Polar form of normal random vector , angle and length are independent ,and angle is spherical distribution
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Represent $g sim N(0,I_n)$in polar form as $g=r theta$ where $r = |g|_2$ is the length and $theta = frac{g}{|g|_2} $ is the direction
prove that $r$ and $theta$ are independent ?
prove that $theta$ is uniformly distributed on sphere $S^{n-1}$
for first one :
The only things I know how to do is to show the product pdf of both of $theta$ and $r$ is same as n-dimeinal pdf of of standard Gaussian vector ? but how to find pdf of $|g|_2$? I have some problem in trasformation of random variable in this case . since the transformationare not bijective , is any simple way to do that?
probability probability-theory random-variables normal-distribution independence
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Represent $g sim N(0,I_n)$in polar form as $g=r theta$ where $r = |g|_2$ is the length and $theta = frac{g}{|g|_2} $ is the direction
prove that $r$ and $theta$ are independent ?
prove that $theta$ is uniformly distributed on sphere $S^{n-1}$
for first one :
The only things I know how to do is to show the product pdf of both of $theta$ and $r$ is same as n-dimeinal pdf of of standard Gaussian vector ? but how to find pdf of $|g|_2$? I have some problem in trasformation of random variable in this case . since the transformationare not bijective , is any simple way to do that?
probability probability-theory random-variables normal-distribution independence
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Represent $g sim N(0,I_n)$in polar form as $g=r theta$ where $r = |g|_2$ is the length and $theta = frac{g}{|g|_2} $ is the direction
prove that $r$ and $theta$ are independent ?
prove that $theta$ is uniformly distributed on sphere $S^{n-1}$
for first one :
The only things I know how to do is to show the product pdf of both of $theta$ and $r$ is same as n-dimeinal pdf of of standard Gaussian vector ? but how to find pdf of $|g|_2$? I have some problem in trasformation of random variable in this case . since the transformationare not bijective , is any simple way to do that?
probability probability-theory random-variables normal-distribution independence
Represent $g sim N(0,I_n)$in polar form as $g=r theta$ where $r = |g|_2$ is the length and $theta = frac{g}{|g|_2} $ is the direction
prove that $r$ and $theta$ are independent ?
prove that $theta$ is uniformly distributed on sphere $S^{n-1}$
for first one :
The only things I know how to do is to show the product pdf of both of $theta$ and $r$ is same as n-dimeinal pdf of of standard Gaussian vector ? but how to find pdf of $|g|_2$? I have some problem in trasformation of random variable in this case . since the transformationare not bijective , is any simple way to do that?
probability probability-theory random-variables normal-distribution independence
probability probability-theory random-variables normal-distribution independence
edited Nov 20 at 2:33
asked Nov 20 at 2:06
ShaoyuPei
1307
1307
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Big hint: The joint density of $G = (X, Y)$ is $f(x,y) , dx , dy = frac{1}{2pi} e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2} , dx , dy$. By performing a change of variables to polar coordinates $R^2 = X^2 + Y^2$ and $Theta = arctan(Y/X)$, we have $$f(r, theta) , dr , dtheta = frac{1}{2pi} e^{-r^2/2} r , dr , dtheta,$$
where the extra factor of $r$ comes from the Jacobian when performing the change of variables.
Hint: If you know the joint density can be written as $f(r, theta) = g(r) h(theta)$ for some densities $g$ and $h$, then $R$ and $Theta$ are independent.
actually I have already seen that , but I think we still need to know the density of θ and r
– ShaoyuPei
Nov 20 at 2:38
@ShaoyuPei But the above argument already shows you that the two densities are $frac{1}{2 pi c}$ and $c e^{-r^2/2} r$ for some constant $c$. (Now you just need to find what $c$ is.)
– angryavian
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Big hint: The joint density of $G = (X, Y)$ is $f(x,y) , dx , dy = frac{1}{2pi} e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2} , dx , dy$. By performing a change of variables to polar coordinates $R^2 = X^2 + Y^2$ and $Theta = arctan(Y/X)$, we have $$f(r, theta) , dr , dtheta = frac{1}{2pi} e^{-r^2/2} r , dr , dtheta,$$
where the extra factor of $r$ comes from the Jacobian when performing the change of variables.
Hint: If you know the joint density can be written as $f(r, theta) = g(r) h(theta)$ for some densities $g$ and $h$, then $R$ and $Theta$ are independent.
actually I have already seen that , but I think we still need to know the density of θ and r
– ShaoyuPei
Nov 20 at 2:38
@ShaoyuPei But the above argument already shows you that the two densities are $frac{1}{2 pi c}$ and $c e^{-r^2/2} r$ for some constant $c$. (Now you just need to find what $c$ is.)
– angryavian
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Big hint: The joint density of $G = (X, Y)$ is $f(x,y) , dx , dy = frac{1}{2pi} e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2} , dx , dy$. By performing a change of variables to polar coordinates $R^2 = X^2 + Y^2$ and $Theta = arctan(Y/X)$, we have $$f(r, theta) , dr , dtheta = frac{1}{2pi} e^{-r^2/2} r , dr , dtheta,$$
where the extra factor of $r$ comes from the Jacobian when performing the change of variables.
Hint: If you know the joint density can be written as $f(r, theta) = g(r) h(theta)$ for some densities $g$ and $h$, then $R$ and $Theta$ are independent.
actually I have already seen that , but I think we still need to know the density of θ and r
– ShaoyuPei
Nov 20 at 2:38
@ShaoyuPei But the above argument already shows you that the two densities are $frac{1}{2 pi c}$ and $c e^{-r^2/2} r$ for some constant $c$. (Now you just need to find what $c$ is.)
– angryavian
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Big hint: The joint density of $G = (X, Y)$ is $f(x,y) , dx , dy = frac{1}{2pi} e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2} , dx , dy$. By performing a change of variables to polar coordinates $R^2 = X^2 + Y^2$ and $Theta = arctan(Y/X)$, we have $$f(r, theta) , dr , dtheta = frac{1}{2pi} e^{-r^2/2} r , dr , dtheta,$$
where the extra factor of $r$ comes from the Jacobian when performing the change of variables.
Hint: If you know the joint density can be written as $f(r, theta) = g(r) h(theta)$ for some densities $g$ and $h$, then $R$ and $Theta$ are independent.
Big hint: The joint density of $G = (X, Y)$ is $f(x,y) , dx , dy = frac{1}{2pi} e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2} , dx , dy$. By performing a change of variables to polar coordinates $R^2 = X^2 + Y^2$ and $Theta = arctan(Y/X)$, we have $$f(r, theta) , dr , dtheta = frac{1}{2pi} e^{-r^2/2} r , dr , dtheta,$$
where the extra factor of $r$ comes from the Jacobian when performing the change of variables.
Hint: If you know the joint density can be written as $f(r, theta) = g(r) h(theta)$ for some densities $g$ and $h$, then $R$ and $Theta$ are independent.
answered Nov 20 at 2:19
angryavian
37k13178
37k13178
actually I have already seen that , but I think we still need to know the density of θ and r
– ShaoyuPei
Nov 20 at 2:38
@ShaoyuPei But the above argument already shows you that the two densities are $frac{1}{2 pi c}$ and $c e^{-r^2/2} r$ for some constant $c$. (Now you just need to find what $c$ is.)
– angryavian
2 days ago
add a comment |
actually I have already seen that , but I think we still need to know the density of θ and r
– ShaoyuPei
Nov 20 at 2:38
@ShaoyuPei But the above argument already shows you that the two densities are $frac{1}{2 pi c}$ and $c e^{-r^2/2} r$ for some constant $c$. (Now you just need to find what $c$ is.)
– angryavian
2 days ago
actually I have already seen that , but I think we still need to know the density of θ and r
– ShaoyuPei
Nov 20 at 2:38
actually I have already seen that , but I think we still need to know the density of θ and r
– ShaoyuPei
Nov 20 at 2:38
@ShaoyuPei But the above argument already shows you that the two densities are $frac{1}{2 pi c}$ and $c e^{-r^2/2} r$ for some constant $c$. (Now you just need to find what $c$ is.)
– angryavian
2 days ago
@ShaoyuPei But the above argument already shows you that the two densities are $frac{1}{2 pi c}$ and $c e^{-r^2/2} r$ for some constant $c$. (Now you just need to find what $c$ is.)
– angryavian
2 days ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005835%2fpolar-form-of-normal-random-vector-angle-and-length-are-independent-and-angle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown