Proving surjectivity of Hopf map and existence of Hopf Circles on $mathbb{S}^3$

Multi tool use
Multi tool use











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am using the Hopf Map $f: mathbb{S}^3 rightarrow mathbb{S}^2$ where $f(a,b,c,d) = (2(ab+cd),2(ad-cb),(a^2+c^2)-(b^2+d^2))$



My question is



1.) How can I prove surjectivity of the map? I am aware of the primary definition of surjectivity but I am unsure how to apply in this case.



I tried using the trivial method of finding an inverse but the method is very complicated.



2.) How can I show that a point that the preimage of $q in mathbb{S}^2$ is a circle in $mathbb{S}^3$?



I realize that the solution is dependent on finding the inverse function as hinted in the first part, but since the function itself was complicated to find, hence I had no progress in this part.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • It might be helpful to view the two-sphere and three-sphere in slighty different ways: we can view the two-sphere as $mathbb{C}P^1$, and the three-sphere as the elements in $mathbb{C}^2$ of magnitude 1. Then the Hopf map is given by $(z,w) mapsto [z:w]$.
    – Brian Shin
    Nov 26 at 0:57












  • @BrianShin How can I demonstrate the equivalence of the two maps?
    – mathnoob123
    Nov 26 at 8:09















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am using the Hopf Map $f: mathbb{S}^3 rightarrow mathbb{S}^2$ where $f(a,b,c,d) = (2(ab+cd),2(ad-cb),(a^2+c^2)-(b^2+d^2))$



My question is



1.) How can I prove surjectivity of the map? I am aware of the primary definition of surjectivity but I am unsure how to apply in this case.



I tried using the trivial method of finding an inverse but the method is very complicated.



2.) How can I show that a point that the preimage of $q in mathbb{S}^2$ is a circle in $mathbb{S}^3$?



I realize that the solution is dependent on finding the inverse function as hinted in the first part, but since the function itself was complicated to find, hence I had no progress in this part.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • It might be helpful to view the two-sphere and three-sphere in slighty different ways: we can view the two-sphere as $mathbb{C}P^1$, and the three-sphere as the elements in $mathbb{C}^2$ of magnitude 1. Then the Hopf map is given by $(z,w) mapsto [z:w]$.
    – Brian Shin
    Nov 26 at 0:57












  • @BrianShin How can I demonstrate the equivalence of the two maps?
    – mathnoob123
    Nov 26 at 8:09













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I am using the Hopf Map $f: mathbb{S}^3 rightarrow mathbb{S}^2$ where $f(a,b,c,d) = (2(ab+cd),2(ad-cb),(a^2+c^2)-(b^2+d^2))$



My question is



1.) How can I prove surjectivity of the map? I am aware of the primary definition of surjectivity but I am unsure how to apply in this case.



I tried using the trivial method of finding an inverse but the method is very complicated.



2.) How can I show that a point that the preimage of $q in mathbb{S}^2$ is a circle in $mathbb{S}^3$?



I realize that the solution is dependent on finding the inverse function as hinted in the first part, but since the function itself was complicated to find, hence I had no progress in this part.










share|cite|improve this question















I am using the Hopf Map $f: mathbb{S}^3 rightarrow mathbb{S}^2$ where $f(a,b,c,d) = (2(ab+cd),2(ad-cb),(a^2+c^2)-(b^2+d^2))$



My question is



1.) How can I prove surjectivity of the map? I am aware of the primary definition of surjectivity but I am unsure how to apply in this case.



I tried using the trivial method of finding an inverse but the method is very complicated.



2.) How can I show that a point that the preimage of $q in mathbb{S}^2$ is a circle in $mathbb{S}^3$?



I realize that the solution is dependent on finding the inverse function as hinted in the first part, but since the function itself was complicated to find, hence I had no progress in this part.







differential-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 25 at 22:58

























asked Nov 25 at 22:04









mathnoob123

688417




688417












  • It might be helpful to view the two-sphere and three-sphere in slighty different ways: we can view the two-sphere as $mathbb{C}P^1$, and the three-sphere as the elements in $mathbb{C}^2$ of magnitude 1. Then the Hopf map is given by $(z,w) mapsto [z:w]$.
    – Brian Shin
    Nov 26 at 0:57












  • @BrianShin How can I demonstrate the equivalence of the two maps?
    – mathnoob123
    Nov 26 at 8:09


















  • It might be helpful to view the two-sphere and three-sphere in slighty different ways: we can view the two-sphere as $mathbb{C}P^1$, and the three-sphere as the elements in $mathbb{C}^2$ of magnitude 1. Then the Hopf map is given by $(z,w) mapsto [z:w]$.
    – Brian Shin
    Nov 26 at 0:57












  • @BrianShin How can I demonstrate the equivalence of the two maps?
    – mathnoob123
    Nov 26 at 8:09
















It might be helpful to view the two-sphere and three-sphere in slighty different ways: we can view the two-sphere as $mathbb{C}P^1$, and the three-sphere as the elements in $mathbb{C}^2$ of magnitude 1. Then the Hopf map is given by $(z,w) mapsto [z:w]$.
– Brian Shin
Nov 26 at 0:57






It might be helpful to view the two-sphere and three-sphere in slighty different ways: we can view the two-sphere as $mathbb{C}P^1$, and the three-sphere as the elements in $mathbb{C}^2$ of magnitude 1. Then the Hopf map is given by $(z,w) mapsto [z:w]$.
– Brian Shin
Nov 26 at 0:57














@BrianShin How can I demonstrate the equivalence of the two maps?
– mathnoob123
Nov 26 at 8:09




@BrianShin How can I demonstrate the equivalence of the two maps?
– mathnoob123
Nov 26 at 8:09















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013479%2fproving-surjectivity-of-hopf-map-and-existence-of-hopf-circles-on-mathbbs3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013479%2fproving-surjectivity-of-hopf-map-and-existence-of-hopf-circles-on-mathbbs3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







R2lyUQUATgTQGQ T,ozUek5aaSj6,Op omW5y iBLpT,uOaGTQEXw9b1Wxys,9MOrDQ,wg 7a9i1oI,VD NuvLqSxICc
VhYELOzOOt7JlTlfN,DBLZZWM0ps54 C4,HH,mpjmwZXhxWtk,EbwffI 1VZ CyRo30COi 8fBy9KoK,zLy18MzaoqWI

Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

27. Oktober

Sommerrodelbahn