Sample from Poisson process with no collisions.












0














On a 2D square $[0, 1]^2$, I can draw a random configuration of points $c = (n, (x_i)_{1..n})$ with interesting independence properties using a Poisson point process: draw the number of points $n hookrightarrow mathcal{P}(lambda)$, and then $n$ coordinates $x_i hookrightarrow mathcal{U}([0, 1]^2)$. Let us call $mathcal{F}$ the support of this process (all possible configurations) and $mathcal{D}(mathcal{F})$ the corresponding distribution over this support.



I wish now that each point is the center of a disk of radius $r$, and that no two disks collide. $mathcal{F}$ is thus reduced into $mathcal{F}^-$ because we have to remove all configurations with collisions. But it is not empty. The new process is: draw a configuration $c hookrightarrow mathcal{D}(mathcal{F})$, reject it until there is no collision in $c$. This yields a new distribution $c hookrightarrow mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$.



A naive way to sample from $mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$ is to simulate the process. But the rejection rate gets really high when $lambda$ and $r$ get big.



Is there a clever way to sample from $mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$ with lower rejection rate?

Can approaches like random tiling with Markov chains be adapted to such a continous case?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    On a 2D square $[0, 1]^2$, I can draw a random configuration of points $c = (n, (x_i)_{1..n})$ with interesting independence properties using a Poisson point process: draw the number of points $n hookrightarrow mathcal{P}(lambda)$, and then $n$ coordinates $x_i hookrightarrow mathcal{U}([0, 1]^2)$. Let us call $mathcal{F}$ the support of this process (all possible configurations) and $mathcal{D}(mathcal{F})$ the corresponding distribution over this support.



    I wish now that each point is the center of a disk of radius $r$, and that no two disks collide. $mathcal{F}$ is thus reduced into $mathcal{F}^-$ because we have to remove all configurations with collisions. But it is not empty. The new process is: draw a configuration $c hookrightarrow mathcal{D}(mathcal{F})$, reject it until there is no collision in $c$. This yields a new distribution $c hookrightarrow mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$.



    A naive way to sample from $mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$ is to simulate the process. But the rejection rate gets really high when $lambda$ and $r$ get big.



    Is there a clever way to sample from $mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$ with lower rejection rate?

    Can approaches like random tiling with Markov chains be adapted to such a continous case?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      On a 2D square $[0, 1]^2$, I can draw a random configuration of points $c = (n, (x_i)_{1..n})$ with interesting independence properties using a Poisson point process: draw the number of points $n hookrightarrow mathcal{P}(lambda)$, and then $n$ coordinates $x_i hookrightarrow mathcal{U}([0, 1]^2)$. Let us call $mathcal{F}$ the support of this process (all possible configurations) and $mathcal{D}(mathcal{F})$ the corresponding distribution over this support.



      I wish now that each point is the center of a disk of radius $r$, and that no two disks collide. $mathcal{F}$ is thus reduced into $mathcal{F}^-$ because we have to remove all configurations with collisions. But it is not empty. The new process is: draw a configuration $c hookrightarrow mathcal{D}(mathcal{F})$, reject it until there is no collision in $c$. This yields a new distribution $c hookrightarrow mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$.



      A naive way to sample from $mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$ is to simulate the process. But the rejection rate gets really high when $lambda$ and $r$ get big.



      Is there a clever way to sample from $mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$ with lower rejection rate?

      Can approaches like random tiling with Markov chains be adapted to such a continous case?










      share|cite|improve this question













      On a 2D square $[0, 1]^2$, I can draw a random configuration of points $c = (n, (x_i)_{1..n})$ with interesting independence properties using a Poisson point process: draw the number of points $n hookrightarrow mathcal{P}(lambda)$, and then $n$ coordinates $x_i hookrightarrow mathcal{U}([0, 1]^2)$. Let us call $mathcal{F}$ the support of this process (all possible configurations) and $mathcal{D}(mathcal{F})$ the corresponding distribution over this support.



      I wish now that each point is the center of a disk of radius $r$, and that no two disks collide. $mathcal{F}$ is thus reduced into $mathcal{F}^-$ because we have to remove all configurations with collisions. But it is not empty. The new process is: draw a configuration $c hookrightarrow mathcal{D}(mathcal{F})$, reject it until there is no collision in $c$. This yields a new distribution $c hookrightarrow mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$.



      A naive way to sample from $mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$ is to simulate the process. But the rejection rate gets really high when $lambda$ and $r$ get big.



      Is there a clever way to sample from $mathcal{D}'(mathcal{F}^-)$ with lower rejection rate?

      Can approaches like random tiling with Markov chains be adapted to such a continous case?







      sampling poisson-process collision-detection






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 4 '18 at 11:21









      iago-litoiago-lito

      295312




      295312






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025439%2fsample-from-poisson-process-with-no-collisions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025439%2fsample-from-poisson-process-with-no-collisions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen