A pyramid $OABC$ has vectors $vec{OA}=a$, $vec{OB}=b$ and $vec{OC}=c$.












-1












$begingroup$



A pyramid $OABC$ has vectors $vec{OA}=a$, $vec{OB}=b$ and $vec{OC}=c$.



The vectors $v_1,v_2,v_3$ and $v_4$ are perpendicular to each of the faces of and of magnitude equal to the area of the face. Show that $v_1+v_2+v_3+v_4=0$.




I have no idea where to even start with this so some help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    -1












    $begingroup$



    A pyramid $OABC$ has vectors $vec{OA}=a$, $vec{OB}=b$ and $vec{OC}=c$.



    The vectors $v_1,v_2,v_3$ and $v_4$ are perpendicular to each of the faces of and of magnitude equal to the area of the face. Show that $v_1+v_2+v_3+v_4=0$.




    I have no idea where to even start with this so some help would be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      -1












      -1








      -1


      0



      $begingroup$



      A pyramid $OABC$ has vectors $vec{OA}=a$, $vec{OB}=b$ and $vec{OC}=c$.



      The vectors $v_1,v_2,v_3$ and $v_4$ are perpendicular to each of the faces of and of magnitude equal to the area of the face. Show that $v_1+v_2+v_3+v_4=0$.




      I have no idea where to even start with this so some help would be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      A pyramid $OABC$ has vectors $vec{OA}=a$, $vec{OB}=b$ and $vec{OC}=c$.



      The vectors $v_1,v_2,v_3$ and $v_4$ are perpendicular to each of the faces of and of magnitude equal to the area of the face. Show that $v_1+v_2+v_3+v_4=0$.




      I have no idea where to even start with this so some help would be appreciated.







      geometry vectors 3d cross-product solid-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 18 '18 at 16:03







      user593746

















      asked Dec 18 '18 at 14:25









      H.LinkhornH.Linkhorn

      431113




      431113






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Hint: Start by showing that the vector $v_1$ for the face $OAB$ is given by
          $$
          v_1 = frac12 a times b,
          $$

          at least for one choice of orientation.



          (By the way, the claim as stated is false; replacing $v_1$ with $-v_1$ keeps it perpendicular to the face, and with the same magnitude. If the claim were true, then we'd also have
          $$
          (-v_1) + v_2 + v_3 + v_4 = 0,
          $$

          from which we could conclude that $v_1 = 0$. But not every pyramid has all faces with area zero.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Not that it matters, but $vec{v_1}=frac12vec atimesvec b$
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:46










          • $begingroup$
            D'oh! Thanks -- fixed.
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:47



















          1












          $begingroup$

          You have $$vec v_1=frac 12 vec atimes vec b$$
          You have similar expressions for $vec v_2$ and $vec v_3$. The missing thing is $vec v_4$. For that, you can see that that particular face is a triangle, with sides $vec b-vec a$ and $vec c-vec a$. Note however that we need to account for the direction of the vector. If you make a quick drawing of the $ABC$ triangle with $A,B,C$ in counter clocwise order, and put $O$ in the middle (as seen from above), you have $vec atimesvec b$ pointing outwards. Similarly $vec btimesvec c$ and $vec ctimesvec a$. Now the $vec b-vec a $ points from $A$ to $B$, and $vec c -vec a$ points from $A$ to $C$. Their cross product points "up" so inwards. To make it point outward, you can just change the sign of one of the vectors. Now all you need is to put everything into a single equation and use $vec btimes vec a=-vec atimes vec b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            ..and fiddle with the signs to actually make things work out. :(
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:20










          • $begingroup$
            Yes. But you can get these if you do a simple sketch. I drew the $ABC$ triangle, and I've put $O$ in the middle. then $vec v_{1,2,3}$ point outwards. The $(vec b-vec a)times(vec c-vec a)$ points inwards, so I've changed the sign on the first
            $endgroup$
            – Andrei
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:34










          • $begingroup$
            "But you can get these..." Hmm. If "you" here refers to me, John Hughes, then I agree. But can the OP understand and get these? I'm less sure of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 16:46










          • $begingroup$
            @JohnHughes Thanks for pointing that out. I will edit my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Andrei
            Dec 18 '18 at 16:48











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045222%2fa-pyramid-oabc-has-vectors-vecoa-a-vecob-b-and-vecoc-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Hint: Start by showing that the vector $v_1$ for the face $OAB$ is given by
          $$
          v_1 = frac12 a times b,
          $$

          at least for one choice of orientation.



          (By the way, the claim as stated is false; replacing $v_1$ with $-v_1$ keeps it perpendicular to the face, and with the same magnitude. If the claim were true, then we'd also have
          $$
          (-v_1) + v_2 + v_3 + v_4 = 0,
          $$

          from which we could conclude that $v_1 = 0$. But not every pyramid has all faces with area zero.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Not that it matters, but $vec{v_1}=frac12vec atimesvec b$
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:46










          • $begingroup$
            D'oh! Thanks -- fixed.
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:47
















          1












          $begingroup$

          Hint: Start by showing that the vector $v_1$ for the face $OAB$ is given by
          $$
          v_1 = frac12 a times b,
          $$

          at least for one choice of orientation.



          (By the way, the claim as stated is false; replacing $v_1$ with $-v_1$ keeps it perpendicular to the face, and with the same magnitude. If the claim were true, then we'd also have
          $$
          (-v_1) + v_2 + v_3 + v_4 = 0,
          $$

          from which we could conclude that $v_1 = 0$. But not every pyramid has all faces with area zero.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Not that it matters, but $vec{v_1}=frac12vec atimesvec b$
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:46










          • $begingroup$
            D'oh! Thanks -- fixed.
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:47














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Hint: Start by showing that the vector $v_1$ for the face $OAB$ is given by
          $$
          v_1 = frac12 a times b,
          $$

          at least for one choice of orientation.



          (By the way, the claim as stated is false; replacing $v_1$ with $-v_1$ keeps it perpendicular to the face, and with the same magnitude. If the claim were true, then we'd also have
          $$
          (-v_1) + v_2 + v_3 + v_4 = 0,
          $$

          from which we could conclude that $v_1 = 0$. But not every pyramid has all faces with area zero.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Hint: Start by showing that the vector $v_1$ for the face $OAB$ is given by
          $$
          v_1 = frac12 a times b,
          $$

          at least for one choice of orientation.



          (By the way, the claim as stated is false; replacing $v_1$ with $-v_1$ keeps it perpendicular to the face, and with the same magnitude. If the claim were true, then we'd also have
          $$
          (-v_1) + v_2 + v_3 + v_4 = 0,
          $$

          from which we could conclude that $v_1 = 0$. But not every pyramid has all faces with area zero.)







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 18 '18 at 14:47

























          answered Dec 18 '18 at 14:37









          John HughesJohn Hughes

          64.2k24191




          64.2k24191












          • $begingroup$
            Not that it matters, but $vec{v_1}=frac12vec atimesvec b$
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:46










          • $begingroup$
            D'oh! Thanks -- fixed.
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:47


















          • $begingroup$
            Not that it matters, but $vec{v_1}=frac12vec atimesvec b$
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:46










          • $begingroup$
            D'oh! Thanks -- fixed.
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:47
















          $begingroup$
          Not that it matters, but $vec{v_1}=frac12vec atimesvec b$
          $endgroup$
          – Shubham Johri
          Dec 18 '18 at 14:46




          $begingroup$
          Not that it matters, but $vec{v_1}=frac12vec atimesvec b$
          $endgroup$
          – Shubham Johri
          Dec 18 '18 at 14:46












          $begingroup$
          D'oh! Thanks -- fixed.
          $endgroup$
          – John Hughes
          Dec 18 '18 at 14:47




          $begingroup$
          D'oh! Thanks -- fixed.
          $endgroup$
          – John Hughes
          Dec 18 '18 at 14:47











          1












          $begingroup$

          You have $$vec v_1=frac 12 vec atimes vec b$$
          You have similar expressions for $vec v_2$ and $vec v_3$. The missing thing is $vec v_4$. For that, you can see that that particular face is a triangle, with sides $vec b-vec a$ and $vec c-vec a$. Note however that we need to account for the direction of the vector. If you make a quick drawing of the $ABC$ triangle with $A,B,C$ in counter clocwise order, and put $O$ in the middle (as seen from above), you have $vec atimesvec b$ pointing outwards. Similarly $vec btimesvec c$ and $vec ctimesvec a$. Now the $vec b-vec a $ points from $A$ to $B$, and $vec c -vec a$ points from $A$ to $C$. Their cross product points "up" so inwards. To make it point outward, you can just change the sign of one of the vectors. Now all you need is to put everything into a single equation and use $vec btimes vec a=-vec atimes vec b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            ..and fiddle with the signs to actually make things work out. :(
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:20










          • $begingroup$
            Yes. But you can get these if you do a simple sketch. I drew the $ABC$ triangle, and I've put $O$ in the middle. then $vec v_{1,2,3}$ point outwards. The $(vec b-vec a)times(vec c-vec a)$ points inwards, so I've changed the sign on the first
            $endgroup$
            – Andrei
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:34










          • $begingroup$
            "But you can get these..." Hmm. If "you" here refers to me, John Hughes, then I agree. But can the OP understand and get these? I'm less sure of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 16:46










          • $begingroup$
            @JohnHughes Thanks for pointing that out. I will edit my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Andrei
            Dec 18 '18 at 16:48
















          1












          $begingroup$

          You have $$vec v_1=frac 12 vec atimes vec b$$
          You have similar expressions for $vec v_2$ and $vec v_3$. The missing thing is $vec v_4$. For that, you can see that that particular face is a triangle, with sides $vec b-vec a$ and $vec c-vec a$. Note however that we need to account for the direction of the vector. If you make a quick drawing of the $ABC$ triangle with $A,B,C$ in counter clocwise order, and put $O$ in the middle (as seen from above), you have $vec atimesvec b$ pointing outwards. Similarly $vec btimesvec c$ and $vec ctimesvec a$. Now the $vec b-vec a $ points from $A$ to $B$, and $vec c -vec a$ points from $A$ to $C$. Their cross product points "up" so inwards. To make it point outward, you can just change the sign of one of the vectors. Now all you need is to put everything into a single equation and use $vec btimes vec a=-vec atimes vec b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            ..and fiddle with the signs to actually make things work out. :(
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:20










          • $begingroup$
            Yes. But you can get these if you do a simple sketch. I drew the $ABC$ triangle, and I've put $O$ in the middle. then $vec v_{1,2,3}$ point outwards. The $(vec b-vec a)times(vec c-vec a)$ points inwards, so I've changed the sign on the first
            $endgroup$
            – Andrei
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:34










          • $begingroup$
            "But you can get these..." Hmm. If "you" here refers to me, John Hughes, then I agree. But can the OP understand and get these? I'm less sure of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 16:46










          • $begingroup$
            @JohnHughes Thanks for pointing that out. I will edit my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Andrei
            Dec 18 '18 at 16:48














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You have $$vec v_1=frac 12 vec atimes vec b$$
          You have similar expressions for $vec v_2$ and $vec v_3$. The missing thing is $vec v_4$. For that, you can see that that particular face is a triangle, with sides $vec b-vec a$ and $vec c-vec a$. Note however that we need to account for the direction of the vector. If you make a quick drawing of the $ABC$ triangle with $A,B,C$ in counter clocwise order, and put $O$ in the middle (as seen from above), you have $vec atimesvec b$ pointing outwards. Similarly $vec btimesvec c$ and $vec ctimesvec a$. Now the $vec b-vec a $ points from $A$ to $B$, and $vec c -vec a$ points from $A$ to $C$. Their cross product points "up" so inwards. To make it point outward, you can just change the sign of one of the vectors. Now all you need is to put everything into a single equation and use $vec btimes vec a=-vec atimes vec b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You have $$vec v_1=frac 12 vec atimes vec b$$
          You have similar expressions for $vec v_2$ and $vec v_3$. The missing thing is $vec v_4$. For that, you can see that that particular face is a triangle, with sides $vec b-vec a$ and $vec c-vec a$. Note however that we need to account for the direction of the vector. If you make a quick drawing of the $ABC$ triangle with $A,B,C$ in counter clocwise order, and put $O$ in the middle (as seen from above), you have $vec atimesvec b$ pointing outwards. Similarly $vec btimesvec c$ and $vec ctimesvec a$. Now the $vec b-vec a $ points from $A$ to $B$, and $vec c -vec a$ points from $A$ to $C$. Their cross product points "up" so inwards. To make it point outward, you can just change the sign of one of the vectors. Now all you need is to put everything into a single equation and use $vec btimes vec a=-vec atimes vec b$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 18 '18 at 16:56

























          answered Dec 18 '18 at 14:59









          AndreiAndrei

          12.4k21128




          12.4k21128








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            ..and fiddle with the signs to actually make things work out. :(
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:20










          • $begingroup$
            Yes. But you can get these if you do a simple sketch. I drew the $ABC$ triangle, and I've put $O$ in the middle. then $vec v_{1,2,3}$ point outwards. The $(vec b-vec a)times(vec c-vec a)$ points inwards, so I've changed the sign on the first
            $endgroup$
            – Andrei
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:34










          • $begingroup$
            "But you can get these..." Hmm. If "you" here refers to me, John Hughes, then I agree. But can the OP understand and get these? I'm less sure of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 16:46










          • $begingroup$
            @JohnHughes Thanks for pointing that out. I will edit my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Andrei
            Dec 18 '18 at 16:48














          • 2




            $begingroup$
            ..and fiddle with the signs to actually make things work out. :(
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:20










          • $begingroup$
            Yes. But you can get these if you do a simple sketch. I drew the $ABC$ triangle, and I've put $O$ in the middle. then $vec v_{1,2,3}$ point outwards. The $(vec b-vec a)times(vec c-vec a)$ points inwards, so I've changed the sign on the first
            $endgroup$
            – Andrei
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:34










          • $begingroup$
            "But you can get these..." Hmm. If "you" here refers to me, John Hughes, then I agree. But can the OP understand and get these? I'm less sure of that.
            $endgroup$
            – John Hughes
            Dec 18 '18 at 16:46










          • $begingroup$
            @JohnHughes Thanks for pointing that out. I will edit my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Andrei
            Dec 18 '18 at 16:48








          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          ..and fiddle with the signs to actually make things work out. :(
          $endgroup$
          – John Hughes
          Dec 18 '18 at 15:20




          $begingroup$
          ..and fiddle with the signs to actually make things work out. :(
          $endgroup$
          – John Hughes
          Dec 18 '18 at 15:20












          $begingroup$
          Yes. But you can get these if you do a simple sketch. I drew the $ABC$ triangle, and I've put $O$ in the middle. then $vec v_{1,2,3}$ point outwards. The $(vec b-vec a)times(vec c-vec a)$ points inwards, so I've changed the sign on the first
          $endgroup$
          – Andrei
          Dec 18 '18 at 15:34




          $begingroup$
          Yes. But you can get these if you do a simple sketch. I drew the $ABC$ triangle, and I've put $O$ in the middle. then $vec v_{1,2,3}$ point outwards. The $(vec b-vec a)times(vec c-vec a)$ points inwards, so I've changed the sign on the first
          $endgroup$
          – Andrei
          Dec 18 '18 at 15:34












          $begingroup$
          "But you can get these..." Hmm. If "you" here refers to me, John Hughes, then I agree. But can the OP understand and get these? I'm less sure of that.
          $endgroup$
          – John Hughes
          Dec 18 '18 at 16:46




          $begingroup$
          "But you can get these..." Hmm. If "you" here refers to me, John Hughes, then I agree. But can the OP understand and get these? I'm less sure of that.
          $endgroup$
          – John Hughes
          Dec 18 '18 at 16:46












          $begingroup$
          @JohnHughes Thanks for pointing that out. I will edit my answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Andrei
          Dec 18 '18 at 16:48




          $begingroup$
          @JohnHughes Thanks for pointing that out. I will edit my answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Andrei
          Dec 18 '18 at 16:48


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045222%2fa-pyramid-oabc-has-vectors-vecoa-a-vecob-b-and-vecoc-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen