A characterisation of semi-continuity











up vote
1
down vote

favorite













Show that function $J$ is semi-continuous at point $vin U$ iff $forall epsilon >0$ there exists $delta >0$ such that $forall uin Ucap L_delta (v)$, $J(u)>J(v)-epsilon $.




$L_delta (v)$ is open ball with center in $v$ and radius $delta$.



Definition of semi-continuity is "Function $J: Urightarrow R, Usubset R^n$ is semi-continuous from under at point $vin U$ if $limlimits_{k to infty} inf J(u_k)geq J(v)$ for every sequence ${u_k}_{kin N}$ that converges to $v$".



Please, can anyone help me to show this.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite













    Show that function $J$ is semi-continuous at point $vin U$ iff $forall epsilon >0$ there exists $delta >0$ such that $forall uin Ucap L_delta (v)$, $J(u)>J(v)-epsilon $.




    $L_delta (v)$ is open ball with center in $v$ and radius $delta$.



    Definition of semi-continuity is "Function $J: Urightarrow R, Usubset R^n$ is semi-continuous from under at point $vin U$ if $limlimits_{k to infty} inf J(u_k)geq J(v)$ for every sequence ${u_k}_{kin N}$ that converges to $v$".



    Please, can anyone help me to show this.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite












      Show that function $J$ is semi-continuous at point $vin U$ iff $forall epsilon >0$ there exists $delta >0$ such that $forall uin Ucap L_delta (v)$, $J(u)>J(v)-epsilon $.




      $L_delta (v)$ is open ball with center in $v$ and radius $delta$.



      Definition of semi-continuity is "Function $J: Urightarrow R, Usubset R^n$ is semi-continuous from under at point $vin U$ if $limlimits_{k to infty} inf J(u_k)geq J(v)$ for every sequence ${u_k}_{kin N}$ that converges to $v$".



      Please, can anyone help me to show this.










      share|cite|improve this question
















      Show that function $J$ is semi-continuous at point $vin U$ iff $forall epsilon >0$ there exists $delta >0$ such that $forall uin Ucap L_delta (v)$, $J(u)>J(v)-epsilon $.




      $L_delta (v)$ is open ball with center in $v$ and radius $delta$.



      Definition of semi-continuity is "Function $J: Urightarrow R, Usubset R^n$ is semi-continuous from under at point $vin U$ if $limlimits_{k to infty} inf J(u_k)geq J(v)$ for every sequence ${u_k}_{kin N}$ that converges to $v$".



      Please, can anyone help me to show this.







      analysis functions continuity






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 24 at 14:40









      quid

      36.8k95093




      36.8k95093










      asked May 31 '13 at 10:15









      user23709

      384515




      384515






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          "If" part: Suppose that the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition holds, and let $u_k$ be a sequence as in definition of semicontinuity. Fix $varepsilon$, and take $delta$ as in the condition. Then for some $n_0$, for $k > n_0$ we have $u_k in L_delta(u)$. Hence $J(u_k) > J(v) - varepsilon$. Passing to $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v) - varepsilon$. Since $varepsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, you get $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v)$



          "Only if" part:
          Suppose that $J$ is semicontinuous from below. If the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition was false, then for some $varepsilon > 0$ we would be able to find $u_k$ with $|u_k - v| < frac{1}{k}$ but $J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$ (else, $delta = 1/k$ would work). Passing to the limit we find $liminf_k J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$, contradicting semicontinuity.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
            – user23709
            Jun 7 '13 at 11:07











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f407574%2fa-characterisation-of-semi-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          "If" part: Suppose that the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition holds, and let $u_k$ be a sequence as in definition of semicontinuity. Fix $varepsilon$, and take $delta$ as in the condition. Then for some $n_0$, for $k > n_0$ we have $u_k in L_delta(u)$. Hence $J(u_k) > J(v) - varepsilon$. Passing to $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v) - varepsilon$. Since $varepsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, you get $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v)$



          "Only if" part:
          Suppose that $J$ is semicontinuous from below. If the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition was false, then for some $varepsilon > 0$ we would be able to find $u_k$ with $|u_k - v| < frac{1}{k}$ but $J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$ (else, $delta = 1/k$ would work). Passing to the limit we find $liminf_k J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$, contradicting semicontinuity.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
            – user23709
            Jun 7 '13 at 11:07















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          "If" part: Suppose that the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition holds, and let $u_k$ be a sequence as in definition of semicontinuity. Fix $varepsilon$, and take $delta$ as in the condition. Then for some $n_0$, for $k > n_0$ we have $u_k in L_delta(u)$. Hence $J(u_k) > J(v) - varepsilon$. Passing to $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v) - varepsilon$. Since $varepsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, you get $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v)$



          "Only if" part:
          Suppose that $J$ is semicontinuous from below. If the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition was false, then for some $varepsilon > 0$ we would be able to find $u_k$ with $|u_k - v| < frac{1}{k}$ but $J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$ (else, $delta = 1/k$ would work). Passing to the limit we find $liminf_k J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$, contradicting semicontinuity.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
            – user23709
            Jun 7 '13 at 11:07













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          "If" part: Suppose that the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition holds, and let $u_k$ be a sequence as in definition of semicontinuity. Fix $varepsilon$, and take $delta$ as in the condition. Then for some $n_0$, for $k > n_0$ we have $u_k in L_delta(u)$. Hence $J(u_k) > J(v) - varepsilon$. Passing to $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v) - varepsilon$. Since $varepsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, you get $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v)$



          "Only if" part:
          Suppose that $J$ is semicontinuous from below. If the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition was false, then for some $varepsilon > 0$ we would be able to find $u_k$ with $|u_k - v| < frac{1}{k}$ but $J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$ (else, $delta = 1/k$ would work). Passing to the limit we find $liminf_k J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$, contradicting semicontinuity.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          "If" part: Suppose that the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition holds, and let $u_k$ be a sequence as in definition of semicontinuity. Fix $varepsilon$, and take $delta$ as in the condition. Then for some $n_0$, for $k > n_0$ we have $u_k in L_delta(u)$. Hence $J(u_k) > J(v) - varepsilon$. Passing to $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v) - varepsilon$. Since $varepsilon > 0$ was arbitrary, you get $liminf_k J(u_k) geq J(v)$



          "Only if" part:
          Suppose that $J$ is semicontinuous from below. If the "$varepsilon/delta$" condition was false, then for some $varepsilon > 0$ we would be able to find $u_k$ with $|u_k - v| < frac{1}{k}$ but $J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$ (else, $delta = 1/k$ would work). Passing to the limit we find $liminf_k J(u_k) leq J(v) - varepsilon$, contradicting semicontinuity.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited May 31 '13 at 11:12

























          answered May 31 '13 at 10:51









          Jakub Konieczny

          9,25011760




          9,25011760












          • Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
            – user23709
            Jun 7 '13 at 11:07


















          • Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
            – user23709
            Jun 7 '13 at 11:07
















          Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
          – user23709
          Jun 7 '13 at 11:07




          Why did you write that $u_kin L_delta (u)$ if, by definition, $lim {u_k} = v$ not $lim {u_k} = u$?
          – user23709
          Jun 7 '13 at 11:07


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f407574%2fa-characterisation-of-semi-continuity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen