beta reduction: order of substitution











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Do we always apply our input to the left most term in a lamda expression?



For instance, take the expressions:



$λP λQ. ∀x P(x)→Q(x)$ which we can rewrite as $[λP λQ[ ∀x P(x)→Q(x)]]$



$λP. λQ. ∀x P(x)→Q(x)$ which we can rewrite as $[λP [λQ[ ∀x P(x)→Q(x)]]]$



If we apply an input to each expression, would the input in both expressions replace P? But if that's the case, wouldn't that make the two expressions equivalent?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I don't see a difference between the two terms besides the dot, which has no meaning.
    – Couchy311
    yesterday















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Do we always apply our input to the left most term in a lamda expression?



For instance, take the expressions:



$λP λQ. ∀x P(x)→Q(x)$ which we can rewrite as $[λP λQ[ ∀x P(x)→Q(x)]]$



$λP. λQ. ∀x P(x)→Q(x)$ which we can rewrite as $[λP [λQ[ ∀x P(x)→Q(x)]]]$



If we apply an input to each expression, would the input in both expressions replace P? But if that's the case, wouldn't that make the two expressions equivalent?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I don't see a difference between the two terms besides the dot, which has no meaning.
    – Couchy311
    yesterday













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Do we always apply our input to the left most term in a lamda expression?



For instance, take the expressions:



$λP λQ. ∀x P(x)→Q(x)$ which we can rewrite as $[λP λQ[ ∀x P(x)→Q(x)]]$



$λP. λQ. ∀x P(x)→Q(x)$ which we can rewrite as $[λP [λQ[ ∀x P(x)→Q(x)]]]$



If we apply an input to each expression, would the input in both expressions replace P? But if that's the case, wouldn't that make the two expressions equivalent?










share|cite|improve this question













Do we always apply our input to the left most term in a lamda expression?



For instance, take the expressions:



$λP λQ. ∀x P(x)→Q(x)$ which we can rewrite as $[λP λQ[ ∀x P(x)→Q(x)]]$



$λP. λQ. ∀x P(x)→Q(x)$ which we can rewrite as $[λP [λQ[ ∀x P(x)→Q(x)]]]$



If we apply an input to each expression, would the input in both expressions replace P? But if that's the case, wouldn't that make the two expressions equivalent?







first-order-logic lambda-calculus






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 20 at 1:22









Matt

23317




23317












  • I don't see a difference between the two terms besides the dot, which has no meaning.
    – Couchy311
    yesterday


















  • I don't see a difference between the two terms besides the dot, which has no meaning.
    – Couchy311
    yesterday
















I don't see a difference between the two terms besides the dot, which has no meaning.
– Couchy311
yesterday




I don't see a difference between the two terms besides the dot, which has no meaning.
– Couchy311
yesterday















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005797%2fbeta-reduction-order-of-substitution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005797%2fbeta-reduction-order-of-substitution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen