Integral of $ln(tanh(x))$
$begingroup$
I'd like a hint toward how I could evaluate this definite integral. I'm aware it's likely to be non elementary and I haven't found a way to evaluate it yet:$$int_0^infty ln(tanh(x)),,mathrm{d}x$$
If you're curious where this came from, I was looking at an integral involving $ln(sin(x))$ and I thought of this one.
Thanks.
calculus integration hyperbolic-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd like a hint toward how I could evaluate this definite integral. I'm aware it's likely to be non elementary and I haven't found a way to evaluate it yet:$$int_0^infty ln(tanh(x)),,mathrm{d}x$$
If you're curious where this came from, I was looking at an integral involving $ln(sin(x))$ and I thought of this one.
Thanks.
calculus integration hyperbolic-functions
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2182256/integral-of-ln-cosh-x Did you find a solution for $int_0^{infty}log(sinh(x))$? Mathematica gives $int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))=-frac{pi^2}{8}$ so there might be a nice way to solve this one
$endgroup$
– Václav Mordvinov
Dec 5 '18 at 20:13
$begingroup$
I believe that both $int_0^infty{lnleft(sinhleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ and $int_0^infty{lnleft(coshleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ diverge but that result for tanh seems promising for a really satisfying solution.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:19
$begingroup$
In the light of some of the solutions below, why not now consider a generalization of your original integral: $int_0^infty left(ln(tanh(x)) right)^n, dx$ where n is a positive integer.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Dec 8 '18 at 17:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'd like a hint toward how I could evaluate this definite integral. I'm aware it's likely to be non elementary and I haven't found a way to evaluate it yet:$$int_0^infty ln(tanh(x)),,mathrm{d}x$$
If you're curious where this came from, I was looking at an integral involving $ln(sin(x))$ and I thought of this one.
Thanks.
calculus integration hyperbolic-functions
$endgroup$
I'd like a hint toward how I could evaluate this definite integral. I'm aware it's likely to be non elementary and I haven't found a way to evaluate it yet:$$int_0^infty ln(tanh(x)),,mathrm{d}x$$
If you're curious where this came from, I was looking at an integral involving $ln(sin(x))$ and I thought of this one.
Thanks.
calculus integration hyperbolic-functions
calculus integration hyperbolic-functions
edited Dec 5 '18 at 20:08
amWhy
1
1
asked Dec 5 '18 at 20:04
SheepeSheepe
433
433
2
$begingroup$
Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2182256/integral-of-ln-cosh-x Did you find a solution for $int_0^{infty}log(sinh(x))$? Mathematica gives $int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))=-frac{pi^2}{8}$ so there might be a nice way to solve this one
$endgroup$
– Václav Mordvinov
Dec 5 '18 at 20:13
$begingroup$
I believe that both $int_0^infty{lnleft(sinhleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ and $int_0^infty{lnleft(coshleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ diverge but that result for tanh seems promising for a really satisfying solution.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:19
$begingroup$
In the light of some of the solutions below, why not now consider a generalization of your original integral: $int_0^infty left(ln(tanh(x)) right)^n, dx$ where n is a positive integer.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Dec 8 '18 at 17:32
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2182256/integral-of-ln-cosh-x Did you find a solution for $int_0^{infty}log(sinh(x))$? Mathematica gives $int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))=-frac{pi^2}{8}$ so there might be a nice way to solve this one
$endgroup$
– Václav Mordvinov
Dec 5 '18 at 20:13
$begingroup$
I believe that both $int_0^infty{lnleft(sinhleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ and $int_0^infty{lnleft(coshleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ diverge but that result for tanh seems promising for a really satisfying solution.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:19
$begingroup$
In the light of some of the solutions below, why not now consider a generalization of your original integral: $int_0^infty left(ln(tanh(x)) right)^n, dx$ where n is a positive integer.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Dec 8 '18 at 17:32
2
2
$begingroup$
Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2182256/integral-of-ln-cosh-x Did you find a solution for $int_0^{infty}log(sinh(x))$? Mathematica gives $int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))=-frac{pi^2}{8}$ so there might be a nice way to solve this one
$endgroup$
– Václav Mordvinov
Dec 5 '18 at 20:13
$begingroup$
Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2182256/integral-of-ln-cosh-x Did you find a solution for $int_0^{infty}log(sinh(x))$? Mathematica gives $int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))=-frac{pi^2}{8}$ so there might be a nice way to solve this one
$endgroup$
– Václav Mordvinov
Dec 5 '18 at 20:13
$begingroup$
I believe that both $int_0^infty{lnleft(sinhleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ and $int_0^infty{lnleft(coshleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ diverge but that result for tanh seems promising for a really satisfying solution.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:19
$begingroup$
I believe that both $int_0^infty{lnleft(sinhleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ and $int_0^infty{lnleft(coshleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ diverge but that result for tanh seems promising for a really satisfying solution.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:19
$begingroup$
In the light of some of the solutions below, why not now consider a generalization of your original integral: $int_0^infty left(ln(tanh(x)) right)^n, dx$ where n is a positive integer.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Dec 8 '18 at 17:32
$begingroup$
In the light of some of the solutions below, why not now consider a generalization of your original integral: $int_0^infty left(ln(tanh(x)) right)^n, dx$ where n is a positive integer.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Dec 8 '18 at 17:32
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
By applying the definition of the hyperbolic tangent function in terms of the exponential we obtain
$$begin{align}
int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))dx&=int_0^{infty}logleft(frac{e^x-e^{-x}}{e^x+e^{-x}}right)dx \
&=int_0^{infty}logleft(frac{1-e^{-2x}}{1+e^{-2x}}right)dx\
&=int_0^{infty}logleft(1-e^{-2x}right)-logleft(1+e^{-2x}right)dx
end{align}$$
Now by expanding the logarithm as a series $($!$)$ we further get
$$begin{align}
int_0^{infty}logleft(1-e^{-2x}right)-logleft(1+e^{-2x}right)dx&=int_0^{infty}-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac1{n}e^{-2nx}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n}e^{-2nx}dx\
&=-sum_{n=1}^{infty}left[-frac{e^{-2nx}}{2n^2}right]_0^{infty}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}left[(-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-2nx}}{2n^2}right]_0^{infty}\
&=-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac1{2n^2}-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n^2}\
&=-frac12zeta(2)-frac12eta(2)\
&=-frac12frac{pi^2}6-frac12frac{pi^2}{12}\
&=-frac{pi^2}8
end{align}$$
Which is the desired result. $zeta(s)$ denotes the Riemann Zeta Function and $eta(s)$ the Dirichlet Eta Function respectively for which the values are known.
Anyway this solution is kind of unsteady since I cannot really justify the validity of the power series of the logarithmic functions $($which is normally restricted to $|x|<1$ $)$ nor the termwise integration. Nevertheless it leads to the right solution.
EDIT:
As illustrated by ComplexYetTrivial within the comments the validity of the series expansion of the logarithm is guaranteed due the the fact that $e^{-2x}<1$ for all $x>0$ from where the series converges. Whereas the termwise integration is justified by the monotone dominate convergence theorem. Thus my proposed solution seems to be entirely fine.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Absolutely amazing, thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@Sheepe Thank you. Howsoever I am still unsure about the convergence radius of the logarithmic series expansion which is dismissed withtin this solution^^
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:41
3
$begingroup$
Since $mathrm{e}^{-2 x} < 1$ for $x>0$, the series expansion is valid. Termwise integration is justified by the monotone/dominated convergence theorem, so the solution is perfectly fine!
$endgroup$
– ComplexYetTrivial
Dec 5 '18 at 20:42
$begingroup$
I did get up until the series substitution in my own attempts, but out of my own concerns of the same idea I couldn't see how to continue but it seems to work out nevertheless.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@ComplexYetTrivial This completes my evaluation and clears my doubts! Thank you! Firstly I was sceptical about my own attempt but out of pure curiosity I finished the evaluation and indeed it turned out to work :)
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Through the substitution $x=text{arctanh}(t)$ we have $I=int_{0}^{+infty}logtanh x,dx = int_{0}^{1}frac{log t}{1-t^2},dt$.
Since $int_{0}^{1}t^{2n}log(t),dt = -frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}$ we have
$$ I = -sum_{ngeq 0}frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}=-left[zeta(2)-frac{1}{4}zeta(2)right]=-frac{3}{4}cdotfrac{pi^2}{6}=color{red}{-frac{pi^2}{8}}. $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a slight variation on a theme.
Making use of the result $tanh^2 x = 1 - mbox{sech}^2 x$, we can write the integral as
$$I = frac{1}{2} int_0^infty ln (1 - text{sech}^2 x) , dx.$$
Setting $text{sech}^2 x mapsto x$ gives
$$I = frac{1}{4} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - x)}{x sqrt{1 - x}} , dx.$$
There are many ways to evaluate this integral. One way is by enforcing a substitution of $x mapsto 1 - x^2$. Doing so we arrive at
$$I = int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1 - x^2} , dx,$$
which is exactly the same point @Jack D'Aurizio arrived at in his solution.
Departing from Jack, we now employ a self-similar substitution of $u = dfrac{1 - x}{1 + x}$.
Thus
$$I = frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{1}{u} ln left (frac{1 - u}{1 + u} right ) , du = frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du - frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 + u)}{u} , du.$$
In the second of these integrals let $u mapsto -u$
begin{align*}
I &= frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du - frac{1}{2} int_0^{-1} frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du\
&= -frac{1}{2} text{Li}_2 (1) + frac{1}{2} text{Li}_2 (-1)\
&= -frac{1}{2} cdot frac{pi^2}{6} + frac{1}{2} cdot -frac{pi^2}{12}\
&= -frac{pi^2}{8},
end{align*}
where use of the dilogarithm function has been made.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another option: $$lntanh x=-2operatorname{artanh}exp -2x=-2sum_{kge 0}frac{exp -(4k+2)x}{2k+1},$$so$$int_0^inftylntanh x dx=-sum_{kge 0}frac{1}{(2k+1)^2}=-frac{pi^2}{8}.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027576%2fintegral-of-ln-tanhx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
By applying the definition of the hyperbolic tangent function in terms of the exponential we obtain
$$begin{align}
int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))dx&=int_0^{infty}logleft(frac{e^x-e^{-x}}{e^x+e^{-x}}right)dx \
&=int_0^{infty}logleft(frac{1-e^{-2x}}{1+e^{-2x}}right)dx\
&=int_0^{infty}logleft(1-e^{-2x}right)-logleft(1+e^{-2x}right)dx
end{align}$$
Now by expanding the logarithm as a series $($!$)$ we further get
$$begin{align}
int_0^{infty}logleft(1-e^{-2x}right)-logleft(1+e^{-2x}right)dx&=int_0^{infty}-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac1{n}e^{-2nx}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n}e^{-2nx}dx\
&=-sum_{n=1}^{infty}left[-frac{e^{-2nx}}{2n^2}right]_0^{infty}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}left[(-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-2nx}}{2n^2}right]_0^{infty}\
&=-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac1{2n^2}-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n^2}\
&=-frac12zeta(2)-frac12eta(2)\
&=-frac12frac{pi^2}6-frac12frac{pi^2}{12}\
&=-frac{pi^2}8
end{align}$$
Which is the desired result. $zeta(s)$ denotes the Riemann Zeta Function and $eta(s)$ the Dirichlet Eta Function respectively for which the values are known.
Anyway this solution is kind of unsteady since I cannot really justify the validity of the power series of the logarithmic functions $($which is normally restricted to $|x|<1$ $)$ nor the termwise integration. Nevertheless it leads to the right solution.
EDIT:
As illustrated by ComplexYetTrivial within the comments the validity of the series expansion of the logarithm is guaranteed due the the fact that $e^{-2x}<1$ for all $x>0$ from where the series converges. Whereas the termwise integration is justified by the monotone dominate convergence theorem. Thus my proposed solution seems to be entirely fine.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Absolutely amazing, thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@Sheepe Thank you. Howsoever I am still unsure about the convergence radius of the logarithmic series expansion which is dismissed withtin this solution^^
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:41
3
$begingroup$
Since $mathrm{e}^{-2 x} < 1$ for $x>0$, the series expansion is valid. Termwise integration is justified by the monotone/dominated convergence theorem, so the solution is perfectly fine!
$endgroup$
– ComplexYetTrivial
Dec 5 '18 at 20:42
$begingroup$
I did get up until the series substitution in my own attempts, but out of my own concerns of the same idea I couldn't see how to continue but it seems to work out nevertheless.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@ComplexYetTrivial This completes my evaluation and clears my doubts! Thank you! Firstly I was sceptical about my own attempt but out of pure curiosity I finished the evaluation and indeed it turned out to work :)
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By applying the definition of the hyperbolic tangent function in terms of the exponential we obtain
$$begin{align}
int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))dx&=int_0^{infty}logleft(frac{e^x-e^{-x}}{e^x+e^{-x}}right)dx \
&=int_0^{infty}logleft(frac{1-e^{-2x}}{1+e^{-2x}}right)dx\
&=int_0^{infty}logleft(1-e^{-2x}right)-logleft(1+e^{-2x}right)dx
end{align}$$
Now by expanding the logarithm as a series $($!$)$ we further get
$$begin{align}
int_0^{infty}logleft(1-e^{-2x}right)-logleft(1+e^{-2x}right)dx&=int_0^{infty}-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac1{n}e^{-2nx}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n}e^{-2nx}dx\
&=-sum_{n=1}^{infty}left[-frac{e^{-2nx}}{2n^2}right]_0^{infty}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}left[(-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-2nx}}{2n^2}right]_0^{infty}\
&=-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac1{2n^2}-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n^2}\
&=-frac12zeta(2)-frac12eta(2)\
&=-frac12frac{pi^2}6-frac12frac{pi^2}{12}\
&=-frac{pi^2}8
end{align}$$
Which is the desired result. $zeta(s)$ denotes the Riemann Zeta Function and $eta(s)$ the Dirichlet Eta Function respectively for which the values are known.
Anyway this solution is kind of unsteady since I cannot really justify the validity of the power series of the logarithmic functions $($which is normally restricted to $|x|<1$ $)$ nor the termwise integration. Nevertheless it leads to the right solution.
EDIT:
As illustrated by ComplexYetTrivial within the comments the validity of the series expansion of the logarithm is guaranteed due the the fact that $e^{-2x}<1$ for all $x>0$ from where the series converges. Whereas the termwise integration is justified by the monotone dominate convergence theorem. Thus my proposed solution seems to be entirely fine.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Absolutely amazing, thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@Sheepe Thank you. Howsoever I am still unsure about the convergence radius of the logarithmic series expansion which is dismissed withtin this solution^^
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:41
3
$begingroup$
Since $mathrm{e}^{-2 x} < 1$ for $x>0$, the series expansion is valid. Termwise integration is justified by the monotone/dominated convergence theorem, so the solution is perfectly fine!
$endgroup$
– ComplexYetTrivial
Dec 5 '18 at 20:42
$begingroup$
I did get up until the series substitution in my own attempts, but out of my own concerns of the same idea I couldn't see how to continue but it seems to work out nevertheless.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@ComplexYetTrivial This completes my evaluation and clears my doubts! Thank you! Firstly I was sceptical about my own attempt but out of pure curiosity I finished the evaluation and indeed it turned out to work :)
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By applying the definition of the hyperbolic tangent function in terms of the exponential we obtain
$$begin{align}
int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))dx&=int_0^{infty}logleft(frac{e^x-e^{-x}}{e^x+e^{-x}}right)dx \
&=int_0^{infty}logleft(frac{1-e^{-2x}}{1+e^{-2x}}right)dx\
&=int_0^{infty}logleft(1-e^{-2x}right)-logleft(1+e^{-2x}right)dx
end{align}$$
Now by expanding the logarithm as a series $($!$)$ we further get
$$begin{align}
int_0^{infty}logleft(1-e^{-2x}right)-logleft(1+e^{-2x}right)dx&=int_0^{infty}-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac1{n}e^{-2nx}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n}e^{-2nx}dx\
&=-sum_{n=1}^{infty}left[-frac{e^{-2nx}}{2n^2}right]_0^{infty}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}left[(-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-2nx}}{2n^2}right]_0^{infty}\
&=-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac1{2n^2}-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n^2}\
&=-frac12zeta(2)-frac12eta(2)\
&=-frac12frac{pi^2}6-frac12frac{pi^2}{12}\
&=-frac{pi^2}8
end{align}$$
Which is the desired result. $zeta(s)$ denotes the Riemann Zeta Function and $eta(s)$ the Dirichlet Eta Function respectively for which the values are known.
Anyway this solution is kind of unsteady since I cannot really justify the validity of the power series of the logarithmic functions $($which is normally restricted to $|x|<1$ $)$ nor the termwise integration. Nevertheless it leads to the right solution.
EDIT:
As illustrated by ComplexYetTrivial within the comments the validity of the series expansion of the logarithm is guaranteed due the the fact that $e^{-2x}<1$ for all $x>0$ from where the series converges. Whereas the termwise integration is justified by the monotone dominate convergence theorem. Thus my proposed solution seems to be entirely fine.
$endgroup$
By applying the definition of the hyperbolic tangent function in terms of the exponential we obtain
$$begin{align}
int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))dx&=int_0^{infty}logleft(frac{e^x-e^{-x}}{e^x+e^{-x}}right)dx \
&=int_0^{infty}logleft(frac{1-e^{-2x}}{1+e^{-2x}}right)dx\
&=int_0^{infty}logleft(1-e^{-2x}right)-logleft(1+e^{-2x}right)dx
end{align}$$
Now by expanding the logarithm as a series $($!$)$ we further get
$$begin{align}
int_0^{infty}logleft(1-e^{-2x}right)-logleft(1+e^{-2x}right)dx&=int_0^{infty}-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac1{n}e^{-2nx}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n}e^{-2nx}dx\
&=-sum_{n=1}^{infty}left[-frac{e^{-2nx}}{2n^2}right]_0^{infty}+sum_{n=1}^{infty}left[(-1)^{n+1}frac{e^{-2nx}}{2n^2}right]_0^{infty}\
&=-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac1{2n^2}-sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n^2}\
&=-frac12zeta(2)-frac12eta(2)\
&=-frac12frac{pi^2}6-frac12frac{pi^2}{12}\
&=-frac{pi^2}8
end{align}$$
Which is the desired result. $zeta(s)$ denotes the Riemann Zeta Function and $eta(s)$ the Dirichlet Eta Function respectively for which the values are known.
Anyway this solution is kind of unsteady since I cannot really justify the validity of the power series of the logarithmic functions $($which is normally restricted to $|x|<1$ $)$ nor the termwise integration. Nevertheless it leads to the right solution.
EDIT:
As illustrated by ComplexYetTrivial within the comments the validity of the series expansion of the logarithm is guaranteed due the the fact that $e^{-2x}<1$ for all $x>0$ from where the series converges. Whereas the termwise integration is justified by the monotone dominate convergence theorem. Thus my proposed solution seems to be entirely fine.
edited Dec 6 '18 at 17:06
answered Dec 5 '18 at 20:37
mrtaurhomrtaurho
4,06121234
4,06121234
$begingroup$
Absolutely amazing, thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@Sheepe Thank you. Howsoever I am still unsure about the convergence radius of the logarithmic series expansion which is dismissed withtin this solution^^
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:41
3
$begingroup$
Since $mathrm{e}^{-2 x} < 1$ for $x>0$, the series expansion is valid. Termwise integration is justified by the monotone/dominated convergence theorem, so the solution is perfectly fine!
$endgroup$
– ComplexYetTrivial
Dec 5 '18 at 20:42
$begingroup$
I did get up until the series substitution in my own attempts, but out of my own concerns of the same idea I couldn't see how to continue but it seems to work out nevertheless.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@ComplexYetTrivial This completes my evaluation and clears my doubts! Thank you! Firstly I was sceptical about my own attempt but out of pure curiosity I finished the evaluation and indeed it turned out to work :)
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely amazing, thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@Sheepe Thank you. Howsoever I am still unsure about the convergence radius of the logarithmic series expansion which is dismissed withtin this solution^^
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:41
3
$begingroup$
Since $mathrm{e}^{-2 x} < 1$ for $x>0$, the series expansion is valid. Termwise integration is justified by the monotone/dominated convergence theorem, so the solution is perfectly fine!
$endgroup$
– ComplexYetTrivial
Dec 5 '18 at 20:42
$begingroup$
I did get up until the series substitution in my own attempts, but out of my own concerns of the same idea I couldn't see how to continue but it seems to work out nevertheless.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@ComplexYetTrivial This completes my evaluation and clears my doubts! Thank you! Firstly I was sceptical about my own attempt but out of pure curiosity I finished the evaluation and indeed it turned out to work :)
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Absolutely amazing, thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
Absolutely amazing, thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@Sheepe Thank you. Howsoever I am still unsure about the convergence radius of the logarithmic series expansion which is dismissed withtin this solution
^^
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
@Sheepe Thank you. Howsoever I am still unsure about the convergence radius of the logarithmic series expansion which is dismissed withtin this solution
^^
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:41
3
3
$begingroup$
Since $mathrm{e}^{-2 x} < 1$ for $x>0$, the series expansion is valid. Termwise integration is justified by the monotone/dominated convergence theorem, so the solution is perfectly fine!
$endgroup$
– ComplexYetTrivial
Dec 5 '18 at 20:42
$begingroup$
Since $mathrm{e}^{-2 x} < 1$ for $x>0$, the series expansion is valid. Termwise integration is justified by the monotone/dominated convergence theorem, so the solution is perfectly fine!
$endgroup$
– ComplexYetTrivial
Dec 5 '18 at 20:42
$begingroup$
I did get up until the series substitution in my own attempts, but out of my own concerns of the same idea I couldn't see how to continue but it seems to work out nevertheless.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
I did get up until the series substitution in my own attempts, but out of my own concerns of the same idea I couldn't see how to continue but it seems to work out nevertheless.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:43
$begingroup$
@ComplexYetTrivial This completes my evaluation and clears my doubts! Thank you! Firstly I was sceptical about my own attempt but out of pure curiosity I finished the evaluation and indeed it turned out to work :)
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:50
$begingroup$
@ComplexYetTrivial This completes my evaluation and clears my doubts! Thank you! Firstly I was sceptical about my own attempt but out of pure curiosity I finished the evaluation and indeed it turned out to work :)
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Dec 5 '18 at 20:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Through the substitution $x=text{arctanh}(t)$ we have $I=int_{0}^{+infty}logtanh x,dx = int_{0}^{1}frac{log t}{1-t^2},dt$.
Since $int_{0}^{1}t^{2n}log(t),dt = -frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}$ we have
$$ I = -sum_{ngeq 0}frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}=-left[zeta(2)-frac{1}{4}zeta(2)right]=-frac{3}{4}cdotfrac{pi^2}{6}=color{red}{-frac{pi^2}{8}}. $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Through the substitution $x=text{arctanh}(t)$ we have $I=int_{0}^{+infty}logtanh x,dx = int_{0}^{1}frac{log t}{1-t^2},dt$.
Since $int_{0}^{1}t^{2n}log(t),dt = -frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}$ we have
$$ I = -sum_{ngeq 0}frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}=-left[zeta(2)-frac{1}{4}zeta(2)right]=-frac{3}{4}cdotfrac{pi^2}{6}=color{red}{-frac{pi^2}{8}}. $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Through the substitution $x=text{arctanh}(t)$ we have $I=int_{0}^{+infty}logtanh x,dx = int_{0}^{1}frac{log t}{1-t^2},dt$.
Since $int_{0}^{1}t^{2n}log(t),dt = -frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}$ we have
$$ I = -sum_{ngeq 0}frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}=-left[zeta(2)-frac{1}{4}zeta(2)right]=-frac{3}{4}cdotfrac{pi^2}{6}=color{red}{-frac{pi^2}{8}}. $$
$endgroup$
Through the substitution $x=text{arctanh}(t)$ we have $I=int_{0}^{+infty}logtanh x,dx = int_{0}^{1}frac{log t}{1-t^2},dt$.
Since $int_{0}^{1}t^{2n}log(t),dt = -frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}$ we have
$$ I = -sum_{ngeq 0}frac{1}{(2n+1)^2}=-left[zeta(2)-frac{1}{4}zeta(2)right]=-frac{3}{4}cdotfrac{pi^2}{6}=color{red}{-frac{pi^2}{8}}. $$
answered Dec 5 '18 at 21:30
Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio
288k33280659
288k33280659
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a slight variation on a theme.
Making use of the result $tanh^2 x = 1 - mbox{sech}^2 x$, we can write the integral as
$$I = frac{1}{2} int_0^infty ln (1 - text{sech}^2 x) , dx.$$
Setting $text{sech}^2 x mapsto x$ gives
$$I = frac{1}{4} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - x)}{x sqrt{1 - x}} , dx.$$
There are many ways to evaluate this integral. One way is by enforcing a substitution of $x mapsto 1 - x^2$. Doing so we arrive at
$$I = int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1 - x^2} , dx,$$
which is exactly the same point @Jack D'Aurizio arrived at in his solution.
Departing from Jack, we now employ a self-similar substitution of $u = dfrac{1 - x}{1 + x}$.
Thus
$$I = frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{1}{u} ln left (frac{1 - u}{1 + u} right ) , du = frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du - frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 + u)}{u} , du.$$
In the second of these integrals let $u mapsto -u$
begin{align*}
I &= frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du - frac{1}{2} int_0^{-1} frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du\
&= -frac{1}{2} text{Li}_2 (1) + frac{1}{2} text{Li}_2 (-1)\
&= -frac{1}{2} cdot frac{pi^2}{6} + frac{1}{2} cdot -frac{pi^2}{12}\
&= -frac{pi^2}{8},
end{align*}
where use of the dilogarithm function has been made.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a slight variation on a theme.
Making use of the result $tanh^2 x = 1 - mbox{sech}^2 x$, we can write the integral as
$$I = frac{1}{2} int_0^infty ln (1 - text{sech}^2 x) , dx.$$
Setting $text{sech}^2 x mapsto x$ gives
$$I = frac{1}{4} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - x)}{x sqrt{1 - x}} , dx.$$
There are many ways to evaluate this integral. One way is by enforcing a substitution of $x mapsto 1 - x^2$. Doing so we arrive at
$$I = int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1 - x^2} , dx,$$
which is exactly the same point @Jack D'Aurizio arrived at in his solution.
Departing from Jack, we now employ a self-similar substitution of $u = dfrac{1 - x}{1 + x}$.
Thus
$$I = frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{1}{u} ln left (frac{1 - u}{1 + u} right ) , du = frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du - frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 + u)}{u} , du.$$
In the second of these integrals let $u mapsto -u$
begin{align*}
I &= frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du - frac{1}{2} int_0^{-1} frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du\
&= -frac{1}{2} text{Li}_2 (1) + frac{1}{2} text{Li}_2 (-1)\
&= -frac{1}{2} cdot frac{pi^2}{6} + frac{1}{2} cdot -frac{pi^2}{12}\
&= -frac{pi^2}{8},
end{align*}
where use of the dilogarithm function has been made.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a slight variation on a theme.
Making use of the result $tanh^2 x = 1 - mbox{sech}^2 x$, we can write the integral as
$$I = frac{1}{2} int_0^infty ln (1 - text{sech}^2 x) , dx.$$
Setting $text{sech}^2 x mapsto x$ gives
$$I = frac{1}{4} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - x)}{x sqrt{1 - x}} , dx.$$
There are many ways to evaluate this integral. One way is by enforcing a substitution of $x mapsto 1 - x^2$. Doing so we arrive at
$$I = int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1 - x^2} , dx,$$
which is exactly the same point @Jack D'Aurizio arrived at in his solution.
Departing from Jack, we now employ a self-similar substitution of $u = dfrac{1 - x}{1 + x}$.
Thus
$$I = frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{1}{u} ln left (frac{1 - u}{1 + u} right ) , du = frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du - frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 + u)}{u} , du.$$
In the second of these integrals let $u mapsto -u$
begin{align*}
I &= frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du - frac{1}{2} int_0^{-1} frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du\
&= -frac{1}{2} text{Li}_2 (1) + frac{1}{2} text{Li}_2 (-1)\
&= -frac{1}{2} cdot frac{pi^2}{6} + frac{1}{2} cdot -frac{pi^2}{12}\
&= -frac{pi^2}{8},
end{align*}
where use of the dilogarithm function has been made.
$endgroup$
Here is a slight variation on a theme.
Making use of the result $tanh^2 x = 1 - mbox{sech}^2 x$, we can write the integral as
$$I = frac{1}{2} int_0^infty ln (1 - text{sech}^2 x) , dx.$$
Setting $text{sech}^2 x mapsto x$ gives
$$I = frac{1}{4} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - x)}{x sqrt{1 - x}} , dx.$$
There are many ways to evaluate this integral. One way is by enforcing a substitution of $x mapsto 1 - x^2$. Doing so we arrive at
$$I = int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1 - x^2} , dx,$$
which is exactly the same point @Jack D'Aurizio arrived at in his solution.
Departing from Jack, we now employ a self-similar substitution of $u = dfrac{1 - x}{1 + x}$.
Thus
$$I = frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{1}{u} ln left (frac{1 - u}{1 + u} right ) , du = frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du - frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 + u)}{u} , du.$$
In the second of these integrals let $u mapsto -u$
begin{align*}
I &= frac{1}{2} int_0^1 frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du - frac{1}{2} int_0^{-1} frac{ln (1 - u)}{u} , du\
&= -frac{1}{2} text{Li}_2 (1) + frac{1}{2} text{Li}_2 (-1)\
&= -frac{1}{2} cdot frac{pi^2}{6} + frac{1}{2} cdot -frac{pi^2}{12}\
&= -frac{pi^2}{8},
end{align*}
where use of the dilogarithm function has been made.
answered Dec 6 '18 at 3:25
omegadotomegadot
4,9322727
4,9322727
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another option: $$lntanh x=-2operatorname{artanh}exp -2x=-2sum_{kge 0}frac{exp -(4k+2)x}{2k+1},$$so$$int_0^inftylntanh x dx=-sum_{kge 0}frac{1}{(2k+1)^2}=-frac{pi^2}{8}.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another option: $$lntanh x=-2operatorname{artanh}exp -2x=-2sum_{kge 0}frac{exp -(4k+2)x}{2k+1},$$so$$int_0^inftylntanh x dx=-sum_{kge 0}frac{1}{(2k+1)^2}=-frac{pi^2}{8}.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another option: $$lntanh x=-2operatorname{artanh}exp -2x=-2sum_{kge 0}frac{exp -(4k+2)x}{2k+1},$$so$$int_0^inftylntanh x dx=-sum_{kge 0}frac{1}{(2k+1)^2}=-frac{pi^2}{8}.$$
$endgroup$
Another option: $$lntanh x=-2operatorname{artanh}exp -2x=-2sum_{kge 0}frac{exp -(4k+2)x}{2k+1},$$so$$int_0^inftylntanh x dx=-sum_{kge 0}frac{1}{(2k+1)^2}=-frac{pi^2}{8}.$$
answered Dec 6 '18 at 17:24
J.G.J.G.
24k22539
24k22539
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027576%2fintegral-of-ln-tanhx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2182256/integral-of-ln-cosh-x Did you find a solution for $int_0^{infty}log(sinh(x))$? Mathematica gives $int_0^{infty}log(tanh(x))=-frac{pi^2}{8}$ so there might be a nice way to solve this one
$endgroup$
– Václav Mordvinov
Dec 5 '18 at 20:13
$begingroup$
I believe that both $int_0^infty{lnleft(sinhleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ and $int_0^infty{lnleft(coshleft(xright)right)},,mathrm{d}x$ diverge but that result for tanh seems promising for a really satisfying solution.
$endgroup$
– Sheepe
Dec 5 '18 at 20:19
$begingroup$
In the light of some of the solutions below, why not now consider a generalization of your original integral: $int_0^infty left(ln(tanh(x)) right)^n, dx$ where n is a positive integer.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Dec 8 '18 at 17:32