Percentage of Ramanujan's conjectures that were proven correct












7












$begingroup$


Today I read the following brief but insightful account of Ramanujan's approach to mathematics: https://www.imsc.res.in/~rao/ramanujan/images/KSRchap3.pdf and while reading this I wondered whether we have a lower-bound on the percentage of Ramanujan's conjectures which are correct.



I'm planning to get a copy of Ramanujan's notebooks. Meanwhile, the above question intrigues me.






ho.history-overview conjectures ramanujan







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Side question, are there conjectures of him still open?
    $endgroup$
    – Per Alexandersson
    Dec 18 '18 at 13:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Dual question: mathoverflow.net/questions/288410/what-did-ramanujan-get-wrong/…
    $endgroup$
    – Timothy Chow
    Dec 18 '18 at 16:45
















7












$begingroup$


Today I read the following brief but insightful account of Ramanujan's approach to mathematics: https://www.imsc.res.in/~rao/ramanujan/images/KSRchap3.pdf and while reading this I wondered whether we have a lower-bound on the percentage of Ramanujan's conjectures which are correct.



I'm planning to get a copy of Ramanujan's notebooks. Meanwhile, the above question intrigues me.






ho.history-overview conjectures ramanujan







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Side question, are there conjectures of him still open?
    $endgroup$
    – Per Alexandersson
    Dec 18 '18 at 13:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Dual question: mathoverflow.net/questions/288410/what-did-ramanujan-get-wrong/…
    $endgroup$
    – Timothy Chow
    Dec 18 '18 at 16:45














7












7








7


3



$begingroup$


Today I read the following brief but insightful account of Ramanujan's approach to mathematics: https://www.imsc.res.in/~rao/ramanujan/images/KSRchap3.pdf and while reading this I wondered whether we have a lower-bound on the percentage of Ramanujan's conjectures which are correct.



I'm planning to get a copy of Ramanujan's notebooks. Meanwhile, the above question intrigues me.






ho.history-overview conjectures ramanujan







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Today I read the following brief but insightful account of Ramanujan's approach to mathematics: https://www.imsc.res.in/~rao/ramanujan/images/KSRchap3.pdf and while reading this I wondered whether we have a lower-bound on the percentage of Ramanujan's conjectures which are correct.



I'm planning to get a copy of Ramanujan's notebooks. Meanwhile, the above question intrigues me.






ho.history-overview conjectures ramanujan




ho.history-overview conjectures ramanujan






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 18 '18 at 13:06









Aidan RockeAidan Rocke

355216




355216








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Side question, are there conjectures of him still open?
    $endgroup$
    – Per Alexandersson
    Dec 18 '18 at 13:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Dual question: mathoverflow.net/questions/288410/what-did-ramanujan-get-wrong/…
    $endgroup$
    – Timothy Chow
    Dec 18 '18 at 16:45














  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Side question, are there conjectures of him still open?
    $endgroup$
    – Per Alexandersson
    Dec 18 '18 at 13:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Dual question: mathoverflow.net/questions/288410/what-did-ramanujan-get-wrong/…
    $endgroup$
    – Timothy Chow
    Dec 18 '18 at 16:45








5




5




$begingroup$
Side question, are there conjectures of him still open?
$endgroup$
– Per Alexandersson
Dec 18 '18 at 13:19




$begingroup$
Side question, are there conjectures of him still open?
$endgroup$
– Per Alexandersson
Dec 18 '18 at 13:19




3




3




$begingroup$
Dual question: mathoverflow.net/questions/288410/what-did-ramanujan-get-wrong/…
$endgroup$
– Timothy Chow
Dec 18 '18 at 16:45




$begingroup$
Dual question: mathoverflow.net/questions/288410/what-did-ramanujan-get-wrong/…
$endgroup$
– Timothy Chow
Dec 18 '18 at 16:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

This interview with Prof. Bruce Berndt indicates the percentage of correct results from his notebooks to be greater than 99.7%. (See also this longer writeup.)




Between 1903 and 1914, before Ramanujan went to Cambridge, he compiled
3,542 theorems in the notebooks. I have gone through every entry in
the notebooks. If a result has already been proved in the literature,
then I just wrote the entry down and said that proofs can be found in
this literature and so on.There are a number of misprints. I did not
count the number of serious mistakes but it is an extremely small
number - maybe five or ten out of over 3,000 results. Considering that
Ramanujan did not have any rigorous training, it is really amazing
that he made so few mistakes.




Bruce Berndt, Ramanujan's Notebooks, parts I--V.



side question: The Ramanujan–Petersson conjecture for Maass forms is still open.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Of course the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture for Maas forms is not actually Ramanujan's per se.
    $endgroup$
    – Josiah Park
    Dec 18 '18 at 13:52








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Do you really mean 0.997%? I guess that should read 99.7% of correct theorems.
    $endgroup$
    – Manfred Weis
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:03










  • $begingroup$
    thank you @ManfredWeis , for correcting my silly typo.
    $endgroup$
    – Carlo Beenakker
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:48






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "really amazing" - is that one of those understatements mathematicians are fond of?
    $endgroup$
    – davidbak
    Dec 18 '18 at 16:02











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f318972%2fpercentage-of-ramanujans-conjectures-that-were-proven-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12












$begingroup$

This interview with Prof. Bruce Berndt indicates the percentage of correct results from his notebooks to be greater than 99.7%. (See also this longer writeup.)




Between 1903 and 1914, before Ramanujan went to Cambridge, he compiled
3,542 theorems in the notebooks. I have gone through every entry in
the notebooks. If a result has already been proved in the literature,
then I just wrote the entry down and said that proofs can be found in
this literature and so on.There are a number of misprints. I did not
count the number of serious mistakes but it is an extremely small
number - maybe five or ten out of over 3,000 results. Considering that
Ramanujan did not have any rigorous training, it is really amazing
that he made so few mistakes.




Bruce Berndt, Ramanujan's Notebooks, parts I--V.



side question: The Ramanujan–Petersson conjecture for Maass forms is still open.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Of course the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture for Maas forms is not actually Ramanujan's per se.
    $endgroup$
    – Josiah Park
    Dec 18 '18 at 13:52








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Do you really mean 0.997%? I guess that should read 99.7% of correct theorems.
    $endgroup$
    – Manfred Weis
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:03










  • $begingroup$
    thank you @ManfredWeis , for correcting my silly typo.
    $endgroup$
    – Carlo Beenakker
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:48






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "really amazing" - is that one of those understatements mathematicians are fond of?
    $endgroup$
    – davidbak
    Dec 18 '18 at 16:02
















12












$begingroup$

This interview with Prof. Bruce Berndt indicates the percentage of correct results from his notebooks to be greater than 99.7%. (See also this longer writeup.)




Between 1903 and 1914, before Ramanujan went to Cambridge, he compiled
3,542 theorems in the notebooks. I have gone through every entry in
the notebooks. If a result has already been proved in the literature,
then I just wrote the entry down and said that proofs can be found in
this literature and so on.There are a number of misprints. I did not
count the number of serious mistakes but it is an extremely small
number - maybe five or ten out of over 3,000 results. Considering that
Ramanujan did not have any rigorous training, it is really amazing
that he made so few mistakes.




Bruce Berndt, Ramanujan's Notebooks, parts I--V.



side question: The Ramanujan–Petersson conjecture for Maass forms is still open.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Of course the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture for Maas forms is not actually Ramanujan's per se.
    $endgroup$
    – Josiah Park
    Dec 18 '18 at 13:52








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Do you really mean 0.997%? I guess that should read 99.7% of correct theorems.
    $endgroup$
    – Manfred Weis
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:03










  • $begingroup$
    thank you @ManfredWeis , for correcting my silly typo.
    $endgroup$
    – Carlo Beenakker
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:48






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "really amazing" - is that one of those understatements mathematicians are fond of?
    $endgroup$
    – davidbak
    Dec 18 '18 at 16:02














12












12








12





$begingroup$

This interview with Prof. Bruce Berndt indicates the percentage of correct results from his notebooks to be greater than 99.7%. (See also this longer writeup.)




Between 1903 and 1914, before Ramanujan went to Cambridge, he compiled
3,542 theorems in the notebooks. I have gone through every entry in
the notebooks. If a result has already been proved in the literature,
then I just wrote the entry down and said that proofs can be found in
this literature and so on.There are a number of misprints. I did not
count the number of serious mistakes but it is an extremely small
number - maybe five or ten out of over 3,000 results. Considering that
Ramanujan did not have any rigorous training, it is really amazing
that he made so few mistakes.




Bruce Berndt, Ramanujan's Notebooks, parts I--V.



side question: The Ramanujan–Petersson conjecture for Maass forms is still open.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



This interview with Prof. Bruce Berndt indicates the percentage of correct results from his notebooks to be greater than 99.7%. (See also this longer writeup.)




Between 1903 and 1914, before Ramanujan went to Cambridge, he compiled
3,542 theorems in the notebooks. I have gone through every entry in
the notebooks. If a result has already been proved in the literature,
then I just wrote the entry down and said that proofs can be found in
this literature and so on.There are a number of misprints. I did not
count the number of serious mistakes but it is an extremely small
number - maybe five or ten out of over 3,000 results. Considering that
Ramanujan did not have any rigorous training, it is really amazing
that he made so few mistakes.




Bruce Berndt, Ramanujan's Notebooks, parts I--V.



side question: The Ramanujan–Petersson conjecture for Maass forms is still open.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 18 '18 at 14:43









Josiah Park

1,325420




1,325420










answered Dec 18 '18 at 13:40









Carlo BeenakkerCarlo Beenakker

77.2k9181286




77.2k9181286








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Of course the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture for Maas forms is not actually Ramanujan's per se.
    $endgroup$
    – Josiah Park
    Dec 18 '18 at 13:52








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Do you really mean 0.997%? I guess that should read 99.7% of correct theorems.
    $endgroup$
    – Manfred Weis
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:03










  • $begingroup$
    thank you @ManfredWeis , for correcting my silly typo.
    $endgroup$
    – Carlo Beenakker
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:48






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "really amazing" - is that one of those understatements mathematicians are fond of?
    $endgroup$
    – davidbak
    Dec 18 '18 at 16:02














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Of course the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture for Maas forms is not actually Ramanujan's per se.
    $endgroup$
    – Josiah Park
    Dec 18 '18 at 13:52








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Do you really mean 0.997%? I guess that should read 99.7% of correct theorems.
    $endgroup$
    – Manfred Weis
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:03










  • $begingroup$
    thank you @ManfredWeis , for correcting my silly typo.
    $endgroup$
    – Carlo Beenakker
    Dec 18 '18 at 14:48






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "really amazing" - is that one of those understatements mathematicians are fond of?
    $endgroup$
    – davidbak
    Dec 18 '18 at 16:02








2




2




$begingroup$
Of course the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture for Maas forms is not actually Ramanujan's per se.
$endgroup$
– Josiah Park
Dec 18 '18 at 13:52






$begingroup$
Of course the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture for Maas forms is not actually Ramanujan's per se.
$endgroup$
– Josiah Park
Dec 18 '18 at 13:52






7




7




$begingroup$
Do you really mean 0.997%? I guess that should read 99.7% of correct theorems.
$endgroup$
– Manfred Weis
Dec 18 '18 at 14:03




$begingroup$
Do you really mean 0.997%? I guess that should read 99.7% of correct theorems.
$endgroup$
– Manfred Weis
Dec 18 '18 at 14:03












$begingroup$
thank you @ManfredWeis , for correcting my silly typo.
$endgroup$
– Carlo Beenakker
Dec 18 '18 at 14:48




$begingroup$
thank you @ManfredWeis , for correcting my silly typo.
$endgroup$
– Carlo Beenakker
Dec 18 '18 at 14:48




2




2




$begingroup$
"really amazing" - is that one of those understatements mathematicians are fond of?
$endgroup$
– davidbak
Dec 18 '18 at 16:02




$begingroup$
"really amazing" - is that one of those understatements mathematicians are fond of?
$endgroup$
– davidbak
Dec 18 '18 at 16:02


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f318972%2fpercentage-of-ramanujans-conjectures-that-were-proven-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Image
Wappen Deutschlandkarte 50.0825 8.24 117 Koordinaten: 50° 5′  N , 8° 14′  O Basisdaten Bundesland: Hessen Regierungsbezirk: Darmstadt Höhe: 117 m ü. NHN Fläche: 203,93 km 2 Einwohner: 278.654 (31. Dez. 2017) [1] Bevölkerungsdichte: 1366 Einwohner je km 2 Postleitzahlen: 65183–65207, 55246, 55252 Vorlage:Infobox Gemeinde in Deutschland/Wartung/PLZ enthält Text Vorwahlen: 0611, 06122, 06127, 06134 Kfz-Kennzeichen: WI Gemeindeschlüssel: 06 4 14 000 LOCODE: DE WIB NUTS: DE714 Stadtgliederung: 26 Ortsbezirke Adresse der Stadtverwaltung: Schlossplatz 6 65183 Wiesbaden Webpräsenz: www.wiesbaden.de Oberbürgermeister: Sven Gerich (SPD) Lage der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden in Hessen und im Regierungsbezirk Darmstadt Offizielles Logo der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden Flagge der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden Wiesbaden is
Read more

Marschland

Image
Kilometerweite Marsch in den Vier- und Marschlanden am Elbdeich Die Wedeler Marschlandschaft in Schleswig-Holstein Der Hadelner Kanal zur Entwässerung der Marsch Die tief gelegene Marsch und ein Entwässerungskanal Das Schöpfwerk Otterndorf im Land Hadeln zur Entwässerung der Medem verfügte damals bereits über die größte Kreiselpumpe Europas. Das Schöpfwerk in Neuhaus für die Aue und des Neuhaus-Bülkauer Kanals Als Marsch(land) (v. niederdt., altsächs. mersc ) – auch Masch , Mersch oder Schwemmland genannt – bezeichnet man eine nacheiszeitlich entstandene geomorphologische Landform im Gebiet der nordwestdeutschen Küsten und Flüsse sowie vergleichbare Landformen weltweit. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Landschaft 2 Entstehung 3 Marschböden 4 Nutzung 5 Marschgebiete in Deutschland 6 Siehe auch 7 Literatur 8 Weblinks 9 Einzelnachweise Landschaft | Marschen sind generell flache Landstriche ohne natürliche Erhebungen. Si
Read more

Dieringhausen

Image
Dieringhausen Stadt Gummersbach 50.982777777778 7.5316666666667 165 Koordinaten: 50° 58′ 58″  N , 7° 31′ 54″  O Höhe: 165  (160–245)  m Einwohner: 5055  (30. Jun. 2016) Postleitzahl: 51645 Vorwahl: 02261 Lage von Dieringhausen in Gummersbach Im Hohl ca. 1927–1930 Ansicht von Südwesten bei Bünghausen Dieringhausen (im örtlichen Dialekt Dierkesen ) ist ein Ortsteil von Gummersbach im Oberbergischen Kreis, Regierungsbezirk Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen (Deutschland). Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Geographie 2 Geschichte 3 Kultur 3.1 Sehenswürdigkeiten 3.2 Regelmäßige Veranstaltungen 4 Infrastruktur und Wirtschaft 4.1 Verkehr 4.1.1 Schienen- und Busverkehr 4.1.2 Straßen 4.2 Öffentliche Einrichtungen 4.2.1 Schulen und Bildungseinrichtungen 4.2.2 Kirchliche Einrichtungen 5 Persönlichkeiten 5.1 In Dieringhausen geboren 5.2 In Dieringhausen gelebt 6 Einzelnachweise 7
Read more