Show that the motion is a circular path











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Question:



The position $mathbf r$ of a particle satisfies



$$ ddot {mathbf r} = fdot {mathbf r} times mathbf k$$



where $f$ is a known constant and $mathbf k$ is the unit vector in the $z$ direction.



Given that $dot {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv 0$, show that the path of the particle is a circle.





Attempt:



Firstly, there are a few quantities that I know are constant:



$$frac{d}{dt}big(|dot{mathbf r}|^2 big) = 2ddot {mathbf r} cdot dot {mathbf r} = 2f(dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) cdot dot{mathbf r} = 0 implies |dot{mathbf r}|^2 equiv text{constant}$$



$$frac{d}{dt}big(mathbf r cdot mathbf kbig) = dot{mathbf r} cdot mathbf k =0 implies {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv text{constant}$$



Moreover, I noticed that



$$frac{d^2dot{mathbf r}}{dt^2} = f^2dot{mathbf r}$$



and solving this gives



$$dot{mathbf r}(t) = mathbf c_1 cos(ft)+mathbf c_2 sin (ft)$$



but I am unsure how to deduce from this that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Question:



    The position $mathbf r$ of a particle satisfies



    $$ ddot {mathbf r} = fdot {mathbf r} times mathbf k$$



    where $f$ is a known constant and $mathbf k$ is the unit vector in the $z$ direction.



    Given that $dot {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv 0$, show that the path of the particle is a circle.





    Attempt:



    Firstly, there are a few quantities that I know are constant:



    $$frac{d}{dt}big(|dot{mathbf r}|^2 big) = 2ddot {mathbf r} cdot dot {mathbf r} = 2f(dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) cdot dot{mathbf r} = 0 implies |dot{mathbf r}|^2 equiv text{constant}$$



    $$frac{d}{dt}big(mathbf r cdot mathbf kbig) = dot{mathbf r} cdot mathbf k =0 implies {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv text{constant}$$



    Moreover, I noticed that



    $$frac{d^2dot{mathbf r}}{dt^2} = f^2dot{mathbf r}$$



    and solving this gives



    $$dot{mathbf r}(t) = mathbf c_1 cos(ft)+mathbf c_2 sin (ft)$$



    but I am unsure how to deduce from this that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Question:



      The position $mathbf r$ of a particle satisfies



      $$ ddot {mathbf r} = fdot {mathbf r} times mathbf k$$



      where $f$ is a known constant and $mathbf k$ is the unit vector in the $z$ direction.



      Given that $dot {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv 0$, show that the path of the particle is a circle.





      Attempt:



      Firstly, there are a few quantities that I know are constant:



      $$frac{d}{dt}big(|dot{mathbf r}|^2 big) = 2ddot {mathbf r} cdot dot {mathbf r} = 2f(dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) cdot dot{mathbf r} = 0 implies |dot{mathbf r}|^2 equiv text{constant}$$



      $$frac{d}{dt}big(mathbf r cdot mathbf kbig) = dot{mathbf r} cdot mathbf k =0 implies {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv text{constant}$$



      Moreover, I noticed that



      $$frac{d^2dot{mathbf r}}{dt^2} = f^2dot{mathbf r}$$



      and solving this gives



      $$dot{mathbf r}(t) = mathbf c_1 cos(ft)+mathbf c_2 sin (ft)$$



      but I am unsure how to deduce from this that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Question:



      The position $mathbf r$ of a particle satisfies



      $$ ddot {mathbf r} = fdot {mathbf r} times mathbf k$$



      where $f$ is a known constant and $mathbf k$ is the unit vector in the $z$ direction.



      Given that $dot {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv 0$, show that the path of the particle is a circle.





      Attempt:



      Firstly, there are a few quantities that I know are constant:



      $$frac{d}{dt}big(|dot{mathbf r}|^2 big) = 2ddot {mathbf r} cdot dot {mathbf r} = 2f(dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) cdot dot{mathbf r} = 0 implies |dot{mathbf r}|^2 equiv text{constant}$$



      $$frac{d}{dt}big(mathbf r cdot mathbf kbig) = dot{mathbf r} cdot mathbf k =0 implies {mathbf r} cdot mathbf k equiv text{constant}$$



      Moreover, I noticed that



      $$frac{d^2dot{mathbf r}}{dt^2} = f^2dot{mathbf r}$$



      and solving this gives



      $$dot{mathbf r}(t) = mathbf c_1 cos(ft)+mathbf c_2 sin (ft)$$



      but I am unsure how to deduce from this that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle.







      differential-equations classical-mechanics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 at 1:54









      glowstonetrees

      1,822315




      1,822315






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          Let $mathbf u = mathbf r + frac1f (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)$, we have
          $$dot{mathbf u} = dot{mathbf r} + frac1f(ddot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)
          = dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) times mathbf k)
          = dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r}cdot mathbf k) mathbf k - dot{mathbf r}) = mathbf 0$$

          This means $mathbf u$ is a constant. Notice
          $$frac{d}{dt}|mathbf r - mathbf u|^2
          = 2(mathbf r-mathbf u)cdot dot{mathbf r} = -frac{2}{f} (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)cdot dot{mathbf r} = mathbf 0$$

          The expression $|mathbf r-mathbf u|^2 = R^2$ is a constant. The particle is moving on a sphere
          centered at $mathbf u$ with radius $R$. Together with what you know $mathbf r cdot mathbf k = $ constant.
          The particle is moving along the intersection of a sphere and a plane, i.e. a circle.






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Insert the solution you found of the derived equations into the original equations.
            $$
            -fvec c_1sin(ft)+fvec c_2cos(ft)=f(vec c_1×vec k)cos(ft)+f(vec c_2×vec k)sin(ft).
            $$

            Comparing coefficients,
            $$
            vec c_2=~~vec c_1×vec k\
            vec c_1=-vec c_2×vec k\
            $$

            is only possible if both vectors are orthogonal to $vec k$, of the same length and orthogonal to each other. With $vec k=(0,0,1)$ you get $vec c_1=(a,b,0)$ and $vec c_2=(b,-a,0)$. This means that $dot{vec r}$ follows a circular curve, and that remains preserved under integration, the integration constant is the midpoint around which $vec r$ circulates.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              One way is to show that the curvature is constant. Recall that
              $$kappa = frac{||mathbf{v}(t) times mathbf{a}(t)||}{||mathbf{v}(t)||^3} = frac{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t) times ddot{mathbf{r}}(t)||}{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t)||^3} $$
              Which should be straightforward since you have $dot{mathbf{r}}(t)$.



              It might help to write:
              begin{align}
              dot{mathbf{r}}(t) &= mathbf{c_1}cos(ft) + mathbf{c_2}sin(ft)\
              &= left[begin{array}{c}c_{11}\c_{12}\c_{13}end{array}right]cos(ft) + left[begin{array}{c}c_{21}\c_{22}\c_{23}end{array}right]sin(ft)\
              &=(c_1cos(ft) + c_2sin(ft))hat{mathbf{i}} + (c_3cos(ft) + c_4sin(ft))hat{mathbf{j}} + (c_5cos(ft) + c_6sin(ft))hat{mathbf{k}}
              end{align}

              Then just do the grinding to get the final result.



              EDIT: I just noticed that it might be easier to replace quantities like $ddot{mathbf{r}}(t) = fdot{mathbf{r}}(t) times mathbf{k}$ into the curvature expression as well.



              EDIT2: It's been a while since I"ve dealt with this... Showing that torsion is $0$ is important too.






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
                – glowstonetrees
                Nov 20 at 2:14










              • @glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
                – AlkaKadri
                Nov 20 at 2:28











              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005821%2fshow-that-the-motion-is-a-circular-path%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              4
              down vote



              accepted










              Let $mathbf u = mathbf r + frac1f (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)$, we have
              $$dot{mathbf u} = dot{mathbf r} + frac1f(ddot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)
              = dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) times mathbf k)
              = dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r}cdot mathbf k) mathbf k - dot{mathbf r}) = mathbf 0$$

              This means $mathbf u$ is a constant. Notice
              $$frac{d}{dt}|mathbf r - mathbf u|^2
              = 2(mathbf r-mathbf u)cdot dot{mathbf r} = -frac{2}{f} (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)cdot dot{mathbf r} = mathbf 0$$

              The expression $|mathbf r-mathbf u|^2 = R^2$ is a constant. The particle is moving on a sphere
              centered at $mathbf u$ with radius $R$. Together with what you know $mathbf r cdot mathbf k = $ constant.
              The particle is moving along the intersection of a sphere and a plane, i.e. a circle.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted










                Let $mathbf u = mathbf r + frac1f (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)$, we have
                $$dot{mathbf u} = dot{mathbf r} + frac1f(ddot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)
                = dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) times mathbf k)
                = dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r}cdot mathbf k) mathbf k - dot{mathbf r}) = mathbf 0$$

                This means $mathbf u$ is a constant. Notice
                $$frac{d}{dt}|mathbf r - mathbf u|^2
                = 2(mathbf r-mathbf u)cdot dot{mathbf r} = -frac{2}{f} (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)cdot dot{mathbf r} = mathbf 0$$

                The expression $|mathbf r-mathbf u|^2 = R^2$ is a constant. The particle is moving on a sphere
                centered at $mathbf u$ with radius $R$. Together with what you know $mathbf r cdot mathbf k = $ constant.
                The particle is moving along the intersection of a sphere and a plane, i.e. a circle.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  Let $mathbf u = mathbf r + frac1f (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)$, we have
                  $$dot{mathbf u} = dot{mathbf r} + frac1f(ddot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)
                  = dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) times mathbf k)
                  = dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r}cdot mathbf k) mathbf k - dot{mathbf r}) = mathbf 0$$

                  This means $mathbf u$ is a constant. Notice
                  $$frac{d}{dt}|mathbf r - mathbf u|^2
                  = 2(mathbf r-mathbf u)cdot dot{mathbf r} = -frac{2}{f} (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)cdot dot{mathbf r} = mathbf 0$$

                  The expression $|mathbf r-mathbf u|^2 = R^2$ is a constant. The particle is moving on a sphere
                  centered at $mathbf u$ with radius $R$. Together with what you know $mathbf r cdot mathbf k = $ constant.
                  The particle is moving along the intersection of a sphere and a plane, i.e. a circle.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  Let $mathbf u = mathbf r + frac1f (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)$, we have
                  $$dot{mathbf u} = dot{mathbf r} + frac1f(ddot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)
                  = dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k) times mathbf k)
                  = dot{mathbf r} + ((dot{mathbf r}cdot mathbf k) mathbf k - dot{mathbf r}) = mathbf 0$$

                  This means $mathbf u$ is a constant. Notice
                  $$frac{d}{dt}|mathbf r - mathbf u|^2
                  = 2(mathbf r-mathbf u)cdot dot{mathbf r} = -frac{2}{f} (dot{mathbf r} times mathbf k)cdot dot{mathbf r} = mathbf 0$$

                  The expression $|mathbf r-mathbf u|^2 = R^2$ is a constant. The particle is moving on a sphere
                  centered at $mathbf u$ with radius $R$. Together with what you know $mathbf r cdot mathbf k = $ constant.
                  The particle is moving along the intersection of a sphere and a plane, i.e. a circle.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago









                  glowstonetrees

                  1,822315




                  1,822315










                  answered Nov 20 at 2:44









                  achille hui

                  93.5k5127251




                  93.5k5127251






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      Insert the solution you found of the derived equations into the original equations.
                      $$
                      -fvec c_1sin(ft)+fvec c_2cos(ft)=f(vec c_1×vec k)cos(ft)+f(vec c_2×vec k)sin(ft).
                      $$

                      Comparing coefficients,
                      $$
                      vec c_2=~~vec c_1×vec k\
                      vec c_1=-vec c_2×vec k\
                      $$

                      is only possible if both vectors are orthogonal to $vec k$, of the same length and orthogonal to each other. With $vec k=(0,0,1)$ you get $vec c_1=(a,b,0)$ and $vec c_2=(b,-a,0)$. This means that $dot{vec r}$ follows a circular curve, and that remains preserved under integration, the integration constant is the midpoint around which $vec r$ circulates.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Insert the solution you found of the derived equations into the original equations.
                        $$
                        -fvec c_1sin(ft)+fvec c_2cos(ft)=f(vec c_1×vec k)cos(ft)+f(vec c_2×vec k)sin(ft).
                        $$

                        Comparing coefficients,
                        $$
                        vec c_2=~~vec c_1×vec k\
                        vec c_1=-vec c_2×vec k\
                        $$

                        is only possible if both vectors are orthogonal to $vec k$, of the same length and orthogonal to each other. With $vec k=(0,0,1)$ you get $vec c_1=(a,b,0)$ and $vec c_2=(b,-a,0)$. This means that $dot{vec r}$ follows a circular curve, and that remains preserved under integration, the integration constant is the midpoint around which $vec r$ circulates.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          Insert the solution you found of the derived equations into the original equations.
                          $$
                          -fvec c_1sin(ft)+fvec c_2cos(ft)=f(vec c_1×vec k)cos(ft)+f(vec c_2×vec k)sin(ft).
                          $$

                          Comparing coefficients,
                          $$
                          vec c_2=~~vec c_1×vec k\
                          vec c_1=-vec c_2×vec k\
                          $$

                          is only possible if both vectors are orthogonal to $vec k$, of the same length and orthogonal to each other. With $vec k=(0,0,1)$ you get $vec c_1=(a,b,0)$ and $vec c_2=(b,-a,0)$. This means that $dot{vec r}$ follows a circular curve, and that remains preserved under integration, the integration constant is the midpoint around which $vec r$ circulates.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Insert the solution you found of the derived equations into the original equations.
                          $$
                          -fvec c_1sin(ft)+fvec c_2cos(ft)=f(vec c_1×vec k)cos(ft)+f(vec c_2×vec k)sin(ft).
                          $$

                          Comparing coefficients,
                          $$
                          vec c_2=~~vec c_1×vec k\
                          vec c_1=-vec c_2×vec k\
                          $$

                          is only possible if both vectors are orthogonal to $vec k$, of the same length and orthogonal to each other. With $vec k=(0,0,1)$ you get $vec c_1=(a,b,0)$ and $vec c_2=(b,-a,0)$. This means that $dot{vec r}$ follows a circular curve, and that remains preserved under integration, the integration constant is the midpoint around which $vec r$ circulates.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          LutzL

                          53.6k41953




                          53.6k41953






















                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote













                              One way is to show that the curvature is constant. Recall that
                              $$kappa = frac{||mathbf{v}(t) times mathbf{a}(t)||}{||mathbf{v}(t)||^3} = frac{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t) times ddot{mathbf{r}}(t)||}{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t)||^3} $$
                              Which should be straightforward since you have $dot{mathbf{r}}(t)$.



                              It might help to write:
                              begin{align}
                              dot{mathbf{r}}(t) &= mathbf{c_1}cos(ft) + mathbf{c_2}sin(ft)\
                              &= left[begin{array}{c}c_{11}\c_{12}\c_{13}end{array}right]cos(ft) + left[begin{array}{c}c_{21}\c_{22}\c_{23}end{array}right]sin(ft)\
                              &=(c_1cos(ft) + c_2sin(ft))hat{mathbf{i}} + (c_3cos(ft) + c_4sin(ft))hat{mathbf{j}} + (c_5cos(ft) + c_6sin(ft))hat{mathbf{k}}
                              end{align}

                              Then just do the grinding to get the final result.



                              EDIT: I just noticed that it might be easier to replace quantities like $ddot{mathbf{r}}(t) = fdot{mathbf{r}}(t) times mathbf{k}$ into the curvature expression as well.



                              EDIT2: It's been a while since I"ve dealt with this... Showing that torsion is $0$ is important too.






                              share|cite|improve this answer























                              • I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
                                – glowstonetrees
                                Nov 20 at 2:14










                              • @glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
                                – AlkaKadri
                                Nov 20 at 2:28















                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote













                              One way is to show that the curvature is constant. Recall that
                              $$kappa = frac{||mathbf{v}(t) times mathbf{a}(t)||}{||mathbf{v}(t)||^3} = frac{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t) times ddot{mathbf{r}}(t)||}{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t)||^3} $$
                              Which should be straightforward since you have $dot{mathbf{r}}(t)$.



                              It might help to write:
                              begin{align}
                              dot{mathbf{r}}(t) &= mathbf{c_1}cos(ft) + mathbf{c_2}sin(ft)\
                              &= left[begin{array}{c}c_{11}\c_{12}\c_{13}end{array}right]cos(ft) + left[begin{array}{c}c_{21}\c_{22}\c_{23}end{array}right]sin(ft)\
                              &=(c_1cos(ft) + c_2sin(ft))hat{mathbf{i}} + (c_3cos(ft) + c_4sin(ft))hat{mathbf{j}} + (c_5cos(ft) + c_6sin(ft))hat{mathbf{k}}
                              end{align}

                              Then just do the grinding to get the final result.



                              EDIT: I just noticed that it might be easier to replace quantities like $ddot{mathbf{r}}(t) = fdot{mathbf{r}}(t) times mathbf{k}$ into the curvature expression as well.



                              EDIT2: It's been a while since I"ve dealt with this... Showing that torsion is $0$ is important too.






                              share|cite|improve this answer























                              • I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
                                – glowstonetrees
                                Nov 20 at 2:14










                              • @glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
                                – AlkaKadri
                                Nov 20 at 2:28













                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote









                              One way is to show that the curvature is constant. Recall that
                              $$kappa = frac{||mathbf{v}(t) times mathbf{a}(t)||}{||mathbf{v}(t)||^3} = frac{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t) times ddot{mathbf{r}}(t)||}{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t)||^3} $$
                              Which should be straightforward since you have $dot{mathbf{r}}(t)$.



                              It might help to write:
                              begin{align}
                              dot{mathbf{r}}(t) &= mathbf{c_1}cos(ft) + mathbf{c_2}sin(ft)\
                              &= left[begin{array}{c}c_{11}\c_{12}\c_{13}end{array}right]cos(ft) + left[begin{array}{c}c_{21}\c_{22}\c_{23}end{array}right]sin(ft)\
                              &=(c_1cos(ft) + c_2sin(ft))hat{mathbf{i}} + (c_3cos(ft) + c_4sin(ft))hat{mathbf{j}} + (c_5cos(ft) + c_6sin(ft))hat{mathbf{k}}
                              end{align}

                              Then just do the grinding to get the final result.



                              EDIT: I just noticed that it might be easier to replace quantities like $ddot{mathbf{r}}(t) = fdot{mathbf{r}}(t) times mathbf{k}$ into the curvature expression as well.



                              EDIT2: It's been a while since I"ve dealt with this... Showing that torsion is $0$ is important too.






                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              One way is to show that the curvature is constant. Recall that
                              $$kappa = frac{||mathbf{v}(t) times mathbf{a}(t)||}{||mathbf{v}(t)||^3} = frac{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t) times ddot{mathbf{r}}(t)||}{||dot{mathbf{r}}(t)||^3} $$
                              Which should be straightforward since you have $dot{mathbf{r}}(t)$.



                              It might help to write:
                              begin{align}
                              dot{mathbf{r}}(t) &= mathbf{c_1}cos(ft) + mathbf{c_2}sin(ft)\
                              &= left[begin{array}{c}c_{11}\c_{12}\c_{13}end{array}right]cos(ft) + left[begin{array}{c}c_{21}\c_{22}\c_{23}end{array}right]sin(ft)\
                              &=(c_1cos(ft) + c_2sin(ft))hat{mathbf{i}} + (c_3cos(ft) + c_4sin(ft))hat{mathbf{j}} + (c_5cos(ft) + c_6sin(ft))hat{mathbf{k}}
                              end{align}

                              Then just do the grinding to get the final result.



                              EDIT: I just noticed that it might be easier to replace quantities like $ddot{mathbf{r}}(t) = fdot{mathbf{r}}(t) times mathbf{k}$ into the curvature expression as well.



                              EDIT2: It's been a while since I"ve dealt with this... Showing that torsion is $0$ is important too.







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Nov 20 at 2:16

























                              answered Nov 20 at 2:10









                              AlkaKadri

                              1,354411




                              1,354411












                              • I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
                                – glowstonetrees
                                Nov 20 at 2:14










                              • @glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
                                – AlkaKadri
                                Nov 20 at 2:28


















                              • I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
                                – glowstonetrees
                                Nov 20 at 2:14










                              • @glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
                                – AlkaKadri
                                Nov 20 at 2:28
















                              I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
                              – glowstonetrees
                              Nov 20 at 2:14




                              I am not quite familiar with the concept of "curvature", so could you please kindly explain why this quantity being constant implies that $mathbf r$ traces out a circle?
                              – glowstonetrees
                              Nov 20 at 2:14












                              @glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
                              – AlkaKadri
                              Nov 20 at 2:28




                              @glowstonetrees It actually takes a little while to get there if you haven't seen curvature before! This answer can get you started on that path though if you want to head down that way: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1505638/…
                              – AlkaKadri
                              Nov 20 at 2:28


















                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded



















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005821%2fshow-that-the-motion-is-a-circular-path%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Wiesbaden

                              Marschland

                              Dieringhausen