Shafarevich, locally regular $Rightarrow$ globally regular











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












So I am confused with this argument in 3rd Ed, pg 47, Basic Alg. Geo. 1.




Definition 1: if $X subseteq Bbb P^n$ is a quasiprojective variety, $x in X$, and $f=P/Q$ is a homogenous function of degree $0$ with $Q(x)not=0$. A function on $X$ that is regular at all points $x in X$ is a regular function on $X$.



Definition 2: If $A$ is a variety of $Bbb A^n$ then $f:A rightarrow k$ is regular if exists poylnomial function $F$ such that $F|A=f$.




So Shafarevich sets out to prove definition 1 for a closed subset $X$ of an affine space coincides with 2.




Proof: By assumption each point $x in X$ has a nhood $U_x$ with $q_x not=0 $ on $U_x$, in which $f=p_x/q_x$. So
$$q_x f= p_x $$
on $U_x$. We can assume that this holds over whole of $X$ by multiplying a regular function equal to $0$ on $Xsetminus U_x$ and nonzero at $x$.




What regular function is referred here? I suppose it is definition 2. By how does such a function exist?










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    So I am confused with this argument in 3rd Ed, pg 47, Basic Alg. Geo. 1.




    Definition 1: if $X subseteq Bbb P^n$ is a quasiprojective variety, $x in X$, and $f=P/Q$ is a homogenous function of degree $0$ with $Q(x)not=0$. A function on $X$ that is regular at all points $x in X$ is a regular function on $X$.



    Definition 2: If $A$ is a variety of $Bbb A^n$ then $f:A rightarrow k$ is regular if exists poylnomial function $F$ such that $F|A=f$.




    So Shafarevich sets out to prove definition 1 for a closed subset $X$ of an affine space coincides with 2.




    Proof: By assumption each point $x in X$ has a nhood $U_x$ with $q_x not=0 $ on $U_x$, in which $f=p_x/q_x$. So
    $$q_x f= p_x $$
    on $U_x$. We can assume that this holds over whole of $X$ by multiplying a regular function equal to $0$ on $Xsetminus U_x$ and nonzero at $x$.




    What regular function is referred here? I suppose it is definition 2. By how does such a function exist?










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      So I am confused with this argument in 3rd Ed, pg 47, Basic Alg. Geo. 1.




      Definition 1: if $X subseteq Bbb P^n$ is a quasiprojective variety, $x in X$, and $f=P/Q$ is a homogenous function of degree $0$ with $Q(x)not=0$. A function on $X$ that is regular at all points $x in X$ is a regular function on $X$.



      Definition 2: If $A$ is a variety of $Bbb A^n$ then $f:A rightarrow k$ is regular if exists poylnomial function $F$ such that $F|A=f$.




      So Shafarevich sets out to prove definition 1 for a closed subset $X$ of an affine space coincides with 2.




      Proof: By assumption each point $x in X$ has a nhood $U_x$ with $q_x not=0 $ on $U_x$, in which $f=p_x/q_x$. So
      $$q_x f= p_x $$
      on $U_x$. We can assume that this holds over whole of $X$ by multiplying a regular function equal to $0$ on $Xsetminus U_x$ and nonzero at $x$.




      What regular function is referred here? I suppose it is definition 2. By how does such a function exist?










      share|cite|improve this question















      So I am confused with this argument in 3rd Ed, pg 47, Basic Alg. Geo. 1.




      Definition 1: if $X subseteq Bbb P^n$ is a quasiprojective variety, $x in X$, and $f=P/Q$ is a homogenous function of degree $0$ with $Q(x)not=0$. A function on $X$ that is regular at all points $x in X$ is a regular function on $X$.



      Definition 2: If $A$ is a variety of $Bbb A^n$ then $f:A rightarrow k$ is regular if exists poylnomial function $F$ such that $F|A=f$.




      So Shafarevich sets out to prove definition 1 for a closed subset $X$ of an affine space coincides with 2.




      Proof: By assumption each point $x in X$ has a nhood $U_x$ with $q_x not=0 $ on $U_x$, in which $f=p_x/q_x$. So
      $$q_x f= p_x $$
      on $U_x$. We can assume that this holds over whole of $X$ by multiplying a regular function equal to $0$ on $Xsetminus U_x$ and nonzero at $x$.




      What regular function is referred here? I suppose it is definition 2. By how does such a function exist?







      algebraic-geometry affine-varieties projective-varieties






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 26 at 7:26

























      asked Nov 25 at 22:34









      CL.

      2,1532822




      2,1532822






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Note that $Z:=Xsmallsetminus U_x$ is a closed subset of $X$ (and hence of $Bbb A^n$). If we take elements $f_1,dots,f_r$ which generate the ideal $I(Z)subset k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ (I'm not sure if this is the notation Shafarevich uses, but $I(Z)$ is the ideal given by polynomials vanishing on all of $Z$, and it is finitely generated because $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ is noetherian).



          If each $f_i$ vanished at $x$, then $x$ would have to be in $Z$ because $Z$ is the vanishing locus of $(f_1,dots,f_r)$, but this is not the case. So some $f_i$ does not vanish at $x$ and, furthermore, it must vanish on all of $Xsmallsetminus U_x$ because it is an element of $I(Z)$. So $f_i$ is the element you want.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I also have another definition question post, I hope you don't mind giving some guidance.
            – CL.
            Nov 26 at 8:19












          • @CL. I've gone ahead and responded, let me know if you have further questions.
            – Alex Mathers
            Nov 26 at 18:10











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013510%2fshafarevich-locally-regular-rightarrow-globally-regular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Note that $Z:=Xsmallsetminus U_x$ is a closed subset of $X$ (and hence of $Bbb A^n$). If we take elements $f_1,dots,f_r$ which generate the ideal $I(Z)subset k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ (I'm not sure if this is the notation Shafarevich uses, but $I(Z)$ is the ideal given by polynomials vanishing on all of $Z$, and it is finitely generated because $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ is noetherian).



          If each $f_i$ vanished at $x$, then $x$ would have to be in $Z$ because $Z$ is the vanishing locus of $(f_1,dots,f_r)$, but this is not the case. So some $f_i$ does not vanish at $x$ and, furthermore, it must vanish on all of $Xsmallsetminus U_x$ because it is an element of $I(Z)$. So $f_i$ is the element you want.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I also have another definition question post, I hope you don't mind giving some guidance.
            – CL.
            Nov 26 at 8:19












          • @CL. I've gone ahead and responded, let me know if you have further questions.
            – Alex Mathers
            Nov 26 at 18:10















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Note that $Z:=Xsmallsetminus U_x$ is a closed subset of $X$ (and hence of $Bbb A^n$). If we take elements $f_1,dots,f_r$ which generate the ideal $I(Z)subset k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ (I'm not sure if this is the notation Shafarevich uses, but $I(Z)$ is the ideal given by polynomials vanishing on all of $Z$, and it is finitely generated because $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ is noetherian).



          If each $f_i$ vanished at $x$, then $x$ would have to be in $Z$ because $Z$ is the vanishing locus of $(f_1,dots,f_r)$, but this is not the case. So some $f_i$ does not vanish at $x$ and, furthermore, it must vanish on all of $Xsmallsetminus U_x$ because it is an element of $I(Z)$. So $f_i$ is the element you want.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I also have another definition question post, I hope you don't mind giving some guidance.
            – CL.
            Nov 26 at 8:19












          • @CL. I've gone ahead and responded, let me know if you have further questions.
            – Alex Mathers
            Nov 26 at 18:10













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          Note that $Z:=Xsmallsetminus U_x$ is a closed subset of $X$ (and hence of $Bbb A^n$). If we take elements $f_1,dots,f_r$ which generate the ideal $I(Z)subset k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ (I'm not sure if this is the notation Shafarevich uses, but $I(Z)$ is the ideal given by polynomials vanishing on all of $Z$, and it is finitely generated because $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ is noetherian).



          If each $f_i$ vanished at $x$, then $x$ would have to be in $Z$ because $Z$ is the vanishing locus of $(f_1,dots,f_r)$, but this is not the case. So some $f_i$ does not vanish at $x$ and, furthermore, it must vanish on all of $Xsmallsetminus U_x$ because it is an element of $I(Z)$. So $f_i$ is the element you want.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Note that $Z:=Xsmallsetminus U_x$ is a closed subset of $X$ (and hence of $Bbb A^n$). If we take elements $f_1,dots,f_r$ which generate the ideal $I(Z)subset k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ (I'm not sure if this is the notation Shafarevich uses, but $I(Z)$ is the ideal given by polynomials vanishing on all of $Z$, and it is finitely generated because $k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ is noetherian).



          If each $f_i$ vanished at $x$, then $x$ would have to be in $Z$ because $Z$ is the vanishing locus of $(f_1,dots,f_r)$, but this is not the case. So some $f_i$ does not vanish at $x$ and, furthermore, it must vanish on all of $Xsmallsetminus U_x$ because it is an element of $I(Z)$. So $f_i$ is the element you want.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 26 at 8:02









          Alex Mathers

          10.7k21344




          10.7k21344












          • I also have another definition question post, I hope you don't mind giving some guidance.
            – CL.
            Nov 26 at 8:19












          • @CL. I've gone ahead and responded, let me know if you have further questions.
            – Alex Mathers
            Nov 26 at 18:10


















          • I also have another definition question post, I hope you don't mind giving some guidance.
            – CL.
            Nov 26 at 8:19












          • @CL. I've gone ahead and responded, let me know if you have further questions.
            – Alex Mathers
            Nov 26 at 18:10
















          I also have another definition question post, I hope you don't mind giving some guidance.
          – CL.
          Nov 26 at 8:19






          I also have another definition question post, I hope you don't mind giving some guidance.
          – CL.
          Nov 26 at 8:19














          @CL. I've gone ahead and responded, let me know if you have further questions.
          – Alex Mathers
          Nov 26 at 18:10




          @CL. I've gone ahead and responded, let me know if you have further questions.
          – Alex Mathers
          Nov 26 at 18:10


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013510%2fshafarevich-locally-regular-rightarrow-globally-regular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen