How to efficiently re-compute the inverse of positive definite matrix when its i-th row and column are...











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Given a positive definite matrix $Ain R^{ntimes n}$ with its inverse $B$ and the Singular Value Decomposition $A=USU^T$. If I replace the $i-$th row and column of $A$ with a vector $x^Tin R^{1times n}$ and $xin R^n$ respectively, so that the new matrix $C$ is generated.



Here, assume that $C$ is still a positive definite matrix, then my question is that how can I efficiently calculate the inverse of $C$ with the results $B$ and $A=USU^T$?



Maybe we should also know some other calculation results about $A$.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Given a positive definite matrix $Ain R^{ntimes n}$ with its inverse $B$ and the Singular Value Decomposition $A=USU^T$. If I replace the $i-$th row and column of $A$ with a vector $x^Tin R^{1times n}$ and $xin R^n$ respectively, so that the new matrix $C$ is generated.



    Here, assume that $C$ is still a positive definite matrix, then my question is that how can I efficiently calculate the inverse of $C$ with the results $B$ and $A=USU^T$?



    Maybe we should also know some other calculation results about $A$.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Given a positive definite matrix $Ain R^{ntimes n}$ with its inverse $B$ and the Singular Value Decomposition $A=USU^T$. If I replace the $i-$th row and column of $A$ with a vector $x^Tin R^{1times n}$ and $xin R^n$ respectively, so that the new matrix $C$ is generated.



      Here, assume that $C$ is still a positive definite matrix, then my question is that how can I efficiently calculate the inverse of $C$ with the results $B$ and $A=USU^T$?



      Maybe we should also know some other calculation results about $A$.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Given a positive definite matrix $Ain R^{ntimes n}$ with its inverse $B$ and the Singular Value Decomposition $A=USU^T$. If I replace the $i-$th row and column of $A$ with a vector $x^Tin R^{1times n}$ and $xin R^n$ respectively, so that the new matrix $C$ is generated.



      Here, assume that $C$ is still a positive definite matrix, then my question is that how can I efficiently calculate the inverse of $C$ with the results $B$ and $A=USU^T$?



      Maybe we should also know some other calculation results about $A$.







      calculus linear-algebra matrices






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 at 1:47









      olivia

      747616




      747616






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          This is basically a rank-2 update. Let $mathbf a_i$ be the $i$-th column of $A$, $u=e_i$ (the $i$-th standard basis vector) and $v=x-mathbf a_i-frac{x_{ii}-a_{ii}}2e_i$. Then $C=A+uv^T+vu^T$. Hence you may apply Sherman-Morrison formula twice to obtain
          $$
          C^{-1}=A^{-1}
          +A^{-1}frac{avv^T-(1+b)(vu^T+uv^T)+cuu^T}{(1+b)^2-ac}A^{-1},
          $$

          where $a=u^TA^{-1}u, b=u^TA^{-1}u$ and $c=v^TA^{-1}v$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005816%2fhow-to-efficiently-re-compute-the-inverse-of-positive-definite-matrix-when-its-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            This is basically a rank-2 update. Let $mathbf a_i$ be the $i$-th column of $A$, $u=e_i$ (the $i$-th standard basis vector) and $v=x-mathbf a_i-frac{x_{ii}-a_{ii}}2e_i$. Then $C=A+uv^T+vu^T$. Hence you may apply Sherman-Morrison formula twice to obtain
            $$
            C^{-1}=A^{-1}
            +A^{-1}frac{avv^T-(1+b)(vu^T+uv^T)+cuu^T}{(1+b)^2-ac}A^{-1},
            $$

            where $a=u^TA^{-1}u, b=u^TA^{-1}u$ and $c=v^TA^{-1}v$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              This is basically a rank-2 update. Let $mathbf a_i$ be the $i$-th column of $A$, $u=e_i$ (the $i$-th standard basis vector) and $v=x-mathbf a_i-frac{x_{ii}-a_{ii}}2e_i$. Then $C=A+uv^T+vu^T$. Hence you may apply Sherman-Morrison formula twice to obtain
              $$
              C^{-1}=A^{-1}
              +A^{-1}frac{avv^T-(1+b)(vu^T+uv^T)+cuu^T}{(1+b)^2-ac}A^{-1},
              $$

              where $a=u^TA^{-1}u, b=u^TA^{-1}u$ and $c=v^TA^{-1}v$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                This is basically a rank-2 update. Let $mathbf a_i$ be the $i$-th column of $A$, $u=e_i$ (the $i$-th standard basis vector) and $v=x-mathbf a_i-frac{x_{ii}-a_{ii}}2e_i$. Then $C=A+uv^T+vu^T$. Hence you may apply Sherman-Morrison formula twice to obtain
                $$
                C^{-1}=A^{-1}
                +A^{-1}frac{avv^T-(1+b)(vu^T+uv^T)+cuu^T}{(1+b)^2-ac}A^{-1},
                $$

                where $a=u^TA^{-1}u, b=u^TA^{-1}u$ and $c=v^TA^{-1}v$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                This is basically a rank-2 update. Let $mathbf a_i$ be the $i$-th column of $A$, $u=e_i$ (the $i$-th standard basis vector) and $v=x-mathbf a_i-frac{x_{ii}-a_{ii}}2e_i$. Then $C=A+uv^T+vu^T$. Hence you may apply Sherman-Morrison formula twice to obtain
                $$
                C^{-1}=A^{-1}
                +A^{-1}frac{avv^T-(1+b)(vu^T+uv^T)+cuu^T}{(1+b)^2-ac}A^{-1},
                $$

                where $a=u^TA^{-1}u, b=u^TA^{-1}u$ and $c=v^TA^{-1}v$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                user1551

                70.2k566125




                70.2k566125






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005816%2fhow-to-efficiently-re-compute-the-inverse-of-positive-definite-matrix-when-its-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen