Proving an isomorphism between field extensions












2












$begingroup$


I am trying to prove the following:




Two field extensions $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{a}]$ and $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{b}],$ where $a,b in mathbb{Q}^times,$ are isomorphic if and only if $sqrt{a/b} in mathbb{Q}.$




I started backwards, that is I first assumed the fields were isomorphic. So there exists $phi$ such that
begin{gather}
phi(sqrt{a}) = s + tsqrt{b}.
end{gather}

This means that this must satisfy the following
begin{gather}
a = s^2 + 2stsqrt{b} + t^2b.
end{gather}

But why is it true that one of $s,t$ must be 0. However, I know that if I can show that then it will be clear that $sqrt{a/b} in mathbb{Q}.$ However, the other direction is not at all obvious, does anyone have any hints?



EDIT: So I started with an element of $u + vsqrt{a}$ and I tried mapping this to $u + vsqrt{b/a}.$ But this doesn't satisfy the multiplicative property of the isomorphism.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    That implies $stsqrt b$ is rational.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:36


















2












$begingroup$


I am trying to prove the following:




Two field extensions $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{a}]$ and $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{b}],$ where $a,b in mathbb{Q}^times,$ are isomorphic if and only if $sqrt{a/b} in mathbb{Q}.$




I started backwards, that is I first assumed the fields were isomorphic. So there exists $phi$ such that
begin{gather}
phi(sqrt{a}) = s + tsqrt{b}.
end{gather}

This means that this must satisfy the following
begin{gather}
a = s^2 + 2stsqrt{b} + t^2b.
end{gather}

But why is it true that one of $s,t$ must be 0. However, I know that if I can show that then it will be clear that $sqrt{a/b} in mathbb{Q}.$ However, the other direction is not at all obvious, does anyone have any hints?



EDIT: So I started with an element of $u + vsqrt{a}$ and I tried mapping this to $u + vsqrt{b/a}.$ But this doesn't satisfy the multiplicative property of the isomorphism.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    That implies $stsqrt b$ is rational.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:36
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


I am trying to prove the following:




Two field extensions $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{a}]$ and $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{b}],$ where $a,b in mathbb{Q}^times,$ are isomorphic if and only if $sqrt{a/b} in mathbb{Q}.$




I started backwards, that is I first assumed the fields were isomorphic. So there exists $phi$ such that
begin{gather}
phi(sqrt{a}) = s + tsqrt{b}.
end{gather}

This means that this must satisfy the following
begin{gather}
a = s^2 + 2stsqrt{b} + t^2b.
end{gather}

But why is it true that one of $s,t$ must be 0. However, I know that if I can show that then it will be clear that $sqrt{a/b} in mathbb{Q}.$ However, the other direction is not at all obvious, does anyone have any hints?



EDIT: So I started with an element of $u + vsqrt{a}$ and I tried mapping this to $u + vsqrt{b/a}.$ But this doesn't satisfy the multiplicative property of the isomorphism.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am trying to prove the following:




Two field extensions $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{a}]$ and $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{b}],$ where $a,b in mathbb{Q}^times,$ are isomorphic if and only if $sqrt{a/b} in mathbb{Q}.$




I started backwards, that is I first assumed the fields were isomorphic. So there exists $phi$ such that
begin{gather}
phi(sqrt{a}) = s + tsqrt{b}.
end{gather}

This means that this must satisfy the following
begin{gather}
a = s^2 + 2stsqrt{b} + t^2b.
end{gather}

But why is it true that one of $s,t$ must be 0. However, I know that if I can show that then it will be clear that $sqrt{a/b} in mathbb{Q}.$ However, the other direction is not at all obvious, does anyone have any hints?



EDIT: So I started with an element of $u + vsqrt{a}$ and I tried mapping this to $u + vsqrt{b/a}.$ But this doesn't satisfy the multiplicative property of the isomorphism.







abstract-algebra polynomials field-theory irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 5 '18 at 20:20









JosabanksJosabanks

936




936








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    That implies $stsqrt b$ is rational.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:36
















  • 4




    $begingroup$
    That implies $stsqrt b$ is rational.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 5 '18 at 20:36










4




4




$begingroup$
That implies $stsqrt b$ is rational.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 5 '18 at 20:36






$begingroup$
That implies $stsqrt b$ is rational.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 5 '18 at 20:36












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027594%2fproving-an-isomorphism-between-field-extensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027594%2fproving-an-isomorphism-between-field-extensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen