A characterisation of semi-continuity
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Show that function $J$ is semi-continuous at point $vin U$ iff $forall epsilon >0$ there exists $delta >0$ such that $forall uin Ucap L_delta (v)$, $J(u)>J(v)-epsilon $.
$L_delta (v)$ is open ball with center in $v$ and radius $delta$.
Definition of semi-continuity is "Function $J: Urightarrow R, Usubset R^n$ is semi-continuous from under at point $vin U$ if $limlimits_{k to infty} inf J(u_k)geq J(v)$ for every sequence ${u_k}_{kin N}$ that converges to $v$".
Please, can anyone help me to show this.
analysis functions continuity
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Show that function $J$ is semi-continuous at point $vin U$ iff $forall epsilon >0$ there exists $delta >0$ such that $forall uin Ucap L_delta (v)$, $J(u)>J(v)-epsilon $.
$L_delta (v)$ is open ball with center in $v$ and radius $delta$.
Definition of semi-continuity is "Function $J: Urightarrow R, Usubset R^n$ is semi-continuous from under at point $vin U$ if $limlimits_{k to infty} inf J(u_k)geq J(v)$ for every sequence ${u_k}_{kin N}$ that converges to $v$".
Please, can anyone help me to show this.
analysis functions continuity
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Show that function $J$ is semi-continuous at point $vin U$ iff $forall epsilon >0$ there exists $delta >0$ such that $forall uin Ucap L_delta (v)$, $J(u)>J(v)-epsilon $.
$L_delta (v)$ is open ball with center in $v$ and radius $delta$.
Definition of semi-continuity is "Function $J: Urightarrow R, Usubset R^n$ is semi-continuous from under at point $vin U$ if $limlimits_{k to infty} inf J(u_k)geq J(v)$ for every sequence ${u_k}_{kin N}$ that converges to $v$".
Please, can anyone help me to show this.
analysis functions continuity
Show that function $J$ is semi-continuous at point $vin U$ iff $forall epsilon >0$ there exists $delta >0$ such that $forall uin Ucap L_delta (v)$, $J(u)>J(v)-epsilon $.
$L_delta (v)$ is open ball with center in $v$ and radius $delta$.
Definition of semi-continuity is "Function $J: Urightarrow R, Usubset R^n$ is semi-continuous from under at point $vin U$ if $limlimits_{k to infty} inf J(u_k)geq J(v)$ for every sequence ${u_k}_{kin N}$ that converges to $v$".
Please, can anyone help me to show this.
analysis functions continuity
analysis functions continuity
edited Nov 24 at 14:40
quid♦
36.8k95093
36.8k95093
asked May 31 '13 at 10:15
user23709
384515
384515
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
"If" part: Suppose that the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition holds, and let $u_k$ be a sequence as in definition of semicontinuity. Fix $varepsilon$, and take $delta$ as in the condition. Then for some $n_0$, for $k > n_0$ we have $u_k in L_delta(u)$. Hence $J(u_k) > J(v) - varepsilon$. Passing to $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v) - varepsilon$. Since $varepsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, you get $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v)$
"Only if" part:
Suppose that $J$ is semicontinuous from below. If the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition was false, then for some $varepsilon > 0$ we would be able to find $u_k$ with $|u_k - v| < frac{1}{k}$ but $J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$ (else, $delta = 1/k$ would work). Passing to the limit we find $liminf_k J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$, contradicting semicontinuity.
Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
– user23709
Jun 7 '13 at 11:07
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
"If" part: Suppose that the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition holds, and let $u_k$ be a sequence as in definition of semicontinuity. Fix $varepsilon$, and take $delta$ as in the condition. Then for some $n_0$, for $k > n_0$ we have $u_k in L_delta(u)$. Hence $J(u_k) > J(v) - varepsilon$. Passing to $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v) - varepsilon$. Since $varepsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, you get $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v)$
"Only if" part:
Suppose that $J$ is semicontinuous from below. If the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition was false, then for some $varepsilon > 0$ we would be able to find $u_k$ with $|u_k - v| < frac{1}{k}$ but $J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$ (else, $delta = 1/k$ would work). Passing to the limit we find $liminf_k J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$, contradicting semicontinuity.
Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
– user23709
Jun 7 '13 at 11:07
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
"If" part: Suppose that the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition holds, and let $u_k$ be a sequence as in definition of semicontinuity. Fix $varepsilon$, and take $delta$ as in the condition. Then for some $n_0$, for $k > n_0$ we have $u_k in L_delta(u)$. Hence $J(u_k) > J(v) - varepsilon$. Passing to $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v) - varepsilon$. Since $varepsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, you get $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v)$
"Only if" part:
Suppose that $J$ is semicontinuous from below. If the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition was false, then for some $varepsilon > 0$ we would be able to find $u_k$ with $|u_k - v| < frac{1}{k}$ but $J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$ (else, $delta = 1/k$ would work). Passing to the limit we find $liminf_k J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$, contradicting semicontinuity.
Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
– user23709
Jun 7 '13 at 11:07
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
"If" part: Suppose that the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition holds, and let $u_k$ be a sequence as in definition of semicontinuity. Fix $varepsilon$, and take $delta$ as in the condition. Then for some $n_0$, for $k > n_0$ we have $u_k in L_delta(u)$. Hence $J(u_k) > J(v) - varepsilon$. Passing to $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v) - varepsilon$. Since $varepsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, you get $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v)$
"Only if" part:
Suppose that $J$ is semicontinuous from below. If the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition was false, then for some $varepsilon > 0$ we would be able to find $u_k$ with $|u_k - v| < frac{1}{k}$ but $J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$ (else, $delta = 1/k$ would work). Passing to the limit we find $liminf_k J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$, contradicting semicontinuity.
"If" part: Suppose that the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition holds, and let $u_k$ be a sequence as in definition of semicontinuity. Fix $varepsilon$, and take $delta$ as in the condition. Then for some $n_0$, for $k > n_0$ we have $u_k in L_delta(u)$. Hence $J(u_k) > J(v) - varepsilon$. Passing to $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v) - varepsilon$. Since $varepsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, you get $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v)$
"Only if" part:
Suppose that $J$ is semicontinuous from below. If the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition was false, then for some $varepsilon > 0$ we would be able to find $u_k$ with $|u_k - v| < frac{1}{k}$ but $J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$ (else, $delta = 1/k$ would work). Passing to the limit we find $liminf_k J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$, contradicting semicontinuity.
edited May 31 '13 at 11:12
answered May 31 '13 at 10:51
Jakub Konieczny
9,25011760
9,25011760
Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
– user23709
Jun 7 '13 at 11:07
add a comment |
Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
– user23709
Jun 7 '13 at 11:07
Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
– user23709
Jun 7 '13 at 11:07
Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
– user23709
Jun 7 '13 at 11:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f407574%2fa-characterisation-of-semi-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown