Asymptotic behavior of the Coulomb logarithm











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












In transport theory in plasma physics, there's an important integral called the Coulomb logarithm, which relates to the scattering cross section off the Yukawa potential. It can be written as
$$
ell(Lambda) = int_0^infty cos^2left(int_0^{u^*}left[1 - 2frac{u}{xi}expleft(-frac{xi}{Lambda u}right) - u^2right]^{-1/2}duright) xi dxi,
$$

where $u^*$ is the turning point--the positive solution to $1 - 2u/xiexp[-xi/(Lambda u)] - u^2=0.$



Now, for a plasma, we usually have $Lambda gg 1$. So being the lazy mathematicians that we are, we instead use the Coulomb potential (the limit $Lambda rightarrow infty$), which is exactly solvable but the $xi$ integral diverges, then cut off the $xi$ integral at $Lambda$ and say "close enough". This gives $ell(Lambda)approx ln Lambda$.



Calculating the above integral numerically indeed gives $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ as $Lambdarightarrowinfty$. But I'd like to be able to show this through analytically, and through a somewhat less handwave-y method. Unfortunately, I'm not really sure where to start--that integral is kind of a hot mess. Any ideas how to get to $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ from that?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Could you clarify the condition on $u^*$? Is it: $$1 - 2frac{u^*}{xi}expleft(-frac{xi}{Lambda u^*}right) - u^{*2}>0$$
    – Yuriy S
    Oct 19 at 7:19










  • If we denote the $u$ integral $I_1$, then is the outer integral $int_0^infty cos (I_1^2) xi d xi$ or $int_0^infty ( cos I_1)^2 xi d xi$?
    – Yuriy S
    Oct 19 at 8:01










  • @YuriyS That quantity is zero, since any larger $u^*$ would make the integral have an imaginary part. And it's $(cos I_1)^2$.
    – eyeballfrog
    Oct 19 at 10:49












  • What do you actually want to calculate? The divergent part was (sort of) obtained by Yuriy. But I feel like you really want to determine the regularized finite part?
    – Diger
    Nov 15 at 22:15












  • @Diger There is no divergent part. The integral is finite for all $Lambda >0$. I'm looking for a rigorous way to make the estimate $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ as $Lambda rightarrow 0$.
    – eyeballfrog
    Nov 15 at 22:24















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












In transport theory in plasma physics, there's an important integral called the Coulomb logarithm, which relates to the scattering cross section off the Yukawa potential. It can be written as
$$
ell(Lambda) = int_0^infty cos^2left(int_0^{u^*}left[1 - 2frac{u}{xi}expleft(-frac{xi}{Lambda u}right) - u^2right]^{-1/2}duright) xi dxi,
$$

where $u^*$ is the turning point--the positive solution to $1 - 2u/xiexp[-xi/(Lambda u)] - u^2=0.$



Now, for a plasma, we usually have $Lambda gg 1$. So being the lazy mathematicians that we are, we instead use the Coulomb potential (the limit $Lambda rightarrow infty$), which is exactly solvable but the $xi$ integral diverges, then cut off the $xi$ integral at $Lambda$ and say "close enough". This gives $ell(Lambda)approx ln Lambda$.



Calculating the above integral numerically indeed gives $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ as $Lambdarightarrowinfty$. But I'd like to be able to show this through analytically, and through a somewhat less handwave-y method. Unfortunately, I'm not really sure where to start--that integral is kind of a hot mess. Any ideas how to get to $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ from that?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Could you clarify the condition on $u^*$? Is it: $$1 - 2frac{u^*}{xi}expleft(-frac{xi}{Lambda u^*}right) - u^{*2}>0$$
    – Yuriy S
    Oct 19 at 7:19










  • If we denote the $u$ integral $I_1$, then is the outer integral $int_0^infty cos (I_1^2) xi d xi$ or $int_0^infty ( cos I_1)^2 xi d xi$?
    – Yuriy S
    Oct 19 at 8:01










  • @YuriyS That quantity is zero, since any larger $u^*$ would make the integral have an imaginary part. And it's $(cos I_1)^2$.
    – eyeballfrog
    Oct 19 at 10:49












  • What do you actually want to calculate? The divergent part was (sort of) obtained by Yuriy. But I feel like you really want to determine the regularized finite part?
    – Diger
    Nov 15 at 22:15












  • @Diger There is no divergent part. The integral is finite for all $Lambda >0$. I'm looking for a rigorous way to make the estimate $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ as $Lambda rightarrow 0$.
    – eyeballfrog
    Nov 15 at 22:24













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





In transport theory in plasma physics, there's an important integral called the Coulomb logarithm, which relates to the scattering cross section off the Yukawa potential. It can be written as
$$
ell(Lambda) = int_0^infty cos^2left(int_0^{u^*}left[1 - 2frac{u}{xi}expleft(-frac{xi}{Lambda u}right) - u^2right]^{-1/2}duright) xi dxi,
$$

where $u^*$ is the turning point--the positive solution to $1 - 2u/xiexp[-xi/(Lambda u)] - u^2=0.$



Now, for a plasma, we usually have $Lambda gg 1$. So being the lazy mathematicians that we are, we instead use the Coulomb potential (the limit $Lambda rightarrow infty$), which is exactly solvable but the $xi$ integral diverges, then cut off the $xi$ integral at $Lambda$ and say "close enough". This gives $ell(Lambda)approx ln Lambda$.



Calculating the above integral numerically indeed gives $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ as $Lambdarightarrowinfty$. But I'd like to be able to show this through analytically, and through a somewhat less handwave-y method. Unfortunately, I'm not really sure where to start--that integral is kind of a hot mess. Any ideas how to get to $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ from that?










share|cite|improve this question















In transport theory in plasma physics, there's an important integral called the Coulomb logarithm, which relates to the scattering cross section off the Yukawa potential. It can be written as
$$
ell(Lambda) = int_0^infty cos^2left(int_0^{u^*}left[1 - 2frac{u}{xi}expleft(-frac{xi}{Lambda u}right) - u^2right]^{-1/2}duright) xi dxi,
$$

where $u^*$ is the turning point--the positive solution to $1 - 2u/xiexp[-xi/(Lambda u)] - u^2=0.$



Now, for a plasma, we usually have $Lambda gg 1$. So being the lazy mathematicians that we are, we instead use the Coulomb potential (the limit $Lambda rightarrow infty$), which is exactly solvable but the $xi$ integral diverges, then cut off the $xi$ integral at $Lambda$ and say "close enough". This gives $ell(Lambda)approx ln Lambda$.



Calculating the above integral numerically indeed gives $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ as $Lambdarightarrowinfty$. But I'd like to be able to show this through analytically, and through a somewhat less handwave-y method. Unfortunately, I'm not really sure where to start--that integral is kind of a hot mess. Any ideas how to get to $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ from that?







integration definite-integrals asymptotics physics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Oct 19 at 10:52

























asked Oct 18 at 22:34









eyeballfrog

5,678528




5,678528












  • Could you clarify the condition on $u^*$? Is it: $$1 - 2frac{u^*}{xi}expleft(-frac{xi}{Lambda u^*}right) - u^{*2}>0$$
    – Yuriy S
    Oct 19 at 7:19










  • If we denote the $u$ integral $I_1$, then is the outer integral $int_0^infty cos (I_1^2) xi d xi$ or $int_0^infty ( cos I_1)^2 xi d xi$?
    – Yuriy S
    Oct 19 at 8:01










  • @YuriyS That quantity is zero, since any larger $u^*$ would make the integral have an imaginary part. And it's $(cos I_1)^2$.
    – eyeballfrog
    Oct 19 at 10:49












  • What do you actually want to calculate? The divergent part was (sort of) obtained by Yuriy. But I feel like you really want to determine the regularized finite part?
    – Diger
    Nov 15 at 22:15












  • @Diger There is no divergent part. The integral is finite for all $Lambda >0$. I'm looking for a rigorous way to make the estimate $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ as $Lambda rightarrow 0$.
    – eyeballfrog
    Nov 15 at 22:24


















  • Could you clarify the condition on $u^*$? Is it: $$1 - 2frac{u^*}{xi}expleft(-frac{xi}{Lambda u^*}right) - u^{*2}>0$$
    – Yuriy S
    Oct 19 at 7:19










  • If we denote the $u$ integral $I_1$, then is the outer integral $int_0^infty cos (I_1^2) xi d xi$ or $int_0^infty ( cos I_1)^2 xi d xi$?
    – Yuriy S
    Oct 19 at 8:01










  • @YuriyS That quantity is zero, since any larger $u^*$ would make the integral have an imaginary part. And it's $(cos I_1)^2$.
    – eyeballfrog
    Oct 19 at 10:49












  • What do you actually want to calculate? The divergent part was (sort of) obtained by Yuriy. But I feel like you really want to determine the regularized finite part?
    – Diger
    Nov 15 at 22:15












  • @Diger There is no divergent part. The integral is finite for all $Lambda >0$. I'm looking for a rigorous way to make the estimate $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ as $Lambda rightarrow 0$.
    – eyeballfrog
    Nov 15 at 22:24
















Could you clarify the condition on $u^*$? Is it: $$1 - 2frac{u^*}{xi}expleft(-frac{xi}{Lambda u^*}right) - u^{*2}>0$$
– Yuriy S
Oct 19 at 7:19




Could you clarify the condition on $u^*$? Is it: $$1 - 2frac{u^*}{xi}expleft(-frac{xi}{Lambda u^*}right) - u^{*2}>0$$
– Yuriy S
Oct 19 at 7:19












If we denote the $u$ integral $I_1$, then is the outer integral $int_0^infty cos (I_1^2) xi d xi$ or $int_0^infty ( cos I_1)^2 xi d xi$?
– Yuriy S
Oct 19 at 8:01




If we denote the $u$ integral $I_1$, then is the outer integral $int_0^infty cos (I_1^2) xi d xi$ or $int_0^infty ( cos I_1)^2 xi d xi$?
– Yuriy S
Oct 19 at 8:01












@YuriyS That quantity is zero, since any larger $u^*$ would make the integral have an imaginary part. And it's $(cos I_1)^2$.
– eyeballfrog
Oct 19 at 10:49






@YuriyS That quantity is zero, since any larger $u^*$ would make the integral have an imaginary part. And it's $(cos I_1)^2$.
– eyeballfrog
Oct 19 at 10:49














What do you actually want to calculate? The divergent part was (sort of) obtained by Yuriy. But I feel like you really want to determine the regularized finite part?
– Diger
Nov 15 at 22:15






What do you actually want to calculate? The divergent part was (sort of) obtained by Yuriy. But I feel like you really want to determine the regularized finite part?
– Diger
Nov 15 at 22:15














@Diger There is no divergent part. The integral is finite for all $Lambda >0$. I'm looking for a rigorous way to make the estimate $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ as $Lambda rightarrow 0$.
– eyeballfrog
Nov 15 at 22:24




@Diger There is no divergent part. The integral is finite for all $Lambda >0$. I'm looking for a rigorous way to make the estimate $ell(Lambda) sim ln Lambda$ as $Lambda rightarrow 0$.
– eyeballfrog
Nov 15 at 22:24










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













I have tried to expand the integrand up to first order in $1/ Lambda$, however I still obtained a divergent integral.



I will still provide the attempt, as it might be useful.



First, I denote:



$$t=frac{1}{Lambda}$$



We are interested in the function



$$f(t)=int_0^infty xi ~mathrm{d} xi cos^2 int_0^{u^*} frac{du}{sqrt{1-u^2-2frac{u}{xi} exp (-frac{t ~xi}{u})}}$$



It makes sense to change the variables in both integrals:



$$v=u / xi \ xi^2=w$$



Then:



$$f(t)=frac{1}{2}int_0^infty mathrm{d} w cos^2 left(sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{dv}{sqrt{1-w v^2-2v exp (-frac{t }{v})}} right)$$



Where $v^*$ is the (smallest positive) root of:



$$1-w v^2-2 v exp (-frac{t }{v})=0$$



Note that we can explicitly define the function $w(v^*)$.





Now comes the tricky part. The most simple way to evaluate the inner integral for small $t$ is expanding the exponential up to first order, then:



$$1-w v^2-2v exp (-frac{t }{v}) approx 1+2t-w v^2-2v$$



We obtained a simple integral, which has an exact expression:



$$int_0^{v^*} frac{dv}{sqrt{1+2t-w v^2-2v}}=frac{1}{sqrt{w}} left(arcsin frac{1+w v^*}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}}-arcsin frac{1}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}} right)$$



From the condition:



$$1+2t-w v^{*2}-2v^*=0$$



we obtain:



$$1+w v^*=sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}$$



So now we have:



$$f(t) approx frac{1}{2}int_0^infty mathrm{d} w cos^2 left( frac{pi}{2}-arcsin frac{1}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}} right)=$$



$$=frac{1}{2} int_0^infty frac{mathrm{d} w}{ 1+(1+2t)w}=frac{1}{2(1+2t)} ln (1+(1+2t)w) bigg|^infty_0$$



This integral diverges logarithmically.



If, as the OP said, we "cut off" the integral at $w=Lambda^2=1/t^2$, we get:



$$f(t) approx frac{1}{2(1+2t)} ln (1+(1+2t)w) bigg|^{1/t^2}_0 approx frac{1}{(1+2t)} ln frac{1}{t} approx ln frac{1}{t} = ln Lambda$$



However, this is just the same trick with a more complicated preliminaries.





I believe, we will have to use more terms in the expansion of the exponential to get a convergent integral, if we even can do it that way. Maybe play with the limits of the $u$ integral somehow.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    typo: $v=u/xi$.
    – Diger
    Nov 15 at 22:20










  • @Diger, fixed, thanks
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 22:27


















up vote
0
down vote













I want to build on what Yuriy already established. First of all let me emphasize that I think at no order in the small $t$ approximation you will get a finite integral. This is because the equation $$1-wv^2-2v expleft({-frac{t}{v}}right)=0 tag{0}$$ has an approximate solution $$v^* approx frac{1}{sqrt{w}} tag{1}$$ in the large $w$ limit which for any finite $t>0$ will have $frac{t}{v^*} approx sqrt{w} ,t >>1$ and the exponential will be suppressed correspondingly. Since $expleft(-frac{t}{v}right)$ does not have a power series expansion about $v=0$ (meaning all the expansion coefficients in the power series expansion being $0$) for large enough $w$ indeed (1) holds to all orders as the next order is exponentially small and we have



$$
sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2vexpleft(-t/vright)}} = frac{pi}{2} + {cal O}left( expleft(-sqrt{w} , tright) right) , .
$$



But this is not what happens in the small $t$ approximation if we cut the expansion at order $n>2$: The large $w$ dependence of the solution will behave like $$v^* approx (-1)^{n} left(frac{2 , t^{n-1}}{(n-1)! , w}right)^{frac{1}{n}} , .$$



In Yuriy's case $n=2$ this expansion is $$v^* = sqrt{frac{2t+1}{w}} - frac{1}{w} + {cal O}left(w^{-3/2}right)$$ which coincidentally matches (1) at $t=0$, but the next order is only $1/w$ which leads to



$$sqrt{w}int_0^{v^*} frac{1}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-frac{t}{v}right)}} approx sqrt{w}int_0^{v^*} frac{1}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} = frac{pi}{2} + {cal O}left(w^{-1/2}right)$$ for $w$ very large, which order-wise is not far away enough from $pi/2$ for the $cos^2$ function to vanish appropriately.





Strategy:



We start with the following sandwiching for the inner integral



begin{align}
&sqrt{w} int_0^{-frac{1}{w} + sqrt{ frac{1}{w^2} + frac{1}{w} }} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v}} \
leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} \
leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} \
leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/v^*right)}} tag{2}
end{align}



where $v^*$ is the solution to (0) which has the following limits



$$
-frac{1}{w} + sqrt{ frac{1}{w^2} + frac{1}{w} } leq v^* leq frac{1}{sqrt{w}} , . tag{3}
$$



Note that we can implicitly express the solution of (0) as



$$
v^*=-frac{epsilon}{w} + sqrt{ left( frac{epsilon}{w} right)^2 + frac{1}{w} }
$$



with $epsilon=expleft(-frac{t}{v^*}right) leq 1$.



We now first calculate the LHS and RHS of (2) by using the formula



$$
sqrt{w} int_0^{-frac{epsilon}{w} + sqrt{ left( frac{epsilon}{w} right)^2 + frac{1}{w} }} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v epsilon}} = frac{pi}{2} - arcsinleft(frac{epsilon}{sqrt{epsilon^2 + w}}right)
$$



for general $epsilon$ and



$$
sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} = arcsinleft(sqrt{w} , v^*right) , .
$$



When applying $cos^2$ the inequalities reverse since the result is $in (0,pi/2)$ and we get



begin{align}
&int_0^infty {rm d}w , frac{1}{w+1} \
geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, {2epsilon} v^* \
geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, cos^2 left( sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} right) \
geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{epsilon^2}{epsilon^2 + w} tag{4} , .
end{align}



The first integral on the LHS diverges: we'll return to it later. The other LHS can be approximated by the following sequence



$$
int_0^infty {rm d} w, {2epsilon} v^* leq 2 int_0^infty {rm d}w , frac{{rm e}^{-sqrt{w} , t}}{sqrt{w}} = frac{4}{t}
$$



where use of the RHS of (3) was made, which unfortunately is not quite the upper bound we are looking for. Likewise for the RHS



$$
int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{epsilon^2}{epsilon^2 + w} geq int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{{rm e}^{-2t , left(1+sqrt{1+w}right)}}{1 + w} = 2 , {rm e}^{-2t} , {rm E}_1(2t) = -2 left{ log(2t) + gamma right} + {cal O}(t)
$$



where use of the LHS of (3) was made.



Going back to the LHS we split the $w$-integral according to



$$
int_0^{w_0} {rm d}w + int_{w_0}^{infty} {rm d}w
$$



and notice that (2) or (4) are valid $forall w>0$, so we can use the left quantity on the LHS (of the expression we are looking for) for the first integral up to $w_0$ and the right quantity (of the LHS) for the second integral from $w_0$ to $infty$. It then follows readily that
$$
int_{0}^{w_0} {rm d}w , frac{1}{w+1} + 2int_{w_0}^{infty} {rm d}w , frac{{rm e}^{-sqrt{w},t}}{sqrt{w}} = log (w_0+1) + frac{4}{t} , {rm e}^{-sqrt{w_0} , t}
$$

and by choosing $w_0={t^{-2delta-2}}$ we have
$$
=-(2delta+2) log(t) + logleft(1+t^{2delta+2}right) + frac{4}{t} , {rm e}^{-t^{-delta}}
$$

$forall delta >0$.



The result therefore is
$$
bbox[lightyellow] {
eqalign{
&-(delta+1) log(t) + frac{1}{2} logleft(1+t^{2delta+2}right) + frac{2}{t} , {rm e}^{-t^{-delta}} cr
geq &frac{1}{2}int_0^infty {rm d} w, cos^2 left( sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} right) cr
geq &-left{ log(2t) + gamma right} + {cal O}(t) , .
}
}
$$






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2961323%2fasymptotic-behavior-of-the-coulomb-logarithm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I have tried to expand the integrand up to first order in $1/ Lambda$, however I still obtained a divergent integral.



    I will still provide the attempt, as it might be useful.



    First, I denote:



    $$t=frac{1}{Lambda}$$



    We are interested in the function



    $$f(t)=int_0^infty xi ~mathrm{d} xi cos^2 int_0^{u^*} frac{du}{sqrt{1-u^2-2frac{u}{xi} exp (-frac{t ~xi}{u})}}$$



    It makes sense to change the variables in both integrals:



    $$v=u / xi \ xi^2=w$$



    Then:



    $$f(t)=frac{1}{2}int_0^infty mathrm{d} w cos^2 left(sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{dv}{sqrt{1-w v^2-2v exp (-frac{t }{v})}} right)$$



    Where $v^*$ is the (smallest positive) root of:



    $$1-w v^2-2 v exp (-frac{t }{v})=0$$



    Note that we can explicitly define the function $w(v^*)$.





    Now comes the tricky part. The most simple way to evaluate the inner integral for small $t$ is expanding the exponential up to first order, then:



    $$1-w v^2-2v exp (-frac{t }{v}) approx 1+2t-w v^2-2v$$



    We obtained a simple integral, which has an exact expression:



    $$int_0^{v^*} frac{dv}{sqrt{1+2t-w v^2-2v}}=frac{1}{sqrt{w}} left(arcsin frac{1+w v^*}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}}-arcsin frac{1}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}} right)$$



    From the condition:



    $$1+2t-w v^{*2}-2v^*=0$$



    we obtain:



    $$1+w v^*=sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}$$



    So now we have:



    $$f(t) approx frac{1}{2}int_0^infty mathrm{d} w cos^2 left( frac{pi}{2}-arcsin frac{1}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}} right)=$$



    $$=frac{1}{2} int_0^infty frac{mathrm{d} w}{ 1+(1+2t)w}=frac{1}{2(1+2t)} ln (1+(1+2t)w) bigg|^infty_0$$



    This integral diverges logarithmically.



    If, as the OP said, we "cut off" the integral at $w=Lambda^2=1/t^2$, we get:



    $$f(t) approx frac{1}{2(1+2t)} ln (1+(1+2t)w) bigg|^{1/t^2}_0 approx frac{1}{(1+2t)} ln frac{1}{t} approx ln frac{1}{t} = ln Lambda$$



    However, this is just the same trick with a more complicated preliminaries.





    I believe, we will have to use more terms in the expansion of the exponential to get a convergent integral, if we even can do it that way. Maybe play with the limits of the $u$ integral somehow.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      typo: $v=u/xi$.
      – Diger
      Nov 15 at 22:20










    • @Diger, fixed, thanks
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 15 at 22:27















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I have tried to expand the integrand up to first order in $1/ Lambda$, however I still obtained a divergent integral.



    I will still provide the attempt, as it might be useful.



    First, I denote:



    $$t=frac{1}{Lambda}$$



    We are interested in the function



    $$f(t)=int_0^infty xi ~mathrm{d} xi cos^2 int_0^{u^*} frac{du}{sqrt{1-u^2-2frac{u}{xi} exp (-frac{t ~xi}{u})}}$$



    It makes sense to change the variables in both integrals:



    $$v=u / xi \ xi^2=w$$



    Then:



    $$f(t)=frac{1}{2}int_0^infty mathrm{d} w cos^2 left(sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{dv}{sqrt{1-w v^2-2v exp (-frac{t }{v})}} right)$$



    Where $v^*$ is the (smallest positive) root of:



    $$1-w v^2-2 v exp (-frac{t }{v})=0$$



    Note that we can explicitly define the function $w(v^*)$.





    Now comes the tricky part. The most simple way to evaluate the inner integral for small $t$ is expanding the exponential up to first order, then:



    $$1-w v^2-2v exp (-frac{t }{v}) approx 1+2t-w v^2-2v$$



    We obtained a simple integral, which has an exact expression:



    $$int_0^{v^*} frac{dv}{sqrt{1+2t-w v^2-2v}}=frac{1}{sqrt{w}} left(arcsin frac{1+w v^*}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}}-arcsin frac{1}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}} right)$$



    From the condition:



    $$1+2t-w v^{*2}-2v^*=0$$



    we obtain:



    $$1+w v^*=sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}$$



    So now we have:



    $$f(t) approx frac{1}{2}int_0^infty mathrm{d} w cos^2 left( frac{pi}{2}-arcsin frac{1}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}} right)=$$



    $$=frac{1}{2} int_0^infty frac{mathrm{d} w}{ 1+(1+2t)w}=frac{1}{2(1+2t)} ln (1+(1+2t)w) bigg|^infty_0$$



    This integral diverges logarithmically.



    If, as the OP said, we "cut off" the integral at $w=Lambda^2=1/t^2$, we get:



    $$f(t) approx frac{1}{2(1+2t)} ln (1+(1+2t)w) bigg|^{1/t^2}_0 approx frac{1}{(1+2t)} ln frac{1}{t} approx ln frac{1}{t} = ln Lambda$$



    However, this is just the same trick with a more complicated preliminaries.





    I believe, we will have to use more terms in the expansion of the exponential to get a convergent integral, if we even can do it that way. Maybe play with the limits of the $u$ integral somehow.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      typo: $v=u/xi$.
      – Diger
      Nov 15 at 22:20










    • @Diger, fixed, thanks
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 15 at 22:27













    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    I have tried to expand the integrand up to first order in $1/ Lambda$, however I still obtained a divergent integral.



    I will still provide the attempt, as it might be useful.



    First, I denote:



    $$t=frac{1}{Lambda}$$



    We are interested in the function



    $$f(t)=int_0^infty xi ~mathrm{d} xi cos^2 int_0^{u^*} frac{du}{sqrt{1-u^2-2frac{u}{xi} exp (-frac{t ~xi}{u})}}$$



    It makes sense to change the variables in both integrals:



    $$v=u / xi \ xi^2=w$$



    Then:



    $$f(t)=frac{1}{2}int_0^infty mathrm{d} w cos^2 left(sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{dv}{sqrt{1-w v^2-2v exp (-frac{t }{v})}} right)$$



    Where $v^*$ is the (smallest positive) root of:



    $$1-w v^2-2 v exp (-frac{t }{v})=0$$



    Note that we can explicitly define the function $w(v^*)$.





    Now comes the tricky part. The most simple way to evaluate the inner integral for small $t$ is expanding the exponential up to first order, then:



    $$1-w v^2-2v exp (-frac{t }{v}) approx 1+2t-w v^2-2v$$



    We obtained a simple integral, which has an exact expression:



    $$int_0^{v^*} frac{dv}{sqrt{1+2t-w v^2-2v}}=frac{1}{sqrt{w}} left(arcsin frac{1+w v^*}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}}-arcsin frac{1}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}} right)$$



    From the condition:



    $$1+2t-w v^{*2}-2v^*=0$$



    we obtain:



    $$1+w v^*=sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}$$



    So now we have:



    $$f(t) approx frac{1}{2}int_0^infty mathrm{d} w cos^2 left( frac{pi}{2}-arcsin frac{1}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}} right)=$$



    $$=frac{1}{2} int_0^infty frac{mathrm{d} w}{ 1+(1+2t)w}=frac{1}{2(1+2t)} ln (1+(1+2t)w) bigg|^infty_0$$



    This integral diverges logarithmically.



    If, as the OP said, we "cut off" the integral at $w=Lambda^2=1/t^2$, we get:



    $$f(t) approx frac{1}{2(1+2t)} ln (1+(1+2t)w) bigg|^{1/t^2}_0 approx frac{1}{(1+2t)} ln frac{1}{t} approx ln frac{1}{t} = ln Lambda$$



    However, this is just the same trick with a more complicated preliminaries.





    I believe, we will have to use more terms in the expansion of the exponential to get a convergent integral, if we even can do it that way. Maybe play with the limits of the $u$ integral somehow.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    I have tried to expand the integrand up to first order in $1/ Lambda$, however I still obtained a divergent integral.



    I will still provide the attempt, as it might be useful.



    First, I denote:



    $$t=frac{1}{Lambda}$$



    We are interested in the function



    $$f(t)=int_0^infty xi ~mathrm{d} xi cos^2 int_0^{u^*} frac{du}{sqrt{1-u^2-2frac{u}{xi} exp (-frac{t ~xi}{u})}}$$



    It makes sense to change the variables in both integrals:



    $$v=u / xi \ xi^2=w$$



    Then:



    $$f(t)=frac{1}{2}int_0^infty mathrm{d} w cos^2 left(sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{dv}{sqrt{1-w v^2-2v exp (-frac{t }{v})}} right)$$



    Where $v^*$ is the (smallest positive) root of:



    $$1-w v^2-2 v exp (-frac{t }{v})=0$$



    Note that we can explicitly define the function $w(v^*)$.





    Now comes the tricky part. The most simple way to evaluate the inner integral for small $t$ is expanding the exponential up to first order, then:



    $$1-w v^2-2v exp (-frac{t }{v}) approx 1+2t-w v^2-2v$$



    We obtained a simple integral, which has an exact expression:



    $$int_0^{v^*} frac{dv}{sqrt{1+2t-w v^2-2v}}=frac{1}{sqrt{w}} left(arcsin frac{1+w v^*}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}}-arcsin frac{1}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}} right)$$



    From the condition:



    $$1+2t-w v^{*2}-2v^*=0$$



    we obtain:



    $$1+w v^*=sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}$$



    So now we have:



    $$f(t) approx frac{1}{2}int_0^infty mathrm{d} w cos^2 left( frac{pi}{2}-arcsin frac{1}{sqrt{1+(1+2t)w}} right)=$$



    $$=frac{1}{2} int_0^infty frac{mathrm{d} w}{ 1+(1+2t)w}=frac{1}{2(1+2t)} ln (1+(1+2t)w) bigg|^infty_0$$



    This integral diverges logarithmically.



    If, as the OP said, we "cut off" the integral at $w=Lambda^2=1/t^2$, we get:



    $$f(t) approx frac{1}{2(1+2t)} ln (1+(1+2t)w) bigg|^{1/t^2}_0 approx frac{1}{(1+2t)} ln frac{1}{t} approx ln frac{1}{t} = ln Lambda$$



    However, this is just the same trick with a more complicated preliminaries.





    I believe, we will have to use more terms in the expansion of the exponential to get a convergent integral, if we even can do it that way. Maybe play with the limits of the $u$ integral somehow.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Nov 15 at 22:27

























    answered Oct 19 at 12:20









    Yuriy S

    15.5k433115




    15.5k433115








    • 1




      typo: $v=u/xi$.
      – Diger
      Nov 15 at 22:20










    • @Diger, fixed, thanks
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 15 at 22:27














    • 1




      typo: $v=u/xi$.
      – Diger
      Nov 15 at 22:20










    • @Diger, fixed, thanks
      – Yuriy S
      Nov 15 at 22:27








    1




    1




    typo: $v=u/xi$.
    – Diger
    Nov 15 at 22:20




    typo: $v=u/xi$.
    – Diger
    Nov 15 at 22:20












    @Diger, fixed, thanks
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 22:27




    @Diger, fixed, thanks
    – Yuriy S
    Nov 15 at 22:27










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I want to build on what Yuriy already established. First of all let me emphasize that I think at no order in the small $t$ approximation you will get a finite integral. This is because the equation $$1-wv^2-2v expleft({-frac{t}{v}}right)=0 tag{0}$$ has an approximate solution $$v^* approx frac{1}{sqrt{w}} tag{1}$$ in the large $w$ limit which for any finite $t>0$ will have $frac{t}{v^*} approx sqrt{w} ,t >>1$ and the exponential will be suppressed correspondingly. Since $expleft(-frac{t}{v}right)$ does not have a power series expansion about $v=0$ (meaning all the expansion coefficients in the power series expansion being $0$) for large enough $w$ indeed (1) holds to all orders as the next order is exponentially small and we have



    $$
    sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2vexpleft(-t/vright)}} = frac{pi}{2} + {cal O}left( expleft(-sqrt{w} , tright) right) , .
    $$



    But this is not what happens in the small $t$ approximation if we cut the expansion at order $n>2$: The large $w$ dependence of the solution will behave like $$v^* approx (-1)^{n} left(frac{2 , t^{n-1}}{(n-1)! , w}right)^{frac{1}{n}} , .$$



    In Yuriy's case $n=2$ this expansion is $$v^* = sqrt{frac{2t+1}{w}} - frac{1}{w} + {cal O}left(w^{-3/2}right)$$ which coincidentally matches (1) at $t=0$, but the next order is only $1/w$ which leads to



    $$sqrt{w}int_0^{v^*} frac{1}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-frac{t}{v}right)}} approx sqrt{w}int_0^{v^*} frac{1}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} = frac{pi}{2} + {cal O}left(w^{-1/2}right)$$ for $w$ very large, which order-wise is not far away enough from $pi/2$ for the $cos^2$ function to vanish appropriately.





    Strategy:



    We start with the following sandwiching for the inner integral



    begin{align}
    &sqrt{w} int_0^{-frac{1}{w} + sqrt{ frac{1}{w^2} + frac{1}{w} }} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v}} \
    leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} \
    leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} \
    leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/v^*right)}} tag{2}
    end{align}



    where $v^*$ is the solution to (0) which has the following limits



    $$
    -frac{1}{w} + sqrt{ frac{1}{w^2} + frac{1}{w} } leq v^* leq frac{1}{sqrt{w}} , . tag{3}
    $$



    Note that we can implicitly express the solution of (0) as



    $$
    v^*=-frac{epsilon}{w} + sqrt{ left( frac{epsilon}{w} right)^2 + frac{1}{w} }
    $$



    with $epsilon=expleft(-frac{t}{v^*}right) leq 1$.



    We now first calculate the LHS and RHS of (2) by using the formula



    $$
    sqrt{w} int_0^{-frac{epsilon}{w} + sqrt{ left( frac{epsilon}{w} right)^2 + frac{1}{w} }} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v epsilon}} = frac{pi}{2} - arcsinleft(frac{epsilon}{sqrt{epsilon^2 + w}}right)
    $$



    for general $epsilon$ and



    $$
    sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} = arcsinleft(sqrt{w} , v^*right) , .
    $$



    When applying $cos^2$ the inequalities reverse since the result is $in (0,pi/2)$ and we get



    begin{align}
    &int_0^infty {rm d}w , frac{1}{w+1} \
    geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, {2epsilon} v^* \
    geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, cos^2 left( sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} right) \
    geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{epsilon^2}{epsilon^2 + w} tag{4} , .
    end{align}



    The first integral on the LHS diverges: we'll return to it later. The other LHS can be approximated by the following sequence



    $$
    int_0^infty {rm d} w, {2epsilon} v^* leq 2 int_0^infty {rm d}w , frac{{rm e}^{-sqrt{w} , t}}{sqrt{w}} = frac{4}{t}
    $$



    where use of the RHS of (3) was made, which unfortunately is not quite the upper bound we are looking for. Likewise for the RHS



    $$
    int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{epsilon^2}{epsilon^2 + w} geq int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{{rm e}^{-2t , left(1+sqrt{1+w}right)}}{1 + w} = 2 , {rm e}^{-2t} , {rm E}_1(2t) = -2 left{ log(2t) + gamma right} + {cal O}(t)
    $$



    where use of the LHS of (3) was made.



    Going back to the LHS we split the $w$-integral according to



    $$
    int_0^{w_0} {rm d}w + int_{w_0}^{infty} {rm d}w
    $$



    and notice that (2) or (4) are valid $forall w>0$, so we can use the left quantity on the LHS (of the expression we are looking for) for the first integral up to $w_0$ and the right quantity (of the LHS) for the second integral from $w_0$ to $infty$. It then follows readily that
    $$
    int_{0}^{w_0} {rm d}w , frac{1}{w+1} + 2int_{w_0}^{infty} {rm d}w , frac{{rm e}^{-sqrt{w},t}}{sqrt{w}} = log (w_0+1) + frac{4}{t} , {rm e}^{-sqrt{w_0} , t}
    $$

    and by choosing $w_0={t^{-2delta-2}}$ we have
    $$
    =-(2delta+2) log(t) + logleft(1+t^{2delta+2}right) + frac{4}{t} , {rm e}^{-t^{-delta}}
    $$

    $forall delta >0$.



    The result therefore is
    $$
    bbox[lightyellow] {
    eqalign{
    &-(delta+1) log(t) + frac{1}{2} logleft(1+t^{2delta+2}right) + frac{2}{t} , {rm e}^{-t^{-delta}} cr
    geq &frac{1}{2}int_0^infty {rm d} w, cos^2 left( sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} right) cr
    geq &-left{ log(2t) + gamma right} + {cal O}(t) , .
    }
    }
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      I want to build on what Yuriy already established. First of all let me emphasize that I think at no order in the small $t$ approximation you will get a finite integral. This is because the equation $$1-wv^2-2v expleft({-frac{t}{v}}right)=0 tag{0}$$ has an approximate solution $$v^* approx frac{1}{sqrt{w}} tag{1}$$ in the large $w$ limit which for any finite $t>0$ will have $frac{t}{v^*} approx sqrt{w} ,t >>1$ and the exponential will be suppressed correspondingly. Since $expleft(-frac{t}{v}right)$ does not have a power series expansion about $v=0$ (meaning all the expansion coefficients in the power series expansion being $0$) for large enough $w$ indeed (1) holds to all orders as the next order is exponentially small and we have



      $$
      sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2vexpleft(-t/vright)}} = frac{pi}{2} + {cal O}left( expleft(-sqrt{w} , tright) right) , .
      $$



      But this is not what happens in the small $t$ approximation if we cut the expansion at order $n>2$: The large $w$ dependence of the solution will behave like $$v^* approx (-1)^{n} left(frac{2 , t^{n-1}}{(n-1)! , w}right)^{frac{1}{n}} , .$$



      In Yuriy's case $n=2$ this expansion is $$v^* = sqrt{frac{2t+1}{w}} - frac{1}{w} + {cal O}left(w^{-3/2}right)$$ which coincidentally matches (1) at $t=0$, but the next order is only $1/w$ which leads to



      $$sqrt{w}int_0^{v^*} frac{1}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-frac{t}{v}right)}} approx sqrt{w}int_0^{v^*} frac{1}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} = frac{pi}{2} + {cal O}left(w^{-1/2}right)$$ for $w$ very large, which order-wise is not far away enough from $pi/2$ for the $cos^2$ function to vanish appropriately.





      Strategy:



      We start with the following sandwiching for the inner integral



      begin{align}
      &sqrt{w} int_0^{-frac{1}{w} + sqrt{ frac{1}{w^2} + frac{1}{w} }} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v}} \
      leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} \
      leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} \
      leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/v^*right)}} tag{2}
      end{align}



      where $v^*$ is the solution to (0) which has the following limits



      $$
      -frac{1}{w} + sqrt{ frac{1}{w^2} + frac{1}{w} } leq v^* leq frac{1}{sqrt{w}} , . tag{3}
      $$



      Note that we can implicitly express the solution of (0) as



      $$
      v^*=-frac{epsilon}{w} + sqrt{ left( frac{epsilon}{w} right)^2 + frac{1}{w} }
      $$



      with $epsilon=expleft(-frac{t}{v^*}right) leq 1$.



      We now first calculate the LHS and RHS of (2) by using the formula



      $$
      sqrt{w} int_0^{-frac{epsilon}{w} + sqrt{ left( frac{epsilon}{w} right)^2 + frac{1}{w} }} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v epsilon}} = frac{pi}{2} - arcsinleft(frac{epsilon}{sqrt{epsilon^2 + w}}right)
      $$



      for general $epsilon$ and



      $$
      sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} = arcsinleft(sqrt{w} , v^*right) , .
      $$



      When applying $cos^2$ the inequalities reverse since the result is $in (0,pi/2)$ and we get



      begin{align}
      &int_0^infty {rm d}w , frac{1}{w+1} \
      geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, {2epsilon} v^* \
      geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, cos^2 left( sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} right) \
      geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{epsilon^2}{epsilon^2 + w} tag{4} , .
      end{align}



      The first integral on the LHS diverges: we'll return to it later. The other LHS can be approximated by the following sequence



      $$
      int_0^infty {rm d} w, {2epsilon} v^* leq 2 int_0^infty {rm d}w , frac{{rm e}^{-sqrt{w} , t}}{sqrt{w}} = frac{4}{t}
      $$



      where use of the RHS of (3) was made, which unfortunately is not quite the upper bound we are looking for. Likewise for the RHS



      $$
      int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{epsilon^2}{epsilon^2 + w} geq int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{{rm e}^{-2t , left(1+sqrt{1+w}right)}}{1 + w} = 2 , {rm e}^{-2t} , {rm E}_1(2t) = -2 left{ log(2t) + gamma right} + {cal O}(t)
      $$



      where use of the LHS of (3) was made.



      Going back to the LHS we split the $w$-integral according to



      $$
      int_0^{w_0} {rm d}w + int_{w_0}^{infty} {rm d}w
      $$



      and notice that (2) or (4) are valid $forall w>0$, so we can use the left quantity on the LHS (of the expression we are looking for) for the first integral up to $w_0$ and the right quantity (of the LHS) for the second integral from $w_0$ to $infty$. It then follows readily that
      $$
      int_{0}^{w_0} {rm d}w , frac{1}{w+1} + 2int_{w_0}^{infty} {rm d}w , frac{{rm e}^{-sqrt{w},t}}{sqrt{w}} = log (w_0+1) + frac{4}{t} , {rm e}^{-sqrt{w_0} , t}
      $$

      and by choosing $w_0={t^{-2delta-2}}$ we have
      $$
      =-(2delta+2) log(t) + logleft(1+t^{2delta+2}right) + frac{4}{t} , {rm e}^{-t^{-delta}}
      $$

      $forall delta >0$.



      The result therefore is
      $$
      bbox[lightyellow] {
      eqalign{
      &-(delta+1) log(t) + frac{1}{2} logleft(1+t^{2delta+2}right) + frac{2}{t} , {rm e}^{-t^{-delta}} cr
      geq &frac{1}{2}int_0^infty {rm d} w, cos^2 left( sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} right) cr
      geq &-left{ log(2t) + gamma right} + {cal O}(t) , .
      }
      }
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        I want to build on what Yuriy already established. First of all let me emphasize that I think at no order in the small $t$ approximation you will get a finite integral. This is because the equation $$1-wv^2-2v expleft({-frac{t}{v}}right)=0 tag{0}$$ has an approximate solution $$v^* approx frac{1}{sqrt{w}} tag{1}$$ in the large $w$ limit which for any finite $t>0$ will have $frac{t}{v^*} approx sqrt{w} ,t >>1$ and the exponential will be suppressed correspondingly. Since $expleft(-frac{t}{v}right)$ does not have a power series expansion about $v=0$ (meaning all the expansion coefficients in the power series expansion being $0$) for large enough $w$ indeed (1) holds to all orders as the next order is exponentially small and we have



        $$
        sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2vexpleft(-t/vright)}} = frac{pi}{2} + {cal O}left( expleft(-sqrt{w} , tright) right) , .
        $$



        But this is not what happens in the small $t$ approximation if we cut the expansion at order $n>2$: The large $w$ dependence of the solution will behave like $$v^* approx (-1)^{n} left(frac{2 , t^{n-1}}{(n-1)! , w}right)^{frac{1}{n}} , .$$



        In Yuriy's case $n=2$ this expansion is $$v^* = sqrt{frac{2t+1}{w}} - frac{1}{w} + {cal O}left(w^{-3/2}right)$$ which coincidentally matches (1) at $t=0$, but the next order is only $1/w$ which leads to



        $$sqrt{w}int_0^{v^*} frac{1}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-frac{t}{v}right)}} approx sqrt{w}int_0^{v^*} frac{1}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} = frac{pi}{2} + {cal O}left(w^{-1/2}right)$$ for $w$ very large, which order-wise is not far away enough from $pi/2$ for the $cos^2$ function to vanish appropriately.





        Strategy:



        We start with the following sandwiching for the inner integral



        begin{align}
        &sqrt{w} int_0^{-frac{1}{w} + sqrt{ frac{1}{w^2} + frac{1}{w} }} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v}} \
        leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} \
        leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} \
        leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/v^*right)}} tag{2}
        end{align}



        where $v^*$ is the solution to (0) which has the following limits



        $$
        -frac{1}{w} + sqrt{ frac{1}{w^2} + frac{1}{w} } leq v^* leq frac{1}{sqrt{w}} , . tag{3}
        $$



        Note that we can implicitly express the solution of (0) as



        $$
        v^*=-frac{epsilon}{w} + sqrt{ left( frac{epsilon}{w} right)^2 + frac{1}{w} }
        $$



        with $epsilon=expleft(-frac{t}{v^*}right) leq 1$.



        We now first calculate the LHS and RHS of (2) by using the formula



        $$
        sqrt{w} int_0^{-frac{epsilon}{w} + sqrt{ left( frac{epsilon}{w} right)^2 + frac{1}{w} }} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v epsilon}} = frac{pi}{2} - arcsinleft(frac{epsilon}{sqrt{epsilon^2 + w}}right)
        $$



        for general $epsilon$ and



        $$
        sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} = arcsinleft(sqrt{w} , v^*right) , .
        $$



        When applying $cos^2$ the inequalities reverse since the result is $in (0,pi/2)$ and we get



        begin{align}
        &int_0^infty {rm d}w , frac{1}{w+1} \
        geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, {2epsilon} v^* \
        geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, cos^2 left( sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} right) \
        geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{epsilon^2}{epsilon^2 + w} tag{4} , .
        end{align}



        The first integral on the LHS diverges: we'll return to it later. The other LHS can be approximated by the following sequence



        $$
        int_0^infty {rm d} w, {2epsilon} v^* leq 2 int_0^infty {rm d}w , frac{{rm e}^{-sqrt{w} , t}}{sqrt{w}} = frac{4}{t}
        $$



        where use of the RHS of (3) was made, which unfortunately is not quite the upper bound we are looking for. Likewise for the RHS



        $$
        int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{epsilon^2}{epsilon^2 + w} geq int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{{rm e}^{-2t , left(1+sqrt{1+w}right)}}{1 + w} = 2 , {rm e}^{-2t} , {rm E}_1(2t) = -2 left{ log(2t) + gamma right} + {cal O}(t)
        $$



        where use of the LHS of (3) was made.



        Going back to the LHS we split the $w$-integral according to



        $$
        int_0^{w_0} {rm d}w + int_{w_0}^{infty} {rm d}w
        $$



        and notice that (2) or (4) are valid $forall w>0$, so we can use the left quantity on the LHS (of the expression we are looking for) for the first integral up to $w_0$ and the right quantity (of the LHS) for the second integral from $w_0$ to $infty$. It then follows readily that
        $$
        int_{0}^{w_0} {rm d}w , frac{1}{w+1} + 2int_{w_0}^{infty} {rm d}w , frac{{rm e}^{-sqrt{w},t}}{sqrt{w}} = log (w_0+1) + frac{4}{t} , {rm e}^{-sqrt{w_0} , t}
        $$

        and by choosing $w_0={t^{-2delta-2}}$ we have
        $$
        =-(2delta+2) log(t) + logleft(1+t^{2delta+2}right) + frac{4}{t} , {rm e}^{-t^{-delta}}
        $$

        $forall delta >0$.



        The result therefore is
        $$
        bbox[lightyellow] {
        eqalign{
        &-(delta+1) log(t) + frac{1}{2} logleft(1+t^{2delta+2}right) + frac{2}{t} , {rm e}^{-t^{-delta}} cr
        geq &frac{1}{2}int_0^infty {rm d} w, cos^2 left( sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} right) cr
        geq &-left{ log(2t) + gamma right} + {cal O}(t) , .
        }
        }
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        I want to build on what Yuriy already established. First of all let me emphasize that I think at no order in the small $t$ approximation you will get a finite integral. This is because the equation $$1-wv^2-2v expleft({-frac{t}{v}}right)=0 tag{0}$$ has an approximate solution $$v^* approx frac{1}{sqrt{w}} tag{1}$$ in the large $w$ limit which for any finite $t>0$ will have $frac{t}{v^*} approx sqrt{w} ,t >>1$ and the exponential will be suppressed correspondingly. Since $expleft(-frac{t}{v}right)$ does not have a power series expansion about $v=0$ (meaning all the expansion coefficients in the power series expansion being $0$) for large enough $w$ indeed (1) holds to all orders as the next order is exponentially small and we have



        $$
        sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2vexpleft(-t/vright)}} = frac{pi}{2} + {cal O}left( expleft(-sqrt{w} , tright) right) , .
        $$



        But this is not what happens in the small $t$ approximation if we cut the expansion at order $n>2$: The large $w$ dependence of the solution will behave like $$v^* approx (-1)^{n} left(frac{2 , t^{n-1}}{(n-1)! , w}right)^{frac{1}{n}} , .$$



        In Yuriy's case $n=2$ this expansion is $$v^* = sqrt{frac{2t+1}{w}} - frac{1}{w} + {cal O}left(w^{-3/2}right)$$ which coincidentally matches (1) at $t=0$, but the next order is only $1/w$ which leads to



        $$sqrt{w}int_0^{v^*} frac{1}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-frac{t}{v}right)}} approx sqrt{w}int_0^{v^*} frac{1}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} = frac{pi}{2} + {cal O}left(w^{-1/2}right)$$ for $w$ very large, which order-wise is not far away enough from $pi/2$ for the $cos^2$ function to vanish appropriately.





        Strategy:



        We start with the following sandwiching for the inner integral



        begin{align}
        &sqrt{w} int_0^{-frac{1}{w} + sqrt{ frac{1}{w^2} + frac{1}{w} }} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v}} \
        leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} \
        leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} \
        leq &sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/v^*right)}} tag{2}
        end{align}



        where $v^*$ is the solution to (0) which has the following limits



        $$
        -frac{1}{w} + sqrt{ frac{1}{w^2} + frac{1}{w} } leq v^* leq frac{1}{sqrt{w}} , . tag{3}
        $$



        Note that we can implicitly express the solution of (0) as



        $$
        v^*=-frac{epsilon}{w} + sqrt{ left( frac{epsilon}{w} right)^2 + frac{1}{w} }
        $$



        with $epsilon=expleft(-frac{t}{v^*}right) leq 1$.



        We now first calculate the LHS and RHS of (2) by using the formula



        $$
        sqrt{w} int_0^{-frac{epsilon}{w} + sqrt{ left( frac{epsilon}{w} right)^2 + frac{1}{w} }} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v epsilon}} = frac{pi}{2} - arcsinleft(frac{epsilon}{sqrt{epsilon^2 + w}}right)
        $$



        for general $epsilon$ and



        $$
        sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2}} = arcsinleft(sqrt{w} , v^*right) , .
        $$



        When applying $cos^2$ the inequalities reverse since the result is $in (0,pi/2)$ and we get



        begin{align}
        &int_0^infty {rm d}w , frac{1}{w+1} \
        geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, {2epsilon} v^* \
        geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, cos^2 left( sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} right) \
        geq &int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{epsilon^2}{epsilon^2 + w} tag{4} , .
        end{align}



        The first integral on the LHS diverges: we'll return to it later. The other LHS can be approximated by the following sequence



        $$
        int_0^infty {rm d} w, {2epsilon} v^* leq 2 int_0^infty {rm d}w , frac{{rm e}^{-sqrt{w} , t}}{sqrt{w}} = frac{4}{t}
        $$



        where use of the RHS of (3) was made, which unfortunately is not quite the upper bound we are looking for. Likewise for the RHS



        $$
        int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{epsilon^2}{epsilon^2 + w} geq int_0^infty {rm d} w, frac{{rm e}^{-2t , left(1+sqrt{1+w}right)}}{1 + w} = 2 , {rm e}^{-2t} , {rm E}_1(2t) = -2 left{ log(2t) + gamma right} + {cal O}(t)
        $$



        where use of the LHS of (3) was made.



        Going back to the LHS we split the $w$-integral according to



        $$
        int_0^{w_0} {rm d}w + int_{w_0}^{infty} {rm d}w
        $$



        and notice that (2) or (4) are valid $forall w>0$, so we can use the left quantity on the LHS (of the expression we are looking for) for the first integral up to $w_0$ and the right quantity (of the LHS) for the second integral from $w_0$ to $infty$. It then follows readily that
        $$
        int_{0}^{w_0} {rm d}w , frac{1}{w+1} + 2int_{w_0}^{infty} {rm d}w , frac{{rm e}^{-sqrt{w},t}}{sqrt{w}} = log (w_0+1) + frac{4}{t} , {rm e}^{-sqrt{w_0} , t}
        $$

        and by choosing $w_0={t^{-2delta-2}}$ we have
        $$
        =-(2delta+2) log(t) + logleft(1+t^{2delta+2}right) + frac{4}{t} , {rm e}^{-t^{-delta}}
        $$

        $forall delta >0$.



        The result therefore is
        $$
        bbox[lightyellow] {
        eqalign{
        &-(delta+1) log(t) + frac{1}{2} logleft(1+t^{2delta+2}right) + frac{2}{t} , {rm e}^{-t^{-delta}} cr
        geq &frac{1}{2}int_0^infty {rm d} w, cos^2 left( sqrt{w} int_0^{v^*} frac{{rm d}v}{sqrt{1-wv^2-2v expleft(-t/vright)}} right) cr
        geq &-left{ log(2t) + gamma right} + {cal O}(t) , .
        }
        }
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago

























        answered Nov 19 at 23:04









        Diger

        1,369411




        1,369411






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2961323%2fasymptotic-behavior-of-the-coulomb-logarithm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen