Smith Form of a matrix which is already diagonal
0
$begingroup$
Find the Smith form of
$$
pmatrix{12 & 0 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 }$$
I don't find a simple explanation of this algorithm.
Could you please help?
Thank you.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
asked Dec 18 '18 at 15:17
PerelManPerelMan
603312
$endgroup$
add a comment |
0
$begingroup$
Find the Smith form of
$$
pmatrix{12 & 0 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 }$$
I don't find a simple explanation of this algorithm.
Could you please help?
Thank you.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
asked Dec 18 '18 at 15:17
PerelManPerelMan
603312
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I think you're going to have to be specific about what you don't understand. You're only likely to get an explanation no clearer than this which is already very clear. People have already tried to be very clear when writing up such things. So it doesn't make sense to ask in the way you have asked. If you specify, however, you'll have better luck.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Actually I've already checked the wikipedia page and I think step II is too heavy. It is suitable for a computer program, but to do the euclid algorithm by hand for each pivot to find bezout coefficients is a tedious task and I think there is a simpler way to do it bu hand?
$endgroup$
– PerelMan
Dec 18 '18 at 15:40
$begingroup$
OK, well that is definitely more specific. You find the Euclidean algorithm for two small numbers tedious? Seems pretty easy, especially in this case.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Here's a start: $pmatrix{12 & 0 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{12 & 18 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{-6 & 18 & 0 \-18 & 18 & 0 }$
$endgroup$
– André 3000
Dec 18 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
0
0
0
1
$begingroup$
Find the Smith form of
$$
pmatrix{12 & 0 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 }$$
I don't find a simple explanation of this algorithm.
Could you please help?
Thank you.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
asked Dec 18 '18 at 15:17
PerelManPerelMan
603312
$endgroup$
Find the Smith form of
$$
pmatrix{12 & 0 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 }$$
I don't find a simple explanation of this algorithm.
Could you please help?
Thank you.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
asked Dec 18 '18 at 15:17
PerelManPerelMan
603312
asked Dec 18 '18 at 15:17
PerelManPerelMan
603312
asked Dec 18 '18 at 15:17
PerelManPerelMan
603312
asked Dec 18 '18 at 15:17
PerelManPerelMan
603312
asked Dec 18 '18 at 15:17
PerelManPerelMan
603312
603312
1
$begingroup$
I think you're going to have to be specific about what you don't understand. You're only likely to get an explanation no clearer than this which is already very clear. People have already tried to be very clear when writing up such things. So it doesn't make sense to ask in the way you have asked. If you specify, however, you'll have better luck.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Actually I've already checked the wikipedia page and I think step II is too heavy. It is suitable for a computer program, but to do the euclid algorithm by hand for each pivot to find bezout coefficients is a tedious task and I think there is a simpler way to do it bu hand?
$endgroup$
– PerelMan
Dec 18 '18 at 15:40
$begingroup$
OK, well that is definitely more specific. You find the Euclidean algorithm for two small numbers tedious? Seems pretty easy, especially in this case.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Here's a start: $pmatrix{12 & 0 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{12 & 18 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{-6 & 18 & 0 \-18 & 18 & 0 }$
$endgroup$
– André 3000
Dec 18 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I think you're going to have to be specific about what you don't understand. You're only likely to get an explanation no clearer than this which is already very clear. People have already tried to be very clear when writing up such things. So it doesn't make sense to ask in the way you have asked. If you specify, however, you'll have better luck.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Actually I've already checked the wikipedia page and I think step II is too heavy. It is suitable for a computer program, but to do the euclid algorithm by hand for each pivot to find bezout coefficients is a tedious task and I think there is a simpler way to do it bu hand?
$endgroup$
– PerelMan
Dec 18 '18 at 15:40
$begingroup$
OK, well that is definitely more specific. You find the Euclidean algorithm for two small numbers tedious? Seems pretty easy, especially in this case.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Here's a start: $pmatrix{12 & 0 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{12 & 18 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{-6 & 18 & 0 \-18 & 18 & 0 }$
$endgroup$
– André 3000
Dec 18 '18 at 16:47
1
1
$begingroup$
I think you're going to have to be specific about what you don't understand. You're only likely to get an explanation no clearer than this which is already very clear. People have already tried to be very clear when writing up such things. So it doesn't make sense to ask in the way you have asked. If you specify, however, you'll have better luck.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
I think you're going to have to be specific about what you don't understand. You're only likely to get an explanation no clearer than this which is already very clear. People have already tried to be very clear when writing up such things. So it doesn't make sense to ask in the way you have asked. If you specify, however, you'll have better luck.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Actually I've already checked the wikipedia page and I think step II is too heavy. It is suitable for a computer program, but to do the euclid algorithm by hand for each pivot to find bezout coefficients is a tedious task and I think there is a simpler way to do it bu hand?
$endgroup$
– PerelMan
Dec 18 '18 at 15:40
$begingroup$
Actually I've already checked the wikipedia page and I think step II is too heavy. It is suitable for a computer program, but to do the euclid algorithm by hand for each pivot to find bezout coefficients is a tedious task and I think there is a simpler way to do it bu hand?
$endgroup$
– PerelMan
Dec 18 '18 at 15:40
$begingroup$
OK, well that is definitely more specific. You find the Euclidean algorithm for two small numbers tedious? Seems pretty easy, especially in this case.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
OK, well that is definitely more specific. You find the Euclidean algorithm for two small numbers tedious? Seems pretty easy, especially in this case.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Here's a start: $pmatrix{12 & 0 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{12 & 18 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{-6 & 18 & 0 \-18 & 18 & 0 }$
$endgroup$
– André 3000
Dec 18 '18 at 16:47
$begingroup$
Here's a start: $pmatrix{12 & 0 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{12 & 18 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{-6 & 18 & 0 \-18 & 18 & 0 }$
$endgroup$
– André 3000
Dec 18 '18 at 16:47
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045278%2fsmith-form-of-a-matrix-which-is-already-diagonal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045278%2fsmith-form-of-a-matrix-which-is-already-diagonal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I think you're going to have to be specific about what you don't understand. You're only likely to get an explanation no clearer than this which is already very clear. People have already tried to be very clear when writing up such things. So it doesn't make sense to ask in the way you have asked. If you specify, however, you'll have better luck.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Actually I've already checked the wikipedia page and I think step II is too heavy. It is suitable for a computer program, but to do the euclid algorithm by hand for each pivot to find bezout coefficients is a tedious task and I think there is a simpler way to do it bu hand?
$endgroup$
– PerelMan
Dec 18 '18 at 15:40
$begingroup$
OK, well that is definitely more specific. You find the Euclidean algorithm for two small numbers tedious? Seems pretty easy, especially in this case.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 18 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
Here's a start: $pmatrix{12 & 0 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{12 & 18 & 0 \0 & 18 & 0 } leadsto pmatrix{-6 & 18 & 0 \-18 & 18 & 0 }$
$endgroup$
– André 3000
Dec 18 '18 at 16:47