Can we say that vector of branches spans $(n-1)$ dimension space or incidence matrix rows (columns?) span...












0












$begingroup$


If we have connected graph and $mathbfPhi=(Phi_1,Phi_2...Phi_n)$ - nodes, and $phi_k=Phi_i-Phi_j$ so
$mathbf{phi}=(phi_1,phi_2...phi_N)$ - branches (edges), can we say that vector $mathbfphi$ spans $(n-1)$ dimensions space independent of $N$?
Also, if we know that $$mathbfphi=A^intercalmathbfPhi,$$
where $A$ - incidence matrix maybe it would be more right to say that incidence matrix rows (columns?) span $(n-1)$ dimensions space?



I've found a proof that $rank(A)le n-1$ but I don't understand 4.4.17. Would be grateful for clarification.
And I don't see how can we use this result for my question.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    If we have connected graph and $mathbfPhi=(Phi_1,Phi_2...Phi_n)$ - nodes, and $phi_k=Phi_i-Phi_j$ so
    $mathbf{phi}=(phi_1,phi_2...phi_N)$ - branches (edges), can we say that vector $mathbfphi$ spans $(n-1)$ dimensions space independent of $N$?
    Also, if we know that $$mathbfphi=A^intercalmathbfPhi,$$
    where $A$ - incidence matrix maybe it would be more right to say that incidence matrix rows (columns?) span $(n-1)$ dimensions space?



    I've found a proof that $rank(A)le n-1$ but I don't understand 4.4.17. Would be grateful for clarification.
    And I don't see how can we use this result for my question.



    enter image description here










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      If we have connected graph and $mathbfPhi=(Phi_1,Phi_2...Phi_n)$ - nodes, and $phi_k=Phi_i-Phi_j$ so
      $mathbf{phi}=(phi_1,phi_2...phi_N)$ - branches (edges), can we say that vector $mathbfphi$ spans $(n-1)$ dimensions space independent of $N$?
      Also, if we know that $$mathbfphi=A^intercalmathbfPhi,$$
      where $A$ - incidence matrix maybe it would be more right to say that incidence matrix rows (columns?) span $(n-1)$ dimensions space?



      I've found a proof that $rank(A)le n-1$ but I don't understand 4.4.17. Would be grateful for clarification.
      And I don't see how can we use this result for my question.



      enter image description here










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      If we have connected graph and $mathbfPhi=(Phi_1,Phi_2...Phi_n)$ - nodes, and $phi_k=Phi_i-Phi_j$ so
      $mathbf{phi}=(phi_1,phi_2...phi_N)$ - branches (edges), can we say that vector $mathbfphi$ spans $(n-1)$ dimensions space independent of $N$?
      Also, if we know that $$mathbfphi=A^intercalmathbfPhi,$$
      where $A$ - incidence matrix maybe it would be more right to say that incidence matrix rows (columns?) span $(n-1)$ dimensions space?



      I've found a proof that $rank(A)le n-1$ but I don't understand 4.4.17. Would be grateful for clarification.
      And I don't see how can we use this result for my question.



      enter image description here







      graph-theory vector-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 18 '18 at 14:34







      Tag

















      asked Dec 18 '18 at 14:09









      TagTag

      696




      696






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Equation (4.4.17) is using the fundamental theorem of linear algebra, which in this case, since the columns of $E$ are elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ (I am using $n$ for the number of nodes, as you do in your question, while the book is using $m$), implies that $$ text{rank}(E^top) + text{dim} , N(E^top) = n. $$
          Since the (nonzero) vector $e$ satisfies $E^top e = 0$, the dimension of the null space of $E^top$ is at least 1, we can conclude $$text{rank}(E)= text{rank}(E^top) le n-1.$$
          Thus, the columns of the incidence matrix span a space of dimension at most $n-1$. As mentioned in the book, if the network is connected, then the columns of the incidence matrix span a space of dimension exactly $n-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for clarification. So it is not right to say that $phi$ spans such a space but it would be right to say that incidence matrix spans such a space? Also, I don't understand, we usually say that some set of vectors spans a space, isn't it more right to divide our incidence matrix in columns or rows?
            $endgroup$
            – Tag
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:56










          • $begingroup$
            Correct, I should have referred more precisely to the set of column vectors of the incidence matrix. I corrected the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Vincenzo
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:15











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045204%2fcan-we-say-that-vector-of-branches-spans-n-1-dimension-space-or-incidence-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Equation (4.4.17) is using the fundamental theorem of linear algebra, which in this case, since the columns of $E$ are elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ (I am using $n$ for the number of nodes, as you do in your question, while the book is using $m$), implies that $$ text{rank}(E^top) + text{dim} , N(E^top) = n. $$
          Since the (nonzero) vector $e$ satisfies $E^top e = 0$, the dimension of the null space of $E^top$ is at least 1, we can conclude $$text{rank}(E)= text{rank}(E^top) le n-1.$$
          Thus, the columns of the incidence matrix span a space of dimension at most $n-1$. As mentioned in the book, if the network is connected, then the columns of the incidence matrix span a space of dimension exactly $n-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for clarification. So it is not right to say that $phi$ spans such a space but it would be right to say that incidence matrix spans such a space? Also, I don't understand, we usually say that some set of vectors spans a space, isn't it more right to divide our incidence matrix in columns or rows?
            $endgroup$
            – Tag
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:56










          • $begingroup$
            Correct, I should have referred more precisely to the set of column vectors of the incidence matrix. I corrected the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Vincenzo
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:15
















          1












          $begingroup$

          Equation (4.4.17) is using the fundamental theorem of linear algebra, which in this case, since the columns of $E$ are elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ (I am using $n$ for the number of nodes, as you do in your question, while the book is using $m$), implies that $$ text{rank}(E^top) + text{dim} , N(E^top) = n. $$
          Since the (nonzero) vector $e$ satisfies $E^top e = 0$, the dimension of the null space of $E^top$ is at least 1, we can conclude $$text{rank}(E)= text{rank}(E^top) le n-1.$$
          Thus, the columns of the incidence matrix span a space of dimension at most $n-1$. As mentioned in the book, if the network is connected, then the columns of the incidence matrix span a space of dimension exactly $n-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for clarification. So it is not right to say that $phi$ spans such a space but it would be right to say that incidence matrix spans such a space? Also, I don't understand, we usually say that some set of vectors spans a space, isn't it more right to divide our incidence matrix in columns or rows?
            $endgroup$
            – Tag
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:56










          • $begingroup$
            Correct, I should have referred more precisely to the set of column vectors of the incidence matrix. I corrected the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Vincenzo
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:15














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Equation (4.4.17) is using the fundamental theorem of linear algebra, which in this case, since the columns of $E$ are elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ (I am using $n$ for the number of nodes, as you do in your question, while the book is using $m$), implies that $$ text{rank}(E^top) + text{dim} , N(E^top) = n. $$
          Since the (nonzero) vector $e$ satisfies $E^top e = 0$, the dimension of the null space of $E^top$ is at least 1, we can conclude $$text{rank}(E)= text{rank}(E^top) le n-1.$$
          Thus, the columns of the incidence matrix span a space of dimension at most $n-1$. As mentioned in the book, if the network is connected, then the columns of the incidence matrix span a space of dimension exactly $n-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Equation (4.4.17) is using the fundamental theorem of linear algebra, which in this case, since the columns of $E$ are elements of $mathbb{R}^n$ (I am using $n$ for the number of nodes, as you do in your question, while the book is using $m$), implies that $$ text{rank}(E^top) + text{dim} , N(E^top) = n. $$
          Since the (nonzero) vector $e$ satisfies $E^top e = 0$, the dimension of the null space of $E^top$ is at least 1, we can conclude $$text{rank}(E)= text{rank}(E^top) le n-1.$$
          Thus, the columns of the incidence matrix span a space of dimension at most $n-1$. As mentioned in the book, if the network is connected, then the columns of the incidence matrix span a space of dimension exactly $n-1$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 18 '18 at 18:14

























          answered Dec 18 '18 at 14:43









          VincenzoVincenzo

          1916




          1916












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for clarification. So it is not right to say that $phi$ spans such a space but it would be right to say that incidence matrix spans such a space? Also, I don't understand, we usually say that some set of vectors spans a space, isn't it more right to divide our incidence matrix in columns or rows?
            $endgroup$
            – Tag
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:56










          • $begingroup$
            Correct, I should have referred more precisely to the set of column vectors of the incidence matrix. I corrected the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Vincenzo
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:15


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for clarification. So it is not right to say that $phi$ spans such a space but it would be right to say that incidence matrix spans such a space? Also, I don't understand, we usually say that some set of vectors spans a space, isn't it more right to divide our incidence matrix in columns or rows?
            $endgroup$
            – Tag
            Dec 18 '18 at 14:56










          • $begingroup$
            Correct, I should have referred more precisely to the set of column vectors of the incidence matrix. I corrected the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Vincenzo
            Dec 18 '18 at 15:15
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks for clarification. So it is not right to say that $phi$ spans such a space but it would be right to say that incidence matrix spans such a space? Also, I don't understand, we usually say that some set of vectors spans a space, isn't it more right to divide our incidence matrix in columns or rows?
          $endgroup$
          – Tag
          Dec 18 '18 at 14:56




          $begingroup$
          Thanks for clarification. So it is not right to say that $phi$ spans such a space but it would be right to say that incidence matrix spans such a space? Also, I don't understand, we usually say that some set of vectors spans a space, isn't it more right to divide our incidence matrix in columns or rows?
          $endgroup$
          – Tag
          Dec 18 '18 at 14:56












          $begingroup$
          Correct, I should have referred more precisely to the set of column vectors of the incidence matrix. I corrected the answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Vincenzo
          Dec 18 '18 at 15:15




          $begingroup$
          Correct, I should have referred more precisely to the set of column vectors of the incidence matrix. I corrected the answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Vincenzo
          Dec 18 '18 at 15:15


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045204%2fcan-we-say-that-vector-of-branches-spans-n-1-dimension-space-or-incidence-ma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen