Cramers decomposition theorem: why are the functions entire and existence of higher moments
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have some questions on the proof of cramers decomposition theorem.
Cramers original paper:
Suppose we have the integral equation:
begin{equation}tag{$star$}
int_{-infty}^infty F_1(x-t)dF_2(t)=Phileft( xright),
end{equation}
With the first moments $m_{F_1}=m_{F_2}=m=0$ and $sigma_1^2+sigma_2^2=1$. The random variables $X_1$ and $X_2$ with $X_1+X_2sim Phi(X)$ are independent.
First he shows the first and second moments of $X_1$ and $X_2$ exist. Then he shows the integrals
$$int e^{frac{x^2}{2}}dF_i(x)$$
are finite by showing
$$x<0:~F_1(x)leq frac{Phi(x-lambda)}{F_2(-lambda)}color{blue}{<Ae^{-frac{x^2}{2}+lambda x}}, quad x>0: 1-F_1(x)<Be^{-frac{x^2}{2}-nu x}.$$
And similarly for $F_2$.
He goes on to say this also shows the existence of higher moments and that the characteristic functions
$$int e^{ixi x}F_i(dx)$$
are entire.
Question: why does that imply the integrals are finite and if they are why does that show the existence of higher moments and entirety? How does the inequality in blue follow
Attempt:
I see that if we write
$$int e^frac{x^2}{2}dF_1(x)color{red}{<} int e^frac{x^2}{2}Ae^{-frac{x^2}{2}+λx}left(-x+λright) dx$$
and then integrate
$$int_{-infty}^0 A:e^{λx}left(-x+λright)dx=Aleft[left(frac{e^{λx}left(-x+λright)}{λ}+frac{e^{λx}}{λ^2}right)right]_{-infty}^0=A(1+frac{1}{lambda^2})$$
But I dont see why the inequality in red must hold.
complex-analysis probability-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have some questions on the proof of cramers decomposition theorem.
Cramers original paper:
Suppose we have the integral equation:
begin{equation}tag{$star$}
int_{-infty}^infty F_1(x-t)dF_2(t)=Phileft( xright),
end{equation}
With the first moments $m_{F_1}=m_{F_2}=m=0$ and $sigma_1^2+sigma_2^2=1$. The random variables $X_1$ and $X_2$ with $X_1+X_2sim Phi(X)$ are independent.
First he shows the first and second moments of $X_1$ and $X_2$ exist. Then he shows the integrals
$$int e^{frac{x^2}{2}}dF_i(x)$$
are finite by showing
$$x<0:~F_1(x)leq frac{Phi(x-lambda)}{F_2(-lambda)}color{blue}{<Ae^{-frac{x^2}{2}+lambda x}}, quad x>0: 1-F_1(x)<Be^{-frac{x^2}{2}-nu x}.$$
And similarly for $F_2$.
He goes on to say this also shows the existence of higher moments and that the characteristic functions
$$int e^{ixi x}F_i(dx)$$
are entire.
Question: why does that imply the integrals are finite and if they are why does that show the existence of higher moments and entirety? How does the inequality in blue follow
Attempt:
I see that if we write
$$int e^frac{x^2}{2}dF_1(x)color{red}{<} int e^frac{x^2}{2}Ae^{-frac{x^2}{2}+λx}left(-x+λright) dx$$
and then integrate
$$int_{-infty}^0 A:e^{λx}left(-x+λright)dx=Aleft[left(frac{e^{λx}left(-x+λright)}{λ}+frac{e^{λx}}{λ^2}right)right]_{-infty}^0=A(1+frac{1}{lambda^2})$$
But I dont see why the inequality in red must hold.
complex-analysis probability-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have some questions on the proof of cramers decomposition theorem.
Cramers original paper:
Suppose we have the integral equation:
begin{equation}tag{$star$}
int_{-infty}^infty F_1(x-t)dF_2(t)=Phileft( xright),
end{equation}
With the first moments $m_{F_1}=m_{F_2}=m=0$ and $sigma_1^2+sigma_2^2=1$. The random variables $X_1$ and $X_2$ with $X_1+X_2sim Phi(X)$ are independent.
First he shows the first and second moments of $X_1$ and $X_2$ exist. Then he shows the integrals
$$int e^{frac{x^2}{2}}dF_i(x)$$
are finite by showing
$$x<0:~F_1(x)leq frac{Phi(x-lambda)}{F_2(-lambda)}color{blue}{<Ae^{-frac{x^2}{2}+lambda x}}, quad x>0: 1-F_1(x)<Be^{-frac{x^2}{2}-nu x}.$$
And similarly for $F_2$.
He goes on to say this also shows the existence of higher moments and that the characteristic functions
$$int e^{ixi x}F_i(dx)$$
are entire.
Question: why does that imply the integrals are finite and if they are why does that show the existence of higher moments and entirety? How does the inequality in blue follow
Attempt:
I see that if we write
$$int e^frac{x^2}{2}dF_1(x)color{red}{<} int e^frac{x^2}{2}Ae^{-frac{x^2}{2}+λx}left(-x+λright) dx$$
and then integrate
$$int_{-infty}^0 A:e^{λx}left(-x+λright)dx=Aleft[left(frac{e^{λx}left(-x+λright)}{λ}+frac{e^{λx}}{λ^2}right)right]_{-infty}^0=A(1+frac{1}{lambda^2})$$
But I dont see why the inequality in red must hold.
complex-analysis probability-theory
I have some questions on the proof of cramers decomposition theorem.
Cramers original paper:
Suppose we have the integral equation:
begin{equation}tag{$star$}
int_{-infty}^infty F_1(x-t)dF_2(t)=Phileft( xright),
end{equation}
With the first moments $m_{F_1}=m_{F_2}=m=0$ and $sigma_1^2+sigma_2^2=1$. The random variables $X_1$ and $X_2$ with $X_1+X_2sim Phi(X)$ are independent.
First he shows the first and second moments of $X_1$ and $X_2$ exist. Then he shows the integrals
$$int e^{frac{x^2}{2}}dF_i(x)$$
are finite by showing
$$x<0:~F_1(x)leq frac{Phi(x-lambda)}{F_2(-lambda)}color{blue}{<Ae^{-frac{x^2}{2}+lambda x}}, quad x>0: 1-F_1(x)<Be^{-frac{x^2}{2}-nu x}.$$
And similarly for $F_2$.
He goes on to say this also shows the existence of higher moments and that the characteristic functions
$$int e^{ixi x}F_i(dx)$$
are entire.
Question: why does that imply the integrals are finite and if they are why does that show the existence of higher moments and entirety? How does the inequality in blue follow
Attempt:
I see that if we write
$$int e^frac{x^2}{2}dF_1(x)color{red}{<} int e^frac{x^2}{2}Ae^{-frac{x^2}{2}+λx}left(-x+λright) dx$$
and then integrate
$$int_{-infty}^0 A:e^{λx}left(-x+λright)dx=Aleft[left(frac{e^{λx}left(-x+λright)}{λ}+frac{e^{λx}}{λ^2}right)right]_{-infty}^0=A(1+frac{1}{lambda^2})$$
But I dont see why the inequality in red must hold.
complex-analysis probability-theory
complex-analysis probability-theory
edited Dec 1 at 18:49
asked Nov 24 at 16:08
orange
575114
575114
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You can use the bounds on the probability distribution function $F_i$ together with Fubini to deduce that $int e^{frac{x^2}{2}} F_i(dx)$ converge. I will use the probability notation of expectations here. Notice that the bounds given state that there are positive constants $A$ and $lambda$ such that for any $t > 0$ we have
$$
F_i(-t) = P[X_i le -t] le A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t]
quad text{and} quad
1 - F_i(t) = P[X_i > t] le A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t]
$$
Here, the actual values of $A$ and $lambda$ are not important. Notice that we can use the same constants for both bounds if we increase the constants a little. Now, for showing that the integral above is finite we write using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and Fubini that
begin{align*}
EBig[expBig[frac{X_i^2}{2}Big]Big]
&= EBig[ 1 + int_0^{|X_i|} t e^{t^2/2} dt Big]
= 1 + EBig[ int_0^{infty} mathbb{1}{|X_i| > t} cdot t e^{t^2/2} dt Big] \
&= 1 + int_0^{infty} t e^{t^2/2} PBig[ |X_i| > t Big] dt
le 1 + int_0^{infty} t e^{t^2/2} A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t] dt \
&= 1 + A int_0^{infty} t e^{- lambda t} dt < infty.
end{align*}
This proves that some exponential moments exist. Notice that the existence of exponential moments imply the existence of $E[|X_i|^n]$ for any $n geq 1$. This is simply because fixed $n$ we have $exp[x^2/2] geq |x|^n$ for any $x$ with $|x| geq M = M(n)$, some positive constant depending on $n$. Then, we have
$$
E[|X_i|^n] le M^n + E[|X_i|^n cdot mathbb{1}{|X_i| geq M}] le M^n + E[exp[X_i^2/2]] < infty.
$$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You can use the bounds on the probability distribution function $F_i$ together with Fubini to deduce that $int e^{frac{x^2}{2}} F_i(dx)$ converge. I will use the probability notation of expectations here. Notice that the bounds given state that there are positive constants $A$ and $lambda$ such that for any $t > 0$ we have
$$
F_i(-t) = P[X_i le -t] le A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t]
quad text{and} quad
1 - F_i(t) = P[X_i > t] le A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t]
$$
Here, the actual values of $A$ and $lambda$ are not important. Notice that we can use the same constants for both bounds if we increase the constants a little. Now, for showing that the integral above is finite we write using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and Fubini that
begin{align*}
EBig[expBig[frac{X_i^2}{2}Big]Big]
&= EBig[ 1 + int_0^{|X_i|} t e^{t^2/2} dt Big]
= 1 + EBig[ int_0^{infty} mathbb{1}{|X_i| > t} cdot t e^{t^2/2} dt Big] \
&= 1 + int_0^{infty} t e^{t^2/2} PBig[ |X_i| > t Big] dt
le 1 + int_0^{infty} t e^{t^2/2} A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t] dt \
&= 1 + A int_0^{infty} t e^{- lambda t} dt < infty.
end{align*}
This proves that some exponential moments exist. Notice that the existence of exponential moments imply the existence of $E[|X_i|^n]$ for any $n geq 1$. This is simply because fixed $n$ we have $exp[x^2/2] geq |x|^n$ for any $x$ with $|x| geq M = M(n)$, some positive constant depending on $n$. Then, we have
$$
E[|X_i|^n] le M^n + E[|X_i|^n cdot mathbb{1}{|X_i| geq M}] le M^n + E[exp[X_i^2/2]] < infty.
$$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You can use the bounds on the probability distribution function $F_i$ together with Fubini to deduce that $int e^{frac{x^2}{2}} F_i(dx)$ converge. I will use the probability notation of expectations here. Notice that the bounds given state that there are positive constants $A$ and $lambda$ such that for any $t > 0$ we have
$$
F_i(-t) = P[X_i le -t] le A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t]
quad text{and} quad
1 - F_i(t) = P[X_i > t] le A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t]
$$
Here, the actual values of $A$ and $lambda$ are not important. Notice that we can use the same constants for both bounds if we increase the constants a little. Now, for showing that the integral above is finite we write using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and Fubini that
begin{align*}
EBig[expBig[frac{X_i^2}{2}Big]Big]
&= EBig[ 1 + int_0^{|X_i|} t e^{t^2/2} dt Big]
= 1 + EBig[ int_0^{infty} mathbb{1}{|X_i| > t} cdot t e^{t^2/2} dt Big] \
&= 1 + int_0^{infty} t e^{t^2/2} PBig[ |X_i| > t Big] dt
le 1 + int_0^{infty} t e^{t^2/2} A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t] dt \
&= 1 + A int_0^{infty} t e^{- lambda t} dt < infty.
end{align*}
This proves that some exponential moments exist. Notice that the existence of exponential moments imply the existence of $E[|X_i|^n]$ for any $n geq 1$. This is simply because fixed $n$ we have $exp[x^2/2] geq |x|^n$ for any $x$ with $|x| geq M = M(n)$, some positive constant depending on $n$. Then, we have
$$
E[|X_i|^n] le M^n + E[|X_i|^n cdot mathbb{1}{|X_i| geq M}] le M^n + E[exp[X_i^2/2]] < infty.
$$
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
You can use the bounds on the probability distribution function $F_i$ together with Fubini to deduce that $int e^{frac{x^2}{2}} F_i(dx)$ converge. I will use the probability notation of expectations here. Notice that the bounds given state that there are positive constants $A$ and $lambda$ such that for any $t > 0$ we have
$$
F_i(-t) = P[X_i le -t] le A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t]
quad text{and} quad
1 - F_i(t) = P[X_i > t] le A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t]
$$
Here, the actual values of $A$ and $lambda$ are not important. Notice that we can use the same constants for both bounds if we increase the constants a little. Now, for showing that the integral above is finite we write using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and Fubini that
begin{align*}
EBig[expBig[frac{X_i^2}{2}Big]Big]
&= EBig[ 1 + int_0^{|X_i|} t e^{t^2/2} dt Big]
= 1 + EBig[ int_0^{infty} mathbb{1}{|X_i| > t} cdot t e^{t^2/2} dt Big] \
&= 1 + int_0^{infty} t e^{t^2/2} PBig[ |X_i| > t Big] dt
le 1 + int_0^{infty} t e^{t^2/2} A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t] dt \
&= 1 + A int_0^{infty} t e^{- lambda t} dt < infty.
end{align*}
This proves that some exponential moments exist. Notice that the existence of exponential moments imply the existence of $E[|X_i|^n]$ for any $n geq 1$. This is simply because fixed $n$ we have $exp[x^2/2] geq |x|^n$ for any $x$ with $|x| geq M = M(n)$, some positive constant depending on $n$. Then, we have
$$
E[|X_i|^n] le M^n + E[|X_i|^n cdot mathbb{1}{|X_i| geq M}] le M^n + E[exp[X_i^2/2]] < infty.
$$
You can use the bounds on the probability distribution function $F_i$ together with Fubini to deduce that $int e^{frac{x^2}{2}} F_i(dx)$ converge. I will use the probability notation of expectations here. Notice that the bounds given state that there are positive constants $A$ and $lambda$ such that for any $t > 0$ we have
$$
F_i(-t) = P[X_i le -t] le A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t]
quad text{and} quad
1 - F_i(t) = P[X_i > t] le A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t]
$$
Here, the actual values of $A$ and $lambda$ are not important. Notice that we can use the same constants for both bounds if we increase the constants a little. Now, for showing that the integral above is finite we write using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and Fubini that
begin{align*}
EBig[expBig[frac{X_i^2}{2}Big]Big]
&= EBig[ 1 + int_0^{|X_i|} t e^{t^2/2} dt Big]
= 1 + EBig[ int_0^{infty} mathbb{1}{|X_i| > t} cdot t e^{t^2/2} dt Big] \
&= 1 + int_0^{infty} t e^{t^2/2} PBig[ |X_i| > t Big] dt
le 1 + int_0^{infty} t e^{t^2/2} A exp[- frac{t^2}{2} - lambda t] dt \
&= 1 + A int_0^{infty} t e^{- lambda t} dt < infty.
end{align*}
This proves that some exponential moments exist. Notice that the existence of exponential moments imply the existence of $E[|X_i|^n]$ for any $n geq 1$. This is simply because fixed $n$ we have $exp[x^2/2] geq |x|^n$ for any $x$ with $|x| geq M = M(n)$, some positive constant depending on $n$. Then, we have
$$
E[|X_i|^n] le M^n + E[|X_i|^n cdot mathbb{1}{|X_i| geq M}] le M^n + E[exp[X_i^2/2]] < infty.
$$
answered Dec 2 at 0:16
Daniel
1,516210
1,516210
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011726%2fcramers-decomposition-theorem-why-are-the-functions-entire-and-existence-of-hig%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown