Trisecting $2pi/5$, is this possible?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I guess that the answer is no, even knowing that $cos(2pi/5)$ is constructible since the $5$th root o unity is construtctible.
But when I use the trick for finding the minimal polynomial of $3theta=2pi/5$ I get that $theta$ is the root of
$p(x)=4x^3 - 3x - cos(2pi/5)$
and this polynomial is not even on $mathbb{Q}[x]$, so how shoul i proceed to prove that is it or isn't possible to trisect $theta?$
group-theory galois-theory
asked Nov 20 at 1:53
Eduardo Silva
67239
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I guess that the answer is no, even knowing that $cos(2pi/5)$ is constructible since the $5$th root o unity is construtctible.
But when I use the trick for finding the minimal polynomial of $3theta=2pi/5$ I get that $theta$ is the root of
$p(x)=4x^3 - 3x - cos(2pi/5)$
and this polynomial is not even on $mathbb{Q}[x]$, so how shoul i proceed to prove that is it or isn't possible to trisect $theta?$
group-theory galois-theory
asked Nov 20 at 1:53
Eduardo Silva
67239
1
Hint: if $a$ and $b$ are constructible then so is $a+b$
– Empy2
Nov 20 at 2:12
3
see this for a construction of regular pentadecagon using compass and ruler.
– achille hui
Nov 20 at 2:18
4
$cos(2pi/5)$ is a number, not an angle, so "trisecting" it makes no sense. I think you mean to ask whether you can trisect $2pi/5$ angle (using, presumably, unmarked straightedge and compass). But look: you know you can construct a pentagon; having constructed a pentagon, construct an equilateral triangle sharing a vertex with that pentagon, and voila! a $2pi/5$ angle.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 20 at 2:47
2
What Gerry Myerson said in different words: $$frac{2pi}{15}=frac{5pi-3pi}{15}=frac{pi}3-frac{pi}5.$$ So if you can construct $2pi/5$ and $2pi/3$ (and know how to bisect angles)...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I guess that the answer is no, even knowing that $cos(2pi/5)$ is constructible since the $5$th root o unity is construtctible.
But when I use the trick for finding the minimal polynomial of $3theta=2pi/5$ I get that $theta$ is the root of
$p(x)=4x^3 - 3x - cos(2pi/5)$
and this polynomial is not even on $mathbb{Q}[x]$, so how shoul i proceed to prove that is it or isn't possible to trisect $theta?$
group-theory galois-theory
asked Nov 20 at 1:53
Eduardo Silva
67239
I guess that the answer is no, even knowing that $cos(2pi/5)$ is constructible since the $5$th root o unity is construtctible.
But when I use the trick for finding the minimal polynomial of $3theta=2pi/5$ I get that $theta$ is the root of
$p(x)=4x^3 - 3x - cos(2pi/5)$
and this polynomial is not even on $mathbb{Q}[x]$, so how shoul i proceed to prove that is it or isn't possible to trisect $theta?$
group-theory galois-theory
group-theory galois-theory
asked Nov 20 at 1:53
Eduardo Silva
67239
asked Nov 20 at 1:53
Eduardo Silva
67239
edited 2 days ago
asked Nov 20 at 1:53
Eduardo Silva
67239
asked Nov 20 at 1:53
Eduardo Silva
67239
asked Nov 20 at 1:53
Eduardo Silva
67239
67239
1
Hint: if $a$ and $b$ are constructible then so is $a+b$
– Empy2
Nov 20 at 2:12
3
see this for a construction of regular pentadecagon using compass and ruler.
– achille hui
Nov 20 at 2:18
4
$cos(2pi/5)$ is a number, not an angle, so "trisecting" it makes no sense. I think you mean to ask whether you can trisect $2pi/5$ angle (using, presumably, unmarked straightedge and compass). But look: you know you can construct a pentagon; having constructed a pentagon, construct an equilateral triangle sharing a vertex with that pentagon, and voila! a $2pi/5$ angle.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 20 at 2:47
2
What Gerry Myerson said in different words: $$frac{2pi}{15}=frac{5pi-3pi}{15}=frac{pi}3-frac{pi}5.$$ So if you can construct $2pi/5$ and $2pi/3$ (and know how to bisect angles)...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Hint: if $a$ and $b$ are constructible then so is $a+b$
– Empy2
Nov 20 at 2:12
3
see this for a construction of regular pentadecagon using compass and ruler.
– achille hui
Nov 20 at 2:18
4
$cos(2pi/5)$ is a number, not an angle, so "trisecting" it makes no sense. I think you mean to ask whether you can trisect $2pi/5$ angle (using, presumably, unmarked straightedge and compass). But look: you know you can construct a pentagon; having constructed a pentagon, construct an equilateral triangle sharing a vertex with that pentagon, and voila! a $2pi/5$ angle.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 20 at 2:47
2
What Gerry Myerson said in different words: $$frac{2pi}{15}=frac{5pi-3pi}{15}=frac{pi}3-frac{pi}5.$$ So if you can construct $2pi/5$ and $2pi/3$ (and know how to bisect angles)...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
2 days ago
1
1
Hint: if $a$ and $b$ are constructible then so is $a+b$
– Empy2
Nov 20 at 2:12
Hint: if $a$ and $b$ are constructible then so is $a+b$
– Empy2
Nov 20 at 2:12
3
3
see this for a construction of regular pentadecagon using compass and ruler.
– achille hui
Nov 20 at 2:18
see this for a construction of regular pentadecagon using compass and ruler.
– achille hui
Nov 20 at 2:18
4
4
$cos(2pi/5)$ is a number, not an angle, so "trisecting" it makes no sense. I think you mean to ask whether you can trisect $2pi/5$ angle (using, presumably, unmarked straightedge and compass). But look: you know you can construct a pentagon; having constructed a pentagon, construct an equilateral triangle sharing a vertex with that pentagon, and voila! a $2pi/5$ angle.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 20 at 2:47
$cos(2pi/5)$ is a number, not an angle, so "trisecting" it makes no sense. I think you mean to ask whether you can trisect $2pi/5$ angle (using, presumably, unmarked straightedge and compass). But look: you know you can construct a pentagon; having constructed a pentagon, construct an equilateral triangle sharing a vertex with that pentagon, and voila! a $2pi/5$ angle.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 20 at 2:47
2
2
What Gerry Myerson said in different words: $$frac{2pi}{15}=frac{5pi-3pi}{15}=frac{pi}3-frac{pi}5.$$ So if you can construct $2pi/5$ and $2pi/3$ (and know how to bisect angles)...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
2 days ago
What Gerry Myerson said in different words: $$frac{2pi}{15}=frac{5pi-3pi}{15}=frac{pi}3-frac{pi}5.$$ So if you can construct $2pi/5$ and $2pi/3$ (and know how to bisect angles)...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The minimal polynomial for an $n$-th root of unity has degree $phi(n)$ and the field has an abelian Galois group. The real subfield containing $y=2cos(2pi/n)$ has degree $phi(n)/2$ is also abelian. Hence since $phi(15)/2=4$ the field generated by $y$ is constructible. (In fact, the minimal polynomial for $y$ is $y^4-y^3-4y^2+4y+1$.)
answered 2 days ago
i. m. soloveichik
3,68011125
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The minimal polynomial for an $n$-th root of unity has degree $phi(n)$ and the field has an abelian Galois group. The real subfield containing $y=2cos(2pi/n)$ has degree $phi(n)/2$ is also abelian. Hence since $phi(15)/2=4$ the field generated by $y$ is constructible. (In fact, the minimal polynomial for $y$ is $y^4-y^3-4y^2+4y+1$.)
answered 2 days ago
i. m. soloveichik
3,68011125
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The minimal polynomial for an $n$-th root of unity has degree $phi(n)$ and the field has an abelian Galois group. The real subfield containing $y=2cos(2pi/n)$ has degree $phi(n)/2$ is also abelian. Hence since $phi(15)/2=4$ the field generated by $y$ is constructible. (In fact, the minimal polynomial for $y$ is $y^4-y^3-4y^2+4y+1$.)
answered 2 days ago
i. m. soloveichik
3,68011125
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The minimal polynomial for an $n$-th root of unity has degree $phi(n)$ and the field has an abelian Galois group. The real subfield containing $y=2cos(2pi/n)$ has degree $phi(n)/2$ is also abelian. Hence since $phi(15)/2=4$ the field generated by $y$ is constructible. (In fact, the minimal polynomial for $y$ is $y^4-y^3-4y^2+4y+1$.)
answered 2 days ago
i. m. soloveichik
3,68011125
The minimal polynomial for an $n$-th root of unity has degree $phi(n)$ and the field has an abelian Galois group. The real subfield containing $y=2cos(2pi/n)$ has degree $phi(n)/2$ is also abelian. Hence since $phi(15)/2=4$ the field generated by $y$ is constructible. (In fact, the minimal polynomial for $y$ is $y^4-y^3-4y^2+4y+1$.)
answered 2 days ago
i. m. soloveichik
3,68011125
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
i. m. soloveichik
3,68011125
answered 2 days ago
i. m. soloveichik
3,68011125
answered 2 days ago
i. m. soloveichik
3,68011125
3,68011125
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005820%2ftrisecting-2-pi-5-is-this-possible%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Hint: if $a$ and $b$ are constructible then so is $a+b$
– Empy2
Nov 20 at 2:12
3
see this for a construction of regular pentadecagon using compass and ruler.
– achille hui
Nov 20 at 2:18
4
$cos(2pi/5)$ is a number, not an angle, so "trisecting" it makes no sense. I think you mean to ask whether you can trisect $2pi/5$ angle (using, presumably, unmarked straightedge and compass). But look: you know you can construct a pentagon; having constructed a pentagon, construct an equilateral triangle sharing a vertex with that pentagon, and voila! a $2pi/5$ angle.
– Gerry Myerson
Nov 20 at 2:47
2
What Gerry Myerson said in different words: $$frac{2pi}{15}=frac{5pi-3pi}{15}=frac{pi}3-frac{pi}5.$$ So if you can construct $2pi/5$ and $2pi/3$ (and know how to bisect angles)...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
2 days ago