When $lim_{r to 0}frac{1}{|B_r(bar x)|}int_0^aint_{B_r(bar x)} u(y,x) dx dy = 0$ implies $u(y,bar x)=0$ for...












1












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a nonnegative $L^infty([0,a], L^1(mathbb{R}^N))$ function. Fix any $bar x in mathbb{R}^N$ where $f$ is defined. If
$$lim_{r to 0}frac{1}{|B_r(bar x)|}int_0^aint_{B_r(bar x)} f(y,x) dx dy = 0,$$
does this imply $$f(y,bar x)=0$$ for a.e. $y in [0,a]$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Idea: Suppose not. Then, use Fubini and the Lebesgue Density theorem to get a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Matematleta
    Dec 29 '18 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    what does $L^infty([0,a], L^1(mathbb{R}^N))$ mean? Also, did $f$ turn into $u?$
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 29 '18 at 20:36












  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Thanks for the correction. It means that $sup_{y in [0,a]} int_{mathbb{R}^N} |f| dx < infty$
    $endgroup$
    – Dal
    Dec 29 '18 at 20:59


















1












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a nonnegative $L^infty([0,a], L^1(mathbb{R}^N))$ function. Fix any $bar x in mathbb{R}^N$ where $f$ is defined. If
$$lim_{r to 0}frac{1}{|B_r(bar x)|}int_0^aint_{B_r(bar x)} f(y,x) dx dy = 0,$$
does this imply $$f(y,bar x)=0$$ for a.e. $y in [0,a]$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Idea: Suppose not. Then, use Fubini and the Lebesgue Density theorem to get a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Matematleta
    Dec 29 '18 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    what does $L^infty([0,a], L^1(mathbb{R}^N))$ mean? Also, did $f$ turn into $u?$
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 29 '18 at 20:36












  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Thanks for the correction. It means that $sup_{y in [0,a]} int_{mathbb{R}^N} |f| dx < infty$
    $endgroup$
    – Dal
    Dec 29 '18 at 20:59
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a nonnegative $L^infty([0,a], L^1(mathbb{R}^N))$ function. Fix any $bar x in mathbb{R}^N$ where $f$ is defined. If
$$lim_{r to 0}frac{1}{|B_r(bar x)|}int_0^aint_{B_r(bar x)} f(y,x) dx dy = 0,$$
does this imply $$f(y,bar x)=0$$ for a.e. $y in [0,a]$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f$ be a nonnegative $L^infty([0,a], L^1(mathbb{R}^N))$ function. Fix any $bar x in mathbb{R}^N$ where $f$ is defined. If
$$lim_{r to 0}frac{1}{|B_r(bar x)|}int_0^aint_{B_r(bar x)} f(y,x) dx dy = 0,$$
does this imply $$f(y,bar x)=0$$ for a.e. $y in [0,a]$?







real-analysis calculus functional-analysis measure-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 29 '18 at 20:58







Dal

















asked Dec 29 '18 at 19:39









DalDal

1,55322473




1,55322473












  • $begingroup$
    Idea: Suppose not. Then, use Fubini and the Lebesgue Density theorem to get a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Matematleta
    Dec 29 '18 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    what does $L^infty([0,a], L^1(mathbb{R}^N))$ mean? Also, did $f$ turn into $u?$
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 29 '18 at 20:36












  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Thanks for the correction. It means that $sup_{y in [0,a]} int_{mathbb{R}^N} |f| dx < infty$
    $endgroup$
    – Dal
    Dec 29 '18 at 20:59




















  • $begingroup$
    Idea: Suppose not. Then, use Fubini and the Lebesgue Density theorem to get a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Matematleta
    Dec 29 '18 at 19:54










  • $begingroup$
    what does $L^infty([0,a], L^1(mathbb{R}^N))$ mean? Also, did $f$ turn into $u?$
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 29 '18 at 20:36












  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Thanks for the correction. It means that $sup_{y in [0,a]} int_{mathbb{R}^N} |f| dx < infty$
    $endgroup$
    – Dal
    Dec 29 '18 at 20:59


















$begingroup$
Idea: Suppose not. Then, use Fubini and the Lebesgue Density theorem to get a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Matematleta
Dec 29 '18 at 19:54




$begingroup$
Idea: Suppose not. Then, use Fubini and the Lebesgue Density theorem to get a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Matematleta
Dec 29 '18 at 19:54












$begingroup$
what does $L^infty([0,a], L^1(mathbb{R}^N))$ mean? Also, did $f$ turn into $u?$
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 29 '18 at 20:36






$begingroup$
what does $L^infty([0,a], L^1(mathbb{R}^N))$ mean? Also, did $f$ turn into $u?$
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 29 '18 at 20:36














$begingroup$
@zhw. Thanks for the correction. It means that $sup_{y in [0,a]} int_{mathbb{R}^N} |f| dx < infty$
$endgroup$
– Dal
Dec 29 '18 at 20:59






$begingroup$
@zhw. Thanks for the correction. It means that $sup_{y in [0,a]} int_{mathbb{R}^N} |f| dx < infty$
$endgroup$
– Dal
Dec 29 '18 at 20:59












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

No. Simply let $f(y, overline{x}) = 1$ for all $y$, and $f(y, x) = 0$ for all $x, y$ where $x neq overline{x}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Then what is the minimal assumption that makes the statement true?
    $endgroup$
    – Dal
    Dec 29 '18 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    @Dal not sure about minimal, but continuity in x for instance would make it true. Even weaker conditions include upper/lower continuity.
    $endgroup$
    – John Jiang
    Dec 29 '18 at 21:35











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056188%2fwhen-lim-r-to-0-frac1b-r-bar-x-int-0a-int-b-r-bar-x-uy-x-dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

No. Simply let $f(y, overline{x}) = 1$ for all $y$, and $f(y, x) = 0$ for all $x, y$ where $x neq overline{x}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Then what is the minimal assumption that makes the statement true?
    $endgroup$
    – Dal
    Dec 29 '18 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    @Dal not sure about minimal, but continuity in x for instance would make it true. Even weaker conditions include upper/lower continuity.
    $endgroup$
    – John Jiang
    Dec 29 '18 at 21:35
















1












$begingroup$

No. Simply let $f(y, overline{x}) = 1$ for all $y$, and $f(y, x) = 0$ for all $x, y$ where $x neq overline{x}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Then what is the minimal assumption that makes the statement true?
    $endgroup$
    – Dal
    Dec 29 '18 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    @Dal not sure about minimal, but continuity in x for instance would make it true. Even weaker conditions include upper/lower continuity.
    $endgroup$
    – John Jiang
    Dec 29 '18 at 21:35














1












1








1





$begingroup$

No. Simply let $f(y, overline{x}) = 1$ for all $y$, and $f(y, x) = 0$ for all $x, y$ where $x neq overline{x}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



No. Simply let $f(y, overline{x}) = 1$ for all $y$, and $f(y, x) = 0$ for all $x, y$ where $x neq overline{x}$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 29 '18 at 21:29









John JiangJohn Jiang

369312




369312












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Then what is the minimal assumption that makes the statement true?
    $endgroup$
    – Dal
    Dec 29 '18 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    @Dal not sure about minimal, but continuity in x for instance would make it true. Even weaker conditions include upper/lower continuity.
    $endgroup$
    – John Jiang
    Dec 29 '18 at 21:35


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you. Then what is the minimal assumption that makes the statement true?
    $endgroup$
    – Dal
    Dec 29 '18 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    @Dal not sure about minimal, but continuity in x for instance would make it true. Even weaker conditions include upper/lower continuity.
    $endgroup$
    – John Jiang
    Dec 29 '18 at 21:35
















$begingroup$
Thank you. Then what is the minimal assumption that makes the statement true?
$endgroup$
– Dal
Dec 29 '18 at 21:31




$begingroup$
Thank you. Then what is the minimal assumption that makes the statement true?
$endgroup$
– Dal
Dec 29 '18 at 21:31












$begingroup$
@Dal not sure about minimal, but continuity in x for instance would make it true. Even weaker conditions include upper/lower continuity.
$endgroup$
– John Jiang
Dec 29 '18 at 21:35




$begingroup$
@Dal not sure about minimal, but continuity in x for instance would make it true. Even weaker conditions include upper/lower continuity.
$endgroup$
– John Jiang
Dec 29 '18 at 21:35


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056188%2fwhen-lim-r-to-0-frac1b-r-bar-x-int-0a-int-b-r-bar-x-uy-x-dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Tonle Sap (See)

I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft