KingDingelingKingDingeling

      1857




      1857






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Why not study the canonical map $mathbb{Z}xrightarrow{varphi} mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$ given by the projection $nmapsto [n]_m$? The first isomorphism theorem tells us that $mathbb{Z}/kervarphicong mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. Because $m|n$, we get that for $kin nmathbb{Z}$, i.e. $k=ell n=ell rm$ for some $kin mathbb{Z}$, we have
          $$varphi(k) =[k]_m=[ell r m]_m=0 pmod{m}.$$
          So, $nmathbb{Z}subseteqkervarphi$ and the factorization theorem tells us that we get an induced map $widetilde{varphi}:nmathbb{Z}to mmathbb{Z}$. This is defined by $widetilde{varphi}(a+nmathbb{Z})=varphi(a)=[a]_m.$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
            $endgroup$
            – KingDingeling
            Jan 3 at 16:02



















          0












          $begingroup$

          If $f : Gto G'$ be a homomorphic and onto then $h : dfrac{G}{K} to G'$ is an isomorphism and onto where $K = ker f$.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Yamini Singh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060672%2ffundamental-theorem-on-homomorphisms-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Why not study the canonical map $mathbb{Z}xrightarrow{varphi} mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$ given by the projection $nmapsto [n]_m$? The first isomorphism theorem tells us that $mathbb{Z}/kervarphicong mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. Because $m|n$, we get that for $kin nmathbb{Z}$, i.e. $k=ell n=ell rm$ for some $kin mathbb{Z}$, we have
            $$varphi(k) =[k]_m=[ell r m]_m=0 pmod{m}.$$
            So, $nmathbb{Z}subseteqkervarphi$ and the factorization theorem tells us that we get an induced map $widetilde{varphi}:nmathbb{Z}to mmathbb{Z}$. This is defined by $widetilde{varphi}(a+nmathbb{Z})=varphi(a)=[a]_m.$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
              $endgroup$
              – KingDingeling
              Jan 3 at 16:02
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Why not study the canonical map $mathbb{Z}xrightarrow{varphi} mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$ given by the projection $nmapsto [n]_m$? The first isomorphism theorem tells us that $mathbb{Z}/kervarphicong mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. Because $m|n$, we get that for $kin nmathbb{Z}$, i.e. $k=ell n=ell rm$ for some $kin mathbb{Z}$, we have
            $$varphi(k) =[k]_m=[ell r m]_m=0 pmod{m}.$$
            So, $nmathbb{Z}subseteqkervarphi$ and the factorization theorem tells us that we get an induced map $widetilde{varphi}:nmathbb{Z}to mmathbb{Z}$. This is defined by $widetilde{varphi}(a+nmathbb{Z})=varphi(a)=[a]_m.$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
              $endgroup$
              – KingDingeling
              Jan 3 at 16:02














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Why not study the canonical map $mathbb{Z}xrightarrow{varphi} mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$ given by the projection $nmapsto [n]_m$? The first isomorphism theorem tells us that $mathbb{Z}/kervarphicong mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. Because $m|n$, we get that for $kin nmathbb{Z}$, i.e. $k=ell n=ell rm$ for some $kin mathbb{Z}$, we have
            $$varphi(k) =[k]_m=[ell r m]_m=0 pmod{m}.$$
            So, $nmathbb{Z}subseteqkervarphi$ and the factorization theorem tells us that we get an induced map $widetilde{varphi}:nmathbb{Z}to mmathbb{Z}$. This is defined by $widetilde{varphi}(a+nmathbb{Z})=varphi(a)=[a]_m.$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Why not study the canonical map $mathbb{Z}xrightarrow{varphi} mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$ given by the projection $nmapsto [n]_m$? The first isomorphism theorem tells us that $mathbb{Z}/kervarphicong mathbb{Z}/mmathbb{Z}$. Because $m|n$, we get that for $kin nmathbb{Z}$, i.e. $k=ell n=ell rm$ for some $kin mathbb{Z}$, we have
            $$varphi(k) =[k]_m=[ell r m]_m=0 pmod{m}.$$
            So, $nmathbb{Z}subseteqkervarphi$ and the factorization theorem tells us that we get an induced map $widetilde{varphi}:nmathbb{Z}to mmathbb{Z}$. This is defined by $widetilde{varphi}(a+nmathbb{Z})=varphi(a)=[a]_m.$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 3 at 15:40

























            answered Jan 3 at 15:34









            Antonios-Alexandros RobotisAntonios-Alexandros Robotis

            10.6k41741




            10.6k41741












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
              $endgroup$
              – KingDingeling
              Jan 3 at 16:02


















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
              $endgroup$
              – KingDingeling
              Jan 3 at 16:02
















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
            $endgroup$
            – KingDingeling
            Jan 3 at 16:02




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer and for taking the time :)
            $endgroup$
            – KingDingeling
            Jan 3 at 16:02











            0












            $begingroup$

            If $f : Gto G'$ be a homomorphic and onto then $h : dfrac{G}{K} to G'$ is an isomorphism and onto where $K = ker f$.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Yamini Singh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              If $f : Gto G'$ be a homomorphic and onto then $h : dfrac{G}{K} to G'$ is an isomorphism and onto where $K = ker f$.






              share|cite|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Yamini Singh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                If $f : Gto G'$ be a homomorphic and onto then $h : dfrac{G}{K} to G'$ is an isomorphism and onto where $K = ker f$.






                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Yamini Singh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$



                If $f : Gto G'$ be a homomorphic and onto then $h : dfrac{G}{K} to G'$ is an isomorphism and onto where $K = ker f$.







                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Yamini Singh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago









                Max

                9771319




                9771319






                New contributor




                Yamini Singh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                answered 2 days ago









                Yamini Singh Yamini Singh

                1




                1




                New contributor




                Yamini Singh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                New contributor





                Yamini Singh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                Yamini Singh is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060672%2ffundamental-theorem-on-homomorphisms-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen